Download Dimensioning of electrical installations Calculation softwares examined

Dimensioning of electrical
installations
Calculation softwares examined
Mats Lindstedt
Bachelor’s thesis
Electrical Engineering
Vaasa 2011
BACHELOR’S THESIS
Author:
Mats Lindstedt
Degree programme:
Electrical Engineering
Specialization:
Electrical Power Engineering
Supervisor:
Matts Nickull
Title: Dimensioning of electrical installations
____________________________________________________________
Date: 7 Feb 2011
Number of pages: 45
Appendices: 3
____________________________________________________________
Abstract
This thesis is an examination of calculation softwares for the dimensioning of
electrical installations. The thesis is done in cooperation with Vaasa
Engineering Oy. The goal is to help the employer find a calculation software
that is suitable for their needs. First the fundamental theory concerning the
subject is dealt with. A short description of how the softwares are utilized in
project planning links the theory to a practical usage of calculation softwares.
These are presented from the angle of plant calculation procedures. After the
presentation the calculation softwares are summarized in an evaluation of
benefits and drawbacks. The result is a recommendation of which calculation
software the employer should use for dimensioning electrical installations. The
thesis is concluded with a short conclusion and discussion.
_____________________________________________________________
Language: English
Key words: calculation software, electrical installation, Vaasa Engineering Oy
_____________________________________________________________
EXAMENSARBETE
Författare:
Mats Lindstedt
Utbildningsprogram och ort:
Elektroteknik, Vasa
Inriktningsalternativ:
Elkraftsteknik
Handledare:
Matts Nickull
Titel: Dimensionering av elanläggningar
____________________________________________________________
Datum: 7 feb 2011
Sidantal: 45
Bilagor: 3
____________________________________________________________
Abstrakt
Detta examensarbete är en undersökning av beräkningsprogram för
dimensionering av elanläggningar. Examensarbetet är gjort i samarbete med
Vaasa Engineering Oy. Målet är att hjälpa uppdragsgivaren med att hitta ett
beräkningsprogram som är lämpligt för deras behov. Först behandlas den
grundläggande teorin gällande ämnet. En kort förklaring av hur dessa program
kan utnyttjas inom projektplanering länkar teorin till praktisk användning av
beräkningsprogram.
Dessa
program
presenteras
ur
synvinkeln
tillvägagångssätt för beräkning av elanläggningar. Efter presentationen
sammanfattas beräkningsprogrammen i en utvärdering av för- och nackdelar.
Resultatet
är
en
rekommendation
av
vilket
beräkningsprogram
uppdragsgivaren borde använda för dimensionering av elanläggningar.
Examensarbetet avslutas med en kort sammanfattning samt diskussion.
____________________________________________________________
Språk: engelska
Nyckelord: beräkningsprogram, elanläggning, Vaasa Engineering Oy
____________________________________________________________
OPINNÄYTETYÖ
Tekijä:
Mats Lindstedt
Koulutusohjelma ja paikkakunta:
Sähkötekniikka Vaasa
Suuntautumisvaihtoehto:
Sähkövoimatekniikka
Ohjaaja:
Matts Nickull
Nimike: Sähkölaitteistojen mitoitus
____________________________________________________________
Päivämäärä: 7 helm 2011
Sivumäärä: 45
Liitteet: 3
____________________________________________________________
Tiivistelmä
Tämä opinnäytetyö käsittää laskentaohjelmistoja sähkölaitteistojen mitoitusta
varten. Opinnäytetyö on tehty ytheistyössä Vaasa Engineering Oy:n kanssa.
Tavoitteena
on
auttaa
tehtävän
toimeksiantajaa
heille
sopivan
laskentaohjelmiston löytämisessä. Ensiksi on käsitelty aiheeseen liittyvä
perusteoria.
Lyhyt
selitys
siitä,
miten
ohjelmistoja
voi
käyttää
projektisuunnittelussa sitoo teorian käytännölliseen laskentaohjelmistojen
käyttöön.
Nämä
ovat
esitetty
laitteistojen
laskentamenettelytavan
näkökulmasta. Ohjelmistojen esittelyn jälkeen niistä on yhteenveto etujen ja
haittapuolien
arvioinnin
laskentaohjelmistoa
yhteydessä.
Tulos
on
suositus
toimeksiantajan
tulisi
käyttää
siitä,
mitä
sähkölaitteistojen
mitoitukseen. Opinnäytetyön päättää lyhyt yhteenveto ja keskustelu.
___________________________________________________________
Kieli: englanti
Avainsanat: laskentaohjelmisto, sähkölaitteisto, Vaasa Engineering Oy
___________________________________________________________
Table of contents
1
2
Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1
2.1
Vaasa Engineering Oy ............................................................................................ 2
2.2
Goal and expectations ............................................................................................. 2
Theory............................................................................................................................ 3
2.1
Types of distribution systems ................................................................................. 3
2.1.1
IT-systems ....................................................................................................... 4
2.1.2
TN-systems ...................................................................................................... 4
2.1.3
TT-systems ...................................................................................................... 5
2.2
Conductor current carrying capacity....................................................................... 5
2.2.1
Conductor overload ......................................................................................... 6
2.2.2
Overload protection ......................................................................................... 6
2.3
Short-circuit currents .............................................................................................. 7
2.3.1
Characteristics of short-circuit currents ........................................................... 7
2.3.2
Protection against contact voltage ................................................................... 8
2.3.3
Protection of cables ......................................................................................... 8
2.4
Calculation of impedances ...................................................................................... 9
2.5
Calculation of short-circuit currents ..................................................................... 11
2.6
The short-circuit power method ............................................................................ 12
2.7
Voltage drop ......................................................................................................... 14
2.8
Selectivity ............................................................................................................. 15
3
Calculation softwares utilized ..................................................................................... 16
4
ABB Doc 1.0.0.0009 ................................................................................................... 18
4.1
4.1.1
General properties.......................................................................................... 19
4.1.2
Selecting layout ............................................................................................. 21
4.1.3
ABB Doc Toolbars ......................................................................................... 21
4.2
5
ABB Doc setup ..................................................................................................... 18
Drawing in ABB Doc ........................................................................................... 23
4.2.1
LV diagram .................................................................................................... 23
4.2.2
Auxiliaries ..................................................................................................... 24
4.2.3
MV diagram ................................................................................................... 25
4.3
Calculation module ............................................................................................... 25
4.4
Curves module ...................................................................................................... 27
4.5
Documentation module ......................................................................................... 28
Febdok 5.0.42 .............................................................................................................. 30
5.1
Febdok setup ......................................................................................................... 30
5.2
Drawing in Febdok ............................................................................................... 32
5.2.1
Febdok toolbar ............................................................................................... 32
5.2.2
Transformer and UPS .................................................................................... 33
5.2.3
The single-line diagram ................................................................................. 34
5.3
2.2.1
I/t menu .......................................................................................................... 35
2.2.2
Comments on calculations ............................................................................. 36
5.4
6
7
Calculation results................................................................................................. 34
Febdok documentation ........................................................................................... 37
Other alternatives ......................................................................................................... 37
6.3.1
My ecodial L.................................................................................................. 37
6.3.2
Calculations in Microsoft excel ..................................................................... 38
Benefits and drawbacks ............................................................................................... 39
7.1
ABB Doc benefits and drawbacks ........................................................................ 39
7.2
Febdok benefits and drawbacks ............................................................................ 40
8
Result ........................................................................................................................... 42
9
Conclusion and discussion .......................................................................................... 43
9.1
Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 43
9.2
Discussion ............................................................................................................. 44
List of sources ...................................................................................................................... 45
Appendices
1. Reference methods of installation
2. Current carrying capacities and correction factors
3. Generator technical specification
1
1
Introduction
When planning electrical installations, safety is always the highest priority. The protection
requirements as regards humans and animals must be fulfilled in any situation. Electrical faults
may also cause fire. This is why electrical installations must be planned and dimensioned
correctly to ensure a safe installation for users. The installation should also be reliable and
qualitative to guarantee device operations and to prevent failures in sensitive devices. Quality
means that disturbances, harmonics and voltage levels should be kept within margins.
