* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download ALS Genetics
Polysubstance dependence wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup
Drug interaction wikipedia , lookup
Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Pharmaceutical industry wikipedia , lookup
Prescription costs wikipedia , lookup
Neuropharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Drug design wikipedia , lookup
Preclinical Drug Development: Opportunities & Challenges Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/ Motor Neuron Disease (ALS/MND) • Degeneration of both upper and lower motor neurons • Median Survival: 3-5 yrs • Average Age onset: 50 • 10% cases genetic • Genes for 70% of cases known • 90% cases sporadic • Clinical presentation identical ALS Genetics Genetics in the Context of Drug Development • The identification of a genetic mutation does NOT always lead to an effective treatment for patients • SOD1 (ALS) in 1993: No effective treatment • CF (Cystic Fibrosis) in 1989: First treatments 2011 • No directly linked genetic mutations: Multiple Sclerosis: 12 FDA approved drugs Its understanding the molecular mechanismsOxidative Stress Astrocytosis Protein Aggregation ER Stress De Myelination Axon Transport Synaptic Die Back RNA Processing Mitochondrial Dysfunction Microglial Activation Muscle Wasting Micro hemorrhaging Leukocyte infiltration Is There a Problem With Preclinical Drug Development? Is hSOD1G93A a Good Preclinical Model for Drug Development ? • 2 lines originally characterized • High and low copy number hSOD1G93A • Lines deposited in JAX • TDI purchased the line and established its own colony in 2001 Gurney., Neurol. Science 1997 Kinetics of Disease in ALS and the SOD1 Model 1.0 BL6 SJL 0.9 0.8 0.750 0.7 Surviving Percent patients surviving 1.000 0.500 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.250 0.2 0.1 0.000 0.0 30.0 60.0 90.0 120.0 Survival (months) 2108 Patients Mean age of onset 55.7 (Range 21-85) 1st symptom to vent 30.6 mo +/- 20 mo hSOD1 Transgenics G93A: mean survival from 60 days to 164 days G37R: 375 days G85R: 243 days D90A: ~520 days 0.0 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 DAge ALS-TDI Colonies SJL/BL6J n = 499 mean survival = 131 days BL6J n =46 mean survival = 164 days JAX Colony (Greg Cox; PC) SJL/BL6J n = 67, mean survival = 129 days BL6J n =140, mean survival = 161 days Cox-2 Inhibitors Extend Survival in a Transgenic Model of ALS Conclusions • Celebrex inhibited prostaglandin E2 • Celebrex delayed disease onset • Celebrex increased lifespan by 25% Observations to keep in mind • Number of animals per group is 9 • Limited info on study design gender and littermate Drachman et al., Ann Neurol 2002 2 Month PGE2 CSF Celebrex Clinical Trial In ALS Summary • 99 Placebo patients • 201 Celebrex 800 mg/daily 12 months • No impact on ALSFRS, FVC, or motor function • No impact on prostaglandin levels in CSF • Safe and well tolerated Cudkowicz et al., Ann. Neurol. 2006 Baseline PGE2 CSF ALS TDI Celecoxib Data: No Change in Onset or Survival Celecoxib 300 mg/kg/d in Chow Survival 100 100 CTRL (88) DRUG (64) CTRL (88) DRUG (64) 75 75 50 50 25 25 0 95 105 115 125 135 145 Onset Age (days) Onset Age K-M Product-Limit Survival Fit Median Time (days) Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG Log-Rank Wilcoxon 116 117 0.9707 0.7506 Cox Proportional Hazards Risk Ratio Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG 0.99 1.01 0.9721 105 115 125 135 145 155 Death Age (days) Death Age K-M Product-Limit Survival Fit Median Time (days) Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG Log-Rank Wilcoxon 130 130 0.8859 0.9599 Cox Proportional Hazards Risk Ratio Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG 1.02 0.98 0.8897 0 Percent Surviving Percent with Disease Onset Disease Onset Minocyline Delays Onset and Extends Survival in hSOD1G93A Mice Conclusions • Minocycline delays disease onset • Minocycline extends survival • Minocycline inhibits cytochrome c release from mitochondria Observations to keep