Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Drug Therapy Options People fighting drug addiction often carry on an internal battle whether to attend drug treatment programs. Most times, the person will concoct excuses about not having any addiction and carry on down the wrong road. Several reasons are there for a person’s awareness of his addiction and the aim of a proper rehabilitation. The most common reasons are indeed the most obvious: • Personal Health: Alcohol and drugs negatively affect the body and eventually cause irreversible damage/death. • Mental State: Personalities are altered by drugs. Family & friends are generally the first to detect before the addict himself does. • Relationships: Alcohol and drugs affect personal relationships. The addict often cuts himself off from everybody. • Family: Addicts put tremendous stress on his family and can tear families apart. • Happiness: While drug addicts may appear happy, normally they are seeking some missing internal contentment (Narconon, 2012). The discussion will address the different aspects of drug treatment programs/options and the peculiarities of each topic in the below sections. Such topics cover employee assistance programs and the support given to employees battling drug addiction and comparing inpatient/outpatient therapy programs. Regarding the two treatment programs mentioned earlier, a discussion will take place on the various modalities offered like psychotherapy, group therapy and individual therapy. Finally, the discussion will conclude with details of the features of successful and notable programs. Addicted Employees and Employee Assistance Programs These days, the increasing work load often leads to behavioral issues in the workplace such as conflicts at home, emotional disturbances and drug abuse issues that can hinder a worker’s efficiency and thwart his desire to give his best. The government recognized this ongoing problem for creating major problems at the work place many years back when President Reagan in 1986 directed the US federal agencies to initiate the employee assistance program (EAP) for those who work for or are employed by the government. Back then, non-governmental agencies were encouraged to initiate such kind of services. The EAP’s purpose was and still remains, to assist employees in any sort of distress, whether it’s work related or due to violence, economic problems or natural disaster (Levinthal, 2010). Nowadays, more privatized companies and agencies are aware of the need to initiate EAPs, as “latest national surveys reveal that EAP services exist in almost 75 percent of all companies in the US” (Attridge, 2010, p. 35). Over the years, EAPs have undergone dramatic change and improvement. Earlier, they mostly provided help by rendering temporary counseling or by offering additional referrals to other companies, but now they also help train employers in recognizing certain issues & mental problems of employees. EAPs are far more complex than before, offering different programs & assistance, which provide help “to tackle a range of mental health, workplace performance and substance abuse issues among workers and their families” (Attridge, 2010, p. 35). Moreover, where the EAPs earlier were typically on-site work services, now several possibilities are there regarding the provision of service. EAPs extend to employees and employers in need, including via a 24-hour call service and the Internet. It’s very significant that there are additional means to communicate with one another, as studies show that people are more comfortable asking for online help rather than in real personal interactions (Barret, 2010). Assistance given via EAPs is voluntary since it’s not compulsory for employees to participate in such programs. If, for example, an employee has substance abuse problems, he can request help via the EAPs, which provide short-term counsel, guidance in finding the right therapy program, advice, appointment scheduling and expectations after end of treatment. Research shows that initiating workplace EAP services helps reduce behavioral issues, including substance abuse at work. Besides, EAPs also facilitate the creation of healthier work morale, greater productivity, and lesser absenteeism (Keay, Durand, Macdonald, Csiernik & Wild, 2010). The seriousness of the addiction also serves as an indicator as to the kind of recommendations the EAP could extend to employees for inpatient/outpatient rehab centers. Comparing inpatient & outpatient therapy programs The therapy & recovery program include outpatient and inpatient programs. In inpatient programs, the patient is permitted to come and leave as per his choice; he also has the flexibility to remain onsite in the day and return home at night. In the outpatient programs, the patients stay onsite for at least 4 weeks, with an assurance that they’ll not leave. The Watershed Addition Treatment plan is an illustration of an inpatient plan. The inpatient program at Watershed provides an environment that lets a patient to concentrate on recovering minus the daily distractions. Watershed offers in patient treatment programs such as medical Detox, Halfway House/ Sober Living and Psychiatric Care. At the conclusion of the program, extended care