Download Trochanteric Bursitis (aka Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
TROCHANTERIC BURSITIS
(AKA GREATER TROCHANTERIC PAIN
SYNDROME)
Inservice – April 2014
Outline









Hip anatomy
Presentation of Trochanteric pain syndrome
Aetiology
Pathological process
Examination
Differential diagnosis
Treatment –traditional and current research.
Prognosis
Practical – some of tests
Hip Joint







Synovial ball and socket joint
Acetabulum faces laterally, anteriorly
and inferiorly
Hip joint two incongruent surfaces,
distributes load better, protecting
cartliage to excessive stress.
Cartliage thickest superior surface head
and acetabulum as most stress here
Labrum runs circumferentially around
acetabular perimeter.
Ligaments iliofemoral, pubofemoral
ligament (anteriorly), ischiofemoral
ligament (posteriorly). Transverse
ligament inferiorly
Nerve supply femoral, obturator and
superior gluteal nerve (L2-S1).
Gluteus Maximus




Largest muscle hip 16% cross
sectional area.
Gluteal surface ilium behind
posterior gluteal line, iliac crest,
coccyx, posterior sacrum, upper
part sacrotuberous ligament,
80% inserts ITB and gluteal
tuberosity femur
Extends and laterally rotates,
accelerate body upward and
forward from position hip flexion.
Importance in gait and standing,
forward bend. Upper – abduct,
lower adduct
Inferior gluteal nerve (L5, S1 and
S2. Skin (L2 and S3)
Gluteus medius





Fan shaped lateral aspect hip,
between iliac crest and greater
trochanter
Superior ilium (iliac crest to
sciatic notch). Anterior, middle
and posterior fibres.
Abduction (anterior/middle
fibres).
Downward tilt ilium ipsilateral
side , raise opposite side pelvis.
Superior gluteal nerve (L4, 5 and
S1).
Gluteus minimus





Triangular shape, lateral aspect
hip
Gluteal surface of ilium down to
anterior superior aspect of
greater trochanter.
Medially rotate (anterior fibres)
if leg fixed raise opposite side
pelvis.
Support and control pelvic
movement.
Superior gluteal nerve L4, 5 and
S1.
Deep external rotators



Obturator internus – lateral rotator
below 90o and medial rotator at
90o. . Nerve supply obturator
internus L5, S1 and S2.
Gemellus superior gluteal surface
of ischial spine, laterally and down
to blend tendon obturator internus.
Nerve supply obturator L5, S1 and
S2.
Gemellus inferior arises upper part
ischial tuberosity, blends obturator
tendon. Nerve supply quadratus
femoris L4, 5 And S1
Tensor fascia lata






Anterolateral thigh superficial
gluteus minmus.
Anterior part of iliac crest (iliac
tubercle, anterior inferior iliac
spine)
Inferiorly to iliotibial tract, below
greater trochanter
Action flexion, abduction, medial
rotation hip. Tightens iliotibial
tract.
Stabilise pelvis
Superior gluteal nerve (L4 and
L5)
GTPS Clinical presentation


Pain over the greater
trochanter, may report
aggravated with stair
climbing and descending,
standing for long periods,
pain with side lying, localised
tenderness to touch.
Pain can be described with
active abduction, passive
adduction.
Aetiology





Altered ‘force vectors’ over the hip, causing adverse hip biomechanics. (Del
Buono et al, 2011).
Common in sedentary/overweight individuals possibly due to overloading
of hip if overweight, can present in runners on downside leg of road
camber.
More common in women aged 40-60 years 4:1 ratio against males. Altered
biomechanics of women in terms of orientation of pelvis and position of ITB,
bursitis can result due to micro trauma (Williams & Cohen, 2009).
Peri and post menopausal women, loss of tensile strength collagen,
increased abdominal adipose tissue.
Affects 10-25% of the population, increased to 35% for patients with LBP
or leg length discrepancy. Evidence that strong association to other
pathologies OA, RA, lumbar spine degeneration and/or mechanical LBP,
Hip OA, knee OA, fibromyalgia, labral tears and hip arthroplasty. Can be
related to repetitive activity, trauma, crystal deposits or even infection
(specific to Tuberculosis).
Pathological process






