Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
REFORMATION OF WORLD MONETARY AND FINANCIAL SYSTEM IN GLOBALIZATION Kuchukova Nurilya Doctor of Economics, Professor, Academician of IAI and IEAE, Eurasian National University named after L.N.Gumilev, Kazakhstan Annotation The primary objectives of research are an exposure of global challenges and problems of functioning of the world monetary-financial system and development of practical recommendations on their decision. The research methodology. On the basis of research, systematization, generalization, analysis of theoretical and practical material on functioning of the world monetary-financial system in the major developed countries of the world, euro zone countries and developing economies of proposed measures to reform the international monetary system and improve the management of global economic and financial systems. Value of work and research results. Strategy of providing of world financial stability in the age of globalization and concrete mechanisms of its practical realization are offered in the article. The essence of author’s practical recommendations and offered mechanism of providing of world financial stability is reduced to the necessity of creating a " Financial stability fund of the world economy" for the sustainable operation of a new global reserve currency. The amount of payments to the Fund may vary from 10% of GDP (for poor countries) to 20% of GDP (for the rich countries). There are also mechanisms for participation in the formation of the Fund's large transnational companies (TNCs), transnational banks (TNB). The whole system of formation, distribution and use of the " Financial stability fund of the world economy" must be extremely transparent. IMF is necessary annually to report before the UNO and the heads of all the countries of the world (about 200 countries) about forming and use of facilities of this Fund. On a sample calculation, the supposed contribution of " financial stability fund of the world economy" can make about $ 6 - 12 Trillion, whereas the world of GDP makes about $ 60 Trillion. This Fund will serve as the "safety cushion " for the world economy and providing of stable functioning of a new world key currency created originally on the basis of multicurrency standard on principle of special drawing rights (SDR) and European Currency Unit ( ECU). Keywords: world monetary and financial system, reformation, globalization. In the last two decades of international financial markets, practice of functioning shows that growing mobility of capitals at global level along with positive influence showing up in increasing the liquidity of markets and promoting economic growth, generates simultaneously row of new problems in functioning of the world financial system: 1)Floating exchange rates even under the condition of the country's healthy economic and financial policies do not guarantee it against a sudden sag, and then no less dramatic tides of "hot" short-term speculative money, and related phenomena such as overheating and instability. For the developing states and countries with a transitional economy liberalization of capital hides in itself a large danger. As a result in periods of financial and economic crises the inevitably nascent capital export in forming markets puts them before a dangerous choice: or constantly to excite interest rates, to retain a foreign capital, and at the same time and rate of exchange, weakening to the same an economic general in a country, or to assume a fall in a currency exchange also with all negative consequences for a national economy. 2)Free moving of financial resources and easy access to the external borrowing in combination with the unsteady financial system, finally lead to the exacerbation of crisis situation of backflow. 3)Financial globalization strengthens financial interdependence of all countries, including Russia and Kazakhstan, as a result increasing quickly the volume of international financial transactions and global capital flow with the use of variety of financial instruments under act of modern electronic technologies, facilities of communications and information. 4)Its potential instability increases together with globalization of financial markets (nowadays it is enough to press a few keys on the keyboard of computer and a sum of money moved from one country into another). 5)Liberalization and deregulation of inter-country capital flow, the streams of that repeatedly increased under act of globalization, generated the new phenomenon, is the negative affecting national economy of rapid inflow of foreign investments foremost short-term and highly liquid. It is impossible not to mark global challenges and problems that exist in functioning of the world monetary system, that is taken to the following: 1) Convertibility of dollar in gold provided legitimacy of dollar as leader of all world currency system, but when this exchange was forbidden, and dollar is not in order. From the legal point of view, Bretton Woods’ rules accepted in 1944, were broken . 