programs are offered. They believe in “Let Recovery Be Your Recover” (Watershed Addition Treatment Program, 2006, para. 1). Laguna Beach Mission Hospital offers a 30-day inpatient program that concentrates on holistic therapies as well as the twelve steps of AA (Mission Hospital, 2009). They render yoga, group activities, nutrition counseling and pain management techniques sans opiates such as acupuncture and relaxation exercises. Pavilion, South Carolina offers an outpatient program treatment, which lets the patient to lessen the impact on his work and family life (Pavilion, 2012). They also offer family education & support sessions as part of their services. Counseling sessions are provided both in the daytime and evenings, giving patients’ the benefit of flexible schedules. The sessions include individual or couples counseling. When comparing the 2 options, the person who progresses from preparation point to action point of his recovery journey, must consider his options. There are significant differences in cost, as the inpatient program requires room & board. The commitment to stay for 4-6 straight weeks at a facility indeed is difficult for any family and therefore flexible hours are necessary for family interaction. Both options advocate an inpatient detoxification plan that offers medical assistance if required. One thing to bear in mind regarding the outpatient program preference is that the patient can maintain confidentiality about his condition as he does not require time off from work to begin the recovery process. Therapy Modalities Provided By Various Programs There are several drug treatment programs available to drug abusers striving to change their lives. Treatment conditions include long-term or short-term resident programs & outpatient programs. Therapy pharmacological/nonpharmacological behavioral therapies (Nsimba, 2007). categories methods that could incorporate include psychosocial or “Outpatient Drug Free” programs (ODF) are outpatient therapy programs that don’t include pharmacological treatments. ODF programs employ behavioral therapies like cognitive therapy, family/couple therapy, skills training, group therapy, counseling and meditation (Grossman, 2009). Such treatment programs can be further categorized as harm reduction or abstinence-based treatment modalities. Patients in formal therapy programs often participate in community-centered self-help groups. Indeed, abstinence-based programs such as Narcotics Anonymous (NA), Cocaine Anonymous and Alcoholic Anonymous (AA) were the popular treatment programs for 52.9 percent of a group studied (Peavy, Cochran, & Wax, 2010). The abstinence-based programs concentrate on the abuser remaining 100 percent clean from drugs or alcohol. Harm-reduction programs at times employ behavior/cognitive therapies like motivational interviewing or cognitive evaluation to explain the merits and demerits of drug abuse to lower substance usage (Nsimba, 2007). Therapy modalities could also combine behavioral or cognitive therapies together with pharmacological treatments. Furthermore, depending on the drugs abused, the treatment may also employ medications together with behavior therapy so as to decrease alcohol/opiate use. Naltrexone is known to help cut heavy drinking as it makes drinking distasteful. Buprenorphine is helpful as methadone in remedying opiate addiction & has less significant side effects and lesser abuse possibility (Nsimba, 2007). The shortcomings of the usefulness of pharmacological interventions are the absence of adherence in ingesting the drug for the recommended length of time. Long or short-term resident drug abuse therapy programs can be an excellent treatment option if outpatient therapies are ineffective or removing the drug abuser from his environment would be helpful (Levinthal, 2010). Temporary resident facilities use similar therapy modalities as outpatient facilities including pharmacotherapies, self-help groups and behavior therapies. In-patient stays usually last for 2-4 weeks as there’s no evidence that longer stays tend to be more beneficial (Miller, 2007). The long-term resident therapies last 3-6 months and include recovery houses or half-way homes where the drug abuser may continue getting support and therapy (Levinthal, 2010). Features of successful programs Businesses and organizations are designing and implementing drug & alcohol programs in workplaces. It’s extremely important for an organization to have written alcohol/drug policies in the place of work for their employees. However, all the programs will not be effective, and a lot of people will not opt for alcohol/drug intervention therapy for numerous reasons. The effectiveness of an alcohol/drug program chosen by an individual depends on the kind of intervention he is in quest of. “Treatment centers, specialists and therapists” are often the final option that individuals select to prevent drug abuse (n, 2012, para. 6). The person must consider each program’s characteristics when selecting a program. Companies provide employee assistance programs in offices to help people affected by drug abuse. EAP’s are professionally staffed and appointments may be fixed within 48 hours. People can instantly access a “referral system of ancillary emergency