Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Natural Resource Management Course Instructor: Prof. Shambu Prasad Term Paper Topic: SOCIAL ECOLOGY Date of Submission: 05.12.2006 Submitted by: Saurabh Pandey (Roll No. u306047) & Shruti Rao (Roll No. u306048) ABSTRACT Due to an increase in the population, in the last few decades, there has been a substantial increase in the demands for products. These products have an ever rising demand due to their requirement in the society. To make available these products there is a need for industrialisation and for industrialisation we need space. This space comes from the depletion of already existing natural resources. According to one school of thought industrialisation is the main reason for the ecological degradation. It is believed that the rapid increase in the demand for industrial goods has led to overexploitation of the natural resources. In this term paper we try to review the steps taken and challenges faced in sustaining development of the society without hampering the environmental setup. Social Ecology is a radical view of ecology and of social/political systems. The World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) defines the concept of sustainable development as a ‘development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’. This clearly states that in case we do not sustain our natural resources now we will be in trouble in the future. It is also said that the elite class manipulates the natural resources “for their own benefits but only at a substantial cost to the environment and disadvantaged social group.” This term paper expects to put emphasis on sustainable development and calculated use of the natural resources. This conflict over natural resources has gone form the conflict for forest resources to conflict for water. And it has been rightly said that the next world war could be fought for water. A holistic and integrated vision of sustainable development is ideal, yet the consensus is that there is currently no universal development model which leads to sustainability at all levels. It is after the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, that Sustainable Development was universally accepted as a steering paradigm integrating economic growth, social development and environmental protection as interdependent and mutually supportive elements of long-term development. Furthermore, in September 2000, The United Nations have declared Environmental Sustainability as one of the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to be reached by the year 2015 and established to integrate the principles of Sustainable Development into country policies and programmes and to reverse the loss of environmental resources as one of the three targets to be achieved under this goal. "The domination of nature by man stems from the very real domination of human by human ’The Ecology of Freedom’, Murray Bookchin INTRODUCTION As explained above the term social ecology has its bearing on mankind as well as on the environment. This can be demonstrated by a simple example; the demand for water is ever increasing at the same time the forest cover is decreasing. These along with the other natural resources are non-renewable resources and they cannot be redeemed once lost. They should, therefore, be judiciously used. And a sight imbalance can go a long way in affecting the lives of the future generations. The term “social ecology” was given by Murray Bookchin in 1964. And it has become more relevant at a time when the uncontrolled exploitation of the natural resources by human beings is taking place. The forest cover in India has decreased from to and this figure is even more alarming in the sense that all this has taken place in a span of few decades. Food security and rural development policies have been revised in recent years placing more emphasis on holistic approaches to rural livelihoods focusing on the sustainable use of natural resources, multi-sectoral collaboration and stakeholder participation in accessing rural assets. We can, therefore, say that the task of an environmentally oriented sociology or social ecology is the study of the reciprocal relations between institutions in the one hand and ecological infrastructure on the other. It has been found that the existing institutions have failed in maintaining this balance between the demand of both the society as well as the environment. This has its bearing on the environment. This impact has to be minimised by the mankind as a whole. And an adequate knowledge on this issue will help us in our cause because this issue does not have its bearing on the human life alone but also on its culture. The depletion of natural resources leads to migration, which is again a very serious problem engulfing the nation today. If the depletion of the natural resources can be controlled then we can surely control the migration of people dependent on these resources. Sociology and ecology are closely related to each other. In many instances social facts can only be properly understood with reference to natural environment with which humans live, survive and reproduce. The ecological infrastructure powerfully conditions the evolution and direction of human economic life, political relation and social structure and ideology. At many times human activities reshape