* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Road to the Civil War
Virginia in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Battle of Wilson's Creek wikipedia , lookup
Opposition to the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Military history of African Americans in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Missouri in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Missouri secession wikipedia , lookup
Mississippi in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Hampton Roads Conference wikipedia , lookup
Union (American Civil War) wikipedia , lookup
United Kingdom and the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
South Carolina in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Border states (American Civil War) wikipedia , lookup
Origins of the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
United States presidential election, 1860 wikipedia , lookup
The Road to the Civil War The Civil War was a product of many events and issues. It is important to understand what caused the war and how it came about. As you complete this worksheet, make sure you (1) know who was involved, (2) why it happened, (3) what it was and (4) what happened as a result – Cause and Effect. You will notice that things start out civilized and led to violence! Use Chapter 14 (pages 438 to 459). We need to go back in time – back to 1819. Missouri was starting to be settled due to exploration and farm lands. Missouri wanted to become a state through the process called annexation. Here was the problem, there was a balance of slave and free states -15 each. So, if Missouri became a state there would be an imbalance. The reason why this was important was representation in Congress would favor the slave states and then they could pass laws promoting slavery. Plus it was a precedent that territories/new states entering into the Union would be slave. The difference between the North and South became apparent and created the idea that sectionalism/regionalism was keeping the United States separate based on the loyalty of regions. To solve this problem, Henry Clay came up with the idea of the Compromise of 1820, also known as the Missouri Compromise . This said (1) Missouri would be a slave state, (2) Maine would be free and (3) lands north of 36030’ latitude would ban or prohibit slavery would be free (except for Missouri). This would solve the problem for a while until the 1840’s when the War with Mexico would create a new problem. The Wilmot Proviso and The Free Soil Party Authored by Rep. David Wilmot Called for the banning of slavery in all territories Proviso passed the northern controlled House, but lost in the southern controlled Senate – therefore did not pass Spurred the debate over the growth of sectionalism The Free Soil Party was formed by antislavery northerners who supported the Wilmot Proviso They feared that slave labor would mean fewer jobs for northern white laborers The Free Soil Party candidate ran Marin Van Buren in election of 1848 The Compromise of 1850 – After the War with Mexico the political balance between the North and South was endangered as Americans asked “Should the new lands be open to slavery?” Make sure you get plenty of details and steps! California entered the Union as a free state The Mexican Cession was divided up in two – Utah and New Mexico – and slavery would be decided by popular sovereignty Texas gives up its claim to land in New Mexico and the government pays off its debt The slave trade is banned in DC Harsher fugitive slave laws are enacted The Fugitive Slave Act forced the citizens of the North to turn in runaway slaves and could be fined/imprisoned if they didn’t help. The law only helped divide the North and South more. Uncle Tom’s Cabin Written by Harriet Beecher Stowe Talked about the cruelty of slavery A story of a slave, Tom, being sold “down river” to Simon Legree In a fit of rage Simon has Tom (because he ran away) beaten to death Uncle Tom’s Cabin energized the abolitionists in the North (they thought that the book was the “bible” and told the truth about slavery) and enflamed the South who claimed it was full of wicked lies (no slave owner would beat their slave to death because they were too expensive to replace) The book is often referenced today in many works dealing with rasism/discrimination The Kansas-Nebraska Act replaced the Missouri Compromise – how? (Don’t forget to include the idea of popular sovereignty) Introduced by Stephen Douglas Divided the remainder of the Louisiana Territory into two – Kansas and Nebraska Allowed territory popular sovereignty when it came to slavery With strong southern support and pressure from Douglas and President Pierce it passed Congress The Kansas-Nebraska Act replaced the Missouri Compromise and allowed for the potential of slavery in the territories Conflict over the use of slavery in these new lands was going to lead to blood shed – Hmmmm a preview to the Civil War me thinks! Describe what led to “Bleeding Kansas” and John Brown’s involvement. Election of 1855, 5000 pro-slavery Missorians crossed the Kansas border and voted in the election As a result there was a pro-slavery majority in the territorial legislature They passed strict laws regarding the questioning of slaveholders rights and aiding and abiding run away slaves Antislavery Kansans established their own capital in Topeka, but it was not recognized by the Federal government In May 1856 a pro-slavery grand jury charged leaders of the antislavery government with treason. 