Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chapter 3 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 3.1 Nuclear Spins Nuclei may possess a spin angular momentum and the observation of nuclear spins in Stern-Gerlach type experiments played a large role in the development and acceptance of particle physics. The original Stern Gerlach experiment in 1922 probed the electron spin in silver atoms evaporated in an oven and flying through a magnetic field (Fig. 3.1). N Ag, (700º C) S Figure 3.1: Stern and Gerlach observed the quantized electron spin νz = ± 21 · ge νB in a beam of neutral silver atoms. Silver atoms have 47 electrons, (electronic shell: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 4p6 3d10 5s1 ). The single outer electron was expected to have zero angular momentum (l=0) 1 2 CHAPTER 3. NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY Nucleus 1 H Abundance Spin Spin projections γN (107 T1·s ) 99.98% I= 12 mI = ± 21 26.752 ± 21 6.727 13 C 1.11% I= 12 14 N 99.64% I=1 I= 12 I= 12 19 F 100% 31 P 100% mI = mI = 0, ±1 mI = mI = ± 21 ± 21 1.933 25.177 10.840 Table 3.1: Nuclear spins regularly used for NMR spectroscopy. and no interaction with the magnetic field was expected. The experiment, however, showed two discreet trajectories indicating a quantized magnetic property of the atoms. Both, the presence of an inherent electron spin, and its quantized property in an external magnetic field came as a surprise and affected the development and wide acceptance of quantum physics. Nuclear spins are about 3 orders of magnitude weaker and were later observed in similar experiments. The observation of nuclear spins gave first indications that nuclei have structure. Nuclei are composed of protons and neutrons, both of which have inherent spins of I = 12 . Hence, nuclei with an odd number of protons or neutrons must have a spin I6=0; if the sum of protons+neutrons is odd, then the spin must be a half-integer number I = n + 12 (n=0,1,...). The nuclear spin quantum number I for nuclei commonly encountered in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is shown in table 3.1. EmI Spin state energy γN gyromagnetic moment B0 Magnetic field EmI = −γN ~B0 mI (3.1) mI spin projection In absence of a magnetic field, the nuclear spin is not an observable property. In presence of a magnetic field B0 , the nuclear spin adopts quantized values mI = -I, -I+1 ... -I, which explains the discreet trajectories observed in the Stern-Gerlach experiments. There exists no classical interpretation for the spin quantization. The energy of the spin states in a magnetic field can be calculated using the nuclear gyromagnetic moment γN in table 3.1 using the equation 3.1. Nuclear Spin Signals The energy difference ∆E = γN ~B0 between proton spin states in a strong magnetic field of 1 T can be directly estimated as ∆E = 2.675 · 108 ~s−1 corresponding to a frequency of 42.6 MHz. This so called ”Larmor frequency” is directly proportional the the magnetic field strength. Irradiation of a sample 3.2. NMR SPECTRA 3 with the Larmor frequency of its nuclei will lead to spin excitation and absorption of the radiation. 1 H gyro. moment Magnetic field Planck constant Boltzmann const. Temperature γN = 2.7 · 108 1 Ts B0 = 1.0 T ~ = 1.05 · 10−34 Js J k = 1.4 · 10−23 K T = 300 K Nα Nβ Nα Nβ γN ~B0 = exp − kT ≈ 1 − 6.7 · 10−6 (3.2) MHz and GHz frequencies are comfortably in the range of radiowave emitters and detectors, so spectroscopic characterization is straightforward. Original experiments used a fixed frequency radiowave oscillator and observed absorption while scanning the magnetic field strength induced by electromagnetic coils. The size of the observed signal is proportional to the population difference between the lower (α) and upper (β) spin state, and to the energy per absorbed photon (the latter is directly proportional to B0 ). We can use the Boltzmann distribution as shown in equation 3.2 to estimate population differences. With the approximation that e−x ≈ 1 − x for small x, the population difference is also proportional to B0 , and we find that the signal depends quadratically on the field strength. This explains the the great efforts to obtain ever stronger magnetic fields for NMR and the early adoption of superconductor materials in the corresponding magnetic coils. Modern NMR spectrometers operate at field strength up to 20 T. 3.2 NMR Spectra Chemical Shift When an external magnetic field is applied to a sample, not all nuclei feel the same field strength. The electron spins with their much higher magnetic moment get spin polarized and induce a local magnetic field which can shield the nucleus or increase the field at the nucleus (Fig. 3.2). Both, the