in mind • Number of animals per group is 10 • Limited info on study design gender and littermate * Zhu et al., Nature 2002 Slope Change ALSFRS Score Minocycline Enhances Disease Progression and Mortality in Phase III Trial Minocycline Placebo Summary • ALSFRS Score • Decreased 9.4 units in placebo • Decreased 11.7 units in Minocycline • Failure endpoint was higher in Minocycline Group • 32 in placebo • 41 in Minocycline • “ Four published reports have shown that minocycline delays disease progression in the ALS transgenic mouse.” “Our results suggest either that the current approach to translational neuroscience is unsatisfactory or the transgenic mouse model is a poor representation of ALS.” * Gordon et al., Lancet 2007 ALS TDI Data Minocycline: Exacerbates Disease Minocycline 200 mg/kg/d in Chow Survival Disease Onset 100 100 75 CTRL (24) DRUG (23) 75 50 50 25 25 CTRL (24) DRUG (23) 0 90 100 110 120 130 140 Onset Age (days) Onset Age K-M Product-Limit Survival Fit Median Time (days) Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG Log-Rank Wilcoxon 125 118 0.0054 0.0332 Cox Proportional Hazards Risk Ratio Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG 2.32 0.43 0.0091 110 120 130 140 0 150 Death Age (days) Death Age K-M Product-Limit Survival Fit Median Time (days) Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG Log-Rank Wilcoxon 136 131 0.0325 0.0548 Cox Proportional Hazards Risk Ratio Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG 1.83 0.55 0.0502 Percent Surviving Percent with Disease Onset SJL Background Ceftriaxone Slows Progression and Improves Survival in hSOD1G93A Mice Conclusions • Ceftriaxone decreases motor neuron loss and muscle weakness • Ceftriaxone increases lifespan • Ceftriaxone increased GLT1 expression in spinal cord Observations to keep in mind • Median Survival of controls • Limited info on study design gender and littermate Rothstein et al., Nature 2005 ALS TDI Data Ceftriaxone: No Change in Onset or Survival Ceftriaxone 200 mg/kg/d i.p. Survival 100 100 CTRL (38) DRUG (38) CTRL (38) DRUG (38) 75 75 50 50 25 25 0 80 90 100 110 120 Onset Age (days) Onset Age K-M Product-Limit Survival Fit Median Time (days) Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG Log-Rank Wilcoxon 101 102 0.2467 0.3848 Cox Proportional Hazards Risk Ratio Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG 1.30 0.77 0.2752 105 115 125 135 145 Death Age (days) Death Age K-M Product-Limit Survival Fit Median Time (days) Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG Log-Rank Wilcoxon 126 126 0.9697 0.8640 Cox Proportional Hazards Risk Ratio Prob>ChiSq CTRL DRUG 0.99 1.01 0.9711 0 Percent Surviving Percent with Disease Onset Disease Onset Lithium Delays Disease Onset and Improves Survival in the G93A Model of ALS Control Summary Pre Clinical Data • Increased lifespan by 36% • delayed progression by 300% • Improved Mn survival • Decreased astrocytosis • Decreased protein aggregation • Increases autophagic vacuoles Fornai et al., PNAS 2008 Lithium Summary Clinical Study • 16 patients on Rilutek plus Lithium • 28 Rilutek alone • Treatment improved respiratory function • Treatment improved motor function • Treatment impacted survival • Many caveats to the study design ALS TDI Data Lithium: No Change in Onset or Survival Disease Onset 40 mg/kg/day Survival Product-Limit Survival Fit Age at Death Survival Plot Time to event: DAge 1.0 Average Neurological Score (R+L, M+F) CTRL DRUG 0.9 0.000 0.8 0.500 0.7 1.500 CTRL 2.000 DRUG Surviving NSAve (0-4) 1.000 0.6 0.5 0.4 2.500 0.3 3.000 0.2 3.500 0.1 0.0 4.000 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 110 150 120 Age (days) K-M Product-Limit Survival Fit Sex Both Female Male Treatment Median Time CTRL DRUG CTRL DRUG CTRL DRUG 2Age 117 114 121 114 113 115 130 140 150 DAge Test Log-Rank Wilcoxon Prob>ChiSq 0.6345 0.5785 0.1876 0.1814 0.7586 0.6293 K-M Product-Limit Survival Fit Sex Both Female Male Treatment Median Time CTRL DRUG CTRL DRUG CTRL DRUG DAge 127 124 129 124 126 124 Test Log-Rank Wilcoxon