Download Phrase particles in the Somali language

Georgi Kapchits
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sentence particles in the Somali language
and their usage in proverbs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Semitica et Semitohamitica Berolinensia
for my wife Tatiana Saburova
2
Contents
Preface ......................................................................................................... 5
0. Introduction ............................................................................................ 7
0.1. The place of Somali in the genetic classification of African languages….. 7
0.2 The aims of the investigation ........................................................................ 8
0.3. A short sketch of the Somali language. ....................................................... 9
0.4. Sentence particles and the focus system in the Somali language. ............. 20
Chapter 1. The sentence particle waa .................................................. 30
1.1. The functions of the particle waa .............................................................. 30
1.2. The subject in a sentence with the particle waa ....................................... 30
1.3. The particle waa with short subjective pronouns .................................... 32
1.4. The order of words in a sentence with the particle waa. .......................... 34
1.5. The particle waa and the agreement of the predicate with the subject .... 39
1.6. Waa as a particle introducing a nominal predicate ................................... 42
1.7. Sentences without the particle waa........................................................... 44
Chapter 2. The sentence particle baa ..................................................... 45
2.1. The functions of the particle baa ............................................................... 45
2.2. Case and tone in a sentence with the particle baa .................................... 46
2.3. The particle baa with short subjective pronouns ...................................... 47
3
2.4. The order of words in a sentence with the particle baa ............................ 50
2.5. The particle baa and the agreement of the predicate with the subject ..... 56
2.6. The particle baa in special syntactic constructions .................................. 63
2.7. Sentences without the particle baa ............................................................ 64
Chapter 3. The sentence particle waxaa ............................................... 66
3.1. The functions of the particle waxaa........................................................... 66
3.2. The particle waxaa with the short subjective pronouns ........................... 68
3.3. The particle waxaa and the agreement of the predicate with the subject ..... 69
3.4. Special cases of the usage of the particle waxaa ...................................... 74
3.5. Two points of view on the particle waxaa ................................................ 75
3.6. Sentences with two sentence particles ...................................................... 79
Chapter 4. Sentence particles in proverbs and proverbial phrases ... 83
4.1. Some peculiarities of Somali paremias..................................................... 83
4.2. Types of Somali paremias ........................................................................ 85
4.3. Preliminary notes on research into the sentence particles in proverbs and
proverbial phrases ............................................................................................. 89
4.4. The particle waa in proverbs and proverbial phrases ................................ 92
4.5. The particle baa in proverbs and proverbial phrases................................. 98
4.6. The particle waxaa in proverbs and proverbial phrases .......................... 106
4.7. Paremias without sentence particles ........................................................ 110
6. Bibliography ....................................................................................... 126
4
Preface
This book is the text of my Ph.D. thesis which was submitted to and accepted
by the Institute of Asian and African Studies of Moscow State University in 2000. I
am grateful to Professor Viktor Porkhomovski who talked me into writing it and
provided me with most valuable supervision. I am indebted to Professors Nelly
Gromova and Irina Toporova, as well as to Assistant Professor Yuliya Suyetina, for
their useful advice and comments.
Since its first presentation the text of the thesis has been slightly shortened and
some revisions have been made thanks to the insightful suggestions of Professors
Giorgio Banti and Rainer Voigt, who read the manuscript. I wish to thank them both
for their generosity to a colleague.
I am also thankful to Abdirahman Farah ‘Barwaaqo’ for his unwavering
readiness to answer my numerous questions.
It is a special pleasure to express my gratitude to Sheila Andrzejewski who
edited the English text of the manuscript and made a number of wise notes, which I
took into consideration.
Finally I have to thank the German Research Society which provided me with a
grant and Dr. Mohamed Mohamud Handule who financially supported the
publication of this book.
x x x
One of the Somali proverbs demonstrating the syntactical mode of the
5
formation of the comparative degree, described in 4.7.2, goes: Subax iyo sadar, subax
baa badan – Days (lit.: mornings) are more than lines (in the Koran) [i.e. by reading a
line a day one can learn the whole Sacred Book]. I have to acknowledge that during
forty years, my daily learning of “the book” of the Somali syntax has left as yet many
unread pages.
It is possible that this work, which reflects my current notion about one of the
most important aspects of the Somali syntax, that is, the actual division of the
sentence, contains hypotheses which need further consideration. But I have no doubt
as to the correctness of the absolute majority of the observations and conclusions
made here.
6
0. Introduction
0.1. The place of Somali in the genetic classification of African languages.
Somali belongs to the eastern group of the Cushitic languages, which are a part
of the Afroasiatic (Hamito-Semitic) language family. This language is spoken by the
nomadic Somali people who inhabit the Horn of Africa. In colonial times the territory
of the Somalis was divided into several parts. In 1960 two of these, British
Somaliland and Italian Somalia, were united as the independent Somali Republic,
which after the Revolution of 1969 was transformed into the Somali Democratic
Republic. This existed until 1991 when the President (and in fact dictator) Mohamed
Siad Barre was overthrown, and since then there have been no nationwide structures
in Somalia. In several regions self-proclaimed states have appeared, and other areas
have fallen under the control of the leaders of military-political groupings created
according to clan (tribal) affiliations.
Thousands of Somalis who left the country after the collapse of the state have
settled in Europe and North America. Traditionally Somalis also inhabit the southern
part of Jibouti, the Ethiopian province of Hararge and Bale (Ogaden), now Somali
Region, and the north-east of Kenya. According to different estimates the number of
people speaking Somali is between 4 and 10 million (Saed, 1984; Strani mira, 1989;
Orwin, 1994).
The nearest linguistic relatives of Somali are Bayso, Boni, Rendille, Arbore,
Elmolo and Dasenech, the speakers of which live in the north-west of Kenya and the
7
south-west of Ethiopia. Apart from Somali, the main East Cushitic languages are
Oromo and Afar, spoken by the neighbours of the Somalis in the Horn of Africa.
0.1.1. In contemporary africanistics the Somali language is regarded as a
bundle of closely related dialects. Lamberti (1986) distinguishes five main dialects
and dialect groups: the group of Northern dialects spoken mainly by nomads; May
together with Digil, the dialect groups of the settled population occupied in
agriculture between the Jubba and Shabelle rivers; the dialects of Benadir spoken
mainly by Somalis living along the southern coast of the Indian Ocean; and Ashraf,
used by the residents of Mogadishu and also by Somalis living in Merka and on the
cost between these two towns.
The Northern dialects (Isak, Darod, Majarten and others) and Benadir are
usually called the Maxaad-tiri dialects spoken by the majority of Somalis. They are
the bases for the so-called Standard Somali which has been rapidly forming since the
introduction of the Somali script in 1972.
0.2. The aims of the investigation
The aims of this investigation are:
1) To determine the semantic and functional characteristics of the sentence
particles and their role in the actual division of the sentence;
2) To consider the specificity of the realization of focus in different types of
clichés;
3) To reveal the system of rheme-making in synchrony (on the material of nonclichéized sentences) and in diachrony (on the material of proverbial structures).
8
An investigation of the problems related to the functioning of the sentence
particles in Somali cannot be done without referring to information from practically
all sections of the grammar of this far from fully investigated language. For this
reason an analysis of the sentence particles has to be preceded by a number of related
aspects of the Somali language.
0.3. A short sketch of the Somali language
0.3.1. Somali, mainly in its "Northern variant", as determined by Hyman
(1981), is a tonal accent language which assigns accents to vowels. Three tones are
distinguished: high, low and falling, but the prosodic characteristics of Somali speech
are not designated in the adopted system of script. The absence of diacritical marks
makes it impossible to differentiate the meaning of those words which differ only by
tone or tonal accent (for details see Kapchits, Keenadiid, 1996). In linguistic literature
(Andrzejewski, 1955, 1964, 1968, 1979; Lamberti, 1983; Banti, 1984; Saeed (1984,
1999) tones are marked in the following way: high tone á, falling tone à or â; the low
tone is not marked.
In Somali the lexical meaning, number and gender of some nouns can be
differentiated only by tone:1
gées (side) – gèes (horn),
Soomáali (a Somali) – Soomaalí (Somalis),
damèer (he-donkey) – daméer (she-donkey).
1
The examples have been taken from Zorc, Issa (1990).
9
Tone is also used as a grammatical marker, differentiating in particular the
subject and non-subject when the former is not marked bay baa.
0.3.2. Nouns and verbs are the main classes of words in Somali, and only they
are characterized by inflexion which is almost completely suffixal (however see
below concerning the preverbal particles). Some words with attributive meanings
belong to the class of verbs:
dheer – to be long,
cad – to be white, etc.
The others form a not very numerous class of unchangeable attributes:
dhexe – middle,
hoose – lower,
shanaad – fifth, etc.
The majority of words with adverbial meaning belong to the class of nouns:
hoos-ta – bottom,
si-da – mode, mean.
Cardinal numerals, demonstrative and personal (emphatic) pronouns and some
others are subclasses of nouns. All of them, in particular, can adjoin a definite article.
Particles, including sentence particles, make a special class of words.
0.3.3. In Somali, as in many languages, nouns have a lexical-grammatical
(classifying) category of gender – masculine and feminine. The categories of number,
case, definiteness and possession are inflectional.
Singular and plural forms are distinguished. There are three persons in the
singular and four in the plural: 1st person exclusive (a speaker and somebody else,
10
but not a listener), 1st person inclusive (a speaker and other people, including a
listener), 2nd person and 3rd person.
Nouns are divided, according to the regular formation of their plurals, into six
(Bell, 1953) or seven (Andrzejewski, 1979; Puglielli and Ciise, 1984; Orwin, 1995;
Saeed, 1999; et al.) classes or declensions. The formation of the plural is mainly
suffixal (in only one class is it gemination):
míis (table) – miisas (tables),
nín (man) – niman (men), etc.
The majority of nouns change gender in the plural (the so-called principle of
polarity). Some, however, do so only formally. When defined, they adjoin the articles
of the opposite gender, but in fact retain the original one (see 0.3.11 and 2.5.3).
The use of morphological markers added to the noun (or to the last word of a
noun phrase), and/or tone, enables four cases to be distinguished: nominative
(subjective), general oblique (objective)2, genitive and vocative. Subjects which are
not marked as logically accented by means of baa or waxaa are in the subjective case.
(1) Nín baa naagi aragtay – A woman (nom.) saw a man.
Subjects which are logically accented are in the general oblique case:
(2) Náag báa nín aragtáy – A woman (obl.) saw a man.
Many forms of the nominative, general oblique and genitive cases are
homonymic. The specific markers of the nominative are -i, -u; of the genitive -eed
(fem. sing.), -ood (fem.pl.); and of the vocative -ow (masc.), -oy, -ey (fem.). These
2
This term was introduced by Zholkovsky (1971). Andrzejewski (1964, 1979), who described the
case system in Somali, called the objective case ‘absolutive’.
11
case markers depend on the usage of sentence particles, and are obligatory only in a
few positions (see 1.2 and 2.2). In all other positions the form of the general oblique
case can be used.
Somali nouns have the category of definiteness. An indefinite article is marked
by zero, while a definite article is added to a noun as a suffix, and marks its gender.
The form of the article depends on the last phoneme of its stem.
The variants of the definite article for masculine nouns are -ka, -ga, -ha, -a:
dal – dalka (the country),
derbi – derbiga (the wall),
habro – habraha (the old women),
ubax – ubaxa (the flower).
The variants of the definite articles for feminine nouns are -ta, -da, -sha:
naag – naagta (the woman),
lo' – lo'da (the cows),
kuul – kuusha3 (the necklace).
In the article -dha (gabadh – gabadh-dha with the meaning of ‘the girl’), the
consonant dh (a voiced retroflex plosive) has emerged as a result of the assimilation
of the consonant of the article -ta to the final consonant of the stem. In the adopted
system of writing, the dh of the article is omitted.
An important characteristic of Somali nouns is their incapacity to govern more
than one dependent noun. This noun is marked by the genitive case.
3
The phoneme sh is the result of the fusion between the final l of the stem and the consonant sound
of the article -ta.
12
0.3.4. The Somali verb is characterized by the inflectional categories of person,
number, tense, mood, and its morphology also marks the sentence type in which it
occurs (affirmative, interrogative, negative, etc). Conjugation by person (1st, 2nd and
3rd) and number (singular and plural) is mainly suffixal. The above-mentioned
attributive verbs make some plural forms by gemination:
wiil yar (a boy who is small) – wiilal yaryar (boys who are small),
or by a combination of gemination and suffixation:
wuu weynaa (he was big) – way waaweynaayeen (they were big).
Some linguists relate the Somali attributive verbs to the class of adjectives
which are used in combination with the verb ahaan – to be. Convincing arguments
disproving such a conclusion have been set out by Antinucci and Puglielli (1980).
Five archaic verbs (ahaan – to be, odhan – to say, iman – to come, aqoon – to
know, ooli – to be in a place) have a prefixal-suffixal conjugation (as in Semitic
languages).
There are seven tenses: present general, present progressive, past general, past
progressive, past habitual, past independent and future. The verbal forms of the past
habitual and future tenses are formed analytically, with the help of auxiliary verbs. In
some tenses the verb conjugation depends on the choice of a sentence particle and its
place in the sentence (see the corresponding sections of chapters 1, 2 and 3).
0.3.5. An important feature of the Somali syntax is a special category of
preverbs (u – to, towards, for, ku – in, on, at, to, into, by means of, ka – at, from,
away, out of, about, la – with, together with) which belong to the system of preverbal
13
particles and serve as conductors of the government from verb to objects. Their place
is fixed in regard to the predicate and other particles, which precede the verb, but not
in regard to other components of the sentence. This means that the position of the
preverb is determined by the verb and is in no way bound up with the place occupied
by the objects themselves.
As well as the preverbs in preposition to the verb, there are short subjective and
objective pronouns and adverbial particles. The use of objective pronouns is
obligatory if there are valencies for them. The absence of the object in a position
where it is syntactically necessary indicates the 3rd person singular or plural and is
expressed by a zero marker (more details about this will be given in connection with
the theory of the origin of the sentence particle baa4). There can be only one short
objective pronoun in preposition to the verb.
0.3.6. The numerous class of particles in Somali also includes sentence,
negative, interrogative and conjunctive ones. In connection with sentence particles
only the latter will be mentioned, as the types of sentences originated with the help of
negative and interrogative particles are not examined in this book.
The conjunctive particles (conjunctions) are always placed between
coordinated members with the exception of the enclitic conjunctions ee – and (in a
certain context), na – and, se – but, and. The subordinate conjunctions maxaa yeelay
and waayo, with the meaning of ‘because’, as well as hase yeeshee (variants: hase
yeelee and hase ahaate) – ‘but’, link only full independent sentences.
4
From now on, the abbreviation SP will replace the term ‘sentence particle’ in combination with
waa, baa (ayaa) and waxaa.
14
The copulative conjunction iyo – ‘and’ only connects nouns (wiil iyo gabadh –
a boy and a girl; shan iyo toban – five and ten, i.e. fifteen).
The conjunction ama – ‘or’ can link nouns:
(3) Guriga ama xafiiska kaalay – Come home or to the office.
The complex conjunction ama…ama – ‘either…or’ can connect verbs:
(4) Ama tag ama joog – Either go away or stay
and nouns:
(5) Ama lacag ama dehab – Either money or gold.
The conjunction oo – ‘and’ can link verbs:
(6) Way maqleen oo garteen – They heard and understood
while the conjunctions oo and ee link homogeneous attributes, oo being used with
indefinite and ee with definite nouns: Faras qurxoon oo orod dheer – A beautiful
(and) fast horse; Faraskii sarkaalka ee weynaa – The big horse of the officer (lit.: the
horse of the officer and big). The conjunctions na, se – ‘and’, ‘but’ can occupy any
place in a sentence and often adjoins a sentence particle.
0.3.7. There are three series of personal pronouns: full emphatic (aniga – I,
adiga – you sing., isaga /asaga, usaga in some dialects/ – he, iyada – she, annaga –
we excl., innaga – we incl., idinka – you pl., iyaga/ayaga – they); clipped emphatic
(ani – I, adi – you sing., etc.) and short subjective (aan – I, aad – you sing., uu – he,
ay – she, aan/nu – we excl., aynu – we incl., aad /variant aydin/ – you pl., ay – they).
The pronouns can take all cases except the vocative. The nominative case marker of
the emphatic pronouns is the morpheme -u, which is always optional. The full
15
emphatic pronouns can play the roles of the subject and object of the predicate of the
main clause. They adjoin the definite article, and follow the general rules for nouns.
If a short subjective pronoun is present in the main clause it usually
immediately follows a sentence particle. The functions of the subjective pronouns
and the rules of their combination with the sentence particles are investigated in detail
in the main part of this work.
The preverbal markers of the object are the short objective pronouns (i – me,
ku – you, thee, na – us excl., ina – us incl., idin – you pl., is – self) and the so-called
second objective pronouns, whose role is played by the possessive pronouns without
articles (kay – my, kaa – your sing., kayo – our excl., keen – our incl., and kiin – your
pl.) When a certain object is designated the presence of the corresponding short
pronoun is obligatory. In the Maxaad-tiri dialects the 3rd person, both singular and
plural, of the short objective pronouns is expressed by a zero marker. The short
objective (non-zero) pronouns exclude each other by one and the same verb. Where it
is necessary to designate two objects simultaneously the second set of objective
pronouns is used:
(7) Wuu iiga (i+u +ka) kaa warramay – He told me about you (sing.) [lit.:
yours].
The same thought can be expressed with the help of the full (emphatic)
pronouns: Wuxuu aniga iiga warramay adiga. However, it must be noted that this
introduces an amendment to the rule about the compulsory supplementing of any
explicitly expressed objects with the corresponding short objective pronouns: here the
second full pronoun adiga – ‘you’ is not supplemented with the corresponding short
16
one, because ku – ‘you’ is incompatible with i – me).5 The short objective pronouns
belong to the system of preverbal particles which determines their place in the
sentence.
0.3.8. A sentence particle together with the indefinite personal pronoun la –
‘one’, ‘someone’ forms a construction which corresponds to the passive voice in
other languages.
(8) Geelii waa la xaday – The camels were stolen [lit.: Somebody stole the
camels]. Here the pronoun la is the subject and is identical to the 3rd person masculine
singular.
0.3.9. The pronoun ay – ‘she’, in the meaning of the impersonal subject, can be
attributed to the short subjective pronouns:
(9) Waa [ay] tahay – All right [lit.: She is].
The pronoun ay is used mainly with the sentence particles waa and waxaa. In
constructions with waa it is dropped even if it is the only representative of the
subject, as in example (9), and not
(10) *Way tahay.6
In combination with the SP waxaa it conforms to the rules concerning the use
of the subject pronouns with this sentence particle (see chapter 3):
(11) Waxaa jirta in Golaha Ammaanka ee UQM uu ka kooban yahay xubno
joogto ah iyo kuwo ku-meel-gaar ah – The fact [lit.: She] is that the UN Security
5
See 0.3.5.
6
An asterisk before an example means that it violates a certain grammatical rule and therefore is
not correct; an asterisk before a word means that it is not used in contemporary Somali.
17
Council consists of permanent and non-permanent members;
(12) Taasuna waxay [waxaa + ay] tahay in dad badan oo Soomaali ahi ay ka
guureen dalkooda – So it [lit.: she] is that many Somalis have left their country.
It is necessary to add that sometimes ay is substituted by the pronoun uu – ‘he’
or the homonymic ay with the meaning of ‘they’ (for example Waa [uu] yahay, with
the same meaning as in 9).
0.3.10. On the whole, the order of words in an independent simple affirmative
sentence in Somali is defined by the placing of the following main components, of
which the first two are obligatory:
1) A verb (more exactly, a predicate in general) with preceding particles;
2) A sentence particle;
3) Nouns (a subject and objects, including objects in the role of an adverbial
modifier of place, manner etc.) followed by their attributes;
4) Adverbial modifiers of time;
5) A short subjective pronoun.
It should be noted, however, that
a) the sentence particle always precedes the predicate7;
b) the subjective pronoun almost always precedes the predicate and always
follows the sentence particle, often immediately;
c) in the framework of the above-stated rules, nouns and adverbial modifiers
can in practice occupy almost any place in regard to other components and each other
7
There is an exceptional case of the usage of the SP weeye in a compound nominal predicate (see
the chapter about the SP waa).
18
(Zholkovsky, 1966, pp.143-144).
Within the limits of the above-mentioned rules, the order of words depends on
the choice of sentence particle, the placement rules of which are described in the
corresponding sections of the book.
0.3.11. The predicate agrees with the subject in gender, person and number, but
not every form distinguishes all these categories. Only the forms of the 3 rd person
singular are opposed by gender (masculine and feminine). It is true that Bell (1953)
considers that in the plural there are also verbal forms of both masculine and
feminine gender. The latter, in his opinion, are generated by conjugation of the verbs,
the subjects of which are plural feminine nouns differing from the corresponding
masculine singular forms either by tone (when undefined) or by an article:
awr-ka (burden camel) – awr-ta (burden camels);
dibi-ga (ox) – dibi-da (oxen);
orgi-ga (he-goat) – orgi-da (he-goats);
carab-ka (Arab) – carab-ta (Arabs).
Besides this small group there are feminine plural nouns which are normally
used in the singular:
marti-da – guests;
Soomaali-da – Somalis;
Xabashi-da – Ethiopians etc. and also the plural forms of some nouns
borrowed from Arabic:
nijaar-ka (carpenter) – nijaariin-ta (carpenters);
19
askari-ga (soldier) – askar-ta (soldiers) and others.
Nevertheless, in all the cases given above the derivation of the verbs results in
forms identical to those which emerge when the subjects are expressed by the
feminine nouns in the singular.
Thus verbs in the plural mainly tie up with plural nouns, and verbs in the
singular of the corresponding gender, with singular nouns. The regular exclusions are
connected to the use of the SPs baa and waxaa.