Traditionally thought inflammation of one or more of bursae, sub gluteus
maximus bursa most commonly.
Chronic micro trauma, overuse or acute injury (Williams & Cohen, 2009).
Rare that find signs of inflammation, redness, heat and swelling as would be
expected MRI showed bursal inflammation in less than 10% of individuals
(Tortolani et al, 2002).
MRI evidence that gluteus medius pathology present – tear or tendinitis in
83% cases for 24 individuals with GTPS (Bird et al, 2001). Can be related
to overuse or falls.
Grimaldi – can be proliferative stage, but only seen when symptomatic
degeneration of gluteal tendons is present.
Continual compression, change proteoglycans becomes larger, with
thickening increased disorganisation tendon → collagen breakdown →
tears.
Objective

Tenderness over Greater trochanter most consistent sign, can refer down as
far as fibula laterally

Can be painful with flexion, abduction and external rotation of hip.

In this position resisted abduction compressed glut med tendons

Leg length discrepancy? Scoliosis?

Trendelenburg sign? Standing posture (hang on hip)

Obers test – usually lengthened, can assess abduction

Active and passive discrepancy abduction more than 5-10 degrees loss of
strength of deep abductors.

Palpate gluteus medius, tensor fascia latae

Lack of definitive signs other than palpation (Williams & Cohen, 2009).
Imaging



X rays (calcification and screen Hip OA, AVN or
SIJ).
US abductor tendon thickening, tendinopathy,
partial or complete tears.
MRI considered gold standard can detect tendinosis,
tendon tear partial/complete, bursal fluid, muscular
fatty atrophy, bony changes, calcification. Use of
thorough clinical exam, ‘carefully selected special
investigations and imaging indicated’ (Hugo & de
Jongh, 2012).
Trendelenburg sign

Positive trendelenburg
could be indicative of
gluteus medius lesion –
has good sensitivity,
specificity and
intraobserver
reliability (Bird et al,
2001) – possibly
investigate MRI for
tendon tear gluteus
medius.
Differential diagnosis



Low back pain with radiculopathy – L2, L3, L4
dermatomes, cannot rule out facet joints, sacroiliac
joint or lumbar disc with nerve root irritation
(Tortolani et al, 2002).
Possibly related to degenerate spine disease as
compromise of function of superior gluteal nerve L4,
L5 and S1 (supplies gluteus medius and minimus)
(Hugo & Jongh, 2012).
Inferior gluteal nerve – ventral rami L5-S2
(innervates gluteus maximus).
Other diagnosis’







Iliotibial band syndrome,
Meralagia parasthetica – lateral cutaneus nerve
OA hip.
Trauma present then must rule out femoral neck fracture or
avascular necrosis (Williams & Cohen, 2009).
Piriformis syndrome, possibly due to anatomical
abnormalities of piriformis (bipartite) or hypertrophic muscle
Obturator internus syndrome which lies inferior to piriformis
– medial surface of pubis covers obturator foramen inserts
at greater trochanter laterally.
Femoral acetabular impingement – can present as c –sign
over lateral hip (Meknas et al, 2011).
Conservative treatment





NSAIDS, ice, weight loss and activity modification.
Physiotherapy for flexibility, strengthening and
improving joint mechanics (mobilising hip, muscle
patterning). Stretch compression and exacerbate?
Traditionally Ultrasound and massage.
ITB adduction stretch, ↑↑compression?!!
Extra corporeal shock wave therapy – poor quality
evidence of efficacy.
Conservative treatment

Education – reduce compression, standing, sitting.

Exercise – activate deep abductors. Clams – activate TFL.


Eccentric strengthening of gluteals, graded approach as patient can
tolerate static→ concentric→ eccentric (functional).
Hip abduction side lying most effective for glut med (Distenfano, et al
2009). Used athletic population.