Prob>ChiSq 0.9304 0.9397 0.6587 0.7357 0.7726 0.7483 Questions: • Are there unrecognized variables that need to be controlled in the study design? • How do we quantify the contribution of each variable? • The search for a positive control: What drugs actually work in this animal model? Variables Contributing to Noise in the Model Variable #1: Censoring Variable #2: Low Copy Animals Variable #3: Gender Variable #4: Litter Controlling Noise Variables and Optimization of Study Design Optimized Study Design Effect of increasing 'n' on Noise for Each Study Design Variable • • Noise: Frequency of Apparent Effects 60.00% • • 50.00% 40.00% • 30.00% • 20.00% • 10.00% 0.00% n=4 N=10 N=16 N=20 n=24 n=30 n=40 n=50 • -10.00% Number Per Group UU+Censored & Low Copy UU+Censored UU MB • 48 total mice. Tx group 12m+12f, control group 12m+12f. Same gender litter matching Observers should be blind to treatment Single, uniform endpoint criterion Confirmation of transgene copy number prior to study enrollment Tracking and censoring from final analysis all non-ALS deaths Statistical analysis, a log rank method is typically necessary for any survival analysis; since we have shown the SOD1G93A model has multiple variables, the Cox Proportional Hazards model is most appropriate We recommend no multi-arm studies Historical Issue with Pre-clinical Animal Model Development Celebrex Slows Disease & Improves Survival in SOD1 Mouse Model, 2002 Minocycline Slows Disease & Improves Survival in SOD1 Mouse Model, 2004 First Mutation Associated with ALS Identified: SOD1 Gene, 1993 1993 Lithium Slows Disease & Improves Survival in SOD1 Mouse Model, 2008 1995 1997 1999 2001 Transgenic mouse model expressing human mutant SOD1, 1997 2003 2005 2007 Celebrex ALS Clinical Trial Fails in Phase III, 2006 Optimized Experimental Design for Preclinical Drug Screening in the ALS Mouse Model, 2007 2009 To make the Model 10 Years To Validate the Model 2013 Lithium ALS Clinical Trial Fails in Phase III, 2010 Minocycline ALS Clinical Trial Fails in Phase III, 2007 4 Years 2011 Flaws in Preclinical Execution Lead to Failures in Clinical Development • ALS TDI has failed to replicate more than a dozen published studies • ALS TDI published optimized experimental design for preclinical testing (Scott, 2008) • These failed studies wasted hundreds of millions of dollars in clinical trial efforts Most importantly it squandered patient opportunity Perrin, Nature 2014 TDP43 Mutations in ALS TDP43 Mutations in ALS: déjà vu? Mutations in theTDP43 Gene in ALS Patients, 2006 Transgenic mouse model expressing human mutant TDP43, 2010 First Mutation Associated with ALS Identified: SOD1 Gene, 1993 1993 1997 Transgenic mouse model expressing human mutant SOD1, 1997 2001 2005 2009 4 Years To make the Model 2013 2017 2021 10 Years To Validate the Model Does it have to take 10 Years to Validate the Model ? Generation of a Validated Preclinical Model of TDP43 Transgenic Mouse Challenges of Original Mouse Models of TDP43 A • The kinetics of survival for the colony are too broad for drug screening • It would require 400 animals per group to detect a 5% drug effect on survival with 95% confidence B Original Data: Survival data for publically available data of prpTDP43 colonies: (A) TDP43 colony at Washington University, St. Louis, MO (B) TDP43 colony maintained for distribution at the Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME Generation of a new TDP43 Colony at ALS TDI by Congenic Back Crossing Initial Results fro TDI: • Kinetics of disease progression within a gender are now very tight. • A power analysis of 1000 animals optimized a study design for PD outcomes with power to detect 5% changes Characterizing the Phenotype is Critical • prpTDP43 animals have minimal nmj loss • They do not die from progressive neurodegeneration • prpTDP43 animal succumb from an acute bowel obstruction How Do You Leverage a Validated Preclinical Model? Molecular Profiling Neurodegenerative Models Animals re genotyped for copy number and assigned to a study d30 Animals