Depending on the role of the subject in the sentence (whether it is the rheme or
not), there are two types of agreement of subject with predicate: “complete” (type I)
and “clipped” or “restricted” (type II).
Type I is characterized by the maximum distinction of all categories in all
forms (persons, genders, numbers, modalities). It occurs when the logical accent is
not placed on the subject (i.e. when the sentence contains the SP waa or when the SP
baa or waxaa joins a short subjective pronoun).
Type II does not distinguish numbers in the forms of the 3 rd person of the usual
verbs and singular persons of the attributive verbs (apart from the 3rd person feminine
in any of the Past Tenses). It is used when the verb agrees with the subject of the
main clause which is stressed by the SP baa (ayaa, yaa) or waxaa (i.e. when a
sentence contains the SP baa or waxaa without a short subjective pronoun).
0.4. Sentence particles and the focus system in the Somali language.
The sentence particles from the paradigm of waa (variant – aa), baa (variants –
ayaa/yaa/aa) and waxaa, by means of which the focus system in the overwhelming
20
majority of Somali dialects is realized, is investigated in this work. Focus (in other
terminologies rheme, comment) plays an important role in Somali grammar. It is
understood as a component of the actual division of the sentence which contains new
information about the theme (topic), that is the initial point of the message or,
according to Mathesius (1939), “the starting point of the utterance”.
However, I am aware of the vulnerability of the notion that a theme does not
contain any novelty but is only “a binding link” between the sentence and the context.
As has been shown in the works of Russian and other linguists, information is created
by the dynamic combination of the theme and the rheme, i.e. by the proposition as a
whole (Krušel’nickaya, 1956; Halliday, 1970; Nikolayeva, 1978; Ševlyakova, 1980;
Padučeva, 1988).
According to Chafe (1976), the old information (‘given’) becomes apparent in
a weaker and more softened form than the new (‘new’). In addition, a certain unit can
be given or can be new, depending on whether the speaker thinks that it is present in
the consciousness of the listener at the moment of the utterance of the sentence. The
works of the representatives of the Czech school (Fibras, 1966 et al.) have
investigated the notion of communicative dynamism, the lower degree of which is
inherent in the given and the higher degree in the new.
While I am well aware that fruitful results can be obtained from a many-sided
approach to investigating the problems of focus, I consider it necessary to
concentrate, at the present stage of Somali language studies, on the immediate task,
that is the elucidation of the surface manifestations of the mechanism of rheme-
21
making. This task is worked out through two interrelated plans: synchrony (on the
material of non- clichéized sentences) and diachrony (on the material of proverbial
structures).
0.4.1.The presence of a sentence particle in practically every independent
simple affirmative sentence is a distinguishing feature of the Somali syntax. The
sentence particle predicatises the sentence, which would otherwise turn into an
attributive construction, and places a logical accent on one of its members:
(13) Ninkii yimid – The man who came, but
(14) Ninkii waa yiimid – The man came or
(15) Ninkii baa yimid – The man came or
(16) Waxaa yimid nin – A man came.
The meaning of what is said here is that in Somali the so-called actual division
of the sentence is grammatically obligatory, is expressed by a special particle and is
inseparable from the predication itself.
The predicative SP waa makes the verb (the predicate) into the rheme. The
nominative baa and waxaa (each in its own way) attract attention to every dependent
member of the first rank (DFR) – subject, objects or adverbial modifiers of time,
manner etc.
Thus the sentence particle in Somali realizes several types of focus:
predicative, agent- and patient-actantial, and circumstantial.
In some sentences it is possible to use two particles: baa (ayaa) and waxaa.
The combination of the SP waa with baa or waxaa is prohibited.
In some texts, especially the folkloristic ones often used in this investigation,
22
one may come across phrases which seem to refute this postulate:
(17) Cigaal Shiidaad waa fuley baad barateen – You have learnt [that] Igal
Shidad is a coward.
But here the compatibility of the sentence particles waa and baa (used with the
short subjective pronoun of the 2nd person singular aad) is imaginary. The first part of
the sentence (Cigaal Shiidaad waa fuley), which has the shape of an independent
syntagm and for this reason contains a sentence particle, plays the role of an object
which is here stressed by baa – the single sentence particle of the whole sentence.
(18) Waxaad u baratay waa baaskaa – What will ruin you is what you have
got accustomed to [lit.: The thing to which you have got accustomed will ruin you].
(Proverb)
This proverb contains only one sentence particle – waa. As for the lexeme
waxaad, which coincides in form with the sentence particle used with the short
subjective pronoun of the 2nd person singular aad (waxaa + aad = waxaad), it can be
seen from the literal translation that it consists of the word wax, which means ‘a
thing’ and the same short subjective pronoun (wax + aad = waxaad).
(19) Waxaan daacad ahayni dib bay ka xumaadaan – He who acts
treacherously harms himself [lit.: What is not honest harms itself]. (Proverb)
In this proverb the form waxaan, which looks like the SP waxaa together with
the short subjective pronoun of the 1st person singular aan (waxaa + aan = waxaan),
creates the illusion of the presence of the two sentence particles waxaa and baa, the
latter adjoining the short subjective pronoun of the 3rd person plural ay (baa + ay =
23
bay). But in fact baa is the single sentence particle here, while waxaan presents a
synthesis of the word wax from the previous example used as the plural (things) and
the negative particle aan (wax + aan = waxaan – the things which are not). It is also
necessary to take into account that the sentence particles baa and waxaa follow each
other in this order when they are used in the same sentence.
Sentence particles always precede the predicate, waa precedes it immediately.
0.4.2. Another focus system is found in the May and Digil dialects; it is
characterized by the absence of verb focusing (and correspondingly the SP waa) and
by the non-combinability of the SP baa and its variants ba, iyaa, aya, ya and others
with short subjective pronouns.
The dialects of the Ashraf group (Shingaani, Merka, Gendershi) use sentence
particles differently from the Maxaad-tiri dialects.
They are also absent in some affirmative sentences using archaic grammatical
(verbal) forms, mainly in proverbs.
In the opinion of Cushitologists (Andrzejewski, 1975; Banti, 1984; Saeed,
1984; Tosco, 1996; Orwin, 1997 and others) the focus system in Somali fulfils the
same syntactic function as the cleft constructions in other Afrasian languages of the
Horn of Africa. But as was pointed out by Griefenow-Mewis (1998), in the Oromo
language there are at least two “optional” focus markers (one for the subject, the
other for the predicate) as well as the emphatic particle uma, which tends to turn into
a focus marker for an object. Forms of expressing focus which resemble those in
Somali have been observed in some West African languages, in particular in Songai
(Vinogradov, 1977).
24
0.4.3. In my dissertation I called waa, baa (ayaa) and waxaa ‘phrase particles’.
This term had been introduced by the pioneer of Somali studies in Russia,
Zholkovsky (1971). It is also used by the German Cushitologist Griefenow-Mewis
(El-Solami-Mewis, 1987). Giorgio Banti suggested that I substitute ‘phrase particles’
by ‘sentence particles’, which I did. This term had already been applied by Mohamed
Haji Rabi in his paper at the 8th Congress of the Somali Studies International
Association, held in Hargeisa in 2001.8
Other western specialists in the Somali language use the terms ‘indicator’
(Bell, 1953), ‘indicator particles’ (Andrzejewski, 1956, 1964; Antinucci and Puglielli,
1980), ‘focus particles’ (Lamberti, 1983), ‘focus markers’ (Heine and Reh, 1983;
Tosco, 1993) and ‘classifiers’ (Saeed, 1984). Griefenow-Mewis proposes the
differentiation of ‘focus markers’ (which she equates with sentence particles) from
‘focus particles’. In her opinion, the first fulfils a mainly grammatical function, the
second a lexical one.
0.4.4. In the majority of Somali dialects (Maxaad-tiri and others) the
development of the system of focus with the usage of the SP baa and its variants
Lamberti explains by the absence from the preverbal particles of the short
objective pronouns of the 3rd person singular and plural. In the dialects which
have the full set of these pronouns there is no SP baa.
Indeed, examples of the usage of a) the SP waa with, let us say, the short
subjective pronoun uu – ‘he’ and b) the short objective pronouns which fulfil the
8
Mohamed Haji Rabi. Somali Syntax: Some Common Features. This article was published in ‘War
Destroys, Peace Nurtures’, Lawrenceville, 2004.
25
function of the direct and indirect objects, result in the following meanings:
(20) Wuu i arkay – He saw me;
Wuu i siiyey – He gave (it) to me;
(21) Wuu ku arkay – He saw you (sing.);
Wuu ku siiyey – He gave (it) to you (sing.);
(22) Wuu arkay – He saw (it/ him/ her/ them);
Wuu siiyey – He gave (it) to (him/ her/ them);
(23) Wuu na arkay – He saw us (excl.);
Wuu na siiyey – He gave (it) to us (excl.);
(24) Wuu ina arkay – He saw us (incl.);
Wuu ina siiyey – He gave (it) to us (incl.);
(25) Wuu idin arkay – He saw you (pl.);
Wuu idin siiyey – He gave (it) to you (pl.).
Naturally in all these sentences the logical accent is placed on the predicate.
When the sentence particle is used it cannot turn the object into the rheme even with
the help of the emphatic pronouns (see 0.3.7), which in the role of objects are
obligatorily supplemented with short objective pronouns (with the exception of
pronouns of the 3rd person singular and plural), and therefore are not necessary
elements of the verbal constructions. However, the pronouns isaga, iyada and iyaga
help to differentiate the objects of the 3 rd person masculine and feminine singular
from the 3rd person plural:9
9
According to Bell, the pronoun iyada means the 3rd person feminine singular and plural, and iyaga
the 3rd person masculine plural.
26
(26) Aniga wuu i arkay – He saw me;
Aniga wuu i siiyey – He gave (it) to me;
(27) Adiga wuu ku arkay – He saw you (sing.);
Adiga wuu ku siiyey – He gave (it) to you (sing.);
(28) Isaga wuu arkay – He saw him;
Isaga wuu siiyey – He gave (it) to him;
(29) Iyada wuu arkay – He saw her;
Iyada wuu siiyey – He gave (it) to her;
(30) Annaga wuu na arkay – He saw us (excl.);
Annaga wuu na siiyey – He gave (it) to us (excl.);
(31) Innaga wuu ina arkay – He saw us (incl.);
Innaga wuu ina siiyey – He gave (it) to us (incl.);
(32) Idinka wuu idin arkay – He saw you (pl.);
Idinka wuu idin siiyey – He gave (it) to you (pl.).
(33) Iyaga wuu arkay – He saw them;
Iyaga wuu siiyey – He gave (it) to them.
In the words of Lamberti (1983, p.106), in such syntactical structures “...it is
difficult to draw the hearer's attention to an element of the sentence other than the
verb. If its object pronoun has disappeared, as is the case for the 3 rd person in Somali,
then it is impossible.” Therefore the Maxaad-tiri and some other dialects needed “a
device which would allow them to draw the hearer's attention, if necessary, to a part
of the sentence expressed within the verbal complex by the pronoun ø ” (ibid., p.107).
27
The SP baa and its variants have become such a tool.
Without disputing what has been said about the short objective pronouns of the
3rd person and of the emphatic pronouns which make up for their absence, I have to
note, however, that this is equally true in regard to all other pronouns which play the
role of objects. As has been shown above, in waa structures it is also not possible to
make any of them the rheme.
It is true that Zorc and Issa (1990, p.79) give an example where the question
Yaa macallinka arkay? (Who saw the teacher?) is followed by the answer Aniga
waan arkay (It was I who saw); Adiga waad aragtay (It was you who saw) etc., that
is with the logical accent on the word (in this case the object, expressed by an
emphatic pronoun) which is followed by the SP waa (not baa) with the corresponding
short subjective pronouns. This, however, contradicts my own observations of the
speech performance of Somalis and published accounts by other researchers into the
Somali syntax. It seems that the natural answer to the question Yaa macallinka
arkay? would be Anigaa (aniga + baa) arkay (It was I who saw); Adigaa (adiga +
baa) arkay (It was you who saw) etc.
So the problem is settled by the SP baa (in this case in combination with the
subjective pronouns, the rules of usage of which are given in detail in the chapters
relating to each of the sentence particles) supplemented by emphatic pronouns:
(34) Aniga buu i arkay – He saw me;
Aniga buu i siiyey – He gave (it) to me;
(35) Adiga buu ku arkay – He saw you (sing.);
Adiga buu ku siiyey – He gave (it) to you (sing.);
28
(36) Isaga buu arkay – He saw him;
Isaga buu siiyey – He gave (it) to him;
(37) Iyada buu arkay – He saw her;
Iyada buu siiyey – He gave (it) to her;
(38) Annaga buu na arkay – He saw us (excl.);
Annaga buu na siiyey – He gave (it) to us (excl.);
(39) Innaga buu ina arkay – He saw us (incl.);
Innaga buu ina siiyey – He gave (it) to us (incl.);
(40) Idinka buu idin arkay – He saw you (pl.);
Idinka buu idin siiyey – He gave (it) to you (pl.).
(41) Iyaga buu arkay – He saw them;
Iyaga buu siiyey – He gave (it) to them.
It is obvious that the hypothesis connecting the origin of the SP baa with the
lack of the short subjective pronouns of the 3 rd person singular in the majority of
Somali dialects needs additional argumentation.
29
Chapter 1. The sentence particle waa
1.1. The functions of the particle waa
As was pointed out in 0.4.1, the SP waa predicatises the sentence and places
the logical accent on the predicate. In other words it turns the verb-predicate into the
logical predicate (rheme) underlining the new information about the logical subject
(theme) which it contains.
(42) Cabdi waa soo jeedaa – Abdi is awake;
(43) Inammadii waa yimaaddeen – The boys came.
1.2. The subject in a sentence with the SP waa
The logical subject (theme) in a Somali sentence is not obligatorily marked out.
In a construction with the SP waa, the word which plays the role of the logical
subject gravitates towards the beginning of the phrase. If it is a noun, as a rule it has a
definite article (the usage of waa assumes a previous acquaintance with the subject).
The subject is in the nominative case, which “marks” subjects which are not logical
predicates (rhemes)10 and almost always adjoins the morphological markers -u, -i (in
Present and Future Tenses) or -ii.11
(44) Geedkanu/i waa weyn yahay – This tree is big;
10
11
The subject which has the logical accent is in the absolutive (objective) case – see Banti (1984).
The same marker is also added to other DFRs in Past Tenses: Buuggii (= Buug-ga-ii) aad i siisey
waan akhristay – I have read the book you gave me.
30
(45) Awrkii waa dhintay – The camel [i.e. the camel about which something is
already known] has died.
For comparison:
46) *Awr waa dhintay – (A certain) camel has died, although this sentence can
be correct in, for example, such a “quantifier” context (Bell, 1953, p.26) as:
(47) Xoolaha, awr waa dhintay, saddex waa lumeen, inta kalese waa nabad
qabtaa – Of the stock, a camel has died, three are lost and the rest are healthy.
The definite article here marks the word xoolaha – ‘stock’ about which
something is known. But awr also does not mean ‘a certain (that is indefinite) camel’,
it means ‘one camel’. As has been rightly observed by Zholkovsky (1971, pp.13132), when quantities are meant, ‘one’ as well as ‘three’ are quite definite things.
The definite article in the waa structures is not joined to subjects represented
by proper names (being in fact nouns, they sometimes join articles: Ibraahimkii kale
– another Ibrahim; Peterkii kowaad – Peter the First):
(48) Ibraahim waa ku jecel yahay – Ibrahim loves you.
As for the morphological subject markers, they are joined to the article of the
subject, the short form of the possessive pronoun (if it is the last part of the subject),
or the last word of the subject group (even if it is a verb of the subordinate clause):
(49) Ninka iyo naagtu waa dirireen – The husband and wife have quarrelled;
(50) Ninka iyo naagtiisu waa kala tegeen – The husband and [lit.: his] wife
have divorced [lit.: have gone in different directions];
31
(51) Hashaad raadsaneysaani waa joogtaa – The she-camel you are looking
for is here.
1.3. The particle waa with short subjective pronouns
Like the other sentence particles waa can be used with short subjective
pronouns. They are joined to the particle waa, often merging with it and creating the
following series of forms:
Singular:
1st pers.
waa + aan = waan
2nd pers.
waa + aad = waad
3rd pers. masc.
waa + uu = wuu
3rd pers. fem.
waa + ay = way
Plural:
1st pers. (excl.)
waa + aan(nu)= waan(nu)
1st pers. (incl.)
waa + aynu = waynu
2nd pers.
waa + aydin = waydin
waa + aad = waad
3rd pers.
waa + ay = way
The short subjective pronouns mainly serve to clarify the relations between
subject and predicate, for example:
(52) Waa tegey may mean either ‘I went’ or ‘He went’, while
(53) Waa tegeysaa may be understood as ‘You (sing.) are leaving’ or as ‘She is
32
leaving’, because in waa structures in all tenses the regular verbs in Somali have
homonymic forms in the 1st person singular and 3rd person masculine singular, and
both regular and irregular verbs in the 2nd person singular and 3rd person feminine
singular. At the same time each of the following examples:
(54) Waan tegey,
(55) Wuu tegey,
(56) Waad tegeysaa,
(57) Way tegeysaa
has only one precise meaning, namely: I went, He went, You (sing.) are leaving and
She is leaving, respectively.
For example, in such a sentence as
(58) Cali waa arkay, it is not clear whether Cali (Ali) is the subject or object,
and therefore this sentence may mean ‘I/He saw Ali, or Ali saw (it)’, while
(59) Cali waan arkay and Cali wuu arkay can be understood only as ‘I saw
Ali’ and ‘Ali saw (it)’.
In the presence of a substantive subject a short subjective pronoun duplicates it,
acting as if it were a “surplus structure”:
(60) Sayid Maxamed taas wuu diidey – Said Mohamed refused it [lit.: Said
Mohamed he refused it].
In such cases a short subjective pronoun is usually omitted:
(61) Sayid Maxamed taas waa diidey.
However, the usage of the SP waa with a short subjective pronoun is almost
33
always optional.
1.3.1. The SP waa without a short subjective pronoun is used in the
constructions with the indefinite personal pronoun (subject) la (see 0.3.8):
(62) Wax kasta oo uu doonaba waa la siin jirey – He used to be given
everything he wanted.
1.4. The order of words in a sentence with the particle waa
The order of words in a sentence with the SP waa conforms in general to the
scheme designated in 0.3.10, with the peculiarity that waa, as a rule, immediately
precedes the verb:
(63) Dhul nin dhintey iyo nin noolba waa deeqaa – The earth is enough for the
dead and the living. (Proverb)
1.4.1. Between waa and the verb, short subjective pronouns (which usually
merge with it) can be placed, as well as the following:
1) The indefinite personal pronoun la and the preverbs (otherwise called the
markers of the prepositional government or – see 0.3.5), which cover only the most
general prepositional meanings (more concrete ones, for example ‘near’, ‘after’,
‘between’ etc. are expressed by possessive constructions combined with the
corresponding adverbial nouns):
(64) Waan u dhiibey – I handed (it) over (to him);
(65) Isaga way ku qososhaa – She laughs at him;
(66) Halkan way ka shaqeeyaan – They work here;
(67) Waannu la nimid – We (excl.) brought (it) [lit.: came with it].
34
2) Short objective pronouns:
(68) Waad i taqaannaan – You (pl.) know me;
(69) Wuu ku dhowraa – He respects you (sing.);
(70) Way na aragtay – She saw us (excl.);
(71) Way ina qabsadeen – They caught us (incl.);
(72) Waannu idin toosiney – We (excl.) woke you up;
(73) Waad is barateen – You got to know each other.
3) Possessive (or the second objective) pronouns kay – my, kaa – your (sing.),
kaya – our (excl.), keen – our (incl.) and kiin – your (pl.):
(74) Wuu kuu kay ammaanay – He praised me [lit.: my] to you (sing.);
(75) Wuu ii kaa ammaanay – He praised you (sing.) [lit.: your] to me;
(76) Wuu kuu kaya ammaanay – He praised us (excl.– lit.: our) to you (sing.);
(77) Wuu kuu keen ammaanay – He praised us (incl. – lit.: our) to you (sing.);
(78) Wuu ii kiin ammaanay – He praised you (pl.) [lit.: your] to me;
(79) Wuu idiin kay ammaanay – He praised me [lit.: my] to you (pl).12
4) The adverbial particles soo – in this direction, sii – in that direction, wada –
together, kala – separately:
(80) Way soo gashay guriga – She entered the house [in which the speaker was];
(81) Way sii gashay guriga – She entered the house [the speaker stayed
outside];
12
These examples have been taken from Warsama, Abraham (1951), with the exception of (76).
35
(82) Ergooyinkii way wada hadleen – The delegations negotiated (something)
[lit.: talked together];
(83) Geelu way kala dideen – The camels scattered.
5) Nouns with adverbial meaning without an article, i.e. ag – ‘near’, ‘beside’;
hoos – ‘under’; hor – ‘in front of’, ‘before’; dhex – ‘inside’, ‘between’ and others:
(84) Wuu i ag fadhiyaa – He is sitting beside me;
(85) Bahalku wuu ku hoos jirey dhulka – The animal was sitting under the earth;
(86) Way iga hor martay – She passed ahead of [lit.: in front of] me.
6) Nouns without an article which form stable combinations with a verb,
practically merging with it13, which is confirmed by the fact that it is impossible to
insert between them and the verb the conjunction na (or se), and by their incapacity,
in contrast to usual objects, to occupy other positions in a sentence:
(87) Waan ka qayb galay bannaanbaxii – I participated [lit.: entered part] in
the demonstration;
(88) Wuu na marti qaaday – He invited us (excl.) [lit.: took (as) guests];
(89) Way aqal gashay – She got married [lit.: entered a house].