The protection of humans is primarily done by preventing them from contact with live parts
through isolation, enclosure or barriers. However, if these are defective the protection should
be fulfilled in other ways. Exposed conductive parts may in some cases also become live due
to isolation faults. In fault situations the current must be cut very fast to prevent injuries or
fire.
Satisfaction of the required demands must be proven through calculation or measurements
with an approved instrument. Since measurement cannot be done in advance, calculations
should always be done. By making correct calculations, expensive misdimensioning will also
be avoided.
This thesis deals with calculation softwares for the dimensioning of electrical installations.
First some potential programs are looked into on the basis of wishes and advice from the
employer and a quick overview of the properties of different programs.
In the theory chapter the regulations concerning dimensioning of electrical installations have
been studied. The theory is primarily based on the Finnish standardization association’s
regulations for low-voltage systems SFS-6000. Most of the information is taken from student
literature found in the library, parallel to the SFS-6000. Some comprehensive information is
taken from IEC-60909 “short-circuit currents in three-phase AC systems”. Software
handbooks also contain very good information on the field.
2
1.1
Vaasa Engineering Oy
Vaasa Engineering Oy (often referred to as VEO) provide automation and electrification
solutions for the energy sector covering energy production, transmission, distribution and use.
They deliver turnkey projects, project components, design and engineering, procurement and
supply, project management, installation, start-up, commissioning and user training to
customers worldwide. VEO also offer plant modernizations, maintenance, system updates and
switchgears. They develop and manufacture all of their core products in-house. As well as
their own products VEO also deliver components from leading manufacturers throughout the
entire energy field. This helps them to remain at the leading edge of development and to offer
optimum, preferred solutions to their customers. (www.veo.fi)
1.2
Goal and expectations
Dimensioning electrical installations can sometimes be tough and time consuming, especially
in extensive installations that may include several motors, transformers or generators. Those
who plan electrical installations must also be able to provide their customers with professional
documentation.
My employer operates in the power generation, distribution and industrial fields. The electric
installations in these kinds of plants are usually very extensive. This makes calculations very
challenging. Particular effort is put on reliability, since operation interruptions may become
very expensive. This is why the employer has given me the assignment to look into some
software tools that will help the project engineers with the calculation of electrical
installations.
The goal is to find a software tool that is user friendly, rapid to use and versatile. The program
should at least be able to calculate short-circuit currents, voltage drops and touch voltages and
also to verify selectivity. It is also important that the documentation of calculations is distinct
and professional. The pros and cons of some calculation softwares will be evaluated to help
the employer decide which tool is most suitable for their needs. This requires some thorough
knowledge about the tools in question.
3
My expectations of this assignment are primarily to learn how calculation tools can be
utilized in the best possible way in project planning. I also expect to learn more about how
each component in electrical installations affects the characteristics of electricity.
2
Theory
The dimensioning of cables and over-current protection devices is one of the most important
things when planning electrical installations. Load-ability, short-circuit current and voltagedrop are all affected by the conductor dimensions. Conductor cross-section areas and the overcurrent protection devices must be chosen so that fault-protection requirements are met in any
situation. Other factors that should be considered are future extensions of the plant and
economical aspects. The economical aspects can be purchase and installation costs, or loss and
maintenance costs.
This chapter contains the fundamental theory of dimensioning electrical installations. It
includes explanations of the most vital properties, and calculation procedures of electrical
installations.
2.1
Types of distribution systems
The dimensioning of distribution systems may at some points differ, depending on the type of
system in question. The type of system depends on how live conductors and earthings are
realized. In AC-systems there are one, two or three phase conductors and usually one neutral
conductor and a protective conductor. The neutral conductor is also considered a live
conductor. (Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995, p.52-56)
4
2.1.1
IT-systems
In an IT-system no live parts are earthed directly. Exposed conductive parts are connected
directly to earth. IT-systems are commonly used as LV-subsystems to increase reliability.
(Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995, p.56)
Figure.1a. IT AC-system
2.1.2
Figure.1b. IT DC-system
TN-systems
In a TN system one point is earthed directly and the exposed conductive parts are connected to
this point with a protective earthing conductor or PEN-conductor. TN-systems are the most
common systems used in power distribution. The TN-system is divided into three different
systems depending on neutral and protective earthing conductor mutual arrangements. TN-S
has separate neutral and protective earthing conductors in the entire system. In TN-C-S neutral
and earthing conductors are combined in parts of the system. In TN-C neutral and earthing
conductors are combined in the entire system. (Tiainen, 2008a, p.30-31)
Figure.2a. TN AC-system
Figure.2b. TN DC-system
5
2.1.3
TT-systems
In a TT-system one point is earthed directly. Exposed conductive parts are connected to
separate electrically independent earth electrodes. The TT-system is generally not used in
distribution. TT-systems are used in special cases such as secondary windings of voltage
transformers. (Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995, p.56)
Figure.3a.TT AC-system
2.2
Figure.3b.TT DC-system
Conductor current carrying capacity
Electric currents heat the conductor it flows through because of power losses due to electric
resistivity in the conductor. The heat is transferred from the conductor to the surroundings
through its insulation and protective layers. Since the cable has a certain heat resistivity, the
temperature of the conductor rises until it reaches the point where the transferred heat
corresponds to the heat losses in the cable. Larger cross-section area of the conductor reduces
electric resistivity and thus the power loss is reduced. (Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995,
p.293)
That is, cross-section area and cable construction have great impact on the current carrying
capacity. Other factors that affect the current carrying capacity are the method of installation,
ambient temperature, other nearby cables, air circulation and heat resistivity of the
surrounding soil in earth cables. Reference methods of installation are found in appendix 1.
Conductor current carrying capacity values depending on the method of installation are found
in appendix 2 (table 1). Correction factors concerning temperatures, ground heat resistivity
and other nearby cables are found in appendix 2 (tables 2 – 6). (Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto
ry, 1995, p.293)
6
2.2.1
Conductor overload
An over-current is any current that is higher than the installation design current. An overloadcurrent is a current that is higher than the allowed current, while there is no fault in the circuit.
Overload causes overheating of electrical components. (Tiainen, 2008a, p.140)
2.2.2
Overload protection
Overload protection devices must be dimensioned so that the over-current is disconnected
before the conductor insulation, connections or the cable surroundings are overheated.
Overload protection must meet the requirements presented in equations 1 and 2. In practice the
protection device is chosen to the next standardized size bigger than IL. I2 appears in the
product standard or is given by the manufacturer. (Tiainen, 2008a, p.140)
IL ≤ In ≤ Iz
(1)
I 2 ≤ 1,45 ⋅ I z
(2)
IL
=
The current that the circuit is planned for
Iz
=
Conductor constant current carrying capacity
In
=
Protection-device nominal current
I2
=
The current that ensures the protection device to work as supposed to
(SFS, 6000-4-43, 433.1)
The electric load IL can either be estimated, or calculated if the load is known and consistent.
Estimation of the circuit load is based on how electrical appliances are used. When it is not
likely that several appliances are used simultaneously, the load can be based on the highest
probable load. (Tiainen, 2008a, p.141)
7
2.3
Short-circuit currents
A short-circuit is a fault of negligible impedance between conductors having a difference in
potential. (Handbook_EN.pdf, 2007, p.209) In electrical installations the prospective shortcircuit current must either be measured or calculated to guarantee disconnection in case of
short-circuit. In short-circuit situations the current must be cut very fast to prevent overheating
and to secure safety for humans and animals. Components must also be able to withstand and
disconnect very high SC currents. High SC currents appear especially in circuits with
generators and motors. SC currents are naturally also very high close to distribution
transformers. Short-circuit protection is often combined with overload protection. (Suomen
Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995, p.338-339)
2.3.1
Characteristics of short-circuit currents
The characteristics of short-circuit currents can be divided into “far from generator”- and
“close to generator” short-circuit. Far from generator the initial symmetrical SC current I k" has
a constant amplitude and is therefore equal to the steady-state SC current I k . Close to
generator I k" is decaying. Far from generators the three-phase SC current is the highest of the
short-circuit currents. In close to generator short-circuits, the single phase short-circuit current
can be higher than the three phase.
Figure.4a. Far from generator short-circuit current
Figure.4b. Close to generator short-circuit current
(http://images.books24x7.com/bookimages/id_15535/fig4-2.jpg)
8
The minimum short-circuit current Ikmin appears at the very end of the line and is determined
to ensure fast disconnection in case of short-circuit. The minimum SC current is the single
phase short-circuit. Maximum SC current Ikmax is calculated directly behind devices. Ikmax is
determined to ensure that the components can withstand and disconnect the high current
during short-circuit. (IEC, 60909-0, 2.4-2.5)
2.3.2
Protection against contact voltage
Contact voltage is the voltage that appears between two parts and both live parts can be
touched simultaneously by humans or animals. (SFS, 6000-1 826-11-05) Protection against
contact voltage is primarily accomplished through automatic disconnection in case of
insulation faults. To avoid physiological defects due to electric currents flowing through the
human body in a fault situation, maximum disconnection times have been given. Residual
current devices (RCD) and low voltage systems can be used as additional protection where
needed. (Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995, p.74)
The disconnection times are strictly dependent on the minimum short-circuit current. The
disconnection time must be ≤ 0,4 s in circuits that are protected with ≤ 31 A overload
protection. In circuits with ≥ 32 A the disconnection time is allowed to be ≤ 5,0 s. Between
switchboards the maximum disconnection time is also ≤ 5,0 s. (Tiainen, 2008a, p.164)
2.3.3
Protection of cables
A cable is protected against short-circuit if the specific let-through energy of the preceding
protection device is ≤ the withstood energy of the cable (equation 3).
I 2t ≤ k 2 S 2
(3)
I2t
is the specific let-through energy of the protection device
S
is the cable cross section area
k
is a factor that depends on the cable insulating and conducting material
(Handbook_EN.pdf, 2007, p.70)
9
Short-circuits must be cut at latest when the conductor reaches its highest allowed
temperature. In short-circuits that last ≤ 5 s the time t can be calculated (equation 4), in which
the temperature of the conductor rises to its allowed maximum residue limit. The conductor is
assumed to be in its normal highest allowed temperature before the short-circuit.
t = (k ⋅
A 2
)
I
t
Duration in seconds
A
Cross-section area
I
RMS short-circuit current
k
In PVC-insulated Cu conductors k = 115, PVC-insulated Al conductors k = 74
(4)
(Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995, p.339-340)
2.4
Calculation of impedances
The impedance of transformers, generators, motors, cables and the upstream network affect
the short-circuit current. The impedance is divided into positive, negative, and zero sequence
impedance. These impedances must be determined in order to be able to calculate the shortcircuit current.
The transformer impedance can generally be considered to consist of positive and negative
sequence impedance. In some cases it may include zero sequence impedance, but can
generally be neglected. Transformer winding impedance limits the short-circuit current.
