Download Supplementary Figure Legends

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics in stem-cell differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup

Mir-92 microRNA precursor family wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
1
Supplementary Figure S1.
2
Unsupervised clustering analysis using Firehose of RNA-seq data from TCGA breast
3
cancer transcriptomes, identifying 7 sample clusters.
4
5
Supplementary Figure S2.
6
(A) GO analysis (by DAVID) of the 100 genes whose expression is most highly correlated
7
with that of Ki-67, as determined by COEXPRESdb.
8
(B) Correlation between cyclin-annotated genes and Ki-67 across colorectal cancer
9
subtypes.
10
(C) Histogram of the number of Ki-67 significantly correlated genes in TCGA breast
11
tumours with respect to Spearman correlation values (all correlation adjusted P < 0.05).
12
The upper right bar plots report the proportion and number of cell cycle genes among
13
genes above a certain correlation coefficient.
14
(D) Correlation between cancer-annotated genes and Ki-67 across TCGA breast cancer
15
subtypes.
16
17
Supplementary Figure S3. Cell cycle dynamics of Ki-67 expression are similar in
18
non-transformed cells and cancer cell lines.
19
A. Immunofluorescence analysis of Ki-67 expression and localisation in asynchronous
20
individual human fibroblasts at different cell cycle phases defined using cell cycle markers
21
cyclin D1, cyclin E1 and cyclin B1.
22
23
B. Left: Graphs showing Ki-67 immunofluroescence staining intensity at different cell cycle
24
stages in asynchronous individual cells, in HDF, U2OS and HCT-116 cells. Pixel intensity
25
was quantified using ImageJ software. The legend shows the criteria for attributing cell
26
cycle phases A-F (Sen: Senescent). Error bars show standard deviation. 50 cells were
1
27
analysed in each case. Right: Example source data for quantification of cell cycle
28
regulation of Ki-67 expression in asynchronous cells, showing a panel of HDF. Top:
29
Hoechst staining. Cells quantified are indicated by red lables corresponding to the cell
30
cycle position, according to the legend, Top left. Middle: Cyclin A immunofluorescence;
31
Bottom: Ki-67 immunofluorescence.
32
33
Supplementary Figure S4. Cell cycle arrest by serum starvation or DNA damage is
34
complete.
35
Analysis of DNA replication by incorporation of EdU following 72 hours of the indicated
36
treatments; cells were labelled with EdU for 24 hours. Gate shows percentage of cells
37
showing any level of incorporation of EdU.
38
39
Supplementary Figure S5.
40
Time course of senescence induction by bleomycin, as assessed by beta-galactosidase
41
assay. Bar, 10μm
42
43
Supplementary Figure S6.
44
(A) Correlation between drug response and Ki-67, CCNA2, CCNB2, CCND1, and CCND3
45
expression across all CCLE cell lines and drugs; smoothing was applied. Number is the
46
correlation coefficient between expression of each gene and drug sensitivity.
47
(B) Same as (A) but restricted to Irinotecan; no smoothing.
48
(C) Same as (A) but restricted to Topotecan; no smoothing.
49
2