Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
List of important publications in mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Karhunen–Loève theorem wikipedia , lookup
Non-standard calculus wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of calculus wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup
MATH 4707 PROBLEM SET 3 FINAL VERSION; DUE WEDNESDAY 3/11 1. Required problems (1) Complete the example from class: the sequence Gn is defined for n ≥ 0 by G0 = 2, G1 = 5 and Gn+2 = 5Gn+1 − 6Gn . Find an explicit formula for Gn . • Exercises from the text: 4.3.2 (note that there is a solution in the back of the book, but it contains several errors; so if you copy it unthinkingly, the results will not be good!), 4.3.11, 4.3.13 (2) Let Hn = n · Fn , where Fn is the nth Fibonacci number. P (So H3 = 3 · F3 = 6, for example.) Compute the generating function H(x) := n≥0 Hn xn . [Hint: if F (x) is d F (x)? the generating function for Fibonacci numbers, what are the coefficients of dx You might try comparing to the third solution of Problem 2.5.2 given in the solutions to P-set 1 posted on the website.] • Exercises from the text: 7.1.6, 7.2.5, 7.3.9, 7.3.12, 8.2.2, 8.5.2, 8.5.3, 8.5.4, 7.3.10. (3) In exercise 7.1.6, you are asked to count labeled graphs, i.e., those in which vertices are labeled and so distinct; let’s say that the correct answer to this question is Ln . Let Un be the number of graphs with n unlabeled vertices. Obviously Un ≤ Ln , since every labeled graph gives rise to an unlabeled graph if you erase the vertex labels. Prove that Un ≥ Ln!n by showing that in this erasing process, at most n! labeled graphs can give rise to the same unlabeled graph. [Not part of the exercise are the following two interesting facts: first (easy), Ln is much larger than n! when n is large, so the result of this theorem is potentially interesting. Second (hard), when n is large in fact the bound in this theorem is very good, and Un will be very close to Ln /n! (in the sense that the ratio of the two will be close to 1).] 2. Optional problems • Text: 4.2.5, 4.3.3, 4.3.4, 4.3.9, 4.3.14, 7.1.2, 7.1.7, 7.2.3, 7.2.7, 7.2.9, 7.3.13, 8.3.1 1