Transformer impedance:
ZT =
u k % U n2
⋅
100 S n
(5)
Synchronous generators contribute to the short-circuit current. To calculate generator
impedances some approximations must be made. The positive sequence reactance Xd can be
assumed to consist only of the sub-transient reactance Xd”. Negative sequence reactance Xi
varies between Xd” and Xq”. In case that Xd” and Xq” differ much the average value between
these two reactances can be used. If not, the negative sequence can be approximated to take
10
the same value as Xd”. The zero sequence reactance Xo varies between a value of 0.1-0.7
times the positive or negative sequence reactance.
Xo =
Zero sequence reactance:
xo % U n2
⋅
100 S n
(6)
xo is a parameter of the generator (appendix 3). Other parameters to include in calculations are
grounding resistance and reactances RG and XG. If the generator star point is not connected to
the ground, the grounding impedance is considered infinite. Generator impedances can be
calculated as follows:
Positive sequence impedance:
Z d = ( Ra + jX d" )
(7)
Negative sequence impedance:
Z i = ( R a + jX i )
(8)
Z o = R a + 3 ⋅ RG + j ( X o + 3 ⋅ X G )
Zero sequence impedance:
Stator resistance:
Ra =
X d"
2 ⋅ π ⋅ f ⋅ Ta
(9)
(10)
Ta is the stator time constant.
Asynchronous three-phase motors contribute to the short-circuit current for 5-6 periods i.e.
100-120 ms in 50 Hz frequency. The positive and negative sequence impedances of a motor
can be considered equal. The zero-sequence ZoM impedance should be given by the
manufacturer. If the motor is not earthed ZoM is infinite. Positive and negative sequence
impedances are calculated as in equation 11:
Z d = Z i = Z M = ( RM + jX M )
ZM =
U n2 1
⋅
I LR S n
In
(11)
(12)
ILR is the current while the rotor is blocked.
Cable impedances limit the short-circuit current. Positive and negative sequence impedances
can be set equal (equation 13).
11
Z d = Z i = Z C = ( RC + jX C )
(13)
The zero-sequence impedance varies depending on the return path of the fault current.
L-to-N:
Z o = Z C + j 3 ⋅ Z NC = ( RC + 3 ⋅ R NC ) + j ( X C + 3 ⋅ X NC )
(14)
L-to-PE (TN-S):
Z o = Z C + j 3 ⋅ Z PEC = ( RC + 3 ⋅ R PEC ) + j ( X C + 3 ⋅ X PEC )
(15)
L-to-ground (TT):
Z o = Z C + j 3 ⋅ Z EC = ( RC + 3 ⋅ R EC ) + j ( X C + 3 ⋅ X EC )
(16)
The upstream network is the distribution net (e.g. MV). The zero sequence impedance is not
considered since the primary winding is generally delta-connected.
Network impedance: Z d = Z i = Z NET =
Un
3 ⋅ I k3
(17)
(Handbook_EN.pdf, 2007, p.228-230)
2.5
Calculation of short-circuit currents
When calculating maximum short-circuit currents Ikmax all elements contributing to the SC
current must be chosen to give the highest possible contribution. All equivalent short-circuit
impedances must be introduced at the smallest possible value. Cable and overhead line
resistances are introduced at a temperature of 20 °C. Motors that contribute to Ikmax shall be
included in calculations. Voltage factor cmax (Table 1) must also be included.
Table 1. Voltage factor c (IEC 60909-0, table 1-Voltage factor c)
Nominal voltage Un
Low voltage 100 V
to 1000 V
Medium voltage 1
kV to 35 kV
Voltage factor c for calculation of
Maximum SC
Minimum SC
currents, cmax
currents, cmin
1,05 *
0,95
1,10 **
1,10
1,00
High voltage >35
kV
* For low voltage systems with a tolerance of +6%, for example
systems renamed from 380 V to 400 V.
** For low voltage systems with a tolerance of +10%.
12
When determing Ikmin the contributing elements are chosen to have the least possible
contribution to Ik. Motors should be excluded from calculations. Resistance of cables and
overhead lines are introduced at the conductor temperature at the end of the short-circuit. The
voltage factor (Table 1) is chosen to be cmin. (IEC 60909-0, ch.2.4-2.5)
c ⋅U n
3-phase short-circuit:
I k3 =
2-phase short-circuit:
Ik2 =
Phase-to-neutral short-circuit:
I k1N =
Phase-to-PE short-circuit:
I k1PE =
3 ⋅ (Z NET + Z T + Z L )
c ⋅U n
2 ⋅ ( Z NET + Z T + Z L )
(18)
(19)
c ⋅U n
2
3 ⋅ ( + Z NET + Z T + Z L + Z N )
3
c ⋅U n
2
3 ⋅ ( + Z NET + Z T + Z L + Z PE )
3
(20)
(21)
(Handbook_EN.pdf, 2007, p.232)
2.6
The short-circuit power method
The short circuit-current can also be calculated by using the “short-circuit power method”.
This method gives an approximate short-circuit current in a simple way. The result is
generally within acceptable accuracy. First the short-circuit power Sk for all the elements
included in the installation must be determined.
Network short-circuit power Sknet or short-circuit current Iknet is generally given by the
distribution company at the supply point, e.g. at a transformer. If not, reference values (Table
2) can be used.
Table 2. Reference values for Network short-circuit power (Handbook_EN.pdf, 2007, p.212)
Net voltage
Un (kV)
Short-circuit power
Sknet (MVA)
≤ 20
≤ 32
≤ 63
500
750
1000
13
Generator short-circuit power SkG contributes to Ik. SkG can be calculated if the generator
reactance Xd’ is known (appendix 3). Xd’ is generally given in percent of generator impedance
Zd, and can either be subtransient, transient, or synchronous reactance depending on in which
instant Sk is to be calculated. Subtransient reactance is usually used in calculations, being the
worst case scenario. The short-circuit power of a transformer limits Ik. Cables also limit the
short-circuit current. Cable short-circuit power can be calculated according to a good
approximation.
