Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) APPRAISAL STAGE Project Name Region Sector Project ID Borrower(s) Implementing Agency Environment Category Date PID Prepared Date of Appraisal Authorization Date of Board Approval Report No.: AB4659 Roads and Bridges Management and Maintenance Program Phase II Additional Financing AFRICA Roads and highways (100%) P114880 GOVERNMENT OF MOZAMBIQUE Road Fund (Fundo de Estradas) [] A [X] B [ ] C [ ] FI [ ] TBD (to be determined) March 27, 2009 April 6, 2009 May 21, 2009 1. Country and Sector Background Country Context a. Mozambique has been a strong economic and social performer in Africa. Since the devastating civil war ended in 1992, the country has enjoyed a remarkable economic recovery, achieving an average annual economic growth rate of 8 percent between 1996 and 2007. As a result, the poverty headcount index fell by 15 percentage points between 1997 and 2003, bringing almost 3 million people (of a total population of 20 million) above the poverty line and out of extreme poverty. In addition, further decentralization and enhanced delivery of key services, especially in rural areas is required. Access to transport infrastructure and services plays a significant role in promoting the rural economy, providing social services, and improving market environments. Sector Issues b. Mozambique's classified road network-the national and regional roads-consists of 29,349 kilometers of roads, of which 5,814 kilometers (or 20 percent) are paved. Road density per land area is low at 46 meters per square kilometer due to the large size of Mozambique, but quite average, relative to the population, at 423 meters per 1,000 populations. Preliminary estimates suggest that the network could provide potential access (measured as those living within two kilometers of any road in the network) to around 41 percent of the nation's rural population. Because of the poor condition of the network, the percentage of the rural population that has reliable, all-year access is much smaller. One of the main objectives of the Roads and Bridges Management and Maintenance Project Phase II (RBMMP2) is to increase the number of rural residents with reliable access to social and economic facilities. The aforementioned statistics suggest that a much larger local road network will be required to connect all residents. Sector Policy and Strategy c. During 2006, in close collaboration with road sector DPs, the GOM developed Programa Integrado do Sector de Estradas (PRISE) (Integrated Road Sector Program) 2007-2009 road sector program, which is based on the 2001-11 Road Sector Strategy (RSS) and the Road Sector Policy. To support GoM in implementation of the Road Sector Strategy 20012011, a 10-year Adaptable Program Loan (APL), RBMMP was designed in three phases. RBMMP Phase 1 (RBMMP1) successfully achieved its objectives and closed on June 30, 2007, though due to cost increases it could not complete the rehabilitation of three sections of the N1 which have now been taken up by the on going RBMMP2. The approval of RBMMP3 is contingent on the successful completion of triggers, which include the requirement that road works under RBMMP2 are substantially completed. d. Road sector expenditures between 2001 and 2006 were about US$ 700 million equivalent or on average US$ 140 million per annum. It has been recognized that past road sector investments were insufficient to support the country's poverty reduction goals. PRISE therefore planned to substantially increase expenditures for both maintenance and investment. Total planned sector expenditure under PRISE 2007-09 is US$ 1,043 million, or about US$ 347 million per annum (about 4.4 percent of GDP). There is strong commitment by all DPs to harmonize their approaches in line with the Paris Protocol. Hence it was decided that PRISE would be implemented in a sector-wide approach (SWAp) mode. The World Bank team has been instrumental in the preparation of PRISE and the furthering of donor harmonization. 2. Objectives The project development objective of RBMMP2 is to improve access of the population to allseason roads through maintenance, rehabilitation and upgrading of the classified road network and the achievement of the PDO is measured through (a) percentage of classified roads in good and fair condition; and (b) the percentage of the rural population within two kilometers of an allseason road. 3. Rationale for Bank Involvement The main purpose of the AF credit is to cover the additional costs for the civil work contracts on National Highway N1. The lowest evaluated bids received on July 28, 2008 for the three civil works contracts planned to be financed under RBMMP2 (without contingencies) amounted to US$121.2 million and were 133 percent above the appraisal estimate of US$51.2 million. IDA gave its no objection to award the contract for lot 2 (Xai-Xai – Chissibuca) for an amount of US$50.8 million on November 5, 2008 and this contract is currently ongoing. Based on recommendations of IDA, lot 1 (Jardim – Benfica) was issued for re-bidding to the pre-qualified bidders after re-scoping, and the lowest evaluated bid received on February 25, 2009 was US$21.7 million (18 percent below the bid of July 2008). For lot 3 (Massinga – Nhachengue) GoM has found another financier (Government of Portugal) and IDA funding is no longer needed. The additional costs for lots 1 and 2, including contingencies of US$4.1 million, are US$25 million. Improvement of these three sections of the N1 was already planned under RBMMP1 but was relegated to RBMMP2 due to insufficient funding. RBMMP1 financed the rehabilitation and upgrading of 670 kilometers of the N1 between Maputo and Inchope to meet national standards and the requirements of current traffic volumes. Accordingly, these three sections represent “gaps” under RBMMP1. They are integral parts of the key backbone SouthNorth road of Mozambique, and not doing them, or doing them only partly, would mean that the PDO of RBMMP2 would not be achieved. 4. Description The amount allocated under category 3 of the credit (consultant’s services, with US$3.12 million earmarked) is insufficient to finance both the supervision of three contracts on N1 and the preparation of designs and bidding documents for works that would be financed under the follow-on RBMMP3 project as originally intended and reflected in the PAD and FA of RBMMP2. The amount was curtailed due to the limited IDA envelope that was available at the time of project preparation (US$100 million as against the originally planned US$135 million of the APL2). Furthermore, following the visit of the World Bank’s President to Mozambique in early 2008, the GOM specifically requested to commence engineering design early for roads to be financed under RBMMP3. It is therefore proposed to allocate an additional amount of US$ 5 million to this category to cover the respective funding gap. 5. Financing Source: BORROWER/RECIPIENT International Development Association (IDA) Total ($m.) 0 30 30 6. Implementation Implementation arrangements will remain as agreed under RBMMP APL 2, P083325. 7. Sustainability Sustainability remains unchanged as under RBMMP APL 2, P083325. 8. Lessons Learned from Past Operations in the Country/Sector Lessons learned are as under RBMMP APL 2, P083325 9. Safeguard Policies (including public consultation) Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01) Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04) Pest Management (OP 4.09) Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11) Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12) Indigenous Peoples (OP/BP 4.10) Forests (OP/BP 4.36) Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37) Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP 7.60)* Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP 7.50) Yes [X] [] [] [] [X] [] [] [] [] [] No [] [X] [X] [X] [] [X] [X] [X] [X] [X] 10. Contact point Contact: Dieter E. Schelling Title: Lead Transport Specialist Tel: 5355+3273 Fax: Email: [email protected] Location: Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania (IBRD) 11. For more information contact: The InfoShop The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20433 Telephone: (202) 458-4500 Fax: (202) 522-1500 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.worldbank.org/infoshop * By supporting the proposed project, the Bank does not intend to prejudice the final determination of the parties' claims on the disputed areas