* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download SG_ch12
Market penetration wikipedia , lookup
Control chart wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
First-mover advantage wikipedia , lookup
Planned obsolescence wikipedia , lookup
Industrial design wikipedia , lookup
Product placement wikipedia , lookup
Pricing strategies wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
Operations Strategy – Student Study Guide CHAPTER 12 PRODUCT AND SERVICE DEVELOPMENT AND ORGANIZATION Introduction The development of new and innovative products and services is clearly of tremendous importance to most organizations. Without a stream of appropriate innovation a company leaves itself vulnerable to having to react to however its competitors decide to innovate. In fact many authorities would disagree with our decision to cover the topic in just one chapter and as part of operations strategy at all. They would say that new product and service development is one of the three major processes that any organization must master in order to succeed (the other two of course being operations and marketing). We would agree with this. In fact, it is because the topic is so important that we include it within our broad treatment of operations strategy; it is not that new product and service development is a subset of operations strategy, rather it is that no operations strategy could regard itself as complete without an understanding of how it interrelates with new product and service development strategy. The way have decided to treat the subject is to look at it through an operations strategy “lens” and explain it in terms of one of the models we introduced earlier – the operations strategy matrix. Most of the chapter is devoted to developing that particular perspective. However, prior to that it discusses the relationship between new product and service development and process development. Key points While the development of new product and service ideas has always been a significant activity in most companies, it is getting more important. The chapter opens by looking at some of the reasons for this, and more importantly, dividing them into those which are based on an operations resource perspective and those which are based on a market requirements perspective. It makes a compelling case. But consider that the case is made particularly compelling by describing it in operations strategy terms. In other words, because product and service development is itself a process, it can be analyzed using operations strategy models. Following on from the point above, the chapter uses a similar calibration of the degree of product or service change to that which was used when describing process change. Although this calibrated scale, which again moves from “modification, through extension and development to pioneer” is described as a four-stage process; it is, of course, a continuum. 1 Operations Strategy – Student Study Guide Product and service development and process development should be considered together. The box that describes the development of the ballpoint pen illustrates the obvious but important point that attempting extensive product or service change at the same time as extensive process change increases the degree of difficulty. Don’t ignore the theory box on modular design and mass customization. Both are significant developments, both are interrelated, and both have done much to overcome the trade-off between cost and variety in new product and service design. For example, think of the way ordinary domestic paint is now sold. Whereas some years ago a paint company would develop a range of colors, manufacture those in its factory and distribute them as separate products to the retail stores, much paint is now sold “made to order” in the store itself. The customer simply chooses a color from an incredibly wide range of alternatives and the paint is mixed there and then. This is only possible because each color is comprised of a defined set of “modules” of component colors. This “recipe-based” approach allows a degree of mass customization because a relatively small number of “modules” or colors can be mixed together in a far wider variety of ways. The chapter devotes some space to explaining the various stages of new product and service development. Here it is important to remember the warning given in the text that, although many organizations have a model that looks like the stages described in the chapter, it is really a huge simplification of reality. Stages will merge with each other and the process will often cycle backwards and forwards. So, don’t think of this as a prescriptive set of steps but rather a description of the activities that, in some order, generally take place during the new product and service development process. Think about the overall design process as progressively filtering out potential designs and thus reducing uncertainty, until the final design is reached. A market perspective The design activity is itself a process that can be judged in the same way as any other operations process, that is in terms of quality, speed, dependability, flexibility and cost of the designs or development ideas that are produced. All the five generic performance objectives are important, but in recent years there has been an increased emphasis on the speed of new product and service development. This speed issue is often referred to “time-to-market”. That is, the time between the original concept and the product or service starting to earn revenue in the marketplace. It is an important performance measure and in most industries is getting shorter. 2 Operations Strategy – Student Study Guide Later in the chapter several determinants of fast time-to-market performance are identified. But the main ones are generally held to be; simultaneous overlapping of development phases (sometimes called simultaneous or concurrent engineering); the early resolution of design conflict; project-based organization structures. The financial consequences of fast time-to-market are best illustrated by the figure shows that a delay in launching a product or service usually means a far longer delay in the financial payback from that product or service. An operations resource perspective The four general categories of operations strategy decisions (capacity, supply networks, process technology and development and organization) are all relevant (and indeed important) in managing the new product and service development process at a strategic level. Capacity is particularly interesting. The issue here being that, unlike the day-today production of products and services, demand for new designs is not always smooth. This “lumpiness” in demand can lead some companies to be reluctant to invest in development capacity – often a mistake. The idea a product and service development network (a similar idea to a supply network) is a useful way of thinking about whether any organization should develop products and services themselves or subcontract the activity. Occasionally organizations do subcontract all their new products and service development activity (book publishers an obvious example!) but generally it is a question of how much development activity to subcontract, if any at all. An interesting development that is likely to get more important is the issue of involving customers in the development process. For example, the Boeing 777 aircraft development famously included several of the large airlines during its development process. The idea of process technology in the product and service development process is a relatively recent one. In manufacturing, computer-aided design (CAD) only became common during the 1980s. Defined more broadly, process technology includes such things as knowledge management technologies, expert systems and simulations. All of these are becoming common in the design of services. 3 Operations Strategy – Student Study Guide One of the areas that has attracted considerable interest has been the organization and development aspects of new product and service development. This interest started in the late 1980s when several authorities began to identify the advantages of dedicated project teams to manage the development process. Prior to that development had often been organized in a functional manner with responsibility being passed from one function to another in some kind of pre-planned sequence. This process became known as “throwing the design over the wall”. In other words, after one function has finished with the design, it merely passed it on to another function without significant communication. The concepts of simultaneous engineering and overlapping development between design phases clearly required a new approach. In fact, as the chapter identifies, one can imagine a spectrum of organizational design between pure functional organizations to pure project organizations. There has been a general more towards increasing project orientation. The general problem in organizing new product and service development can be illustrated by reading the box “….. but then Netscape changed”. This box briefly discusses the issue of how some aspects of creativity can be sacrificed as markets demand faster and more efficient new product and service development processes. Hints on answering the Project Orlando at Dreddo Dan’s case exercise This case exercise covers many issues found in new product and service development projects. In particular the case examines a new type of product that is to be launched in an uncertain and unpredictable market and which also carries some development risks. Above all, the project is a significant development for the company with both the potential for major competitive benefits and some downside risk. Think about the degree of change, both in terms of the product itself and the process that will make it, this project implies for the company. What implications does this have for the company? Think about the performance objectives for this project. Start with the five generic performance objectives (quality, speed, dependability, flexibility and cost) but adapt them and introduce new ones if you think it is appropriate. What are the major decisions that the company faces and how do these relate to the four conventional operations strategy decision categories of capacity, supply networks, process technology, and development and organization? At this point you should be able to draw an operations strategy matrix that articulates the key issues for the company. Use the matrix to make recommendations to the company. 4