* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Jet Impact
Aerodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Compressible flow wikipedia , lookup
Navier–Stokes equations wikipedia , lookup
Computational fluid dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Flow conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Bernoulli's principle wikipedia , lookup
Derivation of the Navier–Stokes equations wikipedia , lookup
Reynolds number wikipedia , lookup
Last Rev.: 11 JUN 08 Jet Impact : MIME 3470 Page 1 Grading Sheet ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ MIME 3470—Thermal Science Laboratory ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Experiment №. 6 JET IMPACT Students’ Names / Section № APPEARANCE, ORGANIZATION, ENGLISH, and GRAMMAR MATHCAD Ordered Data, Dimensions, Physical Properties Calculations & Results Arrays—Include Velocity & Force %Diff Required Plots DISCUSSION OF RESULTS Comment on Differences in Velocity & Force Between Nozzle & Target When Can One Ignore Gravity in Bernoulli’s Equation? Kline-McClintock Uncertainty CONCLUSIONS ORIGINAL DATASHEET TOTAL COMMENTS d GRADER— POINTS 10 10 15 15 10 10 15 10 5 100 SCORE TOTAL Last Rev.: 11 JUN 08 Jet Impact : MIME 3470 Fy m 2V2 sin . MIME 3470—Thermal Science Laboratory ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Experiment №. 6 (4) Moreover, since the jet is flowing freely through air, it is considered to be under constant pressure (i.e., atmospheric) at its interface with the atmosphere. Therefore, it may be assumed that the jet cross-sectional area is constant, A1 = A2. Now from Equation 1 m 1 m 2 FORCE ON VARIOUSLY SHAPED OBJECTS DUE TO JET IMPACT (5) 1 A1V1 2 A2V2 and since the fluid is incompressible. V1 V2 . Therefore, Equations 2 and 3 become1 V11 cos Fy m 2V1 sin . Fx m ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ LAB PARTNERS: NAME NAME NAME SECTION № EXPERIMENT TIME/DATE: Page 2 NAME NAME NAME TIME, DATE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ OBJECTIVE—This experiment is a study in momentum transfer (ergo, force transmitted) from a fluid to objects of various forms. In particular, the study looks at the momentum transfer as a function of the angle through which the fluid stream was deflected. By varying a fluid stream’s deflection angle, up to twice the original momentum of the stream can be transferred to the object. INTRODUCTION—Over the years, engineers have found many ways to utilize the impact force of fluids. For example, the Pelton wheel has been used to make flour. Further, the impulse turbine is still used in the first and also sometimes the second stage of a steam turbine. Firemen make use of the kinetic energy stored in a jet to extinguish fires in high-rise buildings. Many other applications of fluid jets can be cited which reveals their technological importance. This experiment is designed to study the force that can be imparted by a jet of fluid on a surface diverting the flow. (7) EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE—The experimental apparatus is that shown in Figure 2. The procedure detailed below is to be performed on each of two different targets (vanes)—one a flat plate and the other a hemispherical cup. That procedure is as follows: Flat Plate Target Hopper Balance Bar Jockey Balance Bar x1 x2 0 Level Indicator y Hemispherical Cup Target 3L L Valve Weighing Tank (Hopper) Hanger with 5kg Mass x Jockey Mass Spring with Adjustable Tension for Leveling Balance Beam w/ No Flow Stop y F (6) P Water Reservoir Figure 1 — Impact Force Imparted by a Fluid Jet to a Body When the Body Changes the Flow Direction of the Fluid THEORY—A change in momentum of an object or a fluid is always accompanied by an impulse force (impact force). Consider a jet of fluid flowing steadily with a velocity V1 and a mass flow rate m 1 . The jet impinges on a plate inclined at an angle to the direction of the flow. From a mass balance, the same amount of liquid impinging on the plate must also leave the plate; thus, . (1) m 1 m 2 m Force is the time derivative of momentum, mv, where m is the mass impacting on the plate and v is the velocity of impact. Thus, d mv dv dm F m v m v . (2) dt dt dt 0 As there is no acceleration just a change in mass flow From a momentum balance the sum of external forces equals the change in momentum F m v out m v in . Hence, for the x-direction of the system in Figure 1, 1V1 m 2V2 cos m V1 V2 cos (3) Fx m and in the y-direction Figure 2—Experimental Apparatus 1 Think about what is happening before blindly applying these equations. Last Rev.: 11 JUN 08 Jet Impact : MIME 3470 1. The experiment is set up such that the balance beam is horizontal when the upward force of the water impinging on the target is balanced by the downward force of the jockey weight. This means that the balance beam and the target are considered to be weightless. To achieve this weightless estate, the beam is leveled by changing the tension of the adjusting spring shown in the figure when no water is flowing and for the jockey mass at x1 = 0. This must be done for each target used as they are not expected to have the same weight. 