7) Attributive combinations (subordinate constructions) which consist of nouns
and irregular verbs ahaan – ‘to be’, lahaan – ‘to have’ and la’aan – ‘not to have’:
hodon ahaan – to be wealthy, maskax lahaan – to be clever [lit.: to have brain], lacag
la’aan – not to have money etc. Bell interprets these constructions as adjectives
(attributive verbs, according to my terminology). But their double structure is a
13
In modern dictionaries (Zorc and Osman, 1993 and others) they are written together.
36
syntactic feature; when these verb-adjectives are transferred from the attributive role
(as nin hodon ah – a wealthy man) to the predicative one (90-92), the verbal part
behaves as an independent verb and the nominal part as a noun:
(90) Wuu hodon yahay – He is wealthy [lit.: he is a wealthy man];
(91) Wuu maskax leeyahay – He is clever [lit.: he has brain];
(92) Wuu lacag la’yahay – He has no money.
All the other variants are not correct:
(90a) *Hodon wuu yahay;
(90b) *Wuu yahay hodon;
(91a) *Maskax wuu leeyehay;
(91b) *Wuu leeyahay maskax;
(92a) *Lacag wuu la'yahay;
(92b) *Wuu la' yahay lacag.
It is worth noting that Zholkovsky (1971, p.205) speaks of the undesirability of
the usage of these compound forms with the SP waa which combines mainly with
intransitive verbs, turning them into the rheme. I agree that in the construction with
the SP baa these forms are more productive:
(93) Hodon buu yahay – He is a wealthy man.
But the examples given to confirm the thesis about the undesirability of the
usage of the attributive constructions (which the forms under observation in fact are)
with the SP waa, impose a ban on their usage in general. Thus in concert with others
the syntagm described in (77-79) is regarded as a mistake:
37
(94) Wuu gadh leeyahay – He has a beard.
This contradicts the data received from my informants and taken from the
published sources (see in particular Bell, 1953, p.81).
8) Attributive constructions consisting of a noun and an attributive verb
(usually wanaagsan/fiican – to be good, xun – to be bad, badan – to be numerous, yar
– to be small, dheer – to be long, gaaban – to be short etc.):
(95) Way maskax fiican tahay – She is clever [lit.: good brained];
(96) Wuu hadal xun yahay – He has a wicked tongue [lit.: is bad in speech];
(97) Faadumo way hadal badan tahay – Faduma is garrulous [lit.: of much talk];
(98) Wuu gacan yar yahay – He is greedy [lit.: small in hand];
(99) Haramcadku wuu orod dheer yahay – Cheetah runs quickly [lit.: is long in
running];
(100) Diinku wuu socod gaaban yahay – Turtle walks slowly [lit.: is short in
walking].
9) The conjunctions na and se, with the meaning ‘and’, ‘but’, whose place in
the sentence is not fixed. Being used with a sentence particle, they merge with it:
(101) Amarkii wuu heley, wuuse yeeli waayay – He received the order but
could not fulfil it.
10) Subordinate clauses in constructions with the SP waa and the conjunctive
substantive in, which is used for conveying the meaning of necessity. The verb of the
subordinate clause may be in either the indicative or conjunctive mood:
(102) Waa in aan iska tagaa (or tago) – I have to go.
Zholkovsky (1971, p.183) justly sees in the link waa in… the presence of the
38
impersonal subject (the pronoun) ay (see 0.3.9) and the verb ahaan – ‘to be’, which
reveal themselves when the situation is transferred into the past tense and the SP baa
or waxaa is introduced:
(103) Inaan iska tago bay ahayd (= Waxay ahayd inaan iska tago) – I had to go.
1.4.2. In the framework of the above-mentioned limitation (the SP waa
precedes the verb) the disposition of words can be different. For example, such a
sentence as
(104) Meel walba magaciisu waa gaari jirey – His name used to be known
everywhere, which has a subject, a predicate and an adverbial modifier of place, can
have the following variants:
(105) Magaciisu waa gaari jirey meel walba;
(106) Magaciisu meel walba waa gaari jirey;
(107) Meel walba waa gaari jirey magaciisu;
(108) Waa gaari jirey meel walba magaciisu;
(109) Waa gaari jirey magaciisu meel walba.
It must be noted that in all these versions the SP waa can join the short
subjective pronoun of the 3rd person masculine singular uu, and the subject retains the
morphological marker of the subject irrespective of where that subject is situated.
1.5. The particle waa and the agreement of the predicate with the subject
It has been noted in in 0.3.11 that if in a sentence there is the SP waa, the
predicate agrees with the subject according to the “complete” type I which is
39
characterized by the maximum distinction between all categories in all forms (person,
gender and number). Let us illustrate this with the example of the conjugations of the
verbs of the three main classes (keen – bring, samee – make and qabo – take), the
attributive verb baahan – ‘be hungry’ and the irregular verb lahaan – ‘to have’ in the
Present General and Past General tenses, using full (emphatic) pronouns as the
subjects:
Present General Tense
Anigu waan keenaa/ sameeyaa/ qabtaa – I bring/ make/ take
Adigu waad keentaa/ sameysaa/ qabataa – You (sing.) bring/ make/ take
Isagu wuu keenaa/ sameeyaa/ qabtaa – He brings/ makes/ takes
Iyadu way keentaa/ sameysaa/ qabataa – She brings/ makes/ takes
Annagu waannu keennaa/ sameynaa/ qabannaa – We (excl.) bring/ make/ take
Innagu waynu keennaa/ sameynaa/ qabannaa – We (incl.) bring/ make/ take
Idinku waad keentaan/ sameysaan/ qabataan – You (pl.) bring/ make/ take
Iyagu way keenaan/ sameeyaan/ qabtaan – They bring/ make/ take
Anigu waan baahan ahay/ leeyahay – I am hungry/ have
Adigu waad baahan tahay/ leedahay – You (sing.) are hungry/ have
Isagu wuu baahan yahay/ leeyahay – He is hungry / has
Iyadu way baahan tahay/ leedahay – She is hungry/ has
Annagu waannu baahan nahay/ leenahay – We (excl.) are hungry/ have
Innagu waynu baahan nahay/ leenahay – We (incl.) are hungry /have
40
Idinku waad baahan tihiin/ leedihiin – You (pl.) are hungry/ have
Iyagu way baahan yihiin/ leeyihiin – They are hungry/have
Past General Tense14
Anigu waan keenay/ sameeyey/ qabtay – I brought/ made/ took
Adigu waad keentay/ sameysey/ qabatay – You (sing.) brought/ made/ took
Isagu wuu keenay/ sameeyey/ qabtay – He brought/ made/ took
Iyadu way keentay/ sameysey/ qabatay – She brought/ made/ took
Annagu waannu keennay/sameynay/qabannay – We (excl.) brought/made/took
Innagu waynu keennay/ sameynay/ qabannay – We (incl.) brought/ made/ took
Idinku waad keenteen/ sameyseen/ qabateen – You (pl.) brought/ made/ took
Iyagu way keeneen/ sameeyeen/ qabteen – They brought/ made/ took
Anigu waan baahnaa/ lahaa – I was hungry/ had
Adigu waad baahnayd/ lahayd – You (sing.) was hungry/ had
Isagu wuu baahnaa/ lahaa – He was hungry/ had
Iyadu way baahnayd/ lahayd – She was hungry/ had
Annagu waannu baahnayn/ lahayn – We (excl.) were hungry/ had
Innagu waynu baahnayn/ lahayn – We (incl.) were hungry/ had
Idinku waad baahnaadeen/ lahaydeen – You (pl.) were hungry/ had
Iyagu way baahnaayeen/ lahaayeen – They were hungry/ had
14
In Somali there are no perfect forms, therefore waan sameeyey may mean 'I made' and 'I have
made'.
41
It is easy to see that in sentences with the SP waa the pronouns agree in
accordance with their person, number and gender. In present and past tenses (as well
as in all others) the forms of the verbs distinguish five of the eight persons, with the
coincidence of the forms of the 1st person singular and the 3rd person masculine
singular, the 2nd person singular and the 3rd person feminine singular, and the 1st
person plural both exclusive and inclusive. As has already been said, in the absence
of the subjects expressed by substantives, short subjective pronouns are used to
distinguish them. Verbs in the form of the 3rd person singular are distinguished by
gender.
In connection with the description in subsequent chapters of the “clipped” II
type of agreement between predicate and subject in sentences with the particles baa
and waxaa, it is necessary to pay attention to the ending -aa (a long vowel) of the
usual verbs; to their suffixes in the 2nd person singular; to the expanding into a
construction with the verb ahaan – ‘to be’ of the attributive verb in the Present
General, and to the personal forms of the verb lahaan – ‘to be’ in present and past
tenses.
1.6. Waa as a particle introducing a nominal predicate
The SP waa can introduce a nominal predicate, usually preceding it
immediately:
(110) Waa faras – This (is) a horse;
(111) Tani waa geenyo – This (is) a mare;
42
(112) Ninkaasu waa beerale – That man (is) a farmer;
(113) Waa inoo berri – See you tomorrow [lit.: Here (is) tomorrow for us (incl.)].
1.6.1. A noun in the function of a predicate can adjoin a definite article (it is
usually followed by a relative clause):
(114) Waa ardaygii uu ammaanay – This (is) the student he praised.
1.6.2. In such constructions with waa the short subjective pronoun is not used,
even if it is the only manifestation of the subject. The following, for example, is not
correct:
(115) *Wuu xiddigiye – He (is) an astrologer (despite the fact that the correct
construction, waa xiddigiye, may also mean that an astrologer is in the lst person
singular or the 3rd person masculine singular).
1.6.3. Zholkovsky (1971, p.186) regards waa in this role as a special word
homonymic to the SP waa, being one of the realizations of the Somali verb ahaan –
to be. The advantage of such an approach lies in the fact that it does not need a
special description of the forms weeye and weeyaan considered as variants of waa
and fulfilling the same functions. But if this approach is accepted, it becomes
necessary to introduce a special particle homonymic to the SP baa which can also be
used to form constructions with a nominal predicate, a fact not mentioned by
Zholkovsky in his work on the Somali syntax.
It should be noted that one of the variants of weeye or weeyey is the form
waaye, which could be acknowledged as a link in the chain of the evolution of waa
yahay – yes, fine [lit.: here it is] → waaye → waa (Sayeed, 1984).
43
1.6.4. In contrast to waa, the particle weeye (and its variants waaye and
weeyaan) always follows the nominal part of the compound predicate:
(116) Doqon weeye (waaye, weeyaan) – He (is) a fool.
1.7. Sentences without the particle waa
The SP waa is omitted:
1) In the rather rare cases where the subjective pronoun immediately follows
the verb:
(117) Waa aan soo noqday = Soo noqday aan – I returned here.
2) When a predicate is in the form of the archaic Past Independent Tense:15
(118) Ninkii xoolihii laga xad – The stock of this man was stolen.
More details about the absence of the SP waa (as well as baa) in sentences can
be found in the chapter on proverbial clichés.
15
Zholkovsky (1971) calls this the Past Short Tense.
44
Chapter 2. The sentence particle baa
2.1. The functions of the particle baa
As well as the predicatising function which it has in common with all other
sentence particles, the SP baa (in some dialects ayaa/yaa/aa)16 realizes the actantial
and circumstantial focuses. Riveting the attention on a subject, an object or any other
DFR which in Somali is expressed by a noun (personal names and emphatic pronouns
are also nouns, as they can be used with definite articles), the SP baa turns that
member of the above set which it immediately follows into the rheme. Being marked
by baa it becomes the logical acme of an utterance, as it were:
(119) Náag báa nín aragtáy – A woman saw a man;
(120) Nín báa naagi aragtay – A woman saw a man;
(121) Béri báa nín iyo naagi abeesó arkeen – One day a man and a woman saw
a snake.
2.1.1. The place of the SP baa in an affirmative sentence is defined by the
following rules:
1) It immediately follows the word it emphasises;
2) It always precedes a predicate.
But since, as was noted in 0.3.10, nouns and adverbial modifiers can occupy
almost any place in regard to each other, the SP baa can in practice stand in any place
16
Because the SPs ayaa and baa can freely substitute each other in all contexts, the patterns of the
usage of ayaa are investigated only in exceptional cases, in particular in chapter 3.
45
to the left of the verb.
2.2. Case and tone in a sentence with the particle baa
It was mentioned in 0.3.3. that cases and prosodic decoration (“packing”) of
the components of an utterance depend on the choice of sentence particle and its
attitude towards them. In the case of baa two situations are distinguished:
1) The logical accent coincides with the subject of the sentence (119) and
2) The logical accent does not coincide with the subject of the sentence (120
and 121).
In the first case (119) the subject (náag) is in the oblique (objective) case,
indicated by high tone, while in the second (120) it is in the nominative, indicated by
low, non-marked, tone and the special morphological marker -i (naagi). In the
example (121), which is a particular realization of the general case (120), its subject
consists of two nouns connected by1 the copulative conjunction iyo – and; the first
noun (nin – a man) is in the oblique case, while the second (naagi – a woman)
accepts all the exponents of the subjective case.
As for the objects (nín – ‘a man’ in the first and second examples and abeesó –
‘a snake’ in the third, which also includes the adverbial modifier béri – ‘one day’)
these are in the general oblique (objective) case irrespective of whether or not they
bear the logical accent, i.e. whether or not they are followed by the SP baa.
46
2.3. The particle baa with short subjective pronouns
The SP baa is used either on its own or in combination with a short subjective
pronoun, depending upon the presence or absence of the substantive object in a
sentence. If there is a substantive subject, baa may be used either with or without a
short subjective pronoun, but if there is no substantive subject, it may be used only
with such a pronoun:
(122) Muus buu ninkii cunay – A man ate a banana, or
(123) Muus baa ninkii cunay – with the same meaning, but
(124) Muus buu cunay – He ate a banana.
In sentences with the indefinite personal pronoun la, the SP baa and all other
sentence particles are used without short subjective pronouns:
(125) Awr baa la dabray – A burden camel was hobbled [lit.: Somebody
hobbled a burden camel].
2.3.1 The short subjective pronouns combine with baa, making the following
series of forms:
Singular:
1st pers.
baa + aan = baan
2nd pers.
baa + aad = baad
3rd pers. masc.
baa + uu = buu
3rd pers. fem.
baa + ay = bay
Plural:
1st pers. (excl.)
baa + aan(nu)= baan(nu)
47
1st pers. (incl.)
baa + aynu = baynu
2nd pers.
baa + aydin = baydin
baa + aad = baad
3rd pers.
baa + ay = bay
The SP baa serves to place the logical accent on the marked-out member of a
sentence, while the short subjective pronouns clarify the relation between subject and
predicate. The usage of the SP baa with and without the short subjective pronouns
has some peculiarities.
2.3.2. As was partially shown in 2.1, the SP baa without a short subjective
pronoun turns any one of categories a), b) or c) below into the rheme of a sentence:
a) the subject (or subjective group):
(126) Awr baa dhintey – A burden camel has died;
(127) Libaaxii aan dhaawacay baa cararay – The lion I wounded ran away;
b) a direct or indirect object:
(128) Maskii baa naagtii dishey – The woman killed a snake;
(129) Faarax baa Cali ku dhuftay ul – Ali hit Farah with a stick;
(130) Ul baa Cali ku dhuftay Faarax – Ali hit Farah with a stick;
c) an adverbial modifier:
(131) Berri baa walaalkay iman doonaa – My brother will come tomorrow.
It is evident that in the example (128) naagtii – ‘the woman’ is the subject and
maskii – ‘the snake’ the object, because the verb conjugates in the feminine gender
and naagtii is the sole feminine noun here. But the example (129) can be understood
48
as ‘It was Farah whom Ali hit with a stick’ and ‘It was Farah who hit Ali with a
stick’, since there are two nouns of the 3rd person masculine singular (Cali and
Faarax) and one noun (ul – a stick) of the 3rd person feminine singular. The form of
the predicate indicates that the subject is one of the masculine nouns, Cali or Faarax,
and the situation can be made clear by the intonation of the speaker.
(132) Fáarax báa Cáli ku dhuftáy úl – It was Farah who hit Ali with a stick;
(133) Fáarax báa Cali ku dhuftay ul – It was Farah whom Ali hit with a stick.17
Moreover if the subject is expressed not by a proper name, as in the last
examples, but by another noun with an article or a demonstrative pronoun (-kan/tan –
this, these and -kaas/taas, -keer/teer, -koo/too – that, those), or if it is followed by an
adjective (an attributive verb), or is represented by a feminine noun without an article
which ends in a consonant, it can adjoin special morphological marks which help to
distinguish it from the object18:
(134) Awrka baa orgigu raacaa – The he-goat (always) follows the camel;
(135) Libaaxaas baa ninkani diley – This man has killed that lion;
(136) Nin xoog leh baa nin tabar yari legday – A weak man fought down a
strong one;
17
As was noted in 0.3.1 the Somali system of writing does not use diacritical marks, hence the
ambivalence of sentences like these and of structures which include words which differ only by
tone, e.g. Inan buu dhalay – A boy was born to him/A girl was born to him [lit: He gave birth to a
boy/girl].
18
A short but pithy article on this subject was written by Banti (1984).
49
(137) Maalin maalmaha ka mid ah gabadh baa islaani la kulantay – Once
upon a time an old woman met a girl.
A subject stressed by the SP baa does not adjoin morphological markers
because it is not in the nominative case (see 2.2):
(138) *Ninkani baa libaaxaas diley – This man killed that lion.
It should be noted that the examples (128-131) and (134-137) disprove the
assertion of Heine and Reh (1983, p.28) that “the usage of a subjective pronoun
becomes obligatory if a noun followed by the focus marker is not the subject of the
sentence”. The cases of the obligatory usage of the short subjective pronouns with the
SP baa will be described below; here I shall only stress that they help to distinguish a
subject from an object:
(139) Cali Faarax buu ku dhuftay ul – this has only one meaning, namely ‘It
was Farah whom Ali hit with a stick’.
2.4. The order of words in a sentence with the particle baa
Let us examine, using several examples, the order of words in an independent
affirmative sentence with the SP baa without a short subjective pronoun. If there is a
subject in the 3rd person (singular or plural), an adverbial modifier of place and a
predicate (for instance, ‘Ahmed came from Mogadishu’), the following variants are
possible:
(140) Axmed baa Muqdisho ka yimid – Ahmed came from Mogadishu;
(141) Axmed baa ka yimid Muqdisho – Ahmed came from Mogadishu;
(142) Muqdisho Axmed baa ka yimid – Ahmed came from Mogadishu;
50
(143) Muqdisho baa Axmed ka yimid – Ahmed came from Mogadishu.
In examples (140-142) the logical accent is placed on the subject, and in
example (143) it is on the modifier of place. If baa marks any other DFR besides a
subject, the order of words defined in (143) is the only one possible. The following,
for example, are prohibited:
(144) *Axmed Muqdishu baa ka yimid;
(145) *Muqdishu baa ka yimid Axmed.
Therefore, in a sentence with the SP baa without a short subjective pronoun,
the placement of the members of the sentence is defined by the following rules:
1) The subject cannot follow the predicate;
2) The order: subject/ another DFR/ baa is prohibited;
3) The order: another DFR/ baa/ subject is not desirable.
In practice the same rules function in cases where there are a larger number of
members, as here in the patterns of the realization of the sentence ‘Ali brought a book
for Farah’:19
(146) Cali baa u keenay Faarax buug;
(147) Cali baa u keenay buug Faarax;
(148) Cali baa buug u keenay Faarax;
(149) Cali baa buug Faarax u keenay;
(150) Cali baa Faarax buug u keenay;
19
In fact this is only one of the three possible interpretations of the meaning of this paradigm, the
other two being (depending on the logical accent) It was Ali who brought a book for Farah and
What Ali brought for Farah was a book.
51
(152) Cali baa Faarax u keenay buug;
(153) Faarax Cali baa buug u keenay;
(154) Faarax Cali baa u keenay buug;
(155) Faarax baa Cali u keenay buug;
(156) Faarax baa Cali buug u keenay;
(157) Faarax buug Cali baa u keenay;
(158) Faarax buug baa Cali u keenay;
(159) Buug Cali baa Faarax u keenay;
(160) Buug Cali baa u keenay Faarax;
(161) Buug baa Cali u keenay Faarax;
(162) Buug baa Cali Faarax u keenay;
(163) Buug Faarax Cali baa u keenay;
(164) Buug Faarax baa Cali u keenay.
Other variants, for example,
(165) *Cali Faarax baa u keenay buug;
(166) *Cali buug baa u keenay Faarax;
(166) *Cali Faarax buug baa u keenay;
(167) *Faarax buug baa u keenay Cali
are not possible due to the limitations mentioned above.
2.4.1. But if the subject of a sentence is the 1 st or 2nd person singular or plural,
i.e. the full emphatic pronouns aniga – I, annaga/innaga – we (excl./incl.), adiga –
you (sing.) and idinka – you (pl.), the SP baa without a short subjective pronoun can
follow only the subject. By replacing the subject Cali – Ali of the previous example
52
with the pronoun aniga – I, we get a lesser set of variants of the sentence with the
meaning ‘It was I who brought a book for Ali’:
(168) Aniga baa u keenay Faarax buug;
(169) Aniga baa u keenay buug Faarax;
(170) Aniga baa buug u keenay Faarax;
(171) Aniga baa buug Faarax u keenay;
(172) Aniga baa Faarax buug u keenay;
(173) Aniga baa Faarax u keenay buug,
(174) Faarax aniga baa buug u keenay;
(175) Faarax aniga baa u keenay buug;
(176) Faarax buug aniga baa u keenay;
(177) Buug aniga baa Faarax u keenay;
(178) Buug aniga baa u keenay Faarax;
(179) Buug Faarax aniga baa u keenay.
Any other order of words, including non-subject/ baa/ subject is not possible:
(180) *Faarax baa aniga u keenay buug;
(181) *Faarax baa aniga buug u keenay;
(182) *Faarax buug baa aniga u keenay;
(183) *Buug baa aniga u keenay Faarax;
(184) *Buug baa aniga Faarax u keenay;
(185) *Buug Faarax baa aniga u keenay.