2) Today it is uncontroversial that the existing presently system of emission of world currency is uncontrolled, undemocratic and illegal. Financial shocks that test the practically all countries of the world are convincing proof of imperfection of the world monetary system, basis of that the dollar of the USA serves as. 3) " overshoot " in financial system of the USA hundreds of billions dollars can provoke the systemic financial crisis at the international level in future 4) According to David Rosenberg – a former economist of Bank of America Merrull Lynch, the world was flooded by $ 222,5 trillion debt of private and public sectors, that is equivalent to 362%% of GDP in the world . At all levels of society in the most industrially developed countries there are too much debts and too small profits, which is necessary for their payment" [1, c.17]. 5) Financial problems of European countries, deficit of the state budget, an enormous external debt will be rendered strong influence on economic recovery of ЕС. Therefore there are grounds to expect the origin of new-wave of crisis in the world economy. The data of the analysis (table 1) conducted by us, testify that a national debt on the major developed countries of the world, countries of euro zone and developing economies of the world is had a tendency to the height in 2010 than in 2008 both in an absolute sum and in percents to GDP. In particular, the national debt of the USA grew from 38% of GDP in 2008 to 62% in 2010, in Japan accordingly: from 172% to 198%; in Germany - from 66% to 83%; in Italy - from 106% to 119%; in France - from 68% to 82%, Great Britain - from 52% to 76%; To Spain - from 41% to 60%; To Greece - from 97% to 143%; in Netherlands - from 58% to 63%; To Belgium - 90% to 101%. Thus in a prospect situation with a state debt ,a number of countries will not become better, the forecast national debt was testified the reference book of CIA, 2011. In particular, some increasing of national debt is forecast in percents to GDP by 2016 in comparison with 2011: to Japan - from 233,1% in 2011 to 253,8% in 2016; To France - from 86,8% to 87,7%; The USA - 100,0% to 115,4%; To Portugal - from 106,0% to 110,5%; To Spain - from 67,4% to 77,4%; To Ireland - from 109,3% to 114,3%. Some decline of national debt in percents to GDP is forecast in a prospect on: to Canada - from 84,1% in 2011 to 72,9% in 2016; To Italy - from 121,1% to 114,1%; To Iceland - from 101,2% to 82,5%; To India - from 62,4% to 59,7%; To the European union - from 82,3% to 79,5%; To Greece - from 165,5% to 162,8%; To Germany - from 82,6% to 75,0% Hungary - from 76,1% to 71,5%; To Great Britain - from 80,7% in 2011 to 80,4% in 2016. [2, reference Book of CIA 2011]. Table 1 - National debt on the countries of the world Country State debt on 2010 (billion of USD) The USA 9133 Japan 8512 Germany 2446 Italy 2113 India 2107 China 1907 France 1767 Great Britain 1654 Brazil 1281 Canada 1117 Spain 823 Mexico 577 Greece 454 Netherlands 424 Turkey 411 Belgium 398 Egypt 398 Poland 381 South Korea 331 Singapore 309 Chinese 279 Republic Source: reference Book of CIA 2011 % GDP Per man(USD) State debt on 2008 62% 198% 83% 119% 52% 19% 82% 76% 59% 84% 60% 37% 143% 63% 43% 101% 80% 53% 23% 106% 29158 67303 30024 34627 1772 1427 27,062 26375 6299 32829 17598 5071 42216 25152 5218 38139 4846 9907 6793 65144 (5415, 38%) (7469, 172%) (1931, 66%) (1933, 106%) (1863, 56%) (1247, 16%) (1453, 68%) (1158, 52%) (775, 39%) (831, 64%) (571, 41%) (561, 36%) (335, 97%) (392, 58%) (362, 40%) (350, 90%) (385, 87%) (303, 45%) (326, 24%) 34% 12075 Global financial and economic crisis bared a break between a financial sphere and real sector. The overheating of financial markets and before all mortgage became, as one of the factors of bankruptcy of some international banks. Surmounting the crisis in many countries the stagnation of bank credit and complication of "bad credits restructuring " is still steady. Essentially «sovereignization of private debts" was happened: the states forced to undertake considerable part of banks and corporations debts. The expensive antirecessionary policy, and frequently the unbalanced pre-crisis growth of social obligations, led to record budget deficits. Data analysis of " Budgetary bulletin " January, 2012 allow to draw the conclusion that practically all countries of the world in a crisis 2008-2010 the deficit of budget rapidly grew: all over the world - from 2,0% to 5,5%; to the countries with the developed economy - from 3,8% to 7,6%; To the United States - from 6,7% to 10,5%; To the euro zone - from 2,12% to 6,3%; To France - from 3,3% to 7,1%; To Germany - from 0,1% to 4,3%; To Italy - from 2,7% to 4,5%; To Spain - from 4,2% to 9,3%; To Japan - from 4,7% to 9,3%; To the United Kingdom - from 4,9% to 9,9%; To Canada - from 0,1% to 5,6%; countries with the formed market - from 0,4% to 3,6% [3]. Кrasavina L.N., honored scientist of Russian Federation, doctor of economics, professor , marks justly that the "Global