S nG ⋅ 100
X d' %
Generator short-circuit power:
S kG =
Motor short-circuit power:
S kM = 3 ⋅ U n ⋅ I kM
Transformer short-circuit power:
S kT =
100
⋅ S nT
Uk %
(24)
Cable short-circuit power approximation:
S kC =
U n2
ZC
(25)
(22)
(23)
Short-circuit power at the fault point can now be calculated by using equation 26 or 27:
Elements in series:
Sk =
1
(26)
1
1
1
1
+
+
+
S kG S kM S kT S kC
Elements in parallel: S k = S kG + S kM + S kT + S kC
(27)
The short-circuit current is calculated as in formula 28 or 29:
3-phase short-circuit current: I k 3 =
2-phase short-circuit current: I k 2 =
Sk
3 ⋅U n
Sk
2 ⋅U n
(Handbook_EN.pdf, 2007, p.211-220)
(28)
(29)
14
2.7
Voltage-drop
By voltage-drop is meant how much the voltage at the consumption point differs from the
rated voltage at the supply point. In LV installations the voltage drop is recommended to be no
more than 4 % of the rated voltage at the supply point, if no other requirements are set. (SFS,
6000-5-52, 525) Higher voltage drops are allowed in circuits that contain electric motors or
other devices with high inrush currents. The voltage drop can be calculated by using equations
30-32:
In DC circuits:
∆U = I ⋅ 2⋅ r ⋅ l
In 1-phase AC circuits:
∆U = I ⋅ 2 ⋅ l ⋅ (r ⋅ cos ϕ ± x ⋅ sin ϕ )
(31)
In 3-phase AC circuits:
∆U = I ⋅ l ⋅ 3 ⋅ ( r ⋅ cos ϕ ± x ⋅ sin ϕ )
(32)
(30)
When the load is inductive the ± is (+), when capacitive it is (-).
Voltage drop in %:
∆u =
∆U
⋅ 100%
Un
(33)
∆U
is the voltage drop in volts
I
is the load current in amperes
l
is the length of the cable
r
is the self-resistance in ohms/meter
x
is the self-reactance in ohms/meter
Un
is the rated voltage
φ
is the phase angle between the voltage and the current in degrees
∆u
is the proportional voltage drop in %
(Tiainen, 2008a, p.167-168)
15
2.8
Selectivity
Selectivity means that protection devices only work in that part of the circuit where they are
supposed to work in case of overload or short-circuit. This is generally the last protection
device preceding the point where a fault occurs. Selectivity can be verified by studying the
characteristics of protection devices. Selectivity may in some cases lead to unreasonable overdimensioning and is therefore not always necessary. (Tiainen, 2008a, p.166)
Figure.5.Low voltage selectivity with ABB circuit breakers. (QT1_EN.pdf, 2008, p.5).
Figure 5 presents the characteristics of two protection devices. The red curve represents the
characteristics of the protection device closest to the fault point, circuit breaker B. In this
example selectivity is accomplished.
16
3
Calculation softwares utilized
The theory dealt with in chapter 2 is the foundation for electrical dimensioning. This chapter
briefly describes the dimensioning procedure and why calculation softwares should be utilized
in the process. The flow chart (figure 6) is a suggestion of how the dimensioning of electrical
installations should be approached with or without help from computer softwares.
Figure.6. Dimensioning procedure. (Handbook_EN.pdf, 2007, p.24).
17
Figure 6 gives a very good overview of how electrical dimensioning is systematically
carried out. The calculations softwares that are examined are based on drawing a single-line
diagram. Therefore calculations can be done as the single-line diagram takes form,
nevertheless the approach is generally very much the same.
The primary reason for why calculation softwares should be utilized in dimensioning electrical
installations is to save time. Moreover, calculations are tiresome to repeat every time a new
plant is to be dimensioned. The risk of incorrect dimensioning is also reduced since the user
only has to set the data of the plant electrical loads together with general installation
information. Calculations are entirely done by the computer software, based on these settings.
Calculation softwares also contain ready-made databases over components, which is useful
since summarizing the detailed data necessary would be hard work. In addition to calculation
result reports most softwares automatically compile tables of cables and device lists as well.
Once more, the benefit of professional documentation of calculation results to provide the
customers with is highly valued.
Two calculation softwares are chosen to be examined particularly thoroughly. These are
chosen since they meet the requirements at most points. Two other alternatives for
dimensioning electrical installations are also briefly discussed and presented, however these
are not examined any further nor are they considered in the final evaluation. The presentation
of the softwares is meant to give an idea of how they can be utilized in the dimensioning of
electrical installations, which is a significant part of project planning.
18
4
ABB Doc 1.0.0.0009
Doc is a calculation software by ABB based on drawing single-line diagrams. Doc
automatically dimensions cable cross-section area, protection devices and switching devices in
low and medium voltage power plants. The user can choose between light and professional
profiles. The profile is selected on program start-up. The main functionalities of ABB Doc are:
•
Drawing single-line diagrams and auxiliary circuits
•
Calculation of currents, voltage drops and short-circuits
•
Dimensioning cables and verifying cable protection
•
Dimensioning of switching- and protection devices
•
Setting and coordination of protection devices
•
Calculation of over temperatures in switchboards
•
Printing the project documentation
(DOC_EN.pdf)
4.1
ABB Doc setup
On start-up the user can choose between light or professional profile (figure 7). Light profile is
recommended for calculating simple low voltage circuits. In the professional profile all Doc
functionalities are available. Professional profile is recommended for calculating more
complex circuits with MV supplies or generator supplies.
19
Figure.7. ABB Doc user profile selection
4.1.1
General properties
The general properties window opens when a new project is created (figure 8). The window
can be opened later on and some properties can be adjusted, if they are not dependent on the
single-line diagram connected to the supply.
There are four different power supplies to choose between. At light profile the alternatives are
LV supply and MV-LV trafo. At professional profile, the MV supply and Generator are also
available. The generator supply should be used in island operation.
20
Figure.8. ABB Doc plant general properties
In the LV supply the only parameter required is the three-phase short-circuit current at the
supply point. This short-circuit current should be informed by the distribution company or
plant holder. If either the three-phase fault impedance or short-circuit apparent power is
known the short-circuit current can be calculated by clicking the calculator button. The MVLV trafo is used for representing the LV-side in medium or large plants. The parameters
needed in this supply are the rated apparent power, short-circuit voltage and the number of
transformers.
The MV supply is used to represent also the MV side of a transformer when you want Doc to
select MV devices. The parameters needed are the rated voltage, short-circuit current, the state
21
of neutral and the ground fault current at the point of delivery. Short circuit currents are
calculated in the same way as in the LV supply. The ground fault current can be calculated if
the capacity to ground or the Petersen coil parameters are known. Other parameters that can be
selected are e.g. the type of AC system, frequency (50 Hz or 60 Hz), parameters that affect
protection of people, calculation standard method etc.