2.4.2. It was stated above that the SP baa is also used with short subjective
53
pronouns; in this case the SP baa places the logical accent on any DFR which
immediately precedes it, and the pronouns themselves (-aan, -aad, -uu etc.) indicate
the subject of the utterance:
(186) Odeygu Laas Caanood buu tegay – The old man went to Las Anod;
(187) Kal hore bay la socotay adhigii Caasha – Asha pastured sheep and goats
last year;
(188) Lug baannu ku nimid – We (excl.) came on foot [lit.: with a foot];
(189) Wiilkii baa/bay walaashiis seexisey – The boy was put to bed by his sister;
(190) Maroodi baa beerta baabi’iyay – An elephant trampled down the field.
These examples demonstrate the main rules of the usage of the SP baa with a
short subjective pronoun, which becomes necessary in the following circumstances:
a) if the subject is followed by another (emphasised) DFR (186)
b) if the subject is placed behind the predicate (187);
c) if it is the single manifestation of the subject (188);
d) the SP baa may not adjoin a short subjective pronoun if it precedes a
substantive subject of the 3rd person singular or plural (189; cf. 154, 155, 157);
e) a short subjective pronoun is not used if the SP baa immediately follows the
subject (190), therefore the following sentence is not correct:
(191) *Maroodi buu beerta baabi’iyey – An elephant trampled down the field.
2.4.3. The order of words in a sentence with the SP baa and a short subjective
pronoun is defined by the above set of rules, and is exemplified here by the variants
of the realization in Somali of the sentence ‘Mohamed bought (for himself) a loaf of
54
bread’, which consists of a substantive subject of the 3 rd person, an object and a
predicate:
(192) Maxamed kimis buu soo iibsaday;
(193) Kimis buu Maxamed soo iibsaday;
(194) Kimis buu soo iibsaday Maxamed.
In the variants (192) and (194) the usage of the short subjective pronoun is
obligatory because otherwise rules a) and b) would be violated, and in the example
(193) the short subjective pronoun can be omitted. The variant below is impossible
due to the limitations indicated at the beginning of this paragraph:
(195) *Moxamed buu kimis soo iibsaday.
2.4.4. The placement order of the components of a sentence which has a
substantive subject of the 3rd person, a direct and an indirect object is as follows,
using ‘Ahmed bought a loaf for Faduma’ as the example:
(196) Axmed Faadumo buu kimis u soo iibiyey;
(197) Axmed Faadumo buu u soo iibiyey kimis;
(198) Axmed Faadumo kimis buu u soo iibiyey;
(199) Axmed kimis buu Faadumo u soo iibiyey;
(200) Axmed kimis buu u soo iibiyey Faadumo;
(201) Axmed kimis Faadumo buu u soo iibiyey;
(202) Faadumo buu Axmed u soo iibiyey kimis;
(203) Faadumo buu Axmed kimis u soo iibiyey;
(204) Faadumo buu kimis u soo iibiyey Axmed;
55
(205) Faadumo buu kimis Axmed u soo iibiyey;
(206) Faadumo buu u soo iibiyey Axmed kimis;
(207) Faadumo buu u soo iibiyey kimis Axmed;
(208) Faadumo kimis buu Axmed u soo iibiyey;
(209) Faadumo kimis buu u soo iibiyey Axmed;
(210) Faadumo Axmed kimis buu u soo iibiyey;
(211) Kimis buu Axmed u soo iibiyey Faadumo;
(212) Kimis buu Axmed Faadumo u soo iibiyey;
(213) Kimis buu Faadumo u soo iibiyey Axmed;
(214) Kimis buu Faadumo Axmed u soo iibiyey;
(215) Kimis buu u soo iibiyey Axmed Faadumo;
(216) Kimis buu u soo iibiyey Faadumo Axmed;
(217) Kimis Faadumo buu Axmed u soo iibiyey;
(218) Kimis Faadumo buu u soo iibiyey Axmed;
(219) Kimis Axmed Faadumo buu u soo iibiyey.
Of these great number of variants the most frequently used are those which
begin with the subject and in which the objects are divided by the sentence particle or
the predicate (196, 197, 199 and 200).
2.5. The particle baa and the agreement of the predicate with the subject
In 0.2.11 two types of agreement between the predicate and subject in a simple
affirmative sentence were presented: “complete” (type I) and “clipped” (type II). In
regard to the SP baa, the choice of agreement type depends upon which member of
56
the sentence it turns into the rheme. If this is an object, an adverbial modifier or any
other DFR except the subject, type I agreement is used. It is characterised by the
maximum differentiation of all categories in all forms: persons, genders and numbers
(0.3.11). But if the subject becomes the rheme (as was shown in 2.4, this happens
when the SP baa immediately follows the subject and does not adjoin short subjective
pronouns), then type II of the agreement is used. The deciphering of some of its
indications was given in 0.3.11.
2.5.1. The personal verbal forms in the “complete” type of agreement with the
participation of the SP baa follow the same pattern as those described in 1.5 for the
SP waa. To confirm this it will suffice to compare two sets of sentences which differ
only by the placement of the logical accent and correspondingly the type of sentence
particle.
(220) Shaqadii waan dhammeeyey – I finished the work,
Shaqadii baan dhammeeyey – I finished the work;
(221) Shaqadii waad dhammeysey – You (sing.) finished the work,
Shaqadii baad dhammeysey – You (sing.) finished the work;
(222) Shaqadii wuu dhammeeyey – He finished the work,
Shaqadii buu dhammeeyey – He finished the work;
(223) Shaqadii way dhammeysey – She finished the work,
Shaqadii bay dhammeysey – She finished the work;
(224) Shaqadii waannu dhammeyney – We (excl.) finished the work,
Shaqadii baannu dhammeyney – We (excl.) finished the work;
57
(225) Shaqadii waynu dhammeyney – We (incl.) finished the work,
Shaqadii baynu dhammeyney – We (incl.) finished the work;
(226) Shaqadii waad dhammeyseen – You (pl.) finished the work,
Shaqadii baad dhammeyseen – You (pl.) finished the work;
(227) Shaqadii way dhammeeyeen – They finished the work,
Shaqadii bay dhammeeyeen – They finished the work.
2.5.2. The conjugation of a verbal predicate in a sentence of which the rheme is
its subject (“clipped” type of conjugation), results in different forms. It is convenient
to demonstrate these with the example of the verbs of the three main classes (keen –
bring, samee – make and qabo – hold), the attributive verb baahan – ‘be hungry’ and
the irregular verb lahaan – ‘to have’, in the Present General and Past General Tenses,
using full (emphatic) pronouns as the subjects:
Present General Tense
Aniga baa20 keená/ sameeyá/ qabtá – It is I who bring/ make/ take
Adiga baa keená/ sameeyá/ qabtá – It is you (sing.) who bring/ make/ take
Isaga baa keená/ sameeyá/ qabtá – It is he who brings/ makes/ takes
Iyada baa keentá/ sameysá/ qabatá – It is she who brings/ makes/ takes
Annaga baa keenná/ sameyná/ qabanná – It is we (excl.) who bring/make/take
20
In oral communication the SP baa usually merges with the preceding emphatic pronouns, making
the forms anigaa, adigaa, isagaa, iyadaa, annagaa, innagaa, idinkaa and iyagaa. It is appropriate
to remind the reader that in the position before the SP baa, the subjects, including those which are
expressed by the emphatic pronouns, do not assume case suffixes (morphological markers)].
58
Innaga baa keenná/ sameyná/ qabanná – It is we (incl.) who bring/ make/ take
Idinka baa keená/ sameeyá/ qabtá – It is you (pl.) who bring/ make/ take
Iyaga baa keená/ sameeyá/ qabtá – It is they who bring/ make/ take
Aniga baa baahan/ leh – It is I who am hungry/ have
Adiga baa baahan/ leh – It is you (sing.) who is hungry/ have
Isaga baa baahan/ leh – It is he who is hungry/ has
Iyada baa baahan/ leh – It is she who is hungry/ has
Annaga baa baahan/ leh – It is we (excl.) who are hungry/ have
Innaga baa baahan/ leh – It is we (incl.) who are hungry/ have
Idinka baa baahan/ leh – It is you (pl.) who are hungry/ have
Iyaga baa baahan/ leh – It is they who are hungry/ have
Past General Tense
Aniga baa keenáy/sameeyéy/qabtáy – It was I who brought/made/took
Adiga baa keenáy/sameeyéy/qabtáy – It were you (sing.) who brought/made/took
Isaga baa keenáy/ sameeyéy/ qabtáy – It was he who brought/made/took
Iyada baa keentáy sameyséy/ qabatáy – It was she who brought/made/took
Annaga baa keennáy/sameynéy/qabannáy – It were we (excl.) who brought/made/took
Innaga baa keennáy/sameynéy/qabannáy – It were we (incl.) who brought/made/took
59
Idinka baa keenáy/sameeyéy/qabtáy – It were you (pl.) who brought/made/took
Iyaga baa keenáy/sameeyéy/qabtáy – It were they who brought/made/took
Aniga baa baahnaa/ lahaa – It was I who was hungry/ had
Adiga baa baahnaa/ lahaa – It was you (sing.) who were hungry/ had
Isaga baa baahnaa/ lahaa – It was he who was hungry/ had
Iyada baa baahnayd/ lahayd – It was she who was hungry/ had
Annaga baa baahnayn/ lahayn – It was we (excl.) who were hungry/ had
Innaga baa baahnayn/ lahayn – It was we (incl.) who were hungry/ had
Idinka baa baahnaa/ lahaa – It was you (pl.) who were hungry/ had
Iyaga baa baahnaa/ lahaa – It was they who were hungry/ had
In contrast to structures with the SP waa and sentences in which the SP baa
marks objects and adverbial modifiers, when the logical accent is placed on the
subject the difference between the 2nd and 3rd persons singular and plural in all tenses
of the regular verbs, and in the past tense of the attributive verbs and the verbs lahaan
– ‘to have’, la'aan – ‘not to have’ and ahaan – ‘to be’, disappears. In connection with
this it is necessary to point out a mistake made by the authors of a Somali text-book
(Zorc, Issa, 1990, p.203), which is otherwise good in general. In the conjugation
paradigm of the auxiliary verb jiri in the Past Habitual Tense, its form in the 2nd
person singular is given as *jirtey instead of jirey: *Markabkan adigaa lahaan jirtey
– It was you to whom this ship used to belong.
The final vowel of the regular verbs in the Present Tense shortens. The
60
attributive verbs lahaan – ‘to have’, la'aan – ‘not to have’ and ahaan – ‘to be’ in the
Present General are characterised by the syncretism of the agreement markers in all
persons singular and plural. The same verbs in the Present General lose the
differentiation in gender in the 3rd person singular. The syntactical parallelism which
is observed in the conjugation of “adjectival verbs” such as baahan – ‘to be hungry’
in waa structures and in sentences with the SP baa with the accent on the subject, is
one of the arguments for considering them as special (attributive) verbs and not as
adjectives (Antinucci, Puglielli, 1980).
2.5.3. In constructions in which the subject is the rheme the agreement in
gender (where it is possible) usually remains:
(228) Ninkii baa yimid – The man came;
(229) Nimankii baa yimid – The men came;
(230) Gabadhii baa halkaas joogsatay – The girl stopped there;
(231) Gabdhihii baa halkaas joogsaday –The girls stopped there.
In the first example the subject is a noun of the 3 rd person masculine singular;
in the second, the 3rd person masculine plural; in the third, the 3rd person feminine
singular; and in the fourth, the 3rd person masculine plural. Because baa emphasizes
the subject in each example, the verbs have the form of the 3 rd person singular of the
corresponding gender.
The deviations in gender-agreement are connected with the ability of the
Somali nouns of certain classes to change into the opposite gender in the plural. This
is true first of all in regard to masculine nouns whose stem ends in a consonant
61
(Bell’s 2nd class), the vowel -e or the diphthong -ey/ay (6th class). As was
demonstrated by this researcher (Bell, 1953) the feminine gender of these nouns,
recognised by their article, is formal, and therefore the verbal predicate is conjugated
in the masculine. This can be seen in the following pairs of sentences in which the
roles of subjects are played by the nouns of the 2nd and 6th classes and the predicate
has the form of the 3rd person masculine singular:
(232) Siraadkii baa jabay – The lamp has broken;
(233) Siraaddadii baa jabay – The lamps have broken;
(234) Odaygii baa bukooday – The old man got ill;
(235) Odayaashii baa bukooday – The old men got ill.
2.5.4. The verbal predicate can also be conjugated according to the same
scheme when the subject is in the form of a plural noun of Bell’s 5th class, which
consists of recent borrowings from Arabic:
(236) Maxbuuskii baa cararay – The prisoner escaped;
(237) Maxbuusyadii baa cararay – The prisoners escaped.
But the majority of the nouns of this class, including the subject in the example
(236), form their plural in one of two ways: by reduplicating the last consonant of the
stem, adding the vowel -o and changing the gender, like the nouns of the 2nd class, or
else by inserting an additional vowel in the stem according to the “broken” Arabic
paradigm. The gender of the form constructed in the second way is perceived as a
“real” feminine, and therefore agreement takes place according to the feminine gender:
(238) Maxaabiistii baa carartay – The prisoners escaped.
Nevertheless there are some speakers of this language who even with such a
62
subject conjugate the predicate in the masculine:
(239) Maxaabiistii baa cararay – The prisoners escaped.
2.6. The particle baa in special syntactic constructions
Some special syntactic constructions are generated with the help of the SP baa.
It is used in particular:
1) To convey, from the attributive to the predicative role, the verbs ahaan – ‘to
be’, lahaan – ‘to have’ and la’aan – ‘not to have’ which are used in relative
constructions with nouns: oday fariid ah – a wise old man [lit.: an old man who is
wise], nin gadh leh – a bearded man [lit.: a man who has a beard], islaan indho la’ –
a blind old woman [lit.: an old woman who has no eyes].
(240) Odaygu fariid buu yahay – This old man is wise [lit.: is a wise man];
(241) Ninkani gadh buu leeyahay – This man has a beard;
(242) Islaantaasi indho bay la’ayd – That old woman was blind [lit.: had no
eyes].
2) With words of the adverbial type which, in combination with the preverb u,
transmit the meaning of direction (sare...u – up, hoos...u – down, gees...u – to the
side, hor...u – forward, dib..u – backward21):
(243) Sare buu u kacay – He jumped up;
(244) Sanduuqii cuslaa hoos buu u dhacay – The heavy box fell down;
(245) Sagaaro gees bay u orodday – The dik-dik ran to the side;
21
This may also mean ‘again’: Warqaddii dib buu u akhristay – He re-read the letter.
63
(246) Hor baanu u dhaqaaqnay – We (excl.) moved forward;
(247) Gaarigu dib buu u tegey – The car went backward.
3) With the noun si, carrying the meaning of manner, which is used with
attributive verbs and is governed by the preverb u:
(248) Si xun buu u dhaawacmay – He injured himself badly;
(249) Si wanaagsan buu ii (= i+u) galay – He treated me [lit.: He entered into
me] well.
4) With the noun aad, which carries the meaning of intensity (‘very’) and
requires the preverb u:
(250) Aad baan u aqaan Axmed – I know Ahmed very well;
(251) Caasha aad bay u quruxsan tahay – Asha is very beautiful.
5) With the attributive construction si aad ah – ‘very much’, the elements of
which were described in 1), 3) and 4) and which is also governed by the preverb u:
(252) Si aad ah baannu u saaxiibnay – We (excl.) became very (good) friends.
6) In the construction which is regularly used to convey the comparative degree:
(253) Cabdi iyo Ciise, Ciise baa dheer – Issa is taller than Abdi [lit.: Abdi and
Issa, Issa is tall].
2.7. Sentences without the particle baa
The SP baa can be omitted:
1) In sentences with the preverb ka which is used to convey the comparative
degree:
(254) Hawadu maanta (baa) ka xun tii shaleyto – Today the weather is worse
64
than it (was) yesterday.
2) In comparison constructions with attributive verbs which are often used in
proverbs:
(255) Maalin iyo habeen (baa) kala mudan – Night cannot be compared with day.
3) In the second of two sentences divided by the conjunctions ama…ama –
either…or, in cases where their subjects bear the logical accent and their predicates
and objects are common to both sentences (they can be omitted in the second one):
(257) Ama Cali baa geela raacaya ama Faarax (baa geela raacaya) – Either
let Ali pasture the camels or (let) Farah (pasture the camels).
65
Chapter 3. The sentence particle waxaa
3.1. The functions of the particle waxaa
Like baa, the SP waxaa predicatises a sentence and realizes in it the actantial
and circumstantial focuses. However, it is usually used in more complicated
structures:
(258) Maanta warqadihii aqoonsiga ahaa waxaa dhiibey danjireyaasha
dalalka afrikaanka ah u jooga Moosko – Today the ambassadors of the African
countries in Moscow have presented their credentials [lit.: Today the ambassadors
who stay in Moscow for the countries which are African (have) presented the papers
which were recognition].
Here the rheme which coincides with the subject of the sentence follows the
verbal predicate, and the theme (the adverbial modifier of time and the object)
precedes the SP waxaa.
(259) Soomaaliya ee ku taalla Geeska Afrika waxay deris la tahay Keenya,
Itoobiya iyo Jabuuti – Somalia, which is situated in the Horn of Africa, is a neighbour
of Kenya, Ethiopia and Djibouti.
The rheme of this sentence is the the indirect object which follows the verb,
and the theme is the subjective group which precedes the SP waxaa.
(260) Dhallinyaro badan oo karti lihi waxay wax ku baran jirtey Jaamacadda
Muqdisho – Many able young people used to study at the University of Mogadishu.
The logical accent in this sentence is placed on the adverbial modifier of place,
66
and the subject, which is expressed by a noun with the following relative clause [lit.:
young people who are many and who are able], is not emphasised.
In all the examples the SP waxaa can be substituted by the SP baa:
(261) Danjireyaasha dalalka afrikaanka ah baa maanta dhiibay warqadihii
aqoonsiga ahaa;
(262) Keenya, Itoobiya iyo Jabuuti bay Soomaaliya deris la tahay;
(263) Jaamacadda Muqdisho bay wax ku baran jiirtey dhallinyaro badan oo
karti lihi.
The result obtained is close to but not identical with the transformed structures.
In my opinion, as well as the stylistic differences in the second set of examples, the
strengthening of the logical accent on the marked components can be observed. In the
waxaa structures it is probably redistributed in favour of the logical subject (the
theme). The hypothesis that the theme and the rheme in the sentence with the SP
waxaa strive for a balance seems to be confirmed by the possibility of introducing
into these sentences an additional sentence particle (ayaa or baa). The truth is that if
in one and the same sentence two sentence particles with the same functions start to
act in opposite directions, the left part (the theme) and the right part (the rheme)
become equally emphasised. This means that the theme changes into the rheme,
resulting in the presence of two rhemes in the sentence (which is equal to the
disappearance of the logical predicate altogether). Nothing remains but to assume
(and, as will be shown, there are grounds for this) that one of the two particles is the
main one, and the other is subordinate.
67
3.2. The particle waxaa with the short subjective pronouns
As is obvious from the examples (258-260), the SP waxaa, like the other
sentence particles, can be used either with or without the short subjective pronouns.
In adjoining the short subjective pronouns it originates the following sequence of
forms:
Singular
1st pers.
waxaa + aan = waxaan
2nd pers.
waxaa + aad = waxaad
3rd pers. masc.
waxaa + uu = wuxuu
3rd pers. fem.
waxaa + ay = waxay
1st pers. (excl.)
waxaa + aan(nu) = waxaan(nu)
1st pers. (incl.)
waxaa + aynu = waxaynu
2nd pers.
waxaa + aydin + waxaydin
Plural
waxaa + aad = waxaad
3rd pers.
waxaa + ay = waxay
3.2.1. The usage of the SP waxaa with or without a short subjective pronoun
depends upon which member of the sentence is its logical predicate (rheme). There
are two possibilities:
1) If the subject is a logical predicate it follows the verbal predicate, and a short
subjective pronoun never joins the SP waxaa:
68
(264) Cigaal Shiidaad waxaa u soo gurgurtay xaggiisa wiil yar oo uu dhalay
oo afar ilig oo yaryari ay u soo baxeen – A little son for whom four small teeth had
just come through crept up to Igal Shidad.
2) If any other DFR is a rheme, the subject precedes the verb and the SP waxaa
adjoins the short subjective pronouns obligatorily:
(265) Wiil-Waal wuxuu qabay dhowr haween oo mid uu dhowaan guursaday –
Wiil-Waal had several wives, one of whom he had married recently.
Sentences with the SP waxaa and the particle weeye (var. waaye, weeyaan –
see 1.6.4) are an exception:
(266) Niyadaydu waxaa weeye inaan socdaal ku maro Afrika – I want [lit.: My
desire is] to make a trip to Africa.
3.2.2. If the subject is not a logical predicate (rheme) it adjoins (where this is
possible) a morphological marker of the subject:
(267) Ninkaasi/u wuxuu damcay inuu iibiyo xoolihiisa oodhan – This man
intended to sell all his stock.
The presence in a sentence of a substantive subject is not obligatory:
(268) Waxay tegeen magaalo kale oo suldaan kale uu u taliyo – They went to
another town which was governed by another sultan.
3.3. The particle waxaa and the agreement of the predicate with the subject
The agreement of the predicate with the subject in sentences with the SP waxaa
and the word order depend upon which of its components the sentence particle is
69
concerned with.
3.3.1. If waxaa marks any member of the sentence besides the subject (the
subject is not the rheme) the agreement occurs according to the “complete” type,
which is characterised by the maximum distinction between persons, genders and
numbers, as with the SP waa. In this case the normal word order is as follows: the
subject/ waxaa + a short subjective pronoun/ the verbal predicate/ the member of the
sentence which is the rheme:
(269) Odeyaashu waxay caddeeyeen in loo baahan yahay in nabad la gaaro –
The elders announced the necessity of establishing peace.