Genotyped d45 d50 Treatment Initiation Disease onset Tail Paralysis d70-80 End stage disease d80-120 D120-150 Disease progression Paralysis hind limbs to forelimbs • 5 non transgenics, 5 wt animals • SOD1G93A • Loa (Dynein heavy chain mutant) • prpTDP43A315T (2012) • Groups harvested at 10 day intervals starting at day 30 • Tissues extracted and flash frozen on dry ice • Brain, spinal cord, skeletal muscle, brown fat, white fat, sciatic nerve, blood • Laser captured motor neurons and surrounding tissue, NMJs • Profiled on Affymetrix MOE430vII gene chips and Affymetrix Ex1.0 exon arrays • Luminex protein microarrays Activation of Co-Stimulatory Pathway Spinal Cord Muscle • Longitudinal gene expression changes from the SOD1 mouse model • Co-Stimulatory pathway is an immune modulatory pathway • Activated in spinal cord, skeletal muscle, sciatic nerve Drugable pathway present in 3 diseased tissues in the SOD1 pre-clinical model Sciatic Nerve -1 0 1 d50 d60 d80 d90 d100 d110 Activation of Costimulatory Pathway Anti CD40L • Additional therapeutics targeting aspects of the costimulatory pathway -1 0 1 d50 d60 d80 d90 d100 d110 In Vivo Experiments: Blocking Ab to CD40Lg • Pharmacokinetic (Pk) Analysis in mSOD1 mice • Determine ½ life of the drug in mice • Determine biodistribution, tolerability • Dose Ranging Efficacy Studies • A1) Female 1 mg/kg • A2) Male 1.34 mg/kg • B1) Female 2 mg/kg • B2) Male 2.67 mg/kg • C1) Female 4 mg/kg • C2) Male 5.35 mg/kg • Biomarker Drug Response • Dose dependent marker • Amenable to clinical development • Shorten and facilitate phase II trial Pk analysis aCD40L Ab is Efficacious in SOD1G93A Mice Females: 5.22 mg/kg loading dose 1 mg/kg weekly IP Males: 6.75 mg/kg loading dose 1.34 mg/kg weekly IP Proportion at Peak 1.00 A 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 CTRL DRUG 30 40 50 60 pVal= 0.286 Proportion Onset or Survival Day 50 start A. Time required to attain peak body weight. Time to peak was not significantly changed B. Time from peak body weight until death. BW maintenance was significantly improved C. Time to disease onset (Ns =2). Disease onset was significantly delayed by D. Survival was significantly prolonged B 70 80 15 Time (days) 25 35 45 55 65 pVal= 0.046 1.00 C D 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 95 105 115 125 135 145 pVal= 0.001 110 Age (days) 120 130 140 150 pVal= 0.003 Lincecum, 2010 Meta Analysis of Anti CD40L Treatment • 30 female MR1 treated mice • 30 litter matched controls • 500 historical female controls • Median Survival • Female control: 127 days • MR1 treated 139 days • pValue: 0.0002 • • • • • SIM LIMS historical female data Monte Carlo analysis 18 non treated females Random assign treatment/control Frequency of detecting a false positive aCD40L Treatment Reduces Axonal Recruitment of Macrophages CD68+ Cell Counts No treatment: CD68+ Cell Counts S100b+ Distal Nerve (5 fields/count) By Treatment - Tx + Tx Cnt All age matched females, 18 ug/week, I.p. 50 day start, sacrificed at 103 days Biological replicates; double blind analysis 00846 treatment Anti CD40L Treatment Decreases Astrocytosis and Improves Motor Neuron Survival Control Control Anti-CD40L Anti-CD40L • GFAP, Dapi • 100 day Lumbar Spinal Cord • 53 days treatment 1mg/kg • Nissel Staining • 100 day lumbar spinal cord • 53 days treatment 1mg/kg ALS TDI Drug Studies ALS TDI has run more drugs in SOD1 mice than the entire academic community combined % d Survival % d progression Published % Survival Summary • Characterize the phenotype well • Some aspects of the disease will be represented other pathophysiologies may not be part of the model • Perform a robust power analysis on kinetics of the phenotype of interest to optimize experimental design • Remember its just a model of the disease Acknowldgements Sean Scott James Heywood Al Gill Bashar Al Nakhala John Lincecum Monica Wang Ricky Sanchez Isa Carrion Fernando Vieira Januce Kranz Jeff Cole Jeyanthi Ramasubbu Alan Bostrom Ken Thompson Theo Hatzipetros Carlos Maya Andy Moreno Matt Ferola Josh Kidd