4.1.2
Selecting layout
When the general plant properties are defined the next window that appears is the layout
selection. This doesn’t affect the calculation results in any way. In light profile the only
alternative is “LV columns”. The layout can be changed during an ongoing Doc project. In
professional profile the user can choose between:
•
“MV columns” (recommended for drawing MV compartment diagrams)
•
“LV columns” (recommended for drawing LV plants)
•
“Free” (recommended for customized and/or special diagrams on A2, A1, A0 formats)
Figure.9. Available layouts in ABB Doc
4.1.3
ABB Doc Toolbars
At light profile the available toolbars are LV macro toolbars and auxiliary toolbars. In the LV
macro toolbars the most common symbols for rapid and easy drawing are found. At
professional profile the free drawing toolbar is available for customized drawing. All LV
22
macro toolbars, and MV macro toolbars are also available. The user can choose what
toolbars should be visible by clicking “Toolbars” in the “View” menu. In the following
screenshot all available toolbars are visible.
Figure.10. ABB Doc LV columns layout
On the right in figure 10 there are some symbols where the user can switch between the
following modules.
Drawing the MV network
Drawing the LV network
Calculating and dimensioning
Curve verification and drawing
Drawing of auxiliaries
Documentation
23
4.2
Drawing in ABB Doc
Drawing in ABB Doc is rapid and simple, especially by using the macros. The macros consist
of e.g. a protection device or disconnector, cable and load. There are different macros to
choose between, depending on the protection device and load in question. At light profile
using the macros is the only way to draw the single-line diagram. At professional profile the
user can either use the macros or choose loads and protection devices more freely. Loads can
also be more customized at professional profile.
4.2.1
LV diagram
The screenshot displays a LV single-line diagram drawn at light profile. The yellow color of
the lines and symbols indicates that the diagram has not yet been calculated. On the left is the
supply point chosen by the user, in this case LV supply.
Figure.11. ABB Doc LV diagram
24
The incoming disconnector (Figure 11) feeds a switchboard. The switchboard feeds a sub
switchboard, a motor and a board sublevel. The sub switchboard feeder is cross referenced and
the sub switchboard can be drawn on a new page. The board sublevel is used when it is
desirable to protect several departures by e.g. one RCD. By double clicking the load symbol
the user can configure the parameters of the load. The cable dimensions and the characteristics
of the protection device should now be chosen automatically by Doc. However if some
devices or cables are preferred to be chosen manually, it can be done by double clicking the
symbol and the parameters of the device can be chosen. If the user wants to choose devices
manually, the parameters can be locked by clicking the padlock symbol. Now Doc won’t
choose the devices automatically, but the calculations show if they meet the requirements.
4.2.2
Auxiliaries
Auxiliary circuits can also be drawn with Doc. Drawing the auxiliaries is only possible as free
drawing (figure 9), i.e. there are no available macros in the drawing of auxiliaries mode. The
auxiliary circuits are only drawn to get a more complete diagram for documentation, and do
not affect the calculation results.
25
4.2.3
MV diagram
The screenshot (figure 12) is an example of a MV switchgear with a measurement unit, two
transformers and two departures. The LV departure from the transformer is cross-referenced to
another page. The green color of the lines indicates that the diagram is calculated and
dimensioned correctly.
Figure.12. ABB Doc MV diagram
4.3
Calculation module
Calculation is done when the single-line diagram is drawn and the data of the objects have
been defined. The user can modify the calculation procedure if desired. However the Doc
preset calculation procedure covers most common plants. By using the options command in
the tools menu, the user can select “Show calculation settings before dimensioning” to view or
modify the calculation parameters. (DOC_EN.pdf, p.48)
26
During the calculation process a window that shows the progress of the calculation is
visible. There are two types of error messages that may appear during the calculation.
•
Blocking messages: incorrect situation must be corrected before proceeding with
calculation.
•
Warning messages: warn the user of possible errors, but do not block the calculation.
Doc calculation and dimensioning results:
•
Ikmax at all points of the diagram, and Ikmin at the end of each line.
•
Phase and neutral currents at all points of the diagram.
•
Cosφ on each busbar and line, and active and reactive power required at the supply.
•
Minimum cross-sections of cables that satisfy thermal and voltage drop criteria.
•
The most economical ABB protection and switching apparatus.
•
Moving a single or two phase load from one phase to another, to achieve a balanced
load.
•
Dimensioning of transformers and generators.
The user can modify the device selections made by Doc. This is done by choosing the objects
manually and locking them with the padlock symbol. Choosing objects manually can be useful
e.g. when one type of cable is already used at a point of the single-line diagram, and the user
wishes to use the same type at another.
At the footer of the single-line diagram (figures 11 and 12) there is a table, where the
calculation and dimensioning results are shown (figure 13). This way of presenting the results
is very distinct and the user gets a very good overview of the calculation results for each single
departure.
27
Figure.13. ABB Doc calculation results
4.4
Curves module
In the curves module the characteristics of protection devices can be viewed (figure 14). In the
box on the left the user can verify characteristics of the single objects. Several circuit breakers
can be chosen into the same time-current graph so that selectivity can be verified. In the
relations box on the bottom of the window there is a list of the protection verified by doc. The
available curves are time-current tripping characteristics, specific let through energy and
current limitation curves.
When protection relations are satisfied, the state is OK and the color of the text is black. If the
protection relation is failed, the text is red and the state is FAILED. If adjustable protection
devices are used (e.g. device with microprocessor unit and some thermo-magnetic type
devices) the user can adjust the settings of the device until the protection relation is satisfied.
The curves can be printed or attached to the single-line diagram if desired.
28
Figure.14. ABB Doc curves module
4.5
Documentation module
In the documentation module the user can choose what is to be included in the project
documentation. The single-line diagrams are the only compulsory pages in the documentation.
Other pages that are desired by the user can be chosen by ticking its box.
On the right of the window (figure 15) are the commands of the documentation manager. With
the compile layout command, the heading and the layout of each page can be compiled. The
name of the project, the customer, the designer, the descriptions and the dates etc. are chosen
with the compile layout command. There is also a command to export reports into .xls files if
this format is preferred.