An inverted formation of this sentence is also possible: waxaa + a short
subjective pronoun/ the verbal predicate/ the subject/ the rheme:
(270) Waxay caddeeyeen odeyaashu in … etc.
The SP waxaa with a short subjective pronoun always precedes the predicate
though not always immediately; objects, adverbial modifiers of time, place and so on
can be placed between them:
(271) Laanqayrta Casi waxay dadka baahan u geysaneysaa kaalmo degdeg ah
– The Red Cross is delivering urgent aid to needy people;
(272) Axmed wuxuu maalintii dambe igu martiqaaday tuuladii uu ku noolaa –
Next day Ahmed invited me to the village in which he lived;
(273) Ardo ka kala socotay dalal badani waxay Moosko ku yeesheen shir
cilmibaaris ah – Students from many countries have held a scientific conference in
Moscow.
3.3.2. If the SP waxaa marks a subject (i.e. the subject is a rheme) the predicate
70
agrees with it according to the “clipped” type. But in comparison with the agreement
by the SP baa emphasising a subject, here a special form is retained only by the 3rd
person feminine singular of all types of verbs (except the attributive verbs and the
irregular verbs ahaan – ‘to be’, lahaan – ‘to have’ and la’aan – ‘not to have’, all
personal forms of which are the same in the Present Tense):
Present General Tense
Waxaa keená/ sameeyá/ qabtá aniga – It is I who bring/ make/ take
Waxaa keená/ sameeyá/ qabtá adiga – It is you (sing.) who bring/ make/ take
Waxaa keená/ sameeyá/ qabtá isaga – It is he who brings/ makes/ takes
Waxaa keentá/ sameysá/ qabatá iyada – It is she who brings/ makes/ takes
Waxaa keená/ sameeyá/ qabta annaga – It is we (excl.) who bring/make/take
Waxaa keená/ sameeyá/qabta innaga – It is we (incl.) who bring/ make/ take
Waxaa keená/ sameeyá/ qabtá idinka – It is you (pl.) who bring/ make/ take
Waxaa keená/ sameeyá/ qabtá iyaga – It is they who bring/ make/ take
Waxaa baahan/ leh aniga – It is I who am hungry/ have
Waxaa baahan/ leh adiga – It is you (sing.) who is hungry/ have
Waxaa baahan/ leh isaga – It is he who is hungry/ has
Waxaa baahan/ leh iyada – It is she who is hungry/ has
Waxaa baahan/ leh annaga – It is we (excl.) who are hungry/ have
71
Waxaa baahan/ leh innaga – It is we (incl.) who are hungry/ have
Waxaa baahan/ leh idinka – It is you (pl.) who are hungry/ have
Waxaa baahan/ leh iyaga – It is they who are hungry/ have
Past General Tense
Waxaa keenáy/sameeyéy/qabtáy aniga – It was I who brought/made/took
Waxaa keenáy/sameeyéy/qabtáy adiga – It was you (sing.) who brought/made/took
Waxaa keenáy/sameeyéy/qabtáy isaga – It was he who brought/made/took
Waxaa keentáy/sameyséy/qabatáy iyada – It was she who brought/made/took
Waxaa keenáy/sameeyéy/qabtáy annaga – It was we (excl.) who brought/made/took
Waxaa keenáy/sameeyéy/qabtáy innaga – It was we (incl.) who brought/made/took
Waxaa keenáy/sameeyéy/qabtáy idinka – It was you (pl.) who brought/made/took
Waxaa keenáy/sameeyéy/ qabtáy iyaga – It was they who brought/made/took
Waxaa baahnaa/ lahaa aniga – It was I who was hungry/ had
Waxaa baahnaa/ lahaa adiga – It was you (sing.) who were hungry/ had
Waxaa baahnaa/ lahaa isaga – It was he who was hungry/ had
Waxaa baahnayd/ lahayd iyada – It was she who was hungry/ had
Waxaa baahnaa/ lahaa annaga – It was we (excl.) who were hungry/ had
Waxaa baahnaa/ lahaa innaga – It was we (incl.) who were hungry/ had
72
Waxaa baahnaa/ lahaa idinka – It was you (pl.) who were hungry/ had
Waxaa baahnaa/ lahaa iyaga – It was they who were hungry/ had
Being the rheme the subject does not adjoin morphological markers:
(274) Magaalada waxaa ku yaal masjid qurxoon (not qurxooni) – A beautiful
mosque is situated in the city.
The normal order of words: waxaa/ the verbal predicate/ the subject (the
rheme). Objects and adverbial modifiers are placed either before the sentence particle
(a preferable variant) or between it and the verb:
(275) Shaleyto Diinsoor waxaa ka yimid nin aanan marna arki jirin = Shaleyto
waxaa Diinsoor ka yimid nin etc. = Waxaa shaleyto Diinsoor ka yimid nin etc. –
Yesterday a man whom I have never seen came from Dinsor.
In a sentence with the indefinite impersonal pronoun la, any component which
follows the verb becomes its rheme:
(276) Waxaa la sheegay inay dhoofeen – They say [lit.: Somebody said] that
they have left;
(277) Soomaaliya waxaa laga helaa Geeska Afrika – Somalia is situated [lit.:
Somebody finds it] in the Horn of Africa.
In (276) a subordinate clause is the rheme, while in (277) it is a modifier of
place.
Since in a sentence with the SP waxaa the part which follows the verb is the
rheme, constructions like:
73
(278) *Wuxuu u yimi – He came to (him/her/them) or
(279) *Waxaa u yimid – (Somebody) came to (him/her/them)
are not possible.
It is necessary to note that the rule saying that if an object is not explicitly
expressed it is meant (cf. for example Wuu u yimid – He came to him/her/them; U tag
– Go to him/her/them), here does not work.
3.4. Special cases of the usage of the particle waxaa
The SP waxaa fulfils a number of special functions:
1) It introduces direct speech with the help of the verb odhan – ‘to say’, which
belongs to a small group of the Somali “irregular” verbs:
(280) Wuxuu yidhi: “Berri baan imaneyaa” – He said: “I shall come
tomorrow”.
The second part of this construction (as in this example) can have its own
sentence particle. It should be noted that the verb which introduces direct speech can
be repeated:
(281) Dabadeedna dhakhtarkii yidhi, wuxuu yirhi: “Haddaad jirran tahay waa
inaad guriga joogtaa oo shaqada ka fadhiisataa” – Then the doctor said: “If you are
ill stay at home and do not go to work”.
In the first usage, yidhi is the verb of the relative clause of which the subject is
the word ‘doctor’, and in the second it is the verb of the main sentence with the same
subject [lit.: Then the doctor who said, he said: “If you are ill … etc.”].
2) It is a component of the formula waxaa la yidhi – It was said [lit.: Somebody
74
said] which opens every Somali folktale or proverb:
(282) Waxaa la yidhi, waxaa jirey oday wax garad ah oo la yidhaahdo OdayBiiqe – They say, once upon a time there lived a sage whose name was Oday-Biiqe.
(283) Waxaa la yidhi, laba ma dhergaan: cilmidoon iyo hantidoon – They say,
two persons will never be sated: he who craves for knowledge and he who craves
for wealth. (Proverb)
3) In combination with the subjective pronoun of the 2nd person singular or
plural and a verb in the Present General Tense, it conveys the meaning of the
imperative mood; the usual method of forming this is the basic form of the verb for
the 2nd person singular, and the same form plus the suffix -a for the 2nd person plural:
(284) Muus keen! – Bring (sing.) a banana!
alternatively
Waxaad keentaa muus! – Bring a banana! [lit.: You bring a banana].
(285) Guriga gala oo iska nasta! – Enter (pl.) the house and have a rest!
alternatively
Waxaad gashaan guriga oo iska nasataan – Enter the house and have a rest!
[lit.: You enter the house and have a rest].
3.5. Two points of view on the particle waxaa
Some specialists in the Somali language (Bell, 1953; Abraham, 1962; Saeed,
1983 and others) do not attribute waxaa to the sentence particles22. In their opinion
22
It is interesting to note that Andrzejewski (1964) who also used to share this point of view,
changed it after he had come to know the work of Zholkovsky (1971) – see Andrzejewski (1975).
75
syntagm formed with the help of waxaa belongs to one of the three types of two-part
verbless (“cleft”) sentences. The first part of such a sentence consists of the word
waxa – ‘the thing’, ‘the things’ with a relative clause for which it is a subject, and the
second part is a noun or nominal group; it is implied that there is a copula ‘to be’ and
the SP waa in the sentence:
(286) Waxaan dooneyaa [waa] caano geel – I want camel’s milk [lit.: The
thing which I want (is) camel’s milk].
(287) Wuxuu noo loogay [waa] laba wan – He slaughtered for us two rams
[lit.: The things which he slaughtered for us (were) two rams].
(288) Waxaa naga cararay [waa] dameer iyo saddex qaalmood – A donkey
and three young she-camels ran away from us [lit.: The things which ran away from
us (were) a donkey and three young she-camels].
The first part of the sentence is indeed constructed as a relative clause: if it has
its own subject a short subjective pronoun is introduced (–aan in 286 and –uu in
287), and the verb of the relative clause, the subject of which is a determinatum (in
this case waxa, understood as ‘the things’), always takes a singular form (288).
Such an attitude to waxa(a) can be justified by the fact that reference back to
the patterns of the formation of subordinate clauses saves the need to formulate
special rules for the agreement of a verbal predicate with a subject. Nevertheless one
reservation has to be made: where there is a coincidence of the feminine subject with
the rheme, the predicate agrees not with waxa but with this subject, i.e. the verb takes
the form not of the masculine but of the feminine gender:
(289) Qumbe subag ah waxaa keentay Maryam – Miriam brought a pot of butter.
76
The truth is that Lamberti (1982, p.67), who is also an adherent of the
traditional approach, with the subject of the 3 rd person singular feminine conjugates
the verb according to the masculine gender (Waxaa yimid iyada – She came). This
raises in my mind a serious doubt which paradoxically is shared by Saeed, another
advocate of the interpretation of waxaa as a word with the meaning of a thing: Waxa
jabtay (note the feminine!) silsiladdii – The chain broke (Saeed, 1983, p.82). On the
other hand it seems as if Saeed does not see the difference between the word waxa
(wax – a thing + the article -a as in this example) and the lexeme waxaa, which has
one morpheme (a mora23) more and which in reality is used for the building of the
sentence types under discussion irrespective of any of the theories.
Moreover, the fact that in a verbless sentence the role of the “empty” word is
played only by waxaa (its synonyms do not have this possibility) means that we are
dealing not only with the free usage of the word attached by a relative clause, but
with a special type of affirmative sentence.
Indeed, in such sentences as, for example:
(290) Waxay ka hadleen nabadda – They talked about peace [lit., according to
Bell et al, The thing which they talked about (was) peace] it is impossible to
substitute the word waxa – ‘the thing’ by, let us say, arrinta – ‘the problem’, in order
to make what is seemingly an equivalent sentence ‘The problem they talked about
(was) peace’. A Somali sentence built in such a way is grammatically incorrect:
(291) *Arrintay ka hadleen nabadda
23
A mora is a short vowel sound; a long vowel is equal to two moras and is marked by the
reduplication of the corresponding letter: a-aa, e-ee, i-ii etc.
77
while in the correct version:
(292) Arrintay ka hadleen waa (= waxaa weeye24) nabadda there is a sentence particle.
Therefore the rules for the building of an independent sentence must contain
instructions for the usage of waxa and for the types of agreement with it; this is equal
to the introduction into the description of one more sentence particle – waxaa.
3.5.1. Also worth mentioning is the “half-semantic” argument which
Zholkovsky (1971, p.196) adduced in favour of ranking waxaa within the category of
sentence particles: “Waxaa introduces not only those second parts of the sentence
which to some extent are ‘things’ and answer the question ‘who?’ or ‘what?’, but also
the designations of place, time, condition and even subordinate clauses of the
“adverbial participle” type: Waxay guriga weeraareen annagoo meel kale fadhinna.
This, to follow the traditional treatment of waxaa, would mean in literal translation
‘The thing [which] they attacked the house we [who] place another were’25 This
example demonstrates that waxa is used not as a semantic but as a special inflectional
quantity demanding any member of the first rank to follow the predicate. It is evident
that in such cases there is no question of a “restoration” of, as it were, the omitted
element – it is”.
3.5.2. It is worth noting, however, some peculiarities, which distinguish waxaa
from the other sentence particles. First of all waxaa can adjoin attributes (for example
kale with the meaning of ‘another’ or ‘also’):
24
For weeye see the chapter dealing with the SP waa.
25
A literary translation would be ‘(When) they attacked (our) house we were in another place’.
78
(293) Wuxuu kaloo (kale + the conjunction oo) dooneyaa inuu la yimaaddo qof
ii cusub – Besides he wants to come [lit.: that he should come] with a person whom I
do not know.
Secondly the part of the sentence preceding waxaa (as in the case of waa, but
not baa) can adjoin the markers of the subject:
(294) Muuska adduunka ugu macaani wuxuu ka baxaa Soomaaliya – The
sweetest bananas in the whole world grow in Somalia.
For comparison:
(295) Muuska adduunka ugu macaani waa mid ka baxa Soomaaliya and
(296) Muuska adduunka ugu macaan Soomaaliya buu ka baxaa with the same
meaning.
3.6. Sentences with two sentence particles
In sentences with waxaa it is possible to use a second sentence particle, either
ayaa or baa, with each of the sentence particles retaining its functions and the
peculiarities of its usage. Because, according to my observations, ayaa is used more often
in this link with waxaa than is baa, I shall talk in this section basically about the SP ayaa.
3.6.1. The SP ayaa (or baa) always precedes waxaa, often immediately:
(297) Maalin maalmaha ka mid ah ayaa wuxuu ku soo baxay adhi meel
daaqaya – One day he encountered sheep and goats which were grazing in a certain place;
(298) Markii ay haraggii ka bixisey bay waxay u geysey suldaankii magaaladii
ay ku dhaqmeysey – After having skinned (the leopard) she took the skin to the sultan
79
of the city she lived in;
(299) Maalin asagoo meel fadhiya ayaa waxaa u yimid wiil aabbihiis la diley –
One day when he was sitting in a place he was approached by a boy whose father had
been killed;
(300) Waa baa waxaa jirey nin wiil caasi ah ilmo ku leh – Once upon a time
there lived a man one of whose sons was disobedient.
A subject, an object or an adverbial modifier (together with their relative
clauses) can stand between the sentence particles ayaa and waxaa:
(301) Maalin maalmaha ka mid ah ayaa Cigaal Shiidaad iyo naagtiisii oo
gurgooda jooga waxaa u soo muuqday niman – One day when Igal Shidad and his
wife were at home they saw some men [lit.: men appeared in their presence].
3.6.2. The above examples demonstrate that both ayaa and waxaa can be used
with or without short subjective pronouns. The adjoining of short subjective pronouns
with ayaa produces the following sequence of forms:
Singular
1st pers.
ayaa + aan = ayaan
2nd pers.
ayaa + aad = ayaad
3rd pers. masc.
ayaa + uu = ayuu
3rd Pers. fem.
ayaa + ay = ayay
1st pers. (excl.)
ayaa + aan(nu) = ayaan(nu)
1st pers. (incl.)
ayaa + aynu = ayaynu
Plural
80
2nd pers.
ayaa + aydin = ayaydin
ayaa + aad = ayaad
3rd pers.
ayaa + ay = ayay
The rules for the usage of ayaa with and without short subjective pronouns
exactly coincide with those described in the chapter on the SP baa, and those related
to waxaa were expounded in 3.2.1.
3.6.3. In the link with ayaa the SP waxaa adjoins a short subjective pronoun if the
subject of the main sentence is not its rheme. As regards the SP ayaa, it is, first of all,
used mainly with a short subjective pronoun if it is the only representative of the subject:
(302) Markay tashadeen ayay waxay yidhaahdeen: “Berrito kaalay” – After
taken counsel they said: “Come tomorrow”.
Secondly, ayaa never adjoins a short subjective pronoun if it immediately
follows the subject:
(303) Niman ayaa waxay maqleen in Wiil-Waal deeqsi yahay – Some men
have heard that Wiil-Waal is generous.
It should be noted that here the verbal predicate agrees with the subject in
gender, person and number (contrary to the case when ayaa or baa is the only
sentence particle in the sentence), i.e. the agreement occurs as if waxaa were the main
and ayaa (baa) the subordinate sentence particle.
Thirdly, ayaa can be used with or without a short subjective pronoun if the
sentence particle does not emphasise the subject which either precedes or follows it:
(304) Maalin maalmaha ka mid ah Yoonis Tuug sida caadada u ahayd ayaa
81
(=ayuu) wuxuu u baxay meel fog si uu xoolo u soo xado – One day Yonis Tug as
usual went far (from his house) in order to steal (somebody’s) stock;
(305) Markaas ayaa (=ayuu) wiilkii wuxuu ku soo noqday magaaladii
aabbihiis uu u talineyey – Then the boy returned to the town ruled by his father.
But if the subject of the main sentence is its rheme neither ayaa nor waxaa can
adjoin short subjective pronouns:
(306) Waa ayaa waxaa jiri jirey nin aad u lo’ badan – Once upon a time there
was a man who possessed many cows.
It should be remembered that if waxaa had not been present in this phrase the
SP ayaa could have been used, either with or without a short subjective pronoun:
(307) Waa ayaa jiri jirey nin aad u lo’ badan or
(308) Waa ayuu jiri jirey nin aad u lo’ badan.
3.6.4. The usage of the SPs ayaa and waxaa in the same sentence is never
obligatory. By shifting, or softening, the logical accent one of them can be removed,
and the remaining one conforms to the rules which govern the separate usage of the
sentence particles:
(309) Suldaankii markuu aqalkii soo galay ayuu wuxuu arkay afadiisii oo
gogol fadhida – When the sultan entered the house he saw his wife sitting on a mat.
The same phrase can be transformed into:
(310) Markuu aqalkii soo galay suldaankii wuxuu arkay afadiisii oo gogol
fadhida or
(311) Suldaankii markuu aqalkii soo galay ayuu arkay afadiisii oo gogol
fadhida.
82
Chapter 4. Sentence particles in proverbs and proverbial phrases
4.1. Some peculiarities of Somali paremias
The Greek word paremia, which means ‘saying’, ‘parable’, is used in naming
different types of proverbs and sayings. In their own designation the Somalis used
only two words: maahmaah – ‘a proverb’ and oraah – ‘a saying’. Some researchers
into the national folklore affirm that these differ as to alliteration (qaafiyad in
Somali)26, the first supposedly having it and the second not. Others call maahmaah a
“classical” proverb “which contains wisdom or instruction”, and regard oorah as
something “akin to a figure of speech” (Aden, 1995). In fact, one of the features of
many Somali proverbs and proverbial phrases is the occurrence of a minimum of two
words beginning with the same sound. Consonants alliterate more often than vowels;
all the vowels are regarded as one sound, and a, for example, can make up an
alliterative sequence with o, e, etc. In the proverb Far keliya fool ma dhaqdo – One
finger cannot wash a face, two words have the alliterative sound f, and in the proverb
Oohin iyo aroos ammaah weeye – A funeral means debt and a wedding means debt,
there are three words, the initial vowel of one being a long oo, while the other two
begin with a short a. It should be noted that only full-fledged words, that is nouns,
verbs, numerals and proper names, are recognized as alliterative ones, and
grammatical words, such as sentence particles, are not included. This is why, in the
26
Alliteration is also typical for Somali poetry.
83
phonetically very beautiful proverb Biyo badan bar baa calow ah, hadal badanna
bar baa been ah – Much water is half turbid, much talk is half lies, almost all
members of which begin with the consonant b, a Somali “hears” not eight, but only
six, alliterative phonemes, ignoring b in two sentence particles.
4.1.1. In several paremias there is also a partial or complete metrical
parallelism. To understand this it has to be pointed out that Somali has a system of
quantitative scansion where short vowels are always short, including in close
syllables, while diphthongs may be either short or long.
In the above mentioned proverb it can be seen that the two halves scan in the
following way:
◡ ◡ ◡ ◡ ◡ │ — ◡│ — ◡
◡◡◡◡◡│◡—│—◡
The first five syllables and the last two are metrically identical, while the
middle ones are reversed.27
4.1.2. A disposition toward syntactic parallelism can also be detected: Nin aan
talin jirin hadduu taliyo, nin aan tegi jirin ayaa taga; nin aan qaybin jirin hadduu
qaybiyo, nin aan qadi jirin ayaa qada – If a man who has never governed starts to
govern, a man who has never gone away will go away, and if a man who has never
divided (food) starts to divide, a man who has never failed to receive (his part) will
not receive it.
Although these are important and interesting features of Somali paremias, they
27
This metrical analysis was made by G.Banti.
84
cannot serve as a basis for classification. It is enough to look at any extended list of
Somali proverbs and proverbial phrases to be convinced of the merely incidental
importance of such features: paremias with deep meaning but no alliterated words
(Quraanyo aruurtay bulac bay jiiddaa – Together ants can carry even a lizard), and
well-turned but essentially trivial maxims (Intaadan falin ka fiirso – Think before
you do anything) will immediately reveal themselves. As for syntactic harmony, it is
demonstrated mainly by the binomial paremiological structures.
4.2. Types of Somali paremias
According to the theory of cliché elaborated by Permyakov (1970, 1979 and
others), the closeness and openness of clichés and the patterns that express their
general meaning are relevant for the classification of any paremiological stock,
including that of the Somalis.