financial and economic crisis brought to the new touch of Jamaican monetary system, educed its inability to provide relative stability of currency-economic relations in the world. In this regard discussions activated the reformation of currency dispensation. Thus they went out from scientific circles and appeared in the spotlight of presidents and prime ministers of a series of countries and international economic forums of "G20", system measures sanctified to making on an exit from a global financial and economic crisis. President of Russian Federation Medvedev D.A. suggested to conduct an international conference on the problems of world currency-financial device 1"[4, p. 48] . Coming forward on the IV th Economic forum in Astana , May 3, 20112, President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev accented the special attention on three basic sectors: financial, industrially-innovative and resource-food which stand before the world economy today . The challenges of the financial sector consist in imperfectness of global financial system and its basic component - world key currency. Exactly the existent monetary-financial system, not answering principles of legality and democratic character, weakens a height, distorts macroeconomic principles, mixes to work out nascent global problems. Imperfection of the world monetary system already force some countries to undertake practical steps for the use of alternative currencies. In the end all economies of the world will come to the necessity of creation and introduction of supranational unit of account, and then and global currency of fundamentally new class. In this connection, he suggested to work out so-called "road map" on switching to a new world currency. According to his opinion, the creation of new world key currency will allow to range transparent clear to all global monetary-financial system. And on the whole it will allow to fix the prospects of future economic development. To Germany - from 82,6% to 75,0% Hungary - from 76,1% to 71,5%; At the “G20” summit in November 2008, Washington and in april 2009 , London From N.Nazarbayev’s speech on the IV th Economic forum in Astana , May 3, 2011. Komsomolskaya Pravda (Kazakhstan), May 4, 2011.Countries are needed a pact on global regulation (Julia Nitchenko, Astana). 1 2 To Great Britain - from 80,7% in 2011 to 80,4% in 2016. [2, reference Book of CIA 2011]. To Germany - from 82,6% to 75,0% Hungary - from 76,1% to 71,5%; To Great Britain - from 80,7% in 2011 to 80,4% in 2016. [2, reference Book of CIA 2011]. Undeniable fact that it was the first Nursultan Nazarbayev undertook boldness first from the politicians in the world scale, to show publicly the fundamental injustice of current device of world finances to the world, moreover, showed "impudence of responsibility" the persistent and successive appeals to the discussion and joint search of fundamental ways of reformation world financial and economic systems that undoubtedly will serve basis for fundamental reforms of world economic device in behalf on more just, to the human and democratic model [5,6,7,8,9]. It is impossible not to say and that today as never sharply before all humanity the problem of social injustice in society, huge break of standard of living got up between rich and poor people on t, he planet, the main vices of capitalism came to light outside, to what the hearths of instability testify even in the developed countries of the world. Consequently, life requires changing the paradigm of economic development objectively, as humanity appeared not able to provide steady and forward economic development of life on all planet. All more often in the economic system there are failures, socalled world financial and economic crises, thus they began to come more often, and to embrace all planet, and the terms of their life became longer. Exactly the decision of this superunique and most superdifficult problem, in our opinion, all minds of humanity must today immediately engage and not only politicians and scientists-economists but also all progressive humanity of the world. Generally known, that world economic crises arise up first in financial sphere. By guilt there are the so-called "financial bubbles" arising up as a result of forming of risk fictitious capital during realization of various financial operations at the fund market that, as a result for the counted minutes leading financial magnates operating at this market can become the possessors of huge financial assets and incomes. Unhealthy global trend is the fact that today many developed countries of the world began to consume more than to produce material welfares, i.e. to live on credit due to other countries of the world. The debt crisis hit many countries including USA, Japan, Great Britain, Italy, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Greece etc. The point is that the fiscal deficits of these countries are easily covered by the produced governments of these countries by bonds, that are for sale at the fund market and