services” (Franklin Health). Several outpatient/inpatient programs are available at treatment facilities providing group/individual therapy” for couples/families that are impacted by mental or substance abuse. A person must take into consideration several factors when selecting inpatient vs. outpatient programs due to established rehab policies. Individual requirements and rehab center policies govern the period of stay - from twenty-four hours to 6 weeks. Upon completion of inpatient treatment, the individual transitions into a comprehensive outpatient treatment. Individuals using outpatient facilities have less restriction as under outpatient programs, individuals are allowed to obtain treatments and stay at their homes. This enables patients with jobs to be more productive. It’s important for patients to interact with their family members while undergoing this kind of therapy. Patients can also avail of the partial hospitalization treatment program, where they are required to attend for 3-12 hours daily, several times a week. “The patient can stay at home at nighttime, but attends therapy more frequently compared to an individual undergoing routine outpatient therapy” (SoberRecovery, 2010, para. 3). Regardless of which alcohol/drug program a person opts for, he requires treatment to function normally in his daily environment and to increase workplace efficiency. Conclusion "Considering how drug abuse adversely affects productivity, one should anticipate considerable economic & personal benefits once drug-free workplace strategies are established" (Levinthal, 2010, p. 406). Drugs tend to negatively affect the user and those around him, no matter who the individual is or what is his occupation. Some people may use recreational/ prescription drugs without knowing about addiction or the negative consequences. For most people, drug abuse can wreak havoc at home, school, personal relationships and work, leaving the person feeling helpless, ashamed, or isolated (Help Guide, 2012). The subject matter covered dealt with employee assistance programs plus the support provided by each for addicted individuals together with the benefits of outpatient/inpatient programs. The different modalities were also dealt with, like solo therapy, group therapy etc. Finally, the different features of the best programs concluded the discussion together with the common features of such treatment programs. References Summary of EASNA's Purchaser's Guide and Research Notes. Journal of WorkplaceBehavioral Health, 25(1), 34-45.doi:10.1080/15555240903538840 Attridge, M. (2010). Resources for Employers Interested in Employee Assistance Programs: A Grossman, D. S. (2009, Fall). Behavioral and integrative treatment development program. The Journal of Dental Hygiene, 83(4), 220-221. Retrieved from ebscohost.com Barrett, S. (2010). Employee assistance programmers. Employee Benefits, 39-40. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Keay, E. E., Macdonald, S. S., Durand, P. P., Csiernik, R. R., & Wild, T. C. (2010). Reasons for Adopting and Not Adopting: Employee Assistance and Drug Testing Programs in Canada. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 25(1), 65-71. doi:10.1080/15555240903358702 Help Guide. (2012). Drug Abuse and Addiction. Retrieved from http://helpguide.org/mental/drug_substance_abuse_addiction_signs_effects_treatment.ht m Levinthal, C. F. (2010). Drugs, Behavior, and Modern Society (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Narconon. (2012). Five Good Reasons to go to Drug Rehab. Retrieved from http://narconon.ca/blog/drug-rehabilitation/good-reasons-drug-rehab.html Miller, M. M. (2007, September). Evaluating addiction treatment outcomes. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment, 6(3), 101-106. n, d. (n.d.). Franklin Health. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from Employee Assistance Program: http://www.fchn.org/franklin-health/behavioral-services/eap n, d. (2010). SoberRecovery Alcohol Drug Addicted Articles. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from Difference between Inpatient and Outpatient Drug Rehab Programs: http://www.soberrecovery.com/articles/554.html Mission Hospital. (2009). Inpatient Treatment Program. Retrieved from http://www.mission4health.com/services/chemical-dependency/recoveryprograms/chemical-dependency-rehabilitation/inpatient-treatment-program.html n, d. (2012). Lancaster Drug Rehab. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from Welcome to Lancaster Drug Rehab: http://lancasterdrugrehab.com/ Nsimba, S. E. (2007, September). Outpatient treatment programs: A review article on substances of abuse outpatients’ treatment outcome in the United States. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment, 6(3), 91-99. Peavy, K. M., Cochran, B. N., & Wax, J. (2010, December). What they want: Motivation and treatment choice in nontreatment-seeking substance abusers. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment, 9(4), 150-157. Pavillion. (2012). Outpatient Services in Greenville, South Carolina. Retrieved from http://www.pavillon.org/iop.php Watershed Addition Treatment Program. (2006). Watershed Inpatient Treatment. Retrieved from https://lp.thewatershed.com/pgs_google/prgm_inpatient.php