* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Fine Structure Constant and Electron (g‐2) Factor Theory Review
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
4/26/2007 The Fine Structure Constant and Electron (g‐2) Factor Nick Hutzler Physics 135c Spring 2007 Theory Review • A (spin) magnetic moment μ quantifies how a particle interacts with magnetic fields particle interacts with magnetic fields • The electron has μ proportional to spin μ=g eh S S = gμ B 2m h h • The fine structure constant α characterizes the strength of the EM interaction α= e2 1 ≈ 4πε0 hc 137 Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 2 1 4/26/2007 Theory Review • The (spin) factor g is dimensionless and varies b by particle type ti l t – Classical charged sphere: g = 1 – Dirac point particle: g = 2 – Neutron: g = ‐3.826 085 45(90) – Proton: g Proton: g = 5.585 5.585 694 713(46) • The anomalous magnetic moment is defined as a = (g‐2)/2 Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 3 Theory Review • Why measure g? – Probe of possible internal structure – One of best tests of QFT/QED, new physics – Fine structure constant α determined by g+QED Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 4 2 4/26/2007 Theory Review • Why isn’t g = 2? – TTree level Feynman l lF diagram gives g = 2 – Higher order corrections from quantum fluctuations add ~.001 Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 5 Theory Review • g and α are closely related – a has a series expansion in α (remember that α is commonly expanded in perturbation series) a = C1 ( απ ) + C2 ( απ ) + C3 ( απ ) + L + aμτ + ahadronic + aweak 2 3 – The Ci are calculated from QED – The aμτ,hadronic,weak μτ hadronic weak terms are the QED muon/tau contribution, and non‐QED hadronic and weak contributions (respectively) Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 6 3 4/26/2007 Theory Review Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 7 History • Earlier α measurements – Quantum Hall effect RK = μ 0c 2α – Atomic spectra R∞ = α 2 me c 2h – Josephson effect U= h ∂φ 2e ∂t – Recoil measurements, numerology, others Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 8 4 4/26/2007 Philosophy • Why does α have this value? – Anthropic Principle: small changes in the value of α Principle: small changes in the value of α would dramatically change the universe – Numerology: Arthur Eddington calculated α=1/136 using numerology and gave the Eddington Number: N = 2256/ α – Feynman: “one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics: a magic number that comes to us with no physics: a magic number that comes to us with no understanding by man” – James Gilson: α has a formula: α= cos(π / 137 ) tan(π / (137 ⋅ 29 )) ≈ 1 / 137.0359997867 137 π / (137 ⋅ 29 ) Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 9 The Experiment • We shall discuss a recent measurement of g and resulting calculation of α d lti l l ti f • New Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment Using a One‐Electron Quantum Cyclotron – Odom, Hanneke, D Odom, Hanneke, D’Urso, Urso, Gabrielse Gabrielse – Harvard Physics Department – PRL 2006 Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 10 5 4/26/2007 The Experiment • Overview: – Put an electron in cyclotron motion – Measure jumps between lowest quantum states – Calculate g – Calculate α Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 11 Penning Traps • Static fields used to trap charged particles charged particles – Uniform axial B field – Quadrupole E field • Earnshaw’s Theorem: static electric fields alone cannot confine a alone cannot confine a charged particle Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 12 6 4/26/2007 Penning Traps • Four motions: – – – – Spin (ν Spin (νs) Cyclotron (νc = 2 νs/g) Axial (νz) Magnetron (νm) • In the present experiment: – – – – νs ≈ νcc’ ≈ 149 GHz νz’ ≈ 200 MHz νm’ ≈ 134 kHz Prime denotes “actual” Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 13 Particle Motion • Spin motion is essentially free • Cyclotron motion is damped by synchrotron radiation (~0.1 s in free space) – However, in this trap the fields are tuned so that cyclotron motion is far from a cavity mode – Lifetime extended to several seconds Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 14 7 4/26/2007 Energy Levels • Measure jumps between lowest spin (ms) and cyclotron (n) levels E (n , ms ) = 1 g 2 hν m + (n + 1 / 2 )hν c' − hδ(n + 1 / 2 + ms ) 2 c s 2 • νa’ and fc’ are anomaly and spin‐up frequencies (respectively) • νc is classical cyclotron frequency eB/2πm Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 15 Energy Levels • νc is obtained using the Brown Gabrielse Brown‐Gabrielse Invariance Theorem: (ν c )2 = (ν c' )2 + (ν z' )2 + (ν m' )2 • This allows us to calculate g/2: l l /2 g ν a' + ν c' ν a' − ν 2z' / (2 f c' ) = ≅ 1+ 2 νc f c' + 3δ / 2 + ν 2z' / (2 f c' ) Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 16 8 4/26/2007 What is Measured? • Spin and cyclotron jumps induce a change jumps induce a change in νz’ • A resonant circuit drives the axial motion at νz’ (SEO) • Quantum Jump Quantum Jump Spectroscopy Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 17 What is Measured? • Anomaly transitions are created by inducing created by inducing spin‐flips with a perpendicular B field • Cyclotron transitions are induced by microwaves • Both drives are always B hd i l on, but tuned so that only one affects the electron Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 18 9 4/26/2007 Results • g/2 = 1.001 159 652 180 85(76) • That’s 76 parts per trillion • Certainly of the most accurate measurements ever made Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 19 Sources of Error • Magnetic field instabilities – After After settling for several months, the superconducting settling for several months the superconducting solenoid is constant to 10‐9/hours – Maintain in 0.3K environment – Perform measurements at night • Fitting/statistics – ~50 measurements/night • Cavity radiation modes Cavity radiation modes • Blackbody Photon Excitation – Cool sample to <100mK Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 20 10 4/26/2007 Fine Structure Constant • This g‐value translates to α‐1 = 137.035 999 710(90)(33)[0.66][0.24] = 137.035 999 710(96)[0.70] • The top line errors are experimental, QED respectively (second line gives total error) • Square brackets give error in ppb Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 21 Fine Structure Constant • C4,C6,C8,C10 require the evaluation of 7 72 891 12 672 F 7,72,891,12 672 Feynman diagrams di respectively • C8 is known fairly well, C10 is still being calculated Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 22 11 4/26/2007 Important Conclusions • QED continues to be a highly accurate d description of the physical world i ti f th h i l ld • The electron can still be viewed as having no internal structure Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 23 Electron Internal Structure • Internal constituents must have m > 130 GeV – Calculations made assume no internal structure – Thus corrections must come from very high energy/short distance scales – i.e. constituents must be very tightly bound • No QED error: m No QED error: m > 600 GeV 600 GeV Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 24 12 4/26/2007 References • New Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment Using a One‐Electron Using a One Electron Quantum Cyclotron Quantum Cyclotron Odom, Hanneke, D’Urso, Gabrielse. PRL 97, 030801 • New Determination of the Fine Structure Constant from the Electron g Value and QED Gabrielse, Hanneke, Kinoshita, Hio, Odom. PRL 91 030802 • Fully Quantum Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment Magnetic Moment Brian Odom, Thesis, Harvard University, 2004 • A Finer Constant, Czarnecki, Nature 443 p. 516 • James Gilson, fine‐structure‐constant.org Nick Hutzler // Ph 135c // Spring 2007 25 13