their natural environment in its own image. Basic categories of social ecology are: a. b. c. d. e. Ecological infrastructure. Economy. Social structure. Polity. Culture. TIME LINE OF SOCIAL ECOLOGY • History: The human attachment with nature is well known from the historical text. • 1882: Term ecology coined by Ernst Haeckel but it contained the attachment of humanity with the environment. • 1950: William Vogt’s “Our Plundered Planet” which dealt with the ways in which human being started exploiting the environment and causing large scale destruction to the environment as a result of industrialisation. • 1950s: Murray Bookchin’s work on hazards of pesticides & food activities. This study proved beyond doubt the way in which the hazardous chemicals were getting into the human food chain • 1962: Murray Bookchin’s book “Our Synthetic Environment” this book dealt mainly with the concept of human movement in a world which lacked the essence of nature. • 1962: Silent Spring by Rachel Carson, in this book the author talks about the impact of human being on the environment, but the author confined herself to wildlife and nothing more. • 1964: Term Social Ecology coined by Murray Bookchin in his book “Ecology & Revolutionary Thought”, this generated vast interest within the society. • 1964: Article in “Bioscience” titled “A Subversive Science” challenged the accepted social & economic practices. This article compelled people to think if the traditions they were following were right or wrong. • 1970s & 1980s: Anti-Nuclear Alliance. This helped strengthen the existing demand for social ecology. • 1980s: Green Politics in West Germany & other European Countries. Though it was on political lines but it affected the cause of social ecology to a greater extend. • 1999-2000: Conference on Biodevastation was carried out against Biotechnology. Biotechnology became the new target as it has more long term effects than short term gains. • March 2002: Labeling of Genetically Engineered food. A big victory for the social ecologists. SOCIAL ECOLOGY IN INDIAN CONTEXT In Indian context there are many evidences which show the relationship between the society and ecology. Many tribes in India practice shifting cultivation in which they burn the forest and grow crop on the new cleared area. Here we are taking the case of Saora tribes of Orissa. Every Sarora village inhabitant practices shifting cultivation in the hills located in the village boundaries. According to research, 96% of tribes said that forest resources have decreased. This was due to deforestation and population growth. This decrease of forest resources has affected 97% of the tribal population of Orissa. in this we have tried to highlight the effect of culture on the ecological condition. As India is a developing country, therefore, industrilisation is at its peak and the basic mentality what exists is either grow or die. Though many industries are flourishing but at the cost of our environment. We have taken recent example of POSCO which is establishing a steel plant in Orissa. If the Korean steel maker, POSCO, is allowed to build a port at Jatadhari near Paradip, it will adversely affect the nesting beaches for Olive Ridley sea-turtles in the Gahirmatha Marine Sanctuary. There has always been a tussle between development and the environment. Many trees are cut down; organisms there get affected in the name of development. Many have to sacrifice their fertile agriculture lands as in the case of Sardar Sarovar Dam where tribes were displaced by the Narmada Control Authority to raise the height of the Dam to 121.9 meters. To save their land by stopping government to increase the height of the dam at the cost of people living over there, people started protesting against this decision. But their mission was not successful and the whole area particularly Harsud town fell under submergence. OBJECTIVES OF SOCIAL ECOLOGY Social ecology emphasises on the sustainable use of natural resources for the human development. It also highlights the fact that human development should not take place at the expence of the environment. It is, therefore, necessary to put forth the development in a very well coordinated manner and this manner should be in tune with the environment and its components. To point out a few objectives of social ecology: 1. 2. 3. 4. Conservation of biodiversity. Sustainable development. Reducing the dependency of the society on the ecosystem. Creating awareness about the environment. CHALLENGES IN SOCIAL ECOLOGY 1. Industrialisation-Due to an ever increasing demand for goods and services it is necessary to increase the production which requires additional regions to set up production units. The land area required for this purpose has to come from the forests and other natural resources. Therefore, it is a threat to the social ecology initiative. 2. Development- The development is another major problem facing social ecology. In this run for development and generating higher returns human beings have toyed with the nature. This has resulted in large scale destruction of the environment. This blind race has given a threatening sign for the future. 3. Improving lifestyle- With an increase in the social lifestyle, there has been an increase in the demand for various products that cost a lot in comparison to the price being paid as one cannot compute the right price for damaging the environment. This again has its bearing on the environment and its components which includes the human beings and its culture. 