bought by investors, both private and public, both internal and external. As a result there is pumping of economy empty money that does not work on real economy, and spin at the fund market, creating a fictitious capital and causing the crisis phenomena in the economic system. Undoubtedly, all these difficult economic phenomena are in the world, and rendering the main direct influence on development of national economies of other countries, including Russia and Kazakhstan, need deep comprehension and research, in fact science always develops under influence of practical necessities of society and for satisfaction of his certain needs. The crisis phenomena always generate the different projects of reformation of the world monetary system. For example, in the conditions of crisis of Bretton Woods System the projects of creation of collective key currency came into question stormily, producing of the common world currency provided with gold and commodities, increase of role of gold in the international monetary system up to renewal of gold standard [10,11]. Processes of globalizations require from Heads of the states and world financial community of increase of efficiency of adjusting of the world monetary and financial system at an international level, that will allow to minimize affecting of the external crisis phenomena national economies, as they alone are not able to resist to the massed external shocks. In this regard, it is appropriate to the level of heads of 20 leading nations of the world to implement a number of practical measures: - to create the supranational body of the international adjusting of processes of liberalization and internationalization of the national banking systems and providing of financial help to the national economies for softening of negative consequences of world financial and economic crisis; - to work out the mechanisms of international control after motion of foreign capitals, providing transparency of the banking systems of all countries, that means the necessity of native reformation of all international currency-financial system; - to work out the mechanisms of international control after motion of foreign capitals, providing transparency of the banking systems of all countries, that means the necessity of native reformation of all international currency-financial system; - on the transitional stage to assume possibility of forming of new world and regional financial and economic centers with the use of multicurrency standard; - to consider possibility of development in the prospect of supranational currency for providing of monetary-economic safety in the world. It is impossible to ignore circumstance that today in the world really the monetary items of three largest countries prevail: the USA(dollar), European Union(euro) and China (yuan). There are now also expanding the scope of international trade in yuan, bypassing the U.S. dollar. In particular, South Korea, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Argentina, Belarus, Russia, Kazakhstan, truck the currencies for a yuan without the dollar converting. In addition, every day at the internal monetary market of China of $400 million interchange on yuan [12, c.2]. Therefore reformation of the world currency system can not take place without active voice of China, as a yuan applies on the role of regional key currency. In a prospect on the role of regional key currency the Russian rouble applies within the framework of CIS countries. Appearance in the triad of the Chinese yuan is perceived as a paradox: the economy of country did not yet get status market, a yuan is not freely convertible currency, it is not present in the basket of currencies of SDR, a country does not adhere to principles of IMF, the structure of gold-value backlogs and monetary policy of country do not adhere to principles of transparency. The indicated lacks of this block are compensated by the Japanese yen answering all international standards [13]. Not all perceive the real the ascent of the Chinese yuan on the top of pyramid of the world monetary system. However with strengthening of position of China in the world economy of change in a triad will appear inevitable. Asian block in composition yuan - a yen will be rolled on the top of triangle, displacing an euroblock downward. The basic premise of these changes: the growth rate of GDP of China in crisis in 2008 amounted to 8% in sub-zero values of this index in almost all countries, 10.4% - in 2010, 9.2% - in 2011, the IMF forecasts for 2012 and 2013, the highest in China from all over the world, respectively: 8.2% and 8.8% [14]. It should be noted that Russian Federation accepts the most direct and active participating in development of concrete suggestions for "Group 20" on providing of stable world economy and prevention of crises of similar scale in the future. In their number: development and acceptance of the internationally confessed standards in the spheres of macroeconomic and budgetary policy, an observance of that would be obligatory