* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Adverse event - BioMed Central
Survey
Document related concepts
Drug design wikipedia , lookup
Neuropharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Polysubstance dependence wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup
Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup
Drug interaction wikipedia , lookup
Prescription costs wikipedia , lookup
Clinical trial wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacokinetics wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Pharmaceutical industry wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Additional file 2: Definitions of adverse events Adverse event Any sign or symptom whether or not related to the study drug; any clinically significant laboratory abnormality; any abnormality detected on physical examination. Investigators recorded adverse events reported by the patient, as well as those observed based on examination. Severity of adverse events The severity of an adverse event is graded as: Mild (causing no limitation of usual activities) Moderate (causing some limitation of usual activities) Severe (causing inability to carry out usual activities) Serious adverse event Any event causing significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution. Including any event that is: fatal, life threatening, causes significant incapacity or disability, causes or prolongs inpatient hospitalisation, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or is an important medical event. Treatment-related adverse event Adverse events were to be recorded regardless of whether they were thought to be associated with the study or the drug under investigation. An adverse event was considered to be related to use of a study drug if, in the opinion of the investigator, there was a reasonable possibility that the event might have been caused by the study drug. Relationship to study drug was recorded as none, uncertain, or probable. Only those recorded as probable were regarded as treatment-related for this analysis. GI tolerability Adverse events could be mild (causing no limitation of usual activities), moderate (causing some limitation of usual activities), or severe (causing inability to carry out usual activities). GI tolerability was a composite outcome of moderate or severe nausea, dyspepsia, or abdominal pain and was used as such in a number of trials. For trials where that information was not available, but where the individual reports of moderate or severe adverse events were, the composite outcome was calculated for the trial. Endoscopic ulcer In those trials designed to detect ulcers by endoscopy, an ulcer was defined as any break in the mucosa at least 3 mm in diameter with unequivocal depth. Ulcers and bleeds Gastric, duodenal, or gastroduodenal ulcer, or a haemorrhagic ulcer, or gastrointestinal haemorrhage were reported as treatment-emergent events. While some trials had independent adjudication panels, we took the results as reported in the trial report, and not (so far was we know) as judged by a panel. Hypertension Hypertension included both new cases of hypertension, and aggravated hypertension in patients with originally well-controlled hypertension. Hypertension was not given a specific and uniform definition in the trials, except where it was a primary outcome. For this analysis we took all reports of treatment-emergent hypertension or aggravated hypertension. Raised creatinine Creatinine raised to 1.3 times the upper limit of normal for the laboratory or more during treatment. Oedema Oedema at any body site (generalised, peripheral, facial) was analysed together. Oedema was reported inconsistently, sometimes as just oedema, other times as generalised oedema, and in other reports defined by localisation. We analysed reports of unspecified oedema, generalised oedema, or the sum of specific oedema reports.