Selkowitz et al (2013) – hip muscle strengthening (EMG, athletic pop)

Long lever – superficial abductors, closed chain/functional instead.

Bridging double → single.

Consider co existing spinal pathology, think innervation of gluteals

Now more use of imaging in order to get correct diagnosis, suggesting
poorly inappropriate management in the past.
Injection





Failure of conservative measures may progress to
injection.
Relief in 60-100% cases, recent high quality studies
with long term follow up lacking. Injection providing
relief either temporarily or longer lasting can help
confirm diagnosis.
Injections not significantly improved with use of
fluoroscopic guidance, but cost is ‘dramatically
increased’ (Del Buono et al, 2011).
No studies looked at placebo effect of injections.
If poor response could be poor needle placement or
misdiagnosis (Hugo & de Jongh, 2012).
Surgical options





Failure of conservative management and injections.
Open bursectomy and debridement with removal of
calcifications shown to have good long term follow up.
ITB z lengthening for persistent GTPS shown to be
effective 16 of 17 cases.
Glutues medius tendon repair and arthroscopic surgery
for other pathology e.g. labral tear – good results at 2
year follow up (Hugo & de Jongh, 2012).
Some studies looked at surgical tenotomy of internal
obturator tendon shown to relieve symptoms (Meknas et
al, 2011)
Prognosis





Need to correctly diagnose, exclude pathology of
spine and pelvic area.
More likely gluteal tendinopathy/tear (MRI &
research)
No evidence of efficacy of physiotherapy, confident
diagnosis.
Injections success rate of between 60-100%, follow
up varying in published studies (Cohen et al, 2009).
Surgery has evidence of good results, with varying
length of follow up.
Practical -Examination








Gait – valgus knees, pelvic sway, trendelenburg?
Standing – valgus, trendelenburg.
Progress single leg squat if able.
Leg length – standing, supine, long sitting.
Hip flexion, abduction, lateral rotation, resisted
abduction.
Obers test, resisted abduction.
Palpation relaxed, abduction (function).
Active insufficiency – superficial abductors
dominant?
References
Bird, P.A. et al (2001) Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Physical Examination Findings in Patients
With Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome, Arthritis & Rheumatism, 44 (9), 2138-2145.
Cohen, S.P. et al (2009) Comparison of fluoroscopically guided and blind corticosteroid injections for greater trochanteric pain
syndrome: a multicentre RCT. BMJ, 338.
Del Buono et al (2011) Management of the greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a systematic review. Br med bulletin, 102
115-131.
Distefano et al (2009) Gluteal Muscle activation During Common Therapeutic Exercises. JOSPT, 39(7) 532- 540.
Hugo, D. & de Jongh, H.R (2012) Greater trochanteric pain syndrome, SA Ortho J, 11, 1 28-33.
Khaled, M. et al (2011) Retro-trochanteric sciatica-like pain: current concept. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 19, 19711985.
Lustenberger, D.P et al (2011) Efficacy of Treatment of Trochanteric Bursitis: A Systematic Review, Clin J Sport Med, 21 (5),
447-453.
McBeth, J.M. et al (2012) Hip Muscle Activity During 3 Side-Lying Hip-Strengthening Exercises In Distance Runners. J of Athletic
training, 47 (1), 15-23
Reiman et al (2012) A literature review of studies evaluating gluteus maximus and glutues medius activation during
rehabilitation. Physiotherapy Theory & Practice, 28(4), 257-268.
Selkowitz, D.M. et al (2013) Which Exercises Target the Gluteal Muscles While Minimizing Activation of the Tensor Fascia
Lata? Electromyographic Assessment Using Fine-Wire Electrodes. JOSPT, 43(2), 54-65.
Tortolani, P.J. et al (2002) Greater trochanteric pain syndrome in patients referred to orthopaedic spine specialists, The Spine
J, 2 251-254.
Williams, B.S. & Cohen, S.P. (2009) Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Review of Anatomy, Diagnosis and Treatment.
Anesthesia & Analagesia, 108 (5), 1662-1670.