29
Figure.15. ABB Doc documentation module
30
5
Febdok 5.0.42
Febdok is a software tool made for the dimensioning and documentation of electrical
installations. Febdok is developed by Norwegian Nelfo and has been used in Norway for more
than 15 years. The functionalities of Febdok are:
•
Calculation of short-circuit- and fault currents
•
Calculations of touch voltages and voltage drops
•
Dimensioning of cables, busbars and protection devices
•
Verification of selectivity, and protection device check up
•
Documentation of electrical installations
(Nelfo, Foreningen for EL og IT Bedriftene)
Febdok is available in Norwegian, Swedish, Danish, Finnish and UK versions. The difference
between the versions is e.g. the program language, cable markings and possible calculation
differences. In this chapter a demo of the Finnish version is looked into. The demo is
downloaded from Sähköinfo.fi and works on one computer for 45 days. All properties except
documentation are available in the demo version.
5.1
Febdok setup
When Febdok is started and the user has logged in, a window that contains information about
licence and software version is shown. Further licence information is found in the licence
menu.
In the System setup menu (figure 16) the user can set the standard settings for installations.
Febdok will now use these settings every time the user creates a new installation. The system
setup window includes installation, application, cable types, protection devices, utility and
users access rights menus.
31
In the cable types and protection devices menus the user can select which installation
material should be available, e.g. certain manufacturers. In the utility menu the user can set the
information about the network company.
Figure.16. Febdok system setup, Installation menu
When setting the installation data, the user is supposed to set the data to correspond to the
most common plants that are going to be dimensioned further on. This data can however be set
just as easily when a new installation is created.
“Use sum of load currents” should only be chosen if the user has full control of the
simultaneously used loads on the departures from one switchboard. Otherwise Febdok
calculates voltage drops on the basis of the main cable load. In the application menu the user is
recommended to tick the box “default prefix for circuit Id’s” if certain circuit Id systems are
followed. This makes it faster to name the Id’s of each departure.
32
5.2
Drawing in Febdok
When a new installation is created, the installation information window appears. Febdok will
suggest the standard settings for the installation. These settings are the ones that have been set
in the system setup window (figure 16). The parameters must be set to correspond to the
electrical installation as it will be realized.
Febdok can dimension the installation based on any point where the short-circuit currents are
known. If there is one point with known SC currents, “calculate from origin of
installation/distribution board/supply point” should be chosen. However, if the installation is
to be calculated from a transformer, “calculate from transformer” is chosen. The SC currents
at the transformer will now be calculated based on the transformer data. Multiple transformers
can also be chosen.
The first distribution board is adjacent to the point “calculate from”. In this menu the type of
distribution system, phases’ mutual arrangement etc. are set. It should be noted that this is the
data at the first distribution board. Selections made at this point may limit the alternatives in
possible sub-switchboards further on in the installation.
There is also a “load data” box in this menu but the load data doesn’t have to be set at this
point. It is more practical to return to this menu when each single load has been determined.
When one or a few departures are being added to an existing plant, the first distribution board
load can be set based on e.g. the main fuses’ rated currents.
5.2.1
Febdok toolbar
The toolbar (figure 17) is very distinct and does not need any further description. The diagram
is drawn by clicking the symbols in the toolbar. When a new device is added to the diagram, a
setup window for the departure appears.
Figure.17. Febdok toolbar
33
The departures to choose between when drawing the diagram are listed below. When new
departures are created the parameters for devices included in the active departure must be set.
Departure settings are e.g. load, cable and protection device properties, method of installation,
additional protection or other additional devices.
New distribution board
New grouping
New branching node
New connection node
New motor
New variable load
New fixed load
New distributed load (street light) circuit
New control circuit
New spare circuit
5.2.2
Transformer and UPS
When a new departure is created the user can choose to add a transformer or UPS to the
departure. Transformers can be used in the departures to change the voltage level, eliminate
upstream disturbances or for electric insulation. The UPS (uninterruptable power supply) is
used in places where the electricity must be maintained even when the network voltage is
interrupted.
Figure.18. Transformer and UPS symbols
34
5.2.3
The single-line diagram
The diagram is drawn by selecting a switchboard or grouping, and adding the departures from
the toolbar. The single-line diagram takes form as new departures are added. The drawing
cannot be manually customized in any way.
The layout is shown in the screenshot below (figure 19). Some notes have been made in it to
describe the symbols. Distribution boards are shown in the main window. Departures from the
active switchboard are shown in the window on the right.
Figure.19. Febdok layout
5.3
Calculation results
Information about cable current carrying capacity, voltage drops and power losses is shown in
the cable menu. Current carrying capacities are based on conductor cross-section area,
conductor material, cable type, method of installation, ambient temperature, closeness to other
circuits and heat resistivity of the surrounding soil in earth cables. Current carrying capacity
calculations should always be done to the least favourable conditions. The minimum cross-
35
section area concerning the current carrying capacity is chosen by Febdok by eliminating
too weak cables from the cable selection field.
Whether the voltage drop is within limits is calculated when the cable for each departure is
chosen. A warning message will pop-up if the voltage drop exceeds the warning levels set.
The cross-section area will not be changed automatically, but the user can choose to increase
the cross-section area in order to decrease the voltage drop. Max cable/busbar length refers to
the allowed max length of the conductor in question, considering the voltage drop.
Figure.20. Febdok cable menu
5.3.1
I/t menu
In the I/t (current/time) menu data about the protection device of each departure can be
viewed. Short-circuit currents seen by the protection device are displayed in this window. The
SC currents displayed are the maximum SC currents at the beginning and end of the line and
the minimum SC current at the last point of the circuit. The screenshot (figure 21) displays a
single phase load. In three phase load departures, maximum and minimum three and two phase
SC currents are also displayed in this window.
36
Aside from the short-circuit currents Febdok calculates for how long cables can withstand
the short-circuit currents, and verifies however the protection device disconnection times are
fast enough. The Let-through energy and breaking capacity of each PD are verified by Febdok
as well.
Figure.21. Febdok I/t menu
5.3.2
Comments on the calculations
When drawing e.g. socket outlet departures, it is no use drawing any other than the one at the
end of the circuit, since the maximum short-circuit current always appears in the beginning of
the conductor. This is where the voltage drop and minimum short-circuit currents are least
favourable. On the other hand if a complete single-line diagram is desired, every device might
be wanted in the diagram. This is a problem with Febdok. The drawing process becomes very
clumsy and the documentation does not look good.
However, if the maximum load decreases along the circuit or the user wishes to decrease the
conductor cross-section area, the new connection node departure can be utilized. This makes it
possible to choose a new cable after each termination point (e.g. junction boxes or socket
outlets). With this type of departure a diversity factor should be used.