for leading world economies, including countries-issuers of key currencies; stimulation of internal demand is in national economies, thus in accordance with the tasks of providing of Medium to Long Term macroeconomic stability, development and acceptance of international agreement determining the global standards of adjusting and supervision in a financial sector; revision of role and mandate of IMF in accordance with the new structure of the world currencyfinancial system, and also increase of resources and development of new credit mechanisms IMF. Key suggestions of Russia to the London summit of "Group 20"(April 2009) were the following: 1. To provide the clear tying up of increase of resources IMF with his reforms counted on 2-3; 2. To begin a discussion about key currencies (including taking into account the prospect of introduction of supranational key currency); 3. To create more harmonious system of adjusting of financial markets (this initiative pursues the aim of conclusion of international agreement determining the global standards of adjusting and supervision in a financial sector) [15, c.36]. By the key mechanisms of practical realization of mark higher measures on reformation of the world monetary system, in our view, can be following: 1. For introduction of supranational currency it is necessary to create a supranational central bank the central jars of leading countries of the world (maybe, large twenty) must become the members of that. 2. At the same time supranational central bank must use the accumulated experience of operating technique of emission and functioning of international currency units not only (SDR) special drawing rights (from 16 to 4 currencies) but also ECU (12 currencies), and also experience of basket method of determination of conditional cost of future supranational currency. In this case, the basket of currencies, formative basis for the estimation of cost of SDR, must be extended due to including of currencies of all leading countries, and GDP (gross domestic product) also can be included as weight of currency. Distribution of special drawing rights (SDR) can be carried from the system based only on settling, to the system, provided with the real assets, such as backlogs, for the further increase of trust to the market. Transmission of part of backlogs of countries-members in the centralized management IMF, not only will promote possibilities of international association on the settlement of crises and support of stability of the international monetaryfinancial system but also considerably will fix the role of special drawing rights (SDR). 3. It is necessary to mean that experience of ECU was more attractive, than SDR, as it was used by not only official but also private sector (by jars and enterprises), that created pre-conditions for introduction of euro, therefore expediently maximally to use the accumulated experience of operating technique of emission of ECU for the just estimation of cost of future supranational currency. Advantage of ECU consists yet and in that unlike by nothing not provided SDR, it was provided with gold and dollars. And the central jars of countries-members of the European currency system (EBC, 1979-1998гг.) were translated in an emission center by 20% national gold backlogs. Along with reformation of the world monetary system and creation in the prospect of global currency, changes are needed in adjusting of the global economic and financial systems. Presently the recognition of the need to create a new architecture of the global financial system is becoming more and more supporters among the leaders of the largest states, businesses and, of course, in scientific circles. This situation, when capital markets are being globalized, and a supervision and adjusting come true mainly at national level, threatens the train of new crises and their converting into a global system financial crisis. Optimal architecture of the world financial system must answer at least to three fundamental requirements: 1)not to hurt national sovereignty; 2)to provide adjusting and supervision after financial markets and smoothing out of risks; 3)to do advantageous participating in operations on global financial markets. Taking into account complication of simultaneous satisfaction of all three requirements and being of acceptable compromise, participation of all groups of countries and all subjects of economic and financial activity is needed in reformation of the world financial system, as to the global challenges global answers must be contrasted. Reformation of the world financial system must envisage the mechanisms of traffic of short-term capitals between countries and introduction regulation on them tax on a risk capital, with that to shut out intumescing of external debt and crisis caused by him. To the countries, with the formed markets, prepossessing the vulnerable to external shocks financial systems, it is important wider to use Chilean experience accumulated at the beginning of 90th on inhibition of speculative