4. Over-population- In India every 3 seconds a child is born, with the child come demands for food, shelter, clothes etc. and these basic demands are to be met even at the expense of environment. This exponential rise in the population has to be controlled as this explosion can have its adverse affects on mother nature 5. Controlling demands- Demands are something that have to be controlled in order to sustain the environment and decrease the pressure on the environment. Human beings can find alternative methods to decrease this pressure. CONCLUSION Social Ecology is a very important concept specially in the light of over exploitation of natural resouces. The concept of social ecology can help us minimise our dependence on natural resources. The formulation of a consensus framework of conservation biology marks an important stage in the establishment of this branch as a discipline. This shows the sense in which conservation biology is a hybrid discipline that cuts across the boundary of the natural and the social sciences: the multiple criteria that have to be synchronized are generically socioeconomic. LEARNING POINTS Principle of social ecology states that the ecological problems arise from deep-seated social problems. Ecological problems cannot be understood without facing social issues, as both society and ecology work hand in glove. So we learnt that both ecology and society have symbiotic relation. Last few decades have seen an uncontrolled loss of biodiversity in the name of industrialization. In 1993, it was estimated that the Earth was losing something on the order of 30,000 species per year -- which breaks down to the even more daunting statistic of some three species per hour. So to save our environment it is very necessary to learn about the importance of ecology in the human society and how it can play a major role in saving the environment. As we can take the example from the past were the tribes of Uttaranchal district came forward to save the trees by hugging them (Chipko Movement). Another example is of Lakshadweep where fishing is carried out by poll and line method only. It is acknowledged all over the world that Pole and line method is most eco-friendly method of fishing of tuna in which only mother fishes are caught and young ones as also mother marine creatures are spared, which are unnecessarily destroyed in other fishing methods. We learnt from the above facts that how peoples participation and awareness can protect the environment. This term paper was a nice learning experience as we were not aware of the various initiatives being taken worldwide in order to protect the environment. REFERENCES 1. Baviskar A “For a Cultural Politics of Natural Resources”, Economic and Political Weekly, November 29, 2003 2. Bookchin M “Reflections: An Overview of the Roots of Social Ecology”, Harbinger, A Journal of Social Ecology (Vol 3, No. 1) 3. Gadgil G “Ramachandra Guha: The trouble with radical environmentalists”, www.infochange.com/changemaker5 4. Guha R (ed.) 1994 Social ecology (Delhi: Oxford University Press) 5. Guha R and Martinez-Alier J 1998 Varieties of environmentalism: essays north and south (New Delhi: Oxford University Press) 6. Malik B B 2004 Social Ecology of Forest Resources (Delhi: Kalpaz Publication) 7. Staudenmaier P “Economics in a Social-Ecological Society”, Harbinger, A Journal of Social Ecology (Vol 3, No. 1) 8. Tokar B “Social Ecology and Social Movements from the 1960s to the Present”, Harbinger, A Journal of Social Ecology (Vol 3, No. 1) 9. http://www.thegreenfuse.org/socialecology.htm ABOUT THE AUTHORS RAMACHANDRA GUHA: - Historian Ramachandra Guha was professorial fellow at the Centre for Contemporary Studies, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi. He has taught at Yale University, the Indian Institute of Science and University of California at Berkeley, where he was the Indo-American Community Chair professor in 1997 and 1998. He is the author of an acclaimed study of the Chipko movement, The Unquiet Woods, and co-author of This Fissured land, An Ecological History of India and Ecology and Equity. He has also written a critically-acclaimed biography of Verrier Elwin titled Savaging the Civilised. In the book titled “social ecology” he has highlighted the issue of society and resources use and abuse. Dr. BIBHUTI BHUSHAN MALIK:- Dr. Bibhuti Bhushan Malik is a lecturer in sociology at the Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidhyapith University , Varanasi. He completed his master’s in social systems and successfully obtained a doctorate from the center for the study of Social systems at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He was awarded Junior Research Fellowship as well as Senior fellowship by University Grants Commission, New Delhi. His book titled “SOCIAL ECOLOGY OF FOREST RESOURCES” offers a comprehensive analysis of social ecology, environmental sociology and tribal life in the state of Orissa. Deterministic approach has been developed to understand the facets of tribal life and culture. This book studies different aspects of tribal life by utilizing new theoretical developments in the study of social ecology and forest.