From the syntactic point of view Somali paremias are divided into two
categories: one-phrase clichés and supra-phrase clichés, the former consisting of one
sentence and the latter of two (or more) sentences. At the same time one-phrase
clichés can be divided into closed sentences, which consist of permanent members
only (the proverb class), and open sentences, which are replenished from the speech
context (the proverbial phrase class). Supra-phrase clichés are divided into
wellerisms28 where a character delivers an aphorism, and scenes which consist of a
dialogue between characters.
28
Named after Sam Weller, a character in Dickens’s “Pickwick Papers”.
85
Somali paremias express their meaning in three different ways: indirectly
(through an image), directly, and through the context from which they were originally
taken. In other words, some paremias are clichés with imaged motivation of the
general meaning (i.e. sayings with a transferred meaning, which demand a broader
interpretation); others are clichés with direct motivation of the general meaning (i.e.
sayings with a direct meaning which do, however, allow a broader interpretation);
and yet others are clichés without immediate motivation of the general meaning (i.e.
sayings, the meaning of which stems neither directly, nor through the image, from the
meaning of their components, but is determined by the context from which the
sayings were originally taken and which they recall).
Different combinations of the types of syntactic structure and of the character
of the motivation of the general meaning result in twelve types of Somali
paremiological clichés (six of one-phrase clichés and six of supra-phrase clichés).
I. Proverbs
1) Proverbs proper (clichés in the form of closed sentences with imaged
motivation of the general meaning): Maroodigu takarta saaran ma arkee kan kale tan
saaran ayuu arkaa – An elephant does not see the gadfly which is sitting on it but
sees the one sitting on another elephant.
2) Folk aphorisms (clichés in the form of closed sentences with direct
motivation of the general meaning): Been sheeg, laakiin been run u eg sheeg – Tell
lies, but let your lies resemble the truth.
3) Non-divided sentences (clichés in the form of closed sentences without
86
immediate motivation of the general meaning): Timirtii horaba dab loo waa – There
is not yet a fire for the first dates [i.e. until one job is completed one should not start
another one]. This refers to a story about a man who was given some dates, and not
knowing that they are eaten raw decided to fry them; before he had had time to kindle
the fire he was given another handful of dates, and he said these words, which
became a proverb.
II. Proverbial phrases
4) Proverbial phrases proper (clichés in the form of open sentences with imaged
motivation of the general meaning): Markii geel loo heeso yuu dameerro u heesaa –
When all (the people) sing for camels, he sings for donkeys [i.e. not to the point].
5) By-words (clichés in the form of open sentences with direct motivation of the
general meaning): Camalkaa xeero buuxduu kaa qadiyaa – With your obstinacy you
can lose a basin of food [i.e. with such a character as yours you can harm yourself].
6) Non-divided phrases (clichés in the form of open sentences without
immediate motivation of the general meaning): “Yax” lahaydaa! – I should have said
“Whoa!” This refers to a story about a herdsman whose herd strayed into a forest
while he was sleeping, and all were torn to pieces by wild beasts. When he awoke
and realized what had happened he grieved for a long time, saying to himself “I
should have said “Whoa!” [i.e. stopped the herd in time].
III. Wellerisms
87
7) Wellerisms with transferred meaning (clichés with imaged motivation of the
general meaning; where a character delivers an aphorism): Goroyo waxay tiri:
“Cayaarta lug baan gashanayaa. Haddii ay fiicnaatana waan la soo wada geleyaa,
haddii ay xumaatana waan kala wada baxayaa.” – An ostrich said: “I’ll put only one leg
in this game. If it’s good, I’ll put another one in; if it’s bad, I’ll take back the first one”.
8) Wellerisms with direct meaning (clichés with direct motivation of the
general meaning; where a character delivers an aphorism): Shabeel baa beri libaax ku
yidhi: “Libaaxow, bal ama boqol nin la xoog noqo, ama boqol nin la xirrib noqo” –
Once a leopard said to a lion: “Oh lion, either be as strong as a hundred men or as
cunning as a hundred men”.
9) Contextual wellerisms (clichés without immediate motivation of the general
meaning; where a character delivers an aphorism): Abeeso waxay tidhi: “Aadane
abaal ma leh” – A snake said: “A human being is ungrateful”. This refers to a story
about a man who was lying asleep when a snake crept up to him, and when he awoke,
although it had done him no harm, he tried to kill it.
IV. Scenes
10) Fablettes (clichés with transferred meaning containing dialogue):
– Raahow, biyo maxay taraan?
– Dabadayda baa laga arki lahaa.
– Oh frog, is it good to be in water?
– If it had been good I would have had (a fat) bottom.
11) Instantly told (one scene) anecdotes (clichés with direct meaning
88
containing dialogue):
– Geeriyey, maxaad ka daawo tahay?
– Nin meel waayay baan meel u banneeyaa.
– Oh, death, who needs you [lit.: whom do you help]?
– He, who is not yet born [lit.: someone who has no place on earth yet].
12) Non-divided scenes (clichés without immediate motivation of the general
meaning containing dialogue):
“Sagaaro biyo waa cabta” iyo “Ma cabto”.
– Dik-dik drinks water!
– No, it does not!
The meaning is that a trifle can start a big quarrel, and it refers to two friends
who disagreed and nearly killed each other over the question of whether the dik-dik
drinks water or not.
4.3. Preliminary notes on research into the sentence particles in proverbs and
proverbial phrases
Paremias are an indispensable source of materials for the study of the processes
connected with the diachronic development of a language. The clichéized form of the
paremias guarantees the trustworthiness of the information concerning the state of the
language at the moment they entered the speech practice of its bearers, and their
preservation is secured by their constant functioning which, in its turn, is explained
by their signal nature.
89
As signs and models of certain situations, or certain relationships between
objects, paremias are necessary and convenient elements of any language, including
Somali. Instead of having to describe in one’s own words some everyday situation, or
relationship between objects, such as for example ‘if a man acts alone, he cannot do
much, and his efforts will not be effective’ it is enough to bring out from the memory
a set form of words (a cliché) and say: One finger cannot wash a face (if you are a
Somali), One finger cannot catch a fly (if you are an Oromo) or One man on the
battlefield is not a warrior (if you are a Russian).
4.3.1. Paremias occupy a special place in the Somali culture, which has only
recently become written. One well-known Somali proverb goes: Rag waa raggii
hore, hadalna waa intuu yidhi – Real men are the men of old, and real words were
those they pronounced. Eloquence based on a deep knowledge of folklore is valued
as highly as courage is by the Somalis, and the ‘truthfulness’ of paremias is
considered to be beyond doubt: Soomaalidu been waa sheegtaa, beense ma
maahmaahdo – Somalis can lie, but their lie will never become a proverb.
For this reason, in Somalia there is a carefully-preserved, though unwritten,
‘copyright’ of authorship which applies not only to passages of poetry but also to
items of folklore. It goes without saying that the names of the creators of the main
stock of Somali proverbs are not known, but the originators of ‘literary quotations’,
that is well-turned lines of poetry and witty remarks (indistinguishable sometimes
from paremias) of fairly recent origin are known well. It is no wonder that, unlike the
indefinite personal construction Waxaa la yidhi – It was said, which, as was
mentioned in 3.4, opens every proverb and proverbial phrase, the formula when
90
introducing such a “quotation” includes the name of its author: Hebel baa yidhi, or
Hebel wuxuu yidhi – So-and-so said. The clichés of this type which are also present
in my collection are not included in the material investigated in Chapter 4.
4.3.2. It is known that paremias are divided into two communicative types,
depending on the aim of the utterance. Proverbs and proverbial phrases in the form of
affirmative sentences belong to the first type (Af macaan gacan macaan baa dhaanta
– A sweet [i.e. generous] hand is better than a sweet [i.e.generous with promises]
mouth), while those in the form of negative sentences make up the second (Doqon iyo
naag nimay legdaan kama kacaan – A fool and a woman will not get off the man
they have brought down).
Because I have limited this study to affirmative sentences, paremias which
belong to the second type will not be analysed. Although the SP baa can participate
in the formation of negative constructions (Calool cir weyn way dheregtaa e indho
cir weyn baan (baa+aan) dhergin – A gluttonous stomach can be sated, gluttonous
[i.e. covetous] eyes cannot), in the majority of them there are no sentence particles.
This is also true with regard to paremias in the form of interrogative sentences.
As for the variety of paremiological types demonstrated in 4.2, it is possible to
limit myself to an investigation of the first six in the list of proverbs and proverbial
phrases, that is the closed and open phrase clichés which constitute, according to my
calculation, about 90% of the Somali paremiological stock.
Wellerisms and scenes also contain sentence particles, but their function in the
separate components of these types of clichés does not differ from what can be
91
observed in proverbs and proverbial phrases. Moreover, due to the relatively large
size of their syntactic structures (which is doubled by the translations), these paremias
are not the best illustrative material.
4.3.3. Since the following parts of this chapter deal precisely with proverbs and
proverbial phrases the coincidence of the significatum (of these two types of clichés)
with the significant (with these two terms usually used for the designation of all types
of paremias) turns out to be absolute. In other words I use the terms ‘proverb’ and
‘proverbial phrase’ in their exact meaning, the deciphering of which was given in 4.2.
The further subdivision of these paremias into their sub-types seems to be
superfluous for the declared goals of the investigation.
4.3.4. The next three parts of this chapter are devoted to particularities of the
usage of the sentence particles waa and baa in proverbs and proverbial phrases, and
of waxaa in different types of paremias, or to put it another way, to particularities of
proverbs, proverbial phrases and some other paremias dependent on the type of
sentence particles used in them. In the last part of the chapter I shall discuss paremias
without sentence particles.
4.4. The particle waa in proverbs and proverbial phrases
In proverbs and proverbial phrases the SP waa is met with more rarely than is
baa; to judge by my collection, it is contained in only about a hundred out of a
thousand paremias. Practically all are proverbs, i.e. clichés of the closed type which
occur in speech in an invariable form:
(312) Dameertu geela ha iga didisee waa sii ‘qururuf’ leedahay – It is not
92
enough that the she-donkey has dispersed my camels, but she is snorting as well.
[Said about a person who has not only made a bad action but is also expressing his
discontent];
(313) Atoor sagaaro intiisa waa ku duq – Even though a male dik-dik is small,
he is old;
(314) Beeni marka hore waa malab, marka dambana waa malmal – At first a
lie is honey, then it is myrrh [i.e. bitterness].
4.4.1. Proverbial sentences are divided into two classes, particular and general;
the former narrates events of a particular, occasional or unique nature, while the latter
deals with a certain regularity, a constantly repeated phenomenon, or a stable rule or
habit (Permyakov, 1970, p.10).
According to the observations of paremiologists, proverbs possess a higher
degree of generalisation than do proverbial phrases, and this is true of the subjects of
my research.
Somali proverbs are realized in both definite-personal and indefinite
personal constructions (with the indefinite personal pronoun la). If the predicate of a
proverbial sentence is a verb it is as a rule in the Present General Tense.
Somali proverbs, in particular those which include the SP waa, belong mainly
to generalised paremias. I have ascertained that the level of their generalisation
depends on the function fulfilled by the SP waa. If it is a focus marker (as in 312) the
level of generalisation is lower, if it introduces a nominal predicate (as in 313 and
314) it is higher. Because in the overwhelming majority of paremias the SP waa
plays precisely this latter role, it can be considered, firstly, as a marker of a proverb
93
and secondly, with a high degree of probability, as a marker of a generalised, not a
particular, paremia.
4.4.2.
The not very numerous exclusions are represented by comparative
phrases in the form of by-words:
(315) Waa awr heeryadiisii cuneya oo kale – Like a burden camel which
chews its own pack-pad. [Said about a man who harms himself];
(316) Waa biyo sare tegey – Like water which flows upward. [Said about an
incredible event];
(317) Waa sidii waraabe waxartii laysay, oohinna ku dartay – Like a hyena
which ate a kid and (then) mourned over it. [Said about a hypocrite].
Comparative phrases consist of the SP waa and a noun in the role of a
predicate with the attached relative clause. It is worth noting that in almost all
structures of this type the subject of the relative clause is the determinated word itself
(a burden camel which chews, water which flows or a hyena which ate), which
explains the absence of short subjective pronouns. But such pronouns are omitted
even where they should have been used, for example, in the following paremia of the
same meaning as (316):
(318) Waa calaacashoo timo ka baxaan – Like a palm on which hairs are
growing.
In the relative clause to the word calaacasha – the palm (in the proverb it
adjoins the conjunctive oo – which) there is its own subject, timo – hairs, which
should have been echoed by the short subjective pronoun ay – they. But in the spoken
language such a pronoun is often omitted if it is not the single subject of a
94
subordinate syntagm. Its absence from the example under observation is explained by
this; in speech, paremias acquire a certain perfection of form characterised by
laconicism.
Not all phrases of this type end in the conjunction oo and the quantifier
adjective kale with the meaning of ‘like’ (315). If there is no such link it is either implied
(316, 318) or substituted by the noun sida (= sidii) with the same meaning (317).
Being a comparison phrase, this paremiological type is, in fact, an independent
syntactic structure. Two factors allow its attribution to by-words: firstly, the openness
of its syntactic structure, implying the possibility, even necessity, of being broadened
at the expense of the subject (Moxamed waa awr heeryadiisii cunaya oo kale –
Mohamed is like a burden camel which chews its own pack-pad) and secondly, the
direct motivation of the general meaning, which does not cease to be so despite the
fact that almost all the words of this cliché are used as metaphors.
4.4.3. The SP waa in proverbial structures demonstrates at least two special
peculiarities:
1) It mainly introduces a nominal predicate:
(319) Af daboolan waa dahab – A closed mouth is gold;
(320) Adduunyo waa hooska labadiisa gelin – The world is like a shadow: in
the morning it is turned in one direction, in the evening in the opposite one [i.e. it is
changeable];
(321) Ninkii reerkiisa kaa sooraa waa nin, ninkii reer kale kaa sooraana waa
nimanyaal – He who fed you in his house is a man, but he who fed you in somebody
95
else’s house is twice a man [lit.: men].
2) It almost never adjoins short subjective pronouns:
(322) Been waa ku qadeysiisaa, kumase cashaysiiso – A lie will give you a
dinner, but will not give you a supper [i.e. you will not be able to cheat people twice];
(323) Hugaagu waa kula baryo tagaa – A beggar is treated according to his
clothes [lit.: Your clothes go begging with you];
(324) Hadal aadan filayn iyo fallaarba waa ku aammusiyaan – An unexpected
word is like an arrow – it will force you to remain silent.
The explanation of the first peculiarity seems to be concealed in the capacity of
these particular structures to create clichés of the general type, which in fact these
proverbs are. The second peculiarity is connected with the fact that in proverbs a
substantive subject is almost inevitable. As was shown in 1.3 and 1.6.2, with such a
subject the usage of waa with short subjective pronouns is either optional (where the
role of the predicate is played by a verb), or prohibited (where the dominant element
of the predicate is represented by a noun). The non-standard behaviour of the SP waa
in proverbs reveals itself in the omission of the subjective pronouns even in those
positions in which their usage is allowed.
4.4.4. The shaping of the subject in proverbial structures with the SP waa also
differs from that described in Chapter 1.
Firstly, it seldom adjoins the morphological markers of a subject:
(325) Aammusnaan waa oggolaansho barkeed – Silence is half a consent;
(326) Dhagax taabasho iyo tuujin waa isugu mid – It is all the same to a stone
whether you touch it or squeeze it [i.e. it does not matter];
96
(327) Aqoonla’aan waa iftiinla’aan – The absence of knowledge equals the
absence of light.29
Secondly, and most strikingly, the subject in proverbs with the SP waa is
almost always used without the definite article (cf.1.2).
(328) Laf kaa weyni waa ku jebisaa – If a bone is bigger than you it will crush
you [i.e. if somebody is stronger than you he will defeat you];
(329) Calool rag waa webi xagaa – The brain [lit.: stomach] of a man is like a
river-bed in the dry season30;
(330) Hadal waa mergi hadba meel u jiidma – A word is like sinew: it
stretches in every direction.
4.4.5. It was said in 0.3.6 that the compound conjunction ama…ama – either
…or links verbs. A closer look at proverbs:
a) confirms this observation:
(331) Ama buur ahow, ama buur ku tiirsanow – Either be a mountain or lean
on a mountain;
b) widens it by revealing examples of the binomial syntactic structures in the
second part of which a verb can be omitted:
(332) Ama afeef hore lahaw, ama adkeysi dambe – Either refuse (to do
something) at once or put up with it later;
c) changes the conception of the limits of the usage of this conjunction which,
29
We do, however, know a variant of this proverb in which the subject is used with the marker of
nominative case: Aqoonla’aani waa iftiinla’aan.
30
According to Somali ideas the stomach, with the chest, is the main depository of the intellect.
During the dry season heavy rains sometimes fall and fill the dry river-beds.
97
it becomes clear, can link even independent sentences:
(333) Nin salaan badani waa sabool ama waa wadaad, ama waa ciidan, ama
waa beenaale – He who is too affable is either a beggar, a mullah, a servant, or a liar;
(334) Ama waa la muuqdaa, ama waa la maqan yahay – Either be visible or be
absent [lit.: either somebody is visible or somebody is absent, i.e. either do a job well
or not at all].
4.4.6. Judging by the material which is at my disposal the rules of the usage of
the particle weeye in proverbial clichés do not differ from those described in 1.6.4:
(335) Gowrac hal weeye, halka geelse gooni weeye – It is one thing to
slaughter (cattle in general), quite another to slaughter camels.
The presence of the two particles can be explained by the structure of this
cliché, which consists of two independent sentences linked by the conjunction -se
(geelse – lit.: camels-but).
4.5. The particle baa in proverbs and proverbial phrases
The SP baa is used in paremias far more often than are other sentence particles.
Baa (and its variants ayaa/yaa) is found in all proverbs and proverbial phrases in the
form of independent affirmative sentences, with the exception of the relatively small
class of paremias with the SP waa, the not very numerous clichés with the SP waxaa
and the even less widespread structures without sentence particles. Baa can be seen
in all the types of paremias which were defined in 4.2.
4.5.1. Word order in proverbs and proverbial phrases with the SP baa is fairly
strictly regulated in comparison with the similar non-clichéized structures (see 2.4).
98
If in a paremia there is a subject, an object and a predicate and the subject is the
rheme (i.e. the subject is immediately followed by the SP baa), the object occupies
the initial position:
(336) Sir-ma-qabe saab baa biyo u celiya – For an honest man even a saab31
holds water.
(337) Dad nin u taliyey iyo nin tuugay baa yaqaan – People are known to the
man who governs them and to the man who begs from them;
(338) Rag qabri iyo qawl baa ka hara – Of a man, a tomb and (good) fame
[lit.: a word] remain.
When the subject precedes the object the following word order is allowed:
(339) Dimbil baa duur wada gubta – One spark burns a whole forest;
(340) Bir baa bir goysa – Iron cuts iron.
The clipped form of the verb with the final short -a indicates that the word which
precedes the SP baa is the subject here, not the word which follows it (see 2.5.2).
(341) Fakhri baa duco ku bara – Poverty will teach you to bow [lit.: to bless].
However, of the paremias that I know, not a single one demonstrates another
permitted order of the components of a threefold structure (not counting the SP baa
which fulfils an auxiliary function) with the subject occupying the first position and
the object the final one:
(342) *Fakhri baa ku bara duco.
Thus the considerable difference between paremias of this type, in which the
31
Saab is an openwork wicker frame for holding a water-jar.
99
SP baa marks the subject, and similar non-clichéized structures, lies in the position of
the predicate: in proverbs and proverbial phrases it is always in the final position.
The other distinctive sign (less significant but perceptible) reveals itself in the
‘behaviour’ of the object: in paremias it strives for the first place.
4.5.2. Results which are no less interesting can be obtained by observation of
the paremias in which an object, or any other DFR except the subject, is the rheme,
i.e. of the proverbs and proverbial phrases in which the SP baa is used with short
subjective pronouns:
(343) Diqsi biyo ku dabaal bartay fuud buu ku gubtaa – A fly which has got
used to bathing in water will be boiled in soup;
(344) Baqal fardo la daaqday faras bay is moodda – A mule which grazes with
horses thinks it is a horse too;
(345) Belaayo ama ‘guur’ ama ‘guurso’ bay ku tiraahdaa – Misfortune tells
you either to move on or to get married.
In all these typical examples the word order is the same: the cliché begins with
a subject (in 343 and 344 followed by a relative clause) which is followed by an
object and the SP baa with a corresponding short subjective pronoun, and ends with a
predicate. Thus, out of the three possible interpositions of the components
demonstrated in 2.4.3 for the ‘parallel’ non-clichéized structures, in practice only one
is realized in proverbs and proverbial phrases. We have not found a single paremia in
which a subject would follow a predicate (as in 194), and paremias in which a subject
follows an object (as in 193) are very rare:
(346) Ninba dhuuniguu cuno buu dhiiggiisa leeyahay – What a man eats gets
100
into his blood [lit.: Blood of every man has that food which he eats]. This means that
if a man has good food he looks good and if he has bad food he looks bad.
In this proverb, with a rather complicated syntactic structure, including
inversion (Ninba dhuuniguu cuno – Every man the food which he eats, but not
Dhuuniga uu ninba cuno – The food which every man eats), the subject of the main
sentence (the blood) is bound up, by the relation of possessiveness, with the subject
of the relative clause (every man) which determines the object (food). The place of
the possessed, which here plays the role of the subject, seems to be determined by the
structure of the text itself. At any rate, in another proverb with exactly the same
syntax, the possessed (this time in the role of the object) also occupies the position
between the SP baa with a short subjective pronoun and the predicate:
(347) Ninba coodkuu dhaqdo buu caanihiisa dhamaa – Every man drinks the
milk of the cattle he looks after.
4.5.3. The word order in those not very numerous paremias which have the
subject as rheme and two objects (or other DFRs), is the same, in general, as those
with only one: objects occupy the first place, with sometimes an indirect object
preceding a direct one and sometimes the other way round, then come the subject,
marked by the SP baa without a short subject pronoun, and the predicate:
(348) Dheriga karka kulayl baa ka keenay – It was heat that made the cookingpot boil [lit.: The heat brought boiling from the cooking-pot]. This means that there
was a certain reason which made someone angry.