short-term cash inflow. The mechanism of inhibition envisages the accumulation of obligatory interestfree reserves on one year under all volume of inflow of foreign facilities in country, that does not conduce to the increase of size of physical capital, including foreign credits, securities with the fixed income and facilities on the purchase of shares of stock. The inflow of funds is subject to a kind of tax, ie is assigned a share of imports into the country short of capital, which is subject to mandatory deposit on non-interest bearing account for a period of one year. Reserve ratio may change as improvement or deterioration of the situation with the stabilization of capital flows. Initially, in 1991, subject to reservation in Chile accounted for 30%, and in June 1998 it was reduced to 10% and subsequently reduced to zero, although the principle of reservation is not canceled at any time and can be restored. Chile's experience has shown that this chart is effective enough and renders the serious retentive affecting cash inflow by a term less one year. Principle of action of this method consists in that it allows to decrease vulnerability of the financial system of country in case of outflow of capital by limitation of some types of its inflow. Countries get possibility to reduce dependence on the change of mood of foreign portfolio investors, not coming running to direct prohibition of such investments. For the decision of promissory problem of different countries the group of industrial countries at the head with the International monetary fund may take a more active role in the development of effective strategies to prevent debt crises. At this IMF comes forward not only as a "creditor of the last instance", but in a greater measure in a role of guarantor and co-ordinator of work on bringing in of private capitals in countries needing financial inflowing. In Strategy of providing of world financial stability in the conditions of globalization, in our opinion, it is expedient to provide for the following mechanisms for its implementation: 1. In the framework of the UNO it is important to accept the decision concerted with the entire countries of the world, making agreement or accepting Memorandum about creation of "Fund of financial stability of world economy" for the steady functioning of new global key currency. We suppose that presently there is not a necessity to create a new structure for the decision of global challenges and problems, because United Nations are called in the scales of the whole world these problems in the status to occupy exactly. In addition, IMF is the structure of the UNO and already a few decades works out the indicated problems. 2. In creation of this Fund it is important to take part to all countries of the world (about 200 countries of the world). 3. The amount of payments to the Fund may vary from 10 to 20% of the GDP of a country. This is being addressed collectively by all countries of the world. Can be taken and other decisions on this issue. 4. The poorest countries are important to reserve in Fund to 10% from GDP of the country. Participating of poor countries in forming of this Fund is obligatory, firstly, in order that poor countries felt the full-fledged members of world economy and bore responsibility for effective functioning of the national economy and strictly observed budgetary discipline and Standards of financial stability of world economy. 5. G20 countries are designed to take a more meaningful participation in shaping the "Fund of financial stability of world economy". The size of their withholdings can make to 20% from GDP, as the developed industrial countries get most benefits from globalization. In crisis terms a size of such withholdings can be less, than in periods of rapid development of world economy. 6. It is important also to envisage the mechanisms of participating in forming of this Fund of large transnational companies (ТNC), transnational banks (ТNB), as they get considerable incomes from the monopolistic activity in the conditions of globalization and carry in too time most losses in case of offensive of world financial crisis. 7. It is necessary also to envisage the mechanisms of voluntarily participation of rich people in forming of this Fund of financial stability of world economy. 8. Side by side with this, it is expedient to work out the mechanisms of grant of financial help from "Fund of financial stability of world economy" for ТNC and ТNB and other private structures in case of origin for them financial cataclysms, as these structures render substantial influence on the stable functioning of all world economy and it is impossible to assume their crash. 9. On our exemplary settling, the supposed size of "Fund of financial stability of world economy" can make about $ 6 - 12 trillion, if to take into account that world GDP makes about $60 trillion. This Fund will serve as the family the "pillow of safety" for a world economy and providing of the stable functioning of the new world key currency created originally on the basis of multicurrency standard on principle of special drawing rights (SDR) and ECU. 10. Modernized IMF can come forward the operator of this Fund, as he possesses huge experience of adjusting and effective functioning of the world currency system. 