800 pro-slavery men itching for a fight rode into Lawrence, Kansas looking for the antislavery leaders - they didn’t find them Instead, they turned their anger towards the town folk and set the town on fire, looted buildings and destroying what they could One man died in the “Sack of Lawrence” On May 24, 1856 John Brown, a militant abolitionist, and his men attacked along the Pottawatomie Creek, killing five with swords Hostilities would escalate and 200 people would be killed before an attempt to restore order was made in September 1856 Things were getting so bad that Congress erupted into violence. Charles Sumner was an abolitionist senator and was upset and outspoken over Bleeding Kansas. In response to the speeches Preston Brooks came in and hit/beat him with his cane, leaving him bloody and with bumps on the head. Wow, could this be a sign of things to come? New political parties were created and further divisions were made. Discuss the three parties in the Election of 1856. Republican Party Union of Whigs, Democrats, FreeSoiler and abolitionists United against the spread of slavery in the West Single issue party American Party Aka KnowNothing Party Made up of Democrats and Whigs Started as a reaction of immigration in 1849 Democrat Party Supported popular sovereignty Supported selfgovernment not pro-slavery Had to appease the North but lost the South - slavery John C. Fremont Millard Fillmore James Buchanan The Supreme Court is going to get involved in the slavery issue with the Dred Scott Decision. Dred Scott was a slave of Dr. John Emerson, an army surgeon While on tour, Dr. Emerson had taken Scott along with him to various postings in Illinois and Wisconsin and back to Missouri Upon the Doctor’s death, Scott became the property of his widow In 1846 Scott sued for his freedom based on the fact that he had become free while living in “Free Territory” and could therefore not be enslaved again. The lower court ruled in his favor (Dred Scott v Sandford) The Missouri Supreme Court overturned the ruling In 1857 the Dred Scott case came before the US Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, writing for the majority, said that Dred Scott an African American – whether free or slave – was not citizens of the United States under the Constitution and therefore did not have the right to file suit in a federal court Scott’s status as slave would remain because he was back in Missouri and subject to the laws of Missouri The ruling declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional based on the 5th Amendment – you could not be denied life, liberty and property without due process Thus Congress had no right to ban slavery in any federal territory Abraham Lincoln a Republican ran against Stephen Douglas a Democrat for senator from the state of Illinois. Lincoln was going to be at a disadvantage due to his lack of political experiences. In a series of debates between them, Lincoln showed his ability to debate and emerges as a leader of the Republican Party. Lincoln lost the election, but gained national recognition and was on his way to being nominated for President. List the differences between the two candidates: Abraham Lincoln Felt slavery should not spread into the territories African Americans were entitled to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” African Americans and whites were not social or political equals Stephen Douglas Really did not have an opinion on slavery, felt it was up to the states to decide Douglas challenged that Lincoln was trying to make all races equal Supported the Freeport Doctrine where if necessary the police will enforce laws of the territory/state even if they are contrary to that of the Federal Government John Brown was back and on the East Coast. More blood shed was on the way at Harper’s Ferry. What happened? John Brown and his militant group wanted to lead an armed slave revolt On October 16, 1859 Brown seized the arsenal at Harper’s Ferry and went about encouraging slaves to join him Local white southerners attacked Brown killing 8 of his 20 men Brown retreated to a nearby firehouse Robert E. Lee ordered a squad of marines to storm the firehouse killing two and capturing the rest John Brown was sentenced to be hanged on December 2, 1859 The raid on Harper’s Ferry would open the door to the south’s wish to cede from the Union In 1860, the presidential election took place. Why/How did Lincoln win? The Democrat party was split between Senator Stephen Douglas and VP John C. Breckinridge The Constitution Union Party emerged that would recognize “no political principles other than the Constitution of the country, the Union of the states, and they enforcement of the laws” and nominated John Bell The Republicans ran Lincoln a moderate who opposed the spread of slavery but also promised not to abolish it where it existed. Lincoln won but only with 40% of popular vote in this four way election Lincoln was able to win the election with out carrying a single southern state. In fact his name was not even on the ballot in most southern states Even though the Republicans and Lincoln promised not to disturb the issue of slavery, the South didn’t trust them. They decided to separate from the U.S., called secession. The Southern states created the Confederate States of America and elected Jefferson Davis as their President. They wanted states rights! After President Lincoln’s inauguration, Lincoln faced a severe problem that started the Civil War – Ft. Sumter. The secession of South Carolina The formation of the CSA Control of Federal property in seceded states Re-enforcing Ft Sumner List the Confederate States of America South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas seceded first, then North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee and Arkansas followed. Why do you think the loss of the state of Virginia to The Confederate States of America was so scary for the United States of America? Virginia was key – it was the home state of Robert E. Lee Virginia was just across the river from DC – vulnerable! The home of Presidents Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, and Tyler The other states stayed in the Union – including Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland and eventually West Virginia. West Virginia is created in the middle of the war. These states were called the “border states”. They had slaves but sided with the North. This will prove to be great for the North! Why? Controlled key parts of rivers – Mississippi & Ohio Controlled key transportation routes/lines Maryland separated DC from the South And the war between the States has begun!