nuclear polarization and the electron polarization are proportional to the magnetic field, therefore the shielding effect leads to a frequency shift which is a constant fraction of the resonance frequency. It is therefore advantageous to plot NMR spectral shifts 6 0 as parts per million (ppm) on a proportional scale δ = ν−ν ν0 · 10 , invariant to the field strength of a particular experiment. The discovery of the chemical shift moved the investigation of nuclear spins into the domain of chemistry, whereas originally such investigation were of interest only to nuclear physicists who wanted to get insight into the structure of atomic nuclei. In 1952, only 6 years after the publication of the first NMR spectra, Bloch and Purcell were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for their 4 CHAPTER 3. NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY B0 Bloc=B0-σB0 ν= γN (1 − σ )B0 2π Bel=-σB0 Figure 3.2: The applied magnetic field B0 interacts with the electron angular momentum and induces a magnetization Bel . This magnetization affects the local magnetic field acting onto the nucleus and shifts the corresponding resonance frequency ν. work. Through the direct measurement of local magnetic fields, the nuclear spins are perfect probes for local electronic structure. Nuclear spins are always reported relative to a chemical standard, typically tetramethyl-silane (TMS) to remove the need for an absolute calibration. Chemical shifts for some chemical groups are shown in figure 3.3. H R O R H N (TMS) H O R HC CH3 H3C3 Si R O R H O H CH3 R H H H R H R H 11 10 9 8 higher ν 7 6 δ 5 H 4 3 2 R 1 H H 0 Figure 3.3: Chemical shifts for a number of chemical groups. Electron withdrawing groups ”deshield” the protons and lead to smaller shifts and higher excitation frequencies. Spin-Spin Coupling Beyond the interaction with the electron angular momentum, nuclear spins also interact with other nuclear spins leading to the so called ”fine structure” or J-J splitting. This interaction can increase, or reduce the energy of a spin state by 3.2. NMR SPECTRA 5 1 4 J. If we consider a system of two coupled spins A and X, then the combined system can be in an αA αX , αA βX , βA αX , or βA βX state. The excitation energy of either spin from αA αX in the example in Fig. 3.4 is reduced by 2 · 14 J, but the excitation energy from αA βX or βA αX to βA βX is increased by 2 · 14 J. The excitation energies for the nuclear systems A and X are therefore now split into two lines and split by exactly the same energy ± 21 J = J. uncoupled spins +¼ J coupled spins ββ βX uncoupled spins +¼ J βA hνA +½ J h νX hνX +½ J αX β A hνA αA -¼ J +¼ J βα αβ hνA - ½ J h νA -¼ J αA hνX hνX - ½ J αα βX +¼ J αX Figure 3.4: Coupled versus uncoupled spin system: Uncoupled spins A and X can be excited independently, e.g. first A, then X (left) or first X, then A (right). In the coupled system, the spins can stabilize (αβ, βα) or destabilize (αα, ββ) each other by 1 J, leading to a splitting of each transition line. 4 Nuclear spins are magnetic dipoles and spin-spin interaction therefore falls of very rapidly, proportional to r16 . Through-space interaction is therefore limited to very short ranges (< 5Å), and the spins couple most strongly through the electronic system. The coupling through bonding electrons is illustrated in Fig. 3.5: The Fermi coupling between nuclear and electronic spin in a single atom leads to a preferentially antiparallel alignment of nuclear and electronic spin. According to Pauli, the two electrons in the bonding orbital to a neighboring atom must be of opposite spin, carrying the spin information to the next atom. The Hund rule indicates that electrons in different orbitals preferentially adopt the same spin state, carrying the spin correlation into further bonds. However, through-bond spin coupling is is quickly decreasing with the distance, i.e. the number of atoms between the nuclei. The JJ splitting is independent of the magnetic field (6= chemical splitting) and is usually given in Hertz (Hz). Typical coupling constants for a number of vicinal (neighboring) and geminal (non-neighboring) JJ-interactions are given in Figure 3.6. JJ Coupling across more than 3 (for JHH ) or 4 (for JCH ) bonds is rarely observed. When a spin is coupled to two identical spins (e.g. in a system R-C(H)=CH2 ), then two identical splittings lead to the observation of a triplet with intensity ration of 1:2:1 with identical spacing of J. If a spin is coupled to two different 6 CHAPTER 3. NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY hydrogen H e- e- ethylene Hund rule H H Fermi coupling Pauli rule C Fermi coupling C H Figure 3.5: Coupling of nuclear spins occurs predominantly via the