Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Lung cancer Audit support Implementing NICE guidance Palliative interventions and supportive and palliative care 2011 NICE clinical guideline 121 Audit support: Lung cancer (2011) Page 1 of 9 This audit support accompanies the clinical guideline: ‘Lung cancer: the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer’ (available online at www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG121). Issue date: 2011 This is a support tool for clinical audit based on the NICE guidance. It is not NICE guidance. Implementation of this guidance is the responsibility of local commissioners and/or providers. Commissioners and providers are reminded that it is their responsibility to implement the guidance, in their local context, in light of their duties to avoid unlawful discrimination and to have regard to promoting equality of opportunity. Nothing in this guidance should be interpreted in a way which would be inconsistent with compliance with those duties. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence MidCity Place, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6NA; www.nice.org.uk © National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2011. All rights reserved. This material may be freely reproduced for educational and not-for-profit purposes. No reproduction by or for commercial organisations, or for commercial purposes, is allowed without the express written permission of NICE. Audit support: Lung cancer (2011) Page 2 of 9 Using audit support The audit support document can be used to measure current practice in palliative care for people with lung cancer against the recommendations in the NICE guideline. This audit tool is intended to complement the National Lung Cancer Audit (LUCADA) and enable services to carry out local audit in more detail as needed in this area of lung cancer care. Audit support contains criteria and a data collection tool. The data collection tool can be used or adapted for the data collection part of the clinical audit cycle by the trust, service or practice. A baseline assessment tool is also available www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG121/BaselineAssessment. This can help ascertain your trust’s baseline against the guideline’s recommendations and enable you to prioritise implementation activity, including clinical audit. The sample for this audit should include patients with lung cancer who need palliative support and care. Select an appropriate sample in line with your project aims or local clinical audit strategy. Whether or not the audit results meet the standard, re-auditing is a key part of the audit cycle. If your first data collection shows room for improvement, re-run it once changes to the service have had time to make an impact. Continue with this process until the results of the audit meet the standards. Links with other clinical audit priorities The audit based on this guideline should be considered in conjunction with other clinical audit priorities such as: The National Lung Cancer Audit (LUCADA) www.ic.nhs.uk/services/nationalclinical-audit-support-programme-ncasp/cancer/lung Cancer waiting times www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Statistics/Performancedataandstatist ics/HospitalWaitingTimesandListStatistics/CancerWaitingTimes/index.htm The National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (due to be repeated in 2011) www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/D H_122516 Audit support: Lung cancer (2011) Page 3 of 9 Criteria for ‘Lung cancer- palliative interventions and supportive and palliative care’ Palliative interventions and supportive and palliative care Providing palliative care Criterion 1 Patients who may benefit from specialist palliative care services should be identified and referred without delay Exceptions None Guideline reference 1.5.2 Definitions None Managing endobronchial obstruction Criterion 2 When patients have large airway involvement, they should be monitored (clinically and radiologically) for endobronchial obstruction to ensure treatment is offered early Exceptions None Guideline reference 1.5.4 Definitions None Criterion 3 External beam radiotherapy and/or endobronchial debulking or stenting should be offered to patients with impending endobronchial obstruction Exceptions None Guideline reference 1.5.5 Definitions None Other palliative treatments Criterion 4 Pleural aspiration or drainage should be performed in an attempt to relieve the symptoms of a pleural effusion Exceptions None Guideline reference 1.5.7 Definitions None Criterion 5 Patients who benefit symptomatically from aspiration or drainage of fluid should be offered talc pleurodesis for longer-term benefit Exceptions None Guideline reference 1.5.8 Definitions None Audit support: Lung cancer (2011) Page 4 of 9 Criterion 6 Patients with troublesome hoarseness due to recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy should be referred to an ear, nose and throat specialist for advice Exceptions None Guideline reference 1.5.12 Definitions None Criterion 7 Patients who present with superior vena cava obstruction should be offered chemotherapy and radiotherapy according to the stage of disease and performance status Exceptions None Guideline reference 1.5.13 Definitions None Hypercalcaemia, bone pain and pathological features Criterion 8 For patients with bone metastasis requiring palliation and for whom standard analgesic treatments are inadequate, single-fraction radiotherapy should be administered Exceptions None Guideline reference 1.5.17 Definitions None Follow-up and patient perspectives Criterion 9 All patients should be offered an initial specialist follow-up appointment within 6 weeks of completing treatment to discuss ongoing care All patients should be offered regular appointments thereafter, rather than relying on patients requesting appointments when they experience symptoms Exceptions None Guideline reference 1.6.1 (key priority) Definitions None Audit support: Lung cancer (2011) Page 5 of 9 Data collection tool for ‘Lung cancer – palliative interventions and supportive and palliative care’ Complete one form for each patient. Patient identifier: No. Data item no. Sex: Age: Organisation/service: Criteria Yes No NA/ Exceptionsa Palliative interventions and supportive and palliative care Providing palliative care 1.1 Was the patient suitable for specialist palliative care? 1.2 Was there any delay in their referral for specialist palliative care? 1 Managing endobronchial obstruction 2.1 Did the patient have large airway involvement? 2.2 Were they monitored clinically and radiologically for endobronchial obstruction? Were the following offered: 2 2.3 external beam radiotherapy endobronchial debulking stenting? Other palliative treatments 3.1 Did the patient have a pleural effusion? 3.2 Was pleural aspiration or drainage performed? 3.3 Did the patient benefit symptomatically from aspiration or drainage of fluid? 3.4 Were they offered talc pleurodesis? 4.1 Did the patient have troublesome hoarseness due to recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy? 4.2 Were they referred to an ENT specialist? 5.1 Did the patient have superior vena cava obstruction? 5.2 Were they offered chemotherapy and radiotherapy? 3 4 5 Audit support: Lung cancer (2011) Page 6 of 9 Hypercalcaemia, bone pain and pathological features 6 6.1 Did the patient have bone metastasis requiring palliation? 6.2 Was standard analgesic treatment inadequate? 6.3 Was single-fraction radiotherapy administered? Follow-up and patient perspectives? 7 7.1 Was the patient offered a specialist follow-up appointment within 6 weeks of completing treatment? 7.2 Was the patient offered regular appointments for follow-up? 7.3 Did the patient request these? Audit support: Lung cancer (2011) Page 7 of 9 Further information For further information about clinical audit refer to a local clinical audit professional within your own organisation or the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) website www.hqip.org.uk. HQIP was established in April 2008 to promote quality in healthcare, and in particular to increase the impact that clinical audit has on healthcare quality in England and Wales. Supporting implementation NICE has developed tools to help organisations implement the clinical guideline on lung cancer (listed below). These are available on our website (www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG121). Costing tools: costing report to estimate the national savings and costs associated with implementation costing template to estimate the local costs and savings involved. Slides highlighting key messages for local discussion. Implementation advice on how to put the guidance into practice and national initiatives that support this locally. Baseline assessment tool for identifying current practice and prioritising implementation of the guideline. Audit support for local clinical audit: access to services and referral diagnosis and staging small cell lung cancer non-small cell lung cancer palliative care (this document). A series of practical guides to implementation are also available on our website (www.nice.org.uk/usingguidance/implementationtools). Audit support: Lung cancer (2011) Page 8 of 9 The guidance You can download the guidance documents from www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG121. For printed copies of the quick reference guide or ‘Understanding NICE guidance’, phone NICE publications on 0845 003 7783 or email [email protected] and quote N2502 (quick reference guide) and/or N2503 (‘Understanding NICE guidance’). Audit support: Lung cancer (2011) Page 9 of 9