2. In taking data, it would be convenient to have round values of x2 such as 180mm as to 178mm. Thus, the water flow was turned on full force, the jockey weight positioned to the nearest round value, and the water flow backed off just enough to level the balance bar. (It is easier to adjust the water flow for a given position of the jockey weight as to trying to position of the jockey weight for a specified flow of water.). 3. At the left of the schematic is shown a weight hanger. It is quite heavy in its own right—even before additional weight is added. The discharge hopper (weighing tank) is emptied until the weight hanger drops under its own weight. The drain plug at the bottom of the tank is reinserted and the tank begins to fill. At the point in filling the tank when the tank balance bar and weight hanger rise up and hit a stop, a stop watch is started. Directly after starting the watch, 5kg of additional weight is added to the weight hanger. As the discharge tank continues to fill, eventually enough weight of water is achieved to outweigh the 5kg of additional weight that was added. This causes the tank balance beam to rise up against the stop again at which time the stop watch is halted. 4. The ratio of moment arms on either side of the fulcrum of the tank balance beam is 3:1 such that 5kg of additional weight is balanced by 15kg of water. The flow rate is then 15kg of water during the time that the stop watch was running Page 3 5. Decreasing values of x2 are then laid in and flow reduced accordingly. 6. Data was taken for a total of six (approximately evenly spaced) positions of the jockey weight. 7. Perform these steps for each of the targets (flat plate and hemispherical cup). In the report: 1. On one graph, plot for both targets the experimental force vs. the theoretical force. Here, the experimental force is that calculated from the jockey weight and its position. The theoretical force is that calculated from the water flow rate. In determining the theoretical force, the velocity at the target must be used. The distance from the nozzle to the target (if the jockey weight balance beam has been leveled prior to flowing water) is y = 35mm. 2. On one graph, plot for both targets the experimental force vs the jet velocity at the target. On this plot, also plot twice the flat-plate experimental force vs. velocity at the target. 3. In the calculations, determine the percent difference in both the velocity and the theoretical force exerted at the target due to the distance between the nozzle tip and the target. In the discussion, comment on the differences in velocity and force between nozzle and target. Answer the question: when does gravitational deceleration as described by Bernoulli’s relation become important and when may it be neglected? 4. Finally, considering that the only experimental error is caused by the measuring scale on the jockey weight balance bar, find the uncertainty in determining the experimental force imparted on the target using the Kline-McClintock method. Comment on this in the discussion. There is a separate downloadable file describing the Kline-McClintock method. Last Rev.: 11 JUN 08 Jet Impact : MIME 3470 Page 4 Ordered Data, Calculations, & Results BA SIC DIMENSIONS, MA SSES, & PHYSICA L PROPERTIES Jock ey Weigh Mass: Nozzle Diameter: Nozzle-to-Target Distance: Piv ot-to-Nozzle Distance: Tank A rm/Hanger A rm Ratio : Mass Placed on Hanger: Mass of Water in Hopper: A cceleration of Grav ity : Density of Water: i 1 6 FLA T PLA TE DA TA : (subscript "pl" stands for flat PLate) HEMISHERICA L CUP DA TA :(subscript "cup" stands for hemispherical CUP) Last Rev.: 11 JUN 08 Jet Impact : MIME 3470 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS Comment on the differences in velocity and force between nozzle and target. Answer With respect to the first question, when does gravitational deceleration as described by Bernoulli’s relation become important and when may it be neglected? Answer Considering that the only experimental error is caused by the measuring scale on the jockey weight balance bar, find the uncertainty in determining the experimental force imparted on the vane using the Kline-McClintock method. Answer CONCLUSIONS Page 5 Last Rev.: 11 JUN 08 Jet Impact : MIME 3470 APPENDIX A—DATA SHEET Page 6 FOR JET IMPACT Time/Date: ___________________ Lab Partners: _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ Mass of Jockey Weight _____________ Nozzle Diameter _____________ Distance from Nozzle to Target, y _____________ Distance from Pivot to Jet Center, x1 _____________ Mass Used on Weight Hanger _____________ Ratio of (Tank Lever Arm) to (Weight Hanger Lever Arm) _____________ Finest Graduation on Balance Bar _____________ Run FLAT PLATE TARGET Distance of Jockey Time to Fill Mass from Jet Tank, Center, x2 s cm Run 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 HEMISPHERICAL TARGET Distance of Jockey Time to Fill Mass from Jet Tank, Center, x2 s cm