electronic system. The Fermi coupling, Pauli’s rule and Hund’s rule determine whether parallel spins (e.g. hydrogen) or antiparallel spins (e.g. ethylene) are lower in energy. spins x and y, then the interaction will lead to a splitting by Jx and another by Jy and therefore result in 4 lines of equal intensity for the single spin. The fine structure can become very convoluted if multiple couplings are present (e.g. 18 lines in the spectrum of CH3 -CH2 -CH2 -NO2 ), complicating the analysis. Spin-spin coupling also occurs through space, but the magnetic dipole-dipole interaction falls off with the 6t h power of the distance. Therefore only interactions across small distances are observed and no discreet splittings can be assigned. However, the through space coupling of spins A and B reduces the intensity of both spin signals. The intensity of spin A can be recovered by saturating the transition for spin B. This effect is called the ”Nuclear Overhauser” effect and allows to characterize through-space coupling. Spin decoupling To interpret convoluted spectra, it would be desirable to observe only selected JJ couplings which can be unambiguously assigned. This can be done by irradiating the sample with a continuous, strong RF pulse at the Larmor frequency of a chosen spin x. The selected spin will undergo multiple spin flips due to absorption and stimulated emission. If the spin flips occur mich faster than the coalescence time, then the neighboring spins will interact with a time-averaged spin 12 α + 12 β = 0, hence the splitting with spin x is removed. All other spins still couple, so the missing couplings can be assigned to interaction with spin x. 3.3 Fourier Transform NMR Instead of sweeping the magnetic field B0 for a constant RF frequency ωf , or sweeping ωf for constant B0 , it is possible to excited multiple spins coherently and to observe the temporal evolution of the induced magnetization. To excite multiple transitions, the excitation pulse must contain all the corresponding frequencies. A short pulse always contains many frequencies (remember the uncertainty principle: ∆E∆t ≥ ~) and can be considered to be the superposition 3.4. NMR IMAGING 7 R H R R' H H JHH = 12..15 Hz H RR R R H R' H R 1J CH 6..8 Hz H H = 125..200 Hz R 6..9 Hz H R R H R R H H H R H R3C 2J 7..12 Hz R R 160 Hz 250 Hz R R JHH = 0-3 Hz H R H CH R R3C CH RC R2C H H = -2 ..-5 Hz 13..18 Hz 3J H R H -2.5 Hz R3C H R H R CH3 40-66 Hz R3C = 4 ..8 Hz 7-13 Hz H 3 Hz Figure 3.6: Selection of typical homonuclear JHH and heteronuclear JCH coupling constants. of discrete frequencies. The creation of such RF pulses is no major challenge and is illustrated in Fig. 3.8. If a large ensemble of spins interacts with the electromagnetic field, then the superposition of particle waves will resemble a classical particle and instead of quantized properties and a probabilistic description of transitions, we can consider the motion of a quasi-classical particle. We therefore discuss the excitation and observation of a ”spin wavepacket” in the ground (α) and excited (β) state and talk about the total magnetization as if it were a true property of the → − − → − system. In the x-y plane, the external field leads to a torque T = → µ × B0 on the magnetization vector. If the field is oriented along the z-axis, this results in a spinning of the magnetization (superposition of the magnetic moments) in the x-y plane with the difference frequency between α and β, the Larmor frequency. P→ − → − For easy interpretation, the total magnetization M = µi is considered and i plotted as shown in Fig. 3.9. The rotating magnetization vector induces currents into a detector coil, i.e. emits electromagnetic radiation which can be detected. 3.4 NMR Imaging Imaging in one Dimension The resonance (Larmor) frequency for a spin transition is proportional to the γ magnetic field strength: µL = ( 2π · B0 . If a field gradient B = B0 + x · Bx is applied along one axis, then the resonance frequency is a linear function of the spin positions within the sample. A NMR spectrum will then directly measure the spin density along the selected spatial coordinate and offer a one-dimensional 8 CHAPTER 3. NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY image of the sample. Please note, that possible frequency shifts due to chemical shift and fine-structure are very small and are ignored. Measuring multiple one-dimensional projections along different axes allows to reconstruct a two- or three-dimensional image as shown in Fig. 3.10. All biological tissue contains water and other proton sources, hence the contrast of 1 H NMR for biological imaging may be unsatisfactory. But a second observable is directly available: the T2 spin relaxation