Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) Using DIIGO: Why Johnne and Janee Will eResearch Wednesday, November 25th, 2009 Maureen Paparella Eugene Simko Guillermo Santamaria Overview The DIIGO software permits users to bookmark and manage references acquired through the Web. Users may highlight, annotate, and comment on source data and then store such data to a remote server in a file called “My Library” on the Web. Users may share their library with accepted users in groups, and search saved articles and user input by tags or by keywords in annotations. Without risk of losing data from a dynamically changing website, DIIGO users may cache (snapshot) the site, so that when the user returns to the DIIGO file, the site will look exactly as it did when conducting the research. TO HIGHER EDUCATION, the use of DIIGO in the classroom has often been referred to as revolutionary to pedagogy because DIIGO permits students to add to the content of the course material. While course management software (eCampus) allows instructors to upload content, the top-down approach does not permit students to contribute directly. DIIGO allows students to be truly engaged learners as they make direct contributions to the class group. DIIGO software is most commonly known as part of a second generation of the Web, which marketers often refer to as Web 2.0. Web 2.0 is distinguished from Web 1.0, the informational Web, or the first generation of the Web. Web 2.0 is also referred to as “cloud computing,” since the user’s library of sources is saved on a remote server, or “in the cloud.” Because the bookmarks, tags, annotations, and comments are saved to a remote server on the Web, as opposed to a local save when using Internet Explorer’s bookmark feature, DIIGO users may access their library ubiquitously, from anywhere at any time, as long as they have access to the Internet. Web 2.0 is also known for its “open source” platform. Open source means that the code used to create the software is open to be viewed by programmers. Open source software allows users to use the software at no cost and view the source code (the program instructions) and modify the source code for organizations that may desire to customize it to satisfy their own particular needs. Examples of popular open source software packages include OpenOffice, productivity software which is completely compatible to Microsoft Office (although its spreadsheet program is not as sophisticated and not recommended to replace Excel for business users), and Linux, which is derived from Unix, a very powerful operating system, and Moodle, an intranet/extranet system used for course management (eCampus). These programs are now used in many school districts across the country and save millions of dollars in the administration of programs in education. While DIIGO, Spacetime3D, the Google search engine, Google Apps, and other such applications are in beta (still a subject of trial within the environment for which they were designed, after the debugging stage of alpha), like open source software, they are free of charge for use by Internet users. In the second generation of the Web, users become the senses of the Web; that is, they become the contributors of the exponential growth of the vast body of data on the Web. (At approximately 5000 days old, the networks of the Web appeared to simulate the set of neuron networks in the human brain. If we refer to the Web today as one Human Brain or I HB, Kevin Kelly, author and editor of Wired Magazine, suggests that according to Moore’s Law, 30 years from now, the Web will be 6 billion HB). As DIIGO users create tags for their references, they contribute to keywords used to determine results attained by researchers using the Web, both now and in the future. Thus, DIIGO software is also considered to be part of a third generation of the Web, referred to as the Semantic Web or Web 3.0, illustrated by the use of tags typed in by the user at the time a website is bookmarked. During this fall semester, DIIGO was upgraded to 4.0, meaning there have been 4 major upgrades to the software since its inception (the number 4 is the version number, indicating a major upgrade; the number 0 is a release number, representing a minor enhancement). Best Practices 1. Engage your students: During the first class session, ask students to create a DIIGO account at Diigo.com. If students have already completed the IT 100 course, they should already have opened a DIIGO account and will be familiar with the software. Remind students, especially transfer students who have not taken the IT 100 course, that in the on-campus labs, they should use the Mozilla Firefox browser to download the DIIGO toolbar. It is not possible to download the DIIGO toolbar in Internet Explorer in the labs on campus. Any student or faculty member who needs assistance may attend one of the IT Tutoring Labs, which are open without an appointment during two scheduled days each week during the fall and spring semesters. The schedule may be found at www.monmouth.edu/infotech. 2. Engage your students: Explain to students that throughout the semester, they should expect to be assigned individual assignments, in addition to group assignments. For example, you may begin by assigning the task of creating a group account for the class to a student. Ask the designated student to assign you, the instructor, as the moderator. If the student indicates a lack of confidence in his or her ability to create the group, again mention the availability of the IT Tutoring Lab. 3. Engage your students: During lectures, continuously assign research to selected students. For example, during a lesson on intellectual property, I referred to the movie, “Flash of Genius.” I selected a student from the class roster to provide a movie review and another student to search for information about Robert Kearns and his struggle with Ford Motor Company. The students were asked to provide 4. 5. 6. 7. at least two sources. I reminded the students to highlight the material that pertains to our class discussion on intellectual property. I requested that they tag the material both “intellectual property” and “patent.” I asked them to begin their research by using the multi-subject electronic databases from our library. Then I asked all students to read the material before the next class session and add annotations from the lecture and the textbook, where applicable. Engage your students: Set goals for student research activity and input. Consider requesting at least three students to research a topic during each and every class session. Students engaged in research often will begin to enjoy it and feel comfortable with it. No matter the discipline – math, science, history, education, technology – the topics of each class session can include topics for research and collaboration. Engage your students: When notifying students of an upcoming exam, remind students to review their DIIGO group account material. Specify the tag they should use to search for the specific material assessed. Engage your students: Specifically ask students to use the electronic databases accessed through our library website to locate sources. For example, you may, on occasion, request that students use the multi-subject online databases of ProQuest and EBSCOhost. Remind students to edit the name of the article when using electronic sources from the library, since most often, the name of the article will not appear in the file, as it does from other sites. Remind students that when using ProQuest, for example, “full text” responds to HTML documents that will permit highlighting and annotations. However, if the only alternative is PDF, ask students to use the article anyway. Although the ability to highlight and annotate are highly productive, they are not absolutely necessary. On occasion, ask that students provide their research only from a scholarly journal. Reward your students: A complaint of many students is that when the semester ends, they abruptly lose access to the content in eCampus. Keep your DIIGO group accounts open for a few years, enabling your students to refer to the material long after the course has ended. This will provide the added benefit of assisting us in remaining connected to alumni on an intellectual level, which will serve to keep them connected at every level. Conclusion Dr. Judy Harris of the Online Internet Learning Process writes: “We all begin on the Web by “telegathering” (surfing) and “telehunting” (searching). This we can do pretty well…). We need to help our students and ourselves “teleharvest” (sift through, cogitate, comprehend, etc.) the information that we find, and “telepackage” the knowledge that results from active interaction (application, synthesis, evaluation, etc.) with the information. Then, we need to “teleplant” (telepublish, telecollaborate, etc.) these telepackages by sharing them with others…who use them as information…” Are your students making the shift from surfing and searching to comprehending, synthesizing and collaborating?