The disposition of the components in paremias which have two objects (or
101
other DFRs), one of which bears the logical accent and is therefore marked by the SP
baa with a short subjective pronoun, resembles what was said in 4.5.2 about clichés
with one object.
The second object, direct or indirect, is usually placed between the sentence
particle and the predicate:
(349) Beenlow nin dhintey iyo nin dheer buu markhaati u qabsadaa – A liar
calls as witness one who is either dead or far away.
But exceptions can also occur; in at least one proverb the subject and the first
object change places:
(350) Nin wuxuu xarrago moodaa nin kale xumaan moodaa – What one man is
proud of another is ashamed of [lit.: A thing which one man considers to be good
another considers to be bad].
It seems that here the canon has been broken for the sake of achieving the
maximum phonetic, lexical and syntactic balance between the two parts of the
proverb. This is due to the obvious possibilities of inversion (Nin wuxuu – ‘One man
a thing which’ instead of the more natural Wuxuu nin – ‘A thing which one man’), the
dropping of the short subjective pronoun (as was shown in 2.3.2 and 2.4, its usage in
such structures is optional), and the fusion of the SP baa with the last word of the
relative clause (moodo + baa = moodaa), which results in a form indistinguishable
from the verbal predicate of the main sentence (moodaa).
4.5.4 The word order in those quite widespread paremias with the impersonal
pronoun la is determined by its fixed position relative to the sentence particle and the
predicate (la stands between them, adjoining the preverbs of governance). In this
102
case objects and other DFR are placed only before the SP baa:
(351) Cadowgaaga caano mac baa la siiyaa – An enemy should be treated to
fresh milk [i.e. should be treated as a valued guest so as to lessen his vigilance];
(352) Hadal been ah dheg been ah baa lagu dhegeystaa – False speech is
listened to with a false ear;
(353) Dantaada maqaar ey baa loogu seexdaa – In striving for gains one will
sit even on a dogskin32.
4.5.5. Among Somali proverbs there are some structures, by no means rare,
which are composed of two syntactically independent parts, both including the SP
baa, which are linked by the conjunctions na or se with the meaning of ‘and’, ‘but’:
(354) Cid wax ku siisa in badan baad aragtaa, cid wax kuu sheegtase in yar
baad aragtaa – People who can give you a (necessary) thing you meet often, but
people who can give you (necessary) advice you meet seldom [this is why good
advice is so highly appreciated];
(355) Ciil sokeeye kaa galay carrabkaa (carrabka + baa) lagu baxshaa, ciil
shisheeye kaa galayna cududdaa (cududda + baa) lagu baxshaa – One gets rid of an
offence caused by one’s own people with a word [lit.: tongue], but one gets rid of an
offence caused by other people with force [lit.: hand];
However, very often the SP baa and the verbal predicate in the second part of
such paremias are omitted:
(356) Dhagax meel dhow buu ku dhacaa, dhawaaqna meel dheer – A stone
32
According to Muslim ideas a dog is a dirty animal, so after having touched one, the ‘defiled’ spot
needs repeated ablutions.
103
flies [lit.: falls] near, a word [lit.: a sound] far off.
This happens even when the subjects of the two parts of a proverb are not of
the same gender, and the missing verb would not have been identical to the one
present:
(357) Dhib dheef baa ka dambeysa, abaarna aaran – A poor life is followed by
a prosperous life, a drought – by green grass;
(358) Hadal run baa lagu caddeeyaa, ilkana rummay – Truth makes to shine
speech, rummay33– teeth.
4.5.6. As was seen in examples (350) and (355), the SP baa can merge with the
preceding word which is either the rheme itself (355) or which finalises a subordinate
clause attached to the rheme (350). The sentence particle loses its initial consonant b,
and the contracted word its final short vowel.
That these phonemes are dropped is evident from the following examples of
contractions using the SP baa together with the short subjective pronoun in the 3rd
person masculine singular – buu:
(359) Dagaal gondahaaguu (gondahaaga + buu) ka dhashaa – A war can
jump out from under your feet [lit.: can be born under your feet]. This means: get
ready for unexpected troubles.
Bell (1953, p.35) observed this phenomenon in oral communication and
ascertained that a contraction does not occur if the word preceding the SP baa ends in
a long vowel or in any consonant. Moreover, if the last phoneme of this word is a
33
A twig used by Somalis to clean the teeth.
104
short -i, the contraction is not obligatory.
The study of paremias confirms and widens these observations. Firstly, in
proverbs and proverbial phrases, contraction of the SP baa, with or without a
subjective pronoun with the stressed words, is always optional.
This becomes
evident:
1) When variants of the same paremia are compared:
(360) Beentaada hore runtaada danbay (danbe + baa + ay) u baas baxdaa;
(361) Beentaada hore beentaada danbe bay baas u noqotaa – Your previous
lie damages your present truth.
(362) Ri’ waliba shillalkay is dhigtaa (digto + baa) lagu qalaa;
(363) Ri’ walba shillakay is digato baa lagu qalaa – Every she-goat is
slaughtered where she is standing on the board [i.e. everyone gets what he merits].
(364) Geed walba in gubtaa (gubta + baa) hoos taal;
(365) Geed walba in gubta baa hoos taal – Under every tree there is something
which hampers its growth [lit.: burns it].
2) When separate proverbs are examined:
(366) Ammaano kugu raagtay yeddaa baad moodda – Property deposited with
you for safekeeping a long time ago feels like your own;
(367) Ballan habeen kallah arooryo buu leehayay – What was promised in the
evening should be fulfilled [lit.: set off] in the morning;
(368) Deeqsi baa loo duceeya – A generous man is prayed for.
It also becomes apparent that the SP baa can be adjoined by words which end in:
105
1) The glottal consonant h, which is reduced in the final position in the verbal
forms ah – ‘being’ and leh – ‘having’:
(369) Baruur keliyaa (keli ah + baa → keli + aa → keliyaa) baruuro qurmisa
– One piece of fat spoils many pieces;
(370) Ninkii xoog laa (leh + baa → l + aa → laa) xaq leh – He who has
strength has right.
2) The semi-vowal sonant y:
(371) Meel lagaa jecel yahay haddaad ka tagto, meel lagaa neceb yahaad
(yahay + baa + aad → yahaad) tagtaa – If you leave a place where you are loved
you will come to a place where you are hated.
It is also worthy of mention that in (369) and (370) h is “ignored” and the
preceding phonemes, a and e, participate in the contraction, and in (371) the phoneme
b of the sentence particle interacts with the diphthong ay of the verb yahay – (he) is.
Contractions with the SP ayaa, a variant of baa, with the preceding word have
not been observed:
(372) Dhubuq-dhubuq hore dhabanno-hays dambay (dambe + bay) leedahay –
He who makes haste at the beginning will hold his head in his hands at the end.
(373) Dhubuq-dhubuq hore dhabanno-hays dambe ayay leedahay.
4.6. The particle waxaa in proverbs and proverbial phrases
Of the sentence particles, waxaa is the one most seldom used in proverbs. This
can be explained by the specificity of the sentence particle itself, which serves mainly
for the creation of complex sentences, and by that of paremias which, with some
106
exceptions, represent simple syntactical structures. Inasmuch as functionally the SP
waxaa is similar to the SP baa (they both realize the same types of focus – actantial
and circumstantial), the place it might have taken in paremias is, as a rule, occupied by
baa. In the preference which is given to the SP baa a part is also played by the abovementioned ability of this particle to disappear, as it were, by merging with the marked
words, a process which saves the “building material” of the proverbial structures.
Typical sayings with the SP waxaa contain one or several dependent clauses:
(374) Belaayo waxay u daran tahay marka reer aad mijihiisa tahay ay madax
kaaga dhigto – Misfortune is when a reer34 in which you are a leg [i.e. occupy a
subordinate position] makes you a head [i.e. a chief];
(375) Rag waxaa ugu xun saddex: nin maqan oon la tebin, nin jooga oon la
tirin iyo nin tegeya oon la celin – Of all men, three types are the worst: he who is not
remembered when absent, he who is ignored when present, and he who is not stopped
when departing;
(376) Maalintii col loo joogo labo nin lalama tashado – fuley iyo geesi ee
waxaa lala tashadaa nin caaqil ah – When the (attack of) an enemy is expected one
does not seek advice from a coward or a brave man, but from a wise man.
As we see, in proverbial sentences the SP waxaa is used with a short subjective
pronoun (example 374 in which the subject is not the rheme), without a short
subjective pronoun (example 375 in which the subject is the rheme) and with the
indefinite personal pronoun la which is never the rheme (example 376).
34
Here: clan, tribe.
107
4.6.1. Among the items of Somali folklore there is a number of “numerical”
clichés traditionally attributed to proverbs. A careful observation of the so-called
labaley, saddexley, afarley (clichés based on numbers ‘two’, ‘three’, ‘four’) and so
on, reveals that they are not homogeneous. Some are typical proverbs (375), others
are riddles (often with answers), or fablettes etc. Without going into the problem of
the classification of the “numerical” clichés I shall only mention that some are onephrase and others supra-phrase structures, and that both are rather complicated
syntactical formations in which, however, the SP waxaa is almost never used:
(377) Laba waa la dhibaa, labana waa la dhowraa, labana waa la dheefiyaa.
Hadday lugaha wax ka gaaraan waa la dhibaa, labada gacmood hadday wax
gaaraan waa la dhowraa, labada indhoodna hadday wax gaaraan waa la dheefiyaa
– Two (things) are not spared, two are cared for and two are gratified. When legs are
tired they are not spared [i.e. they are forced to go on], when hands are tired they are
cared for [i.e. they are given rest], when eyes are tired they are gratified [i.e. they are
cured];
(378) Saddex baa maskiin ah, saddex baase ka sii maskiinsan. Meyd baa
maskiin ah, ninkii maro u waayo baa ka sii maskiinsan; tuugsade baa maskiin ah,
ninkii taano u waayo baa ka sii maskiinsan; naag baa maskiin ah, ragannimo ninkii u
waayo baa ka sii maskiinsan – Three (things) gain sympathy, three gain pity. A dead
man gains sympathy, the man [i.e. kinsman] who is not able to get a shroud for him
gains pity; a beggar gains sympathy, the man who is not able to give him anything
[lit.: a five cent coin] gains pity; a woman gains sympathy, the man who is not able to
108
satisfy her gains pity.
The usage (though seldom) of the SP waxaa can be explained by the desire to
avoid the frequent repetition of other sentence particles at least in one part of a
“numerical” cliché:
(379) Raggu waxay u kala baxaan afar: nin af garad ah oo is mooda nimaan
wax garad ahayn – kaasi waa caaqil ee gar siiya; nin jaahil ah oo is og inuu jaahil
yahay – kaas wax bara; nimaan wax garad ahayn oo is mooda inuu wax garad yahay
– kaasi waa badow madax adag ee ka dheeraada; nin wax garad ah oo is og inuu
wax garad yahay – kaasi waa caaqil ee qaddariya – Men are of four types: one
knows much but thinks that he knows little – he must be given his dued; another
knows little and understands that he knows little – he must be taught; the third knows
little but thinks that he knows much – this stubborn ignoramus must be avoided; the
fourth knows much and understands that he knows much – he must be respected.
4.6.2. Among the printed sources of paremias which are at my disposal there is
an eclectic collection by Abdurahman Aden (1995) which rather stands apart. It
mainly contains a number of previously published proverbs existing in the Maxaadtiri dialects, supplemented with others collected in Mogadishu, the inhabitants of
which speak the Ashraf dialect (see 0.1.1). The noticeable syntactical peculiarity of
the original part of the material is a frequent usage of the SP waxaa. For example, the
only one out of a great number of variations of the proverb ‘It was heat that made the
cooking-pot boil’ (see 348) which contains the SP waxaa was recorded in the main
Somali city:
109
(380) Dheriga karkarka waxaa ka keenay kulaylka.
The same source provides further examples in which the necessity of the usage
of the SP waxaa from the point of view of the above-described “paremiological
norm” is not evident:
(381) Dhallinyaro waxaa ah ruux aan rafaad arag – A young man [lit.: youth]
is one who has not learnt suffering;
(382) Gef waxaa u weyn gefafka dadka kale – The most unpardonable [lit.: the
biggest] mistake is that of other people;
(383) Beenlow waxaa sira xasuus-xumi – A liar is betrayed by a bad memory.
It is necessary to point out the somewhat “bookish” nature of the urban
paremias, the majority of which are sayings with a direct meaning, i.e. are not
proverbs proper, but folk aphorisms (see 4.2).
4.7. Paremias without sentence particles
In his review of “Somali Proverbs and Sayings” (Kapchits, 1983)
Andrzejewski (1986) attracted the attention of linguists to “archaic grammatical
forms which, paradoxically enough, form part of everyday language and are
commonly used in conversations and in the mass media. A good example of this are
those verbal and verbal-adjectival forms which exclude the occurrence of focus
indicators (baa, ayaa, waxaa and waa) in declarative sentences such as for example
Ayax teg eelna reeb – ‘Locusts go away but leave damage behind’ and Tuug wax ka
tuhun badan – ‘A thief is more suspicious than anyone else’. In Kapchits’ collection
7 per cent of all the items contain such grammatical forms, while normally focus
110
indicators are obligatory in all declarative sentences.”
Teg and reeb in the first proverb are the forms of the 3rd person masculine
singular of verbs tag – ‘go’ and reeb – ‘leave’ in the so-called Past Independent
Tense and badan in the second proverb is the form of the 3rd person masculine
singular of the attributive verb badan – ‘be numerous’ in the Present Comparative
Tense (the terminology of Andrzejewski, 1969).
4.7.1. Personal verbal forms in the Past Independent Tense, now found mainly
in folklore texts (see, however, 118) differ from the corresponding forms in the Past
General Tense either by tone or by a combination of tone and suffixes. This can be
clearly seen by the following example of the conjugations of verbs from the three
main verbal classes which have already been mentioned: keen – bring, samee – make
and qabo – take:
Past General Tense
Singular
1st pers.
keenay/ sameeyey/ qabtay
2nd pers.
keentay/ sameysey/ qabatay
3rd pers. masc.
keenay/ sameeyey/ qabtay
3rd pers. fem.
keentay/ sameysey/ qabatay
1st pers. (excl.)
keennay/ sameynay/ qabannay
1st pers. (incl.)
keennay/ sameynay/ qabannay
2nd pers.
keenteen/ sameyseen/ qabateen
Plural
111
3rd pers.
keeneen/ sameeyeen/ qabteen
Past Independent Tense35
Singular
1st pers.
kéenay/ saméeyey/ qábtay
2nd pers.
kéentay/ saméysey/ qabátay
3rd pers. masc.
kéen/ samée/ qabáy
3rd pers. fem.
kéentay/ saméysey/ qabátay
1st pers. (excl.)
kéennay/ saméynay/ qabánnay
1st pers. (incl.)
kéennay/ saméynay/ qabánnay
2nd pers.
keenté/ sameysé/ qabaté
3rd pers.
keené/ sameeyé/ qabté
Plural
Proverbs employing the Past Independent Tense constitute a considerable,
though not the biggest, part of the paremias without sentence particles:
(384) Cad ku ceejiyey xil iyo geeri ku dil – If you choke with a big piece (of
food) you will both disgrace yourself and die [lit.: A big piece which stuck in your
throat killed you with shame and death]. This means: It is bad to gobble;
(385) Geel laba jir soo wada mar – All the camels were two years old [lit.:
passed the two-year age]. This means: Once upon a time everybody was young;
(386) Laga barayba laga badi – One surpasses [lit.: surpassed] the man from
35
See Andrzejewski (1956), p.126.
112
whom one has learnt something;
(387) Hadday fooli timaaddo, gudaqarsiimo hartay – When labour pains start,
shame must be thrown off [lit.: had to be thrown off];
(388) Wax rag kaa galay rako kaa gale – What [lit.: things] you gave a man
you will not get back [lit.: they stuck in him].
The subjects in each of these examples are as follows: in 384 it is the 3 rd person
masculine singular noun cad – a piece; in 385 it is the collective masculine noun geel
– camels, in which, as in 384, the verbal predicate takes the form of the 3rd person
masculine singular; in 386 it is the indefinite personal pronoun la (see 0.3.8), again
with a 3rd person masculine singular verb; in 387 it is the 3 rd person feminine singular
noun gudaqarsiimo – covering of the genitals; and in 388 it is the 3rd person plural
noun wax – things. The set of subjects in the paremias known to me in which the Past
Independent Tense is used is, in fact, exhausted by the nouns of the 3 rd person
singular and plural and the pronoun la, and correspondingly only those forms of the
regular verbs which I have shown in the examples can be found among them.
The personal forms of the attributive verbs are extremely rare in paremias with
the usage of the Past Independent Tense. Suffice it to say that in my collection of about
ten thousand proverbs there is only one – that of the 3rd person feminine singular:
(389) Gabadhii xabaal ku asturrayd ama nin ku asturrayd – Only grave or marrige
can save a girl (from seduction) [lit.: A girl is preserved in a grave or in a husband].
The paradigm of the verb asturan – ‘be preserved’, ‘be covered’ in the Past
113
Independent Tense is as follows36 (see the corresponding forms of the attributive
verbs in the Past General in 2.5.2):
Singular
1st pers.
asturnáa (asturráa)
2nd pers.
asturnáyd (asturráyd)
3rd pers. masc.
asturnáa (asturráa)
3rd pers. fem.
asturnáyd (asturráyd)
1st pers. (excl.)
asturnáyn (asturráyn)
1st pers. (incl.)
asturnáyn (asturráyn)
2nd pers.
asturnaydé (asturraydé)
3rd pers.
asturnaayé (asturraayé)
Plural
4.7.2. Attributive verbs appear much more often in paremias without sentence
particles in which the Present Comparative Tense is employed. Banti (1988, p.209)
writes that in the Present (Comparative) Tense all the verbs of the class 437 have a
simple form38 which does not co-occur with focus particles and is used in
36
See also ibid., p. 129.
37
i.e. attributive verbs.
38
What is meant is the dictionary form (wanaagsan – be good, daran – be bad, tough) which these
verbs assume in relative clauses without subjects of their own: Nin wanaagsan – a good man [lit.: A
man who is good], Abaar daran – A severe drought [lit.: A drought which is severe] in contrast to a
compound form in which they appear in the role of the predicate of the main sentence, for example
with the SP waa: Ninku waa wanaagsan yahay – ‘This man is good’ or of the predicate in the
114
comparative structures of proverbs and other fixed expressions. In a later letter to the
author (1990) he drew his attention to the fact that the Present Comparative Tense is
not used only in comparative contexts.
Before setting about the analysis of the proverbs with attributive verbs in the
Comparative Tense it is necessary to name the regular ways of the formation of the
comparative degree used in proverbs. They are three: one syntactical and two lexical.
There is no morphological expression of degrees of comparison in Somali.
1) The syntactical pattern presumes the building of a construction which starts
with the names of a pair of compared things followed by the name of that one of the
pair which is superior in quality and is usually a subject or an object to the verbal
predicate which closes the construction:
(390) Dhegta iyo isha, dhegta ayaa da’ weyn – An ear is older [i.e. more
important] than an eye [lit.: An ear and an eye, an ear is old];
(391) Libaax aammusan iyo libaax ciyaa, libaax ciyaa [ciya + baa]
wanaagsan – A growling lion is better [i.e. less dangerous] than one which keeps
silent [lit.: A silent lion and a growling lion, a growling lion is good];
(392) Dhurwaa kan ciya iyo kan aammusan, kan ciyaa [ciya + baa] la qaatay
– A barking hyena is better [i.e. less dangerous] than one which keeps silent [lit.: A
barking hyena and a silent hyena, one has preferred a barking hyena].
2) Lexically the comparative degree can be expressed by two modes:
relative clause with its own subject: Inuu daran yahay waa la ogsoon yahay – It is known that he is
bad.
115
a) with the help of the preverb ka meaning ‘than’ in proximity to attributive
verbs:
(393) Dhul jid baa ka toosan, dadna kii qaada – A road is straighter than open
ground and he who takes it (is straighter) than other people [i.e. he leaves them
behind].
It is necessary to note that in the second part of the proverb, which is also a
comparative structure, there is no sentence particle, preverb or attributive verb;
(394) Nin fiicanba nin baa ka sii fiican – For every good man there is a better
man [lit.: One man is good, the other man is still more good].
In this proverb the preverb ka is supplemented by the particle sii which here
means ‘still more’ because both comparable “things” possess the same quality.
(395) Afar-addinle waxaa ka halis badan laba-addinle – He who possesses two
legs [i.e. a human being] is more dangerous that he who possesses four legs [i.e. an
animal].
It is worth paying attention to the fact that in all three proverbs the thing which
possesses superior quality is a subject which coincides with the rheme. It is shown by
the absence of short subjective pronouns in proximity to the sentence particles.
b) with the help of the verb dhaan – be better than. In the constructions with
dhaan “a better thing” becomes a subject, the verb becomes a predicate and the SP
baa (ayaa) is used either with or without short subjective pronouns:
(396) Maroodiga iliggiisaa (iliggiisa + baa) dhaama – The tusk of an elephant
is better [i.e. more expensive] than he himself;
116
(397) Nin dhintay kabihiisaa [kabihiisa + baa] dhaama – The sandals of a
dead man are more valuable than he is [there is no benefit from a dead man];
(398) Dameerka ninka wada mar buu dhaamaa – Sometimes a donkey is better
than its driver.