11. All system of forming, distribution and use of facilities of "Fund of financial stability of world economy" must be exceptionally transparent. 12. All operations of Fund expediently every day to reflect on a web-site IMF. 13. IMF desirably quarterly to report before the heads of "large twenty" about the state of motion of facilities of this Fund and operatively to accept decision on providing of sponsorship of one or another country or regional integration association (for example, ЕU (euro zones), EEU (again formed Eurasian economic union), countries of the Pacific region, countries of BRIC, countries of Latin America, African countries of and other of integration associations), as a stable functioning of world economy depends on the effective functioning of these regional educations. 14. All countries in the world are under an obligation strictly to observe budgetary discipline and execute of the certain Standards of financial stability and norm, worked out and accepted by countries "G20" and approved collectively by the special decision of the UNO by the entire countries of the world. 15. IMF is necessary annually to report before the UNO and heads of entire countries of the world (about 200 countries) about forming and use of facilities of this Fund. Along with these measures, Strategy of providing of world financial stability in globalization supposes: 1. Increase the role of openness, to transparency and accounting of countries and IMF for providing of stability of the world financial system. 2. Streamlining of standards, principles and substantive provisions, regulative financially-bank practice. It is important to guarantee the application of internationally recognized standards and "codes of good conduct", which include: reporting standards, developed by the IMF's fiscal transparency code and a code of transparency in monetary and fiscal policies, etc. The adoption of such standards in the areas that are essential to ensure financial stability, will help raise awareness in the provision of credit and investment decisions. In addition, the government will pursue a more balanced policy, markets and private investors - more accurately assess the risks and the country - to achieve higher macroeconomic indicators. 3. International estimation of degree of implementation by the separate countries of standards and codes. Although implementation of standards carries voluntarily character, an international association must know in what degree of financial system of the countries correspond to the international confessed standards and codes. 4. Engaging of private sector in permission of crisis problems, e.g. participation of private creditors in providing stabilization of financing programs supported by IMF, the financial responsibility of the solution to crisis must be spread evenly between private and official structures. Such approach assists strengthening of market discipline and the same to the increase of efficiency and stability of international capital markets. LITERATURE: Financier, .№21, 2010, С.17. Reference book of CIA 2011 Bulletin of the "Budgetary announcer", January 2012 Krasavina L.N. Conceptual approaches to reforming the world monetary system.. Money and credit, №5, 2010, p.48-57. 5. Nazarbayev N.A. Keys from a crisis. Russian newspaper, February, 2 2009 6. Nazarbayev N.A. Speech on opening of II Economic forum of Astana, March 11-12, 2009 Астана, Palace of Independence. 7. Nazarbayev N.A. Speech at conference of Boao Forum for Asia, Haynan, China, April 18, 2009 8. Nazarbayev N.A. The fifth way. The origins of the crisis and ways to treat (programmatic article) a newspaper’’ News’’, Septembers 22, 2009 9. Nazarbayev N.A. "Toward ' currencies of a class'" International Herald Tribune, Septembers 23, 2009 10.Krasavina L.N. The scientific school of international monetary and financial relations // Money and credit, 2009, № 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 11.Krasavina L.N. System methodology of antirecession policy and reform of the world (Jamaican) monetary system design. Thematic collection. Discussion of the article of Nazarbayev N.A. “Keys from a crisis”/ Baizakov S., Nugerbekov S., Astana, 2009. - 224 p.(Materials of II Economic forum of Astana, Kazakhstan, Astana, on March, 11-12 of 2009). 12.Republic № 16(395), on April, 26 2011 of p.2. 13.Kazakhstanskaya pravda, 22.06.2011. World currency disorder: what exit and what strategy? Berlin of Irishev, managing partner Parlink Consulting (Paris, on December, 31, 2010). 14.World Economic Outlook. Bulletin of the key PWE projections, Washington, IMF January 24, 2012. 15.Minin B.V. Tarankova L.G. Bank of Russia. Activity of "Group 20" overcoming of world financial crisis. Money and credit, № 5, 2009, с.28-36.