time which is a sensitive probe to diffusion properties, pH, proton mobility, and other factors. T2 is preferentially measured in the time domain using a π − mixing − time − π/2 pulse sequence as shown in Fig. 3.11. Because signals measured with the π − π/2 pulse sequence may show different phases for spins with long/short τ1 lifetimes, selection of a suitable mixing time can give excellent contrast in imaging experiment and allows the easy distinction of different types of biological tissue as seen in the T2 enhanced brain image in figure 3.14, center. Imaging in Multiple Dimensions If imaging is performed in the time domain, multiple pulsed field gradients can be used to mark spins in more than one dimension. In a first approach, we can excite only a selected slice of the sample along axis x with a field gradient Bx and a frequency selective excitation pulse. After free induction decay is complete, a π pulse leads to a spin echo, which is detected while applying a field gradient By . The detected frequencies thus encode the y position within a slice x, as shown in Fig. 3.12. There is, however, a more elegant way for multidimensional imaging: a detected coherent spin signal is due to the larmor precession of the corresponding spin magnetization vector sin(ω·t+δ0 ) with the larmor frequency ω = γN ·B0 . If a field gradient B0 (x) = B0 + x · ∆Bx is applied, the Larmor frequency will vary as a function of x. As illustrated in Fig. 3.13, the precessing spins now dephase with time t by ∆ω · tx = γN · B0 (x) · tx . After the field is switched off, we can observe the unperturbed frequencies, but with a phase shift of δ0 = δ0 + ∆ω · tx . A measurement of the phase shift is therefore a direct measurement of the position along the axis x. In a sequence of spin-echo measurements, multiple phase shifts can be induced along different axes using field gradients Bx , By and Bz to obtain 3-dimensional spatial information. Instead of discrete field gradient pulses along x,y and z, is is preferable to use sinusoidally varying B-fields Bx,y,z ∼ sin((ax + by + cz) · t). The corresponding frequency components a, b and c are superimposed on the actual spin frequencies and can be recovered by the fourier transform. This allows the measurement of three-dimensional images in a single experiment, but requires that the experiment can resolve the applied frequency components from linewidth effects.). 3.4. NMR IMAGING 9 Medical Imaging The potential use of NMR tomography in medicine was a large motivator from the early days of NMR imaging. NMR tomography offers a non-invasive and non-destructive imaging method for biological tissue which easily penetrates a human body. As compared to X-ray tomography, NMR offers unique capabilities beyond the simple imaging of tissue density. First and foremost, we should consider the spin relaxation time τ1 , which is easily measured with a scheme as shown in 3.11. The spin relaxation time is a function of rotational mobility (e.g. high in water, low in fat), pH (≥ 7 in normal cells, often lower in cancer cells), and diffusion. The contrast can therefore be optimized for a particular diagnostic problem. With spin lifetimes of seconds, it is even possible to follow the flow of fluids. Figure 3.14 shows the image of a brain after a stroke, using different imaging methods to diagnose the blood flow or lack thereof in the affected brain regions (1). The ability to observe blood flow and metabolic activity resulted in a novel medical field, the so called ”functional imaging” or fNMR, where local brain activity is monitored and correlated with mental activity. Fig. 3.15 shows two examples, the brain activity associated with moving a finger and the more abstract brain activity of imagining pain (1, 2). These methods offer unprecedented insight into neurological processes. Direct spectroscopic measurements can characterize metabolites and properties such as pH (via analysis of phosphate signals). In some cases, metabolic pathways can be followed, such as the chemical pathway of drugs. 10 CHAPTER 3. NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY δ 1.02 7.2 Hz triplet triplet 7.2 Hz quadruplet δ 4.35 7.5 Hz triplet Figure 3.7: Example for spin decoupling in the molecule 1-nitropropane: The convoluted band at δ2 appears to be a sextet. Decoupling at the frequency of the δ1.02 band (bottom) reveals a triplet due to coupling with the CH2 NO2 group. Decoupling of the band δ4.35 leads to a quadruplet due to coupling with the CH3 moiety (second from top). The apparent sextet is therefore due to 12 lines, which cannot be experimentally resolved. ©1999 William Reusch, All rights reserved, http://www.cem.msu.edu/~reusch/VirtualText/Spectrpy/spectro.htm#contnt δ 2.04 7.5 Hz 3.4. NMR IMAGING 11 Figure 3.8: 5 Sinusoidal pulses with frequency differences of approximately π/10 (top) and their sum (bottom). The sum is an apparently shorter pulse, and indeed we expect a frequency uncertainty according to the uncertainty principle (h∆ν · ∆t ≥ h). B0 B0 z z Μ μi π/2zy pulse μi Μ y y x x Figure 3.9: Nuclear spins µi and total magnetization M = P µi in a magnetic field B0 (left), and after excitation of a coherent spin wavepacket with a π2 zy pulse. 