4.7.3. In all the paremias without sentence particles in which comparisons are
made between elements possessing different degrees of particular qualities (there are
dozens of such paremias in my collection), the first lexical pattern of the expression
of the comparative degree is used, as in examples (393-395). These paremias belong
to two constructive logical types:
1) If one element has a particular quality and another element a different
degree of the same quality, one element will exceed, or be preferable to, the other:
(399) Carrab dalab leh lug dalab leh laga garan og – It is easier to recognize
the crookedness of one’s tongue [i.e. one’s lie] than the crookedness of one’s leg;
(400) Gows la qaaday geel la qaaday ka daran – It is worse to eat before
someone's eyes39 [i.e.without sharing the food] than to steal his camels;
(401) Far bukta faraha ka dheer – A sour finger seems to be longer than the
others [because it always hits against something].
2) If one element has a particular quality to a greater extent than does another
element, it also has some other quality to a greater extent than does that other
element:
39
In the original the idiom ‘to take one’s tooth’ which means ‘to eat before someone’s eyes’.
117
(402) Nin gu’ kaa weyn garaadna kaa weyn – He who is one year older [lit.:
bigger] than you has a mind bigger than yours;
(403) Nin gu’ kaa weyn il guruxeedna kaa weyn – He who is one year older
[lit.: bigger] than you has an eye [lit.: eyeball] bigger than yours [i.e. he sees more];
(404) Nin gu’ kaa weyn gu’ baas kaa weyn – He who is one year older [lit.:
bigger] than you suffers one year longer [lit.: bigger] than you.
Proverbs (400-404) differ from the similar constructions in (393-395) only by
the absence of sentence particles. At first glance they simply omitted and can be
easily “reconstructed” without any damage to their syntactical structure and meaning.
However, on closer examination it becomes clear that this operation can be applied in
full measure only to two of them:
(405) *Gows la qaaday geel la qaaday baa ka daran;
(406) *Far bukta baa faraha ka dheer.
It can also be applied in part to proverbs (402-404):
(407) *Nin gu’ kaa weyn baa garaadna kaa weyn;
(408) *Nin gu’ kaa weyn baa il guruxeedna kaa weyn;
(409) *Nin gu’ kaa weyn baa gu’ baas kaa weyn.
But in some variants of these proverbs one can spot the morphological marker
-i which is incompatible with the SP baa stressing the subject (see 2.2):
(410) Nin gu’ kaa weyni garaadna kaa weyn;
(411) Nin gu’ kaa weyni il guruxeedna kaa weyn;
(412) Nin gu’ kaa weyni gu’ baas kaa weyn.
In other words the following are not grammatically correct:
118
(413) *Nin gu’ kaa weyni baa garaadna kaa weyn;
(414) *Nin gu’ kaa weyni baa il guruxeedna kaa weyn;
(415) *Nin gu’ kaa weyni baa gu’ baas kaa weyn.
If the “dropped out” SP baa had marked not the subject phrase but the object
(which would have justified the addition of the morphological marker -i to the last
word of the subject phrase) it would, firstly, have been used with a short subjective
pronoun and secondly, the attributive verbal predicate would have adjoined the 3 rd
person masculine singular form of the verb ahaan – to be:
(416) *Nin gu’ kaa weyni garaad baanu (baa + uu + na) kaa weyn yahay;
(417) *Nin gu’ kaa weyni il guruxeed baanu (baa + uu + na) kaa weyn yahay;
(418) *Nin gu’ kaa weyni gu’ baas buu (baa + uu) kaa weyn yahay.
The sentence particles waa and waxaa also do not fit within the context of the
proverbs concerned. In the case of waa, the predicate would have agreed with the
subject according to the “complete” type I, and in the case of waxaa, among other
differences the verb could not have occupied the final position.
As for the proverb (399), the clipped form of the attributive verb og – ‘aware’,
‘know’, when used in the role of the predicate of the indefinite personal pronoun la (the
subject), always makes a construction with the verb ahaan – ‘to be’ in any of the present
tenses, irrespective of the type of sentence particle used in the sentence (see 1.5).
(419) *Carrab dalab leh lug dalab leh baa laga garan og yahay.
Hence there have been revealed three types of paremias without sentence
particles in which the attributive verb-predicate is used in the so-called Present
119
Comparative Tense:
1) Paremias which allow for the reconstruction of the SP baa without any
change of their structure and meaning (400-401);
2) Paremias of which some variants allow for the reconstruction of the SP baa
(402-404);
3) Paremias which do not allow for the reconstruction of the SP baa (399).
Proverbs which belong to the third type seem to be the most ancient. It may be
assumed that they appeared when the SP baa was not yet used for the topic-comment
articulation (see 0.3.5). Paremias which belong to the second (“intermediate”) type
may have been created when the SP baa had just emerged as one of the focus
particles. Finally, the proverbs of the first type seem to have entered the Somali
discourse when the SP baa had already established itself in the language but had not
yet driven out the other functionally similar rheme-marking means.
The aforesaid makes more exact the following observation made by
Zholkovsky: “…the SP baa can be omitted in the sentences with the preverb ka in the
meaning of the comparative degree” (1971, p.194), because, as has been just
demonstrated, in some proverbial sentences with the attributive verbs in the role of
the predicate, sentence particles are not only absent, but they cannot occur.
4.7.4. One of the interesting types of paremias without sentence particles is
represented by the proverb mentioned in Andrzejewski’s review (4.7):
(420) Tuug wax ka tuhun badan – A thief is more suspicious than anyone else
[lit.: A thief is more suspicious than anything].
Here the preverb ka – than, which usually serves to convey the meaning of the
120
comparative degree, is used to express the superlative degree (instead of the preverb
u – most):
(421) Habaar waxaa u daran ‘lixdan jir ku cayrow’, ‘labaatan jir kaa dhimay’,
‘laba jir caano u waa’ – The most terrible curse is ‘May you become poor at sixty’,
‘May you lose your twenty-year-old (son)’, ‘May you fail to get milk for your twoyear-old (child)’.
Syntactical structures with this exceptional usage of the preverb ka represent
one of the archaic paremiological types. I know of another two proverbs of this kind:
(422) Fuley wax ka daymo badan – A coward looks back most frequently;
(423) Fuley wax ka qoryo badan – Nobody arms himself better than a coward.
These proverbs allow for the reconstruction of the SP baa:
(424) *Tuug baa wax ka tuhun badan.
4.7.5. Some other types of proverbs also make syntactical forms without
sentence particles, among them the following in particular:
1) Proverbs with the verbal predicate waa40 – ‘fail’, which in combination with
the indefinite personal subject la, the short objective pronoun is – ‘self’ and the
preverbs ku or la41 (la+is+ku = laysku; la+is+la = laysla) means ‘One cannot bring
together’ or ‘One cannot do two things at the same time’:
(425) Calool bukta iyo weji furfuran laysku waa – One cannot smile [lit.: make
an amiable face] when one has a stomach-ache;
40
The coincidence of this verbal form with the SP waa is purely graphical. In fact they differ by the
quality of the vowel: in the verb it is closed (fronted) and in the particle it is open (retracted).
41
For their meaning see in 0.3.5.
121
(426) Fadhi iyo fuud yicibeed laysku waa – One cannot sit at home [i.e. idle]
and enjoy yicib-nut soup;42
(427) Laf iyo labo dhagax laysla waa – Where there is a bone you cannot find
two stones [which you need for crushing the bone and eating the marrow].
In paremias of this type a sentence particle cannot be reconstructed.
2) Proverbs with the attributive and irregular verbs lahaan – ‘to have’ and
la’aan – ‘not to have’ in the role of the predicate in combination with the adverbial
particle kala – ‘apart’, ‘differently’, which in their turn divide into two subtypes:
a) proverbs with the indefinite personal subject la:
(428) Alle la kala baryi og, erayna la kala dhihi og – (People) pray to Allah
differently and speak differently [ie. some of them do it better, some worse);
(429) Dhaan loo kala habboon – Some (people) can go for water and some
cannot.43
b) proverbs with nominal subjects:
(430) Run iyo beeni kala raad leh – Truth and lies leave different traces;
(431) Hadal iyo hilbaba kala qalan – Talk is like different sorts of meat [some
is good and some is bad];
(432) Kala fog fool iyo lulmo – When in labour one cannot sleep [lit.:
childbirth and sleepiness are far from each other]. This means: when someone is in
trouble, he cannot rest.
42
Somalis usually go to remote and often almost inaccessible places to gather these very nutritious
nuts.
43
This refers to the important and laborious task of bringing water to a nomadic encampment,
which is charged to the strongest and most sturdy men.
122
(433) Laba kala bariday kala war la’ – If two men have spent a night far away
from each other, neither knows how the other one is now.
Paremias which belong to type (a), and some proverbs of type (b), i.e. (430)
and (431), do not allow for the reconstruction of sentence particles (see the
argumentation in 4.7.3), while (432) and (433) can perfectly well be used with the SP
baa. In proverb (432), however, it would then become necessary to cancel the
inversion, resulting in the adverbial particle occupying the first place in the sentence,
which is an extremely untypical situation in Somali affirmative structures;
3) Proverbs with attributive verbs in what Andrzejewski (1969) called the
Present Exclamatory Tense:
(434) Aji bakhti la buuranaa! – (It seems) to an aji44 (that) a dead beast was
fat! This means: A lost thing seems to have been good;
(435) Ayandarro fac-weynaa! – Bad luck lasts a long time!
(436) Maba dhalane dhawrsan okaa! – She has not been born yet but is already
ashamed (of her nakedness)! Said when a young person acts as seriously as if they
were adult.
4) Verbless proverbs, which resemble structures with the SP waa introducing a
compound nominal predicate (see 1.6). These proverbs can be divided, according to
their syntactic complexity, into two sub-types: one-part and two-part structures. They
both allow for the reconstruction of the SP waa:
a) verbless proverbs in the form of one-part deep structures:
44
A person of a high caste.
123
(437) Cunug fiyow, hooyo fiican – A good [lit.: healthy] child (means) a good mother;
(438) *Cunug fiyow waa hooyo fiican.
(439) Ballan badan, been badan – A lot of promises (means) a lot of lies;
(440) *Ballan badan waa been badan.
b) verbless proverbs in the form of two-part deep structures:
(441) Dharaartiina il, habeenkiina dheg – By day (one needs) eyes, by night
(one needs) ears;
(442) *Dharaartiina waa il, habeenkiina waa dheg.
(443) Kismaayo kistaa ama kaskaa – (To live) in Kismayo45 (one needs) either
money or brains;
(444) *Kismaayo waa kistaa ama waa kaskaa.
4.7.6. It is worth mentioning that archaic grammatical forms which exclude the
usage of sentence particles co-exist with the usual forms, not only within the
framework of the Somali proverbial stock as a whole but also at the level of the
variants of individual paremias. This can be exemplified by a proverb taken at
random:
(445) Caano daatay dabadoodaa (dabadooda + baa) la qabtaa – When milk
spills one tries to save at least the last drop [lit.: catches milk by its tail].
Many variants of this proverb were received from informants, the following
among them:
45
Kismayo – a Somali coastal city.
124
(446) Caano daatay waa la dabo qabtaa and
(447) Caano daatayba dabadood la qabay.
Proverbs 445 and 446 represent syntactic structures with the indefinite personal
pronoun la, followed by a direct object (in the first example caano daatay dabadood
– ‘spilled milk’s tail’, in the second caano daatayba – ‘any spilled milk’) and a
verbal predicate in the form of the 3rd person masculine singular in the Present
General Tense (qabtaa – ‘catches’ and dabo qabtaa – ‘catches behind’). But whereas
in (445) the SP baa makes the object into the rheme, in (446) the SP waa transfers
logical accent to the verb.
Proverb (447), which is used along with other variants, belongs to the paremias
described in 4.7.1, which have archaic verbal forms in the Past Independent Tense
incompatible with any of the sentence particles and seldom used in contemporary
Somali.
125
6. Bibliography
Виноградов, В. А. 1997 “К типологии фокусных конструкций в западноафриканских языках” – Африка в меняющемся мире, 2. Москва.
Жолковский, А. К. 1966 “Последовательность предглагольных частиц в
языке сомали” – Языки Африки. Москва.
Жолковский, А. К. 1971 Синтаксис сомали. Москва.
Капчиц, Г. Л. 1983 Сомалийские пословицы и поговорки (составление,
перевод с сомали, предисловие и логико-семиотическая классификация) Москва.
Капчиц, Г. Л. 1996 “«Война» и «мир» в сомалийских паремиях” – Африка:
общества, культуры, языки. Москва.
Капчиц, Г. Л., Кенадид М. 1996 “Устные формы речи и проблема
становления письменности языка сомали” – Литературный язык и устные
сферы коммуникации. (Ред. В. Я. Порхомовский, Н. Н. Семенюк). Москва.
Капчиц, Г.Л. 1997 “Логический акцент в языке сомали: фразовая
частица waa” Африка в меняющемся мире, 2. Москва.
Капчиц, Г. Л. 1998 “Логический акцент в языке сомали: фразовая частица baa” –
Африка: общества, культуры, языки. Москва.
Капчиц, Г. Л. 1999 “Логический акцент в языке сомали: фразовая частица waxaa” –
Африка: общества, культуры, языки. Москва.
126
Крушельницкая, К. Г. 1956 К вопросу о смысловом членении предложения – ВЯ.
Москва.
Лаптева, О. А. 1972 Нерешенные вопросы теории актуального членения –
ВЯ. Москва.
Николаева, Т. М. 1978 Лингвистика текста. Современное состояние и
перспектива – НЗЛ, 8. Москва.
Нунэн, М. 1982 “О подлежащих и топиках” (пер. с англ.) – НЗЛ, 9. Москва.
Падучева Е. В. 1988 Логический анализ языка: Знание и мнение. Москва.
Пермяков, Г. Л. 1970 От поговорки до сказки (Заметки по общей теории
клише). Москва.
Пермяков, Г. Л. 1979 Пословицы и поговорки народов Востока.
Систематизированное собрание изречений двухсот народов. Москва.
Пермяков, Г. Л. 1988 Основы структурной паремиологии (составление,
вступительная статья и комментарий Капчица Г. Л.). Москва.
Порхомовский, В. Я. 1982 “Проблемы генетической классификации
языков Африки” – Теоретические основы классификации языков мира. Москва.
Слюсарева, Н. А. 1986 Категориальная основа тема-рематической
организации предложения – ВЯ. Москва.
Страны мира. 1989 Москва.
Хэллидей, М. А. 1978 “Место «функциональной перспективы предложения»
в системе лингвистического описания” (пер. с англ.) – НЗЛ, 8. Москва.
Шахтер, П. 1982 “Ролевые и референциальные свойства подлежащих”
127
(пер. с англ.) – НЗЛ, 9. Москва.
Шевякова, В. Е. 1980 Современный английский язык. Порядок слов,
актуальное членение, интонация. Москва.
Щеглов, Ю. К. 1964 “К понятиям логических субъекта и предиката” –
Машинный перевод и прикладная лингвистика, 8. Москва.
Abdurahman, H.H.Aden. 1995 Murtidu waa Hodantinnimo. Cologne-Paris.
Abraham, R.C. 1964 Somali-English Dictionary. London.
Abraham, R.C. 1967 English-Somali Dictionary. London.
Andrzejewski, B.W. 1955 “The Problem of Vowel Representation in the Isaaq
Dialect of Somali” – Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 17.3. London.
Andrzejewski, B.W. 1956 “Accentual Patterns in Verbal Forms in the Isaaq
Dialect of Somali” – Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 18.
Andrzejewski, B.W. 1960 “Pronominal and Prepositional Particles in
Northern Somali” – African Language Studies, 1. London.
Andrzejewski, B.W. 1961 “Notes on the Substantive Pronouns in Somali” –
African Language Studies 2. London.
Andrzejewski, B.W. 1964 The Declensions of Somali Nouns. London.
Andrzjewski, B.W. 1968 “Inflectional Characteristics of the so-called ‘Weak
Verbs’ in Somali” – African Language Studies, 9. London.
Andrzejewski, B.W. 1969 “Some Observations on Hybrid Verbs in Somali” –
African Language Studies X. London.
Andrzejewski, B.W. 1975 “The Role of Indicator Particles in Somali” –
Afroasiatic Linguistics 1.6. London.
128
Andrzejewski, B.W. 1979 “The Case System in Somali” – School of Oriental
and African Studies. London.
Andrzejewski, B.W. 1986 “G.L. Kabjits/ G.L. Kapchits: Maahmaahyada
Soomaalida ee ku qoran afka Soomaaliga iyo afka Ruushka oo ay weheliyaan
maahmaahyada Ruushka ee ay isu dhigmaan/Somaliiskie poslovitsy i pogovorki na
somaliiskom i russkom yazykakh s russkimi sootvetstviyami. Moscow, 1983” (review)
– Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 49/2. London.
Antinucci, F., Puglielli, A. 1980 “The Syntax of Indicator Particles in
Somali: Relative Clause Construction” – Afroasiatic Linguistics 7.3. London.
Antinucci, F. 1980 “The Syntax of indicator particles in Somali. Part two: the
construction of interrogative, negative, and negative-interrogative clauses” - Studies
in African Linguistics, 11.
Armstrong, L.E. 1934 “The Phonetic Structure of Somali” – Mitteilungen des
Seminars fur Orientalische Sprachen zu Berlin, 37-38. Berlin.
Banti, G. 1984 “The Morphology of the Nominative Case in Somali” – Wiener
Linguistische Gazette, 3. Wien.
Banti, G. 1988 “Adjectives in East Cushitic” – Papers from the International
Symposium on Cushitic and Omotic languages. Cologne, Jan.6-9 1986. Hamburg.
Banti, G., Giannattasio F. 1996 “Music and Metre in Somali Poetry” – Voice
and Power (ALC Supplement 3). Oxford.
Bell, R. C. V. 1953 The Somali Language. London.
Chafe, W.L. 1976 “Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects,
129
Topics? And Point of View” – Subject and Topic. New York.
Fibras J. 1966 “On Defining the Theme in Functional Sentence Analysis” –
Travaux inguistiques de Prague. Praha.
Galaal, M. and Andrzejewski B.W. 1956 Hikmad Soomaali. London.
Greenberg, J. 1963 The Languages of Africa. Bloomington.
Griefenow-Mewis (El-Solami-Mewis), C. 1987 Lehrbuch des Somali. Leipzig.
Griefenow-Mewis, C. 1998 “Focus marking in Somali and Oromo – Two
different strategies” – The Proceedings of NACAL-98 (in print).
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967 “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: 2” –
Journal of Linguistics, 3.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1970 “Language Structure and Language Function” – New
Horizons in Linguistics. J. Lyons (ed.) Harmondsworth.
Heine, B., Reh M. 1983 Diachronic Observations on Completive Focus
Marking in Some African Languages – Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika, 5. Köln
Herburger, E. 1997 “Focus and Weak Noun Phrases” – Natural Language
Semantics. Dodrecht-Boston-London.
Hetzron, R. 1965 “The Particle baa in Northern Somali” – Journal of African
Languages 4.2. London.
Hyman, L. 1981 “L’accento tonale in somalo” – Fonolologia e lessico. Studi
Somali, 1 (ed. G. Cardona, F. Agostini). Rome.
Hyman, L. 1984 “Auxiliary Focus” – Studies in African Linguistics, 15.
Jackendoff, R. 1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar.
Cambridge, Massachusetts.
130
Kapchits (Kabjits), G. L. 1996 Waxaa la yidhi – Sheekooyin hidde ah.
Cologne.
Kapchits, G. L. 1997 War and Peace in Somali Oral Traditions – Pour une
Culture de la Paix en Somalie. Paris.
Kapchits, G. L. 1998 Qaamuuska maahmaahyada Soomaaliyeed/ The
Dictionary of Somali Proverbs. Moscow.
Kapchits, G. L. 1998 The Somali Oral Traditions: a Call for Salvation – Die
heutige Bedeutung oraler Traditionen. Opladen-Wiesbaden.
Keenadiid, Y. C. 1976 Qaamuuska Af-Soomaaliga.
Kirk, J.W.C. 1905 A Grammar of the Somali Language. Cambridge.
Lamberti, M. 1984 “The origin of the focus particles in Somali” – Sprache,
Geschichte und Kultur in Afrika”. Hamburg.
Lamberti, M. 1986 Map of Somali dialects in the Somali Democratic Republic.
Hamburg
Maino, M. 1953 La lingua Somala. Strumento d’isegnamento professionale.
Alessandria.
Moreno, M. M. 1955 Il Somalo della Somalia: grammatica e testi del Benadir,
Darod e Dighil. Roma.
Odden, D. 1984 “Formal Correlates of Focusing in Kimatuumbi” – Studies in
African Linguistics, 15.
Orwin, M. 1994 “Somali Language” – The Encyclopedia of Language and
Linguistics, 8. Oxford.
131
Orwin, M. 1995 Colloquial Somali (A Complete language Course). London.
Orwin M. 1997 “Somali Language” – The Encyclopaedia of Islam, 9. Leiden.
Puglielli, A. (ed.) 1981 Sintassi della lingua Somala (Studi Somali, 2). Rome.
Reinisch, L. 1900 Die Somali-Sprache. Wien.
Saeed, J.I. 1984 The Syntax of Focus and Topic in Somali. Hamburg.
Saeed, J. 1999 Somali. Amsterdam – Philadelphia.
Schachter, P. 1973 “Focus and realization” – Journal of the Linguistic Society
of America”, 49. Baltimore.
Tosco, M. 1993 “Copula, Focus, Cleft, etc. in Southern Somali” – AAP, 36.
Voigt, R. 1975 “In memoriam Maria Klingenheben – v. Tiling” – Africana
Marburgensia, VIII, 1. Marburg
Warsama, S., Abraham, R.C. 1951 The principles of Somali. London.
Zaborski, A. 1976 “Cushitic Overview” – The Non-Semitic Languages of
Ethiopia (ed. M. L. Bender). East Lansing.
Zorc, R., Issa A. A. 1990 Somali Textbook. Wheaton.
Zorc, R., Osman, M. M. 1993 Somali-English Dictionary (with English index),
Kensington.
132