Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Life, Liberty, and Property Court Cases Cheat Sheet Korematsu v. United States (1944) During World War II, Japanese ancestry was excluded from areas deemed critical to national defense and potentially vulnerable to espionage. Korematsu remained in San Leandro, California and violated Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34 of the U.S. The Court sided with the government and held that the need to protect against espionage outweighed Korematsu's rights. Griswold vs. Connecticut (1965) Griswold gave medical advice and counseling to married couples concerning birth control. Griswold and colleuges were convicted under connecticut law who criminalized the counselling or other medical treatment, to married people preventing conception. The First,Third,Fourth, and Ninth amendments create a new constitutional right, the right to privacy in martial relations. Because of this the case ended in null and void. Roe v. Wade (1973) Roe was a Texas woman who wanted an abortion, but at the time, abortions were against the law unless it was to save the pregnant woman’s life. The court decided that the right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy so she was allowed to terminate the pregnancy during the first trimester. Planed Parenthood v. Casey (1992) Overturned Roe by putting restrictions on abortions: a woman has to have informed consent from her doctor, notify the spouse, have parent consent if she’s a minor, and there needs to be a 24-hour waiting period. Lawrence v. Texas (2003) Texas police caught Lawrence engaging in sexual activity with another man when they entered his apartment due to weapon disturbance in a private residence. They were arrested since Texas law forbids two people of the same sex to engage in sexual conduct. They took the case to the Supreme Court, which ruled that the right to liberty under the Due Process Clause allowed them to engage in private conduct