12 CHAPTER 3. NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY Bo ωL B o Bo ωL ωL Figure 3.10: NMR Zeugmatogram: If a linear magnetic field gradient B0 is applied along an axis, then the spin frequencies ωL in the sample are directly proportional to the position along the axis. The NMR spectrum then measures spin density as function of position. Measuring multiple projections along different axes allows the reconstruction of an image (Lauterbur 1973, Nobelprice for medicine together with Mansfied in 2003). B0 z π Μ t1 y x z z z π/2 τ1 short y y x τ1 short x τ1 long y x τ1 long Figure 3.11: Measurement of τ1 : after spin inversion with a π pulse, waiting time t1 allows for spin relaxation. With a π/2 pulse, spins are turned into the x-y plane for detection of the free induction decay (FID) signal. Signals which decayed by more than 50% have opposite sign of the magnetization vector before the π/2 pulse and have opposite phase in the FID. 3.4. NMR IMAGING 13 frequency / space selective excitation ωX gh hi frequency / space encoded detection w lo q. fr e BY q. fre BX π (ωX) π/2 BX BY Figure 3.12: Selective excitation of a yz plane is achieved by applying a field gradient x and selecting a suitable excitation frequency ωx . The spin echo is detected after a π/2 pulse while applying a field gradient along the y axis. Y-positions within the selected yz-plane are now encoded in the frequencies of the free-induction decay. x=0: ν = γN⋅B0/2π x≠0: ν = γN⋅B(t)/2π B(t) = B0 π/2 B(t) = B0 + ΔB⋅x π B(t) = B0 π ΔB⋅x Figure 3.13: Phase encoding of the spatial position: Varying the magnetic field strength B along one spatial coordinate x will lead to gradual dephasing of the magnetic vectors along this axis. The phase shift is directly proportional to the field and the encoded phases can be analyzed by detecting a spin echo signal after a π pulse. 14 CHAPTER 3. NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY Prichard, J. W et al. BMJ 1999;319:1302 Copyright ©1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. Figure 3.14: Magnetic resonance images after clinical stroke (blocked blood vessels P.L. Jackson et al., Neuropsychologia 44, 752–761 (2006). Copyright ©1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. Prichard, J. W et al. BMJ 1999;319:1302 in the brain). Left: ”Diffusion weighted imaging” shows damaged tissue. Center: conventional T2 weighted image. Right: Magnetic resonance angiography (measurement of blood flow) shows flow void in blood vessels. Figure 3.15: (A) Functional NMR image of the brain during finger movement shows increased blood flow to particular brain regions. (B) fNMR imaging of the brain during the abstract thought about pain. Bibliography [1] J.W. Prichard, J.R. Alger, ”The NMR revolution in brain imaging”, BMJ 319, 1302 (1999). [2] P.L. Jackson, E. Brunet, A.N. Meltzoff, J. Decety, ”Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain”, Neuropsychologia 44, 752761 (2006). [3] P.C. Lauterbur, ”Image Formation by Induced Local Interactions: Examples Employing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance”, Nature 242, 190 (1973). [4] T.F. Budinger and P.C. Lauterbur, ”NMR Technology for Medical Studies”, Science 226, 288-298 (1984). [5] P.J. McDonald and B. Newling, ”Stray field magnetic resonance imaging”, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 1441 (1998). [6] W. Kckenberger, ”Nuclear magnetic resonance micro-imaging in the investigation of plant cell metabolism”, Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 641 (2001). [7] K. Wtrich, ”NMR Studies of Structure and Function of biological maromolecules”, Nobel price lecture http://nobelprize.org/nobel prizes/chemistry/laureates/2002/wuthrichlecture.html. [8] L. Frydman, ”Single-scan multidimensional NMR”, C. R. Chimie 9, 336 (2006). [9] A. Mittermaier and L.E. Kay, ”New Tools Provide New Insights in NMR Studies of Protein Dynamics”, Science 312, 224 (2006). [10] S.F. Keevil, ”Spatial localization in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy”, Phys. Med. Biol. 51, R579 (2006). [11] J.P. Hornak, ”The Basics of NMR”, http://www.cis.rit.edu/htbooks/nmr/inside.htm. [12] B. Jaun, ”Script Analytical Chemistry IV”, http://www.jaun.chem.ethz.ch. 15