37
5.4
Febdok documentation
Since only the demo version of Febdok has been accessible, the documentation procedure
couldn’t be looked into any further. However, a ready project documentation done in Febdok
has been studied. What should be mentioned about the result of the calculations is that the
documentation is very distinct and everything is presented in a logical way. The only thing
that wasn’t impressive at all was the looks of the single-line diagram.
The documentation includes a cover, address information, supply point data, a single-line
diagram, a list of devices, a table of cables, reports of fault currents and fault messages,
calculation results and a discrimination analysis.
6
Other alternatives
In this chapter alternatives for dimensioning electric circuits are briefly presented. Beyond the
ones mentioned here there are numerous other alternatives. Some component manufacturers
have their own calculation softwares, e.g. ABB Doc. Many of these resemble each other
significantly and therefore they are not all presented. The other alternatives are not included in
the evaluation of the benefits and drawbacks (chapter 7).
6.1
My Ecodial L
My Ecodial L is a calculation software by Schneider electric. It is quite similar to both ABB
Doc and Febdok. Even though it hasn’t been examined any further, a “quick tour” has been
studied and the impression indicates that My Ecodial L is very user friendly. The software is
free and can be obtained from Schneider on request.
The diagrams are drawn with ready macros by “drag and drop”. The macros resemble the ones
in ABB Doc. Although it doesn’t have as much functionalities as Doc it seems a bit easier to
use. My Ecodial L is not able to calculate MV protection devices nor UPS systems. (Electrical
installation & energy efficiency, 2010, online)
38
Since My Ecodial L hasn’t been looked into thoroughly any detailed evaluation cannot be
made. But it is considered to be one good alternative among numerous others. The reason why
it has not been studied any further is because it is a component manufacturer calculation tool
such as ABB Doc. Doc is more complete and therefore it is a better alternative for the
employer. My Ecodial L should however be kept in mind, maybe not as the only calculation
tool, but perhaps as an alternative for those who are interested.
6.2
Calculations in Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Excel is a good software for most calculations. This is why it is listed as an
alternative for the dimensioning of electrical installations. To make a complete calculation tool
in Excel would probably take a very long time, but a simple version can be made in just a few
hours if you are a skilled Excel user.
There are simpler approximations to the formulas presented in the theory chapter (chapter 2),
which are significantly easier to work with in Excel than the ones mentioned above. The
question is whether the customer approves such approximations. At least in MV calculations
they won’t measure up for the regulations.
Calculations in Microsoft Excel can be used, especially for simple calculations in small plants.
Most computer users have Microsoft Excel installed on their computers and have some kind of
knowledge of the program.
The biggest drawback with calculations in Excel is how to gather and present data about
devices. To make a database similar to the one in e.g. Febdok would take ages. In practice it
means that after calculations are done the user would have to go through numerous device
datasheets to study device properties, which is very time consuming.
To my employer this alternative might not be very attractive. A more standardised way of
documentation is preferred. In extensive plants it would definitely not be user friendly.
39
7
Benefits and drawbacks
The main goal set by the employer was to find a calculation tool that is easy to use so that all
project engineers would be encouraged to use it. In this way the project planning time can be
shrunk and the engineers have a distinct documentation to provide their customers with. The
choices are made after considering what programs would suit the employer’s needs the most.
Every calculation tool has its pros and cons. This means that finding the best one is more
about finding the best compromise for the employer’s needs. In this chapter the benefits and
drawbacks for the software’s are listed.
7.1
Benefits and drawbacks of ABB Doc
ABB Doc is very rapid to use, but it takes some time to learn all the functionalities. It feels
very up-to-date and the single-line diagram looks very professional and distinct. Doc is able to
calculate MV components and it seems more focused on industrial use. The MV calculations
might be useful for my employer, although that wasn’t required in the beginning. However,
Doc is not able to calculate DC circuits, which is also very important for the employer. On the
other hand DC calculations are quite easy to do by hand or in Microsoft Excel.
When drawing in DOC it is enough to select what types of protection devices and cables shall
be used. When the loads have been determined the user can simply click the calculate button,
and the cables and protection devices are dimensioned automatically. However, when it comes
to voltage drop and selectivity, the user might have to choose some devices manually. Too
high a voltage drop is indicated by a warning message.
There seems to be some bugs in ABB Doc though, since it crashed a few times during the
work. Especially when trying to make changes upstream in the diagram problems may occur.
Some problems that occurred were solved by redrawing in a different way. But for some
problems it was very difficult to figure out the reasons. If the user can manage by only using
the macros, problems will seldom occur.
In general ABB Doc is a very useful tool. It has a lot of functionalities and setup possibilities.
It is very rapid to use once it has been learned. A problem with Doc is that its device database
40
covers only ABB devices. This might seem quite obvious, but it is a problem for the
employer who is using components from several different manufacturers.
ABB Doc benefits:
•
Rapid to use
•
Complete and professional looking single-line diagram
•
The curves module is good
•
MV calculations and devices
ABB Doc drawbacks:
7.2
•
No DC calculations
•
Some bugs
•
Limited to ABB components
Febdok benefits and drawbacks
Febdok is a calculation software which is easy to use and very fast to learn. It is a versatile and
distinct tool when it comes to dimensioning electric circuits. The ability to calculate DC
circuits is useful for the employer, since many circuit breakers and disconnectors are
controlled by DC motors.
Febdok has a huge database with more than 10 000 components from different manufacturers,
in relation to ABB Doc which is limited to ABB products. It also has a database over outdated
components, which can be useful when working on existing old circuits. The device database
provides a great advantage over the other programs I have looked into.
Febdok is, however, not able to calculate MV devices, which is a definitive drawback. It also
feels a bit old, although Febdok has been used in Norway for more than 15 years. Several
updates have naturally been made, but still it doesn’t feel particularly up-to-date.
41
Bugs or errors were not found in Febdok, which might be a result of many years of
development. However, one thing that was noted was when a new connection node departure
was used with 16 A fuses, and from that connection node four other connection nodes were
created to form a chain of e.g. socket outlets. The load current of each socket outlet was set to
16 A, the total current of the departure seen at the distribution board was, 5x16 A or 80 A
altogether. In practice this is not possible since the departure fuse has a rated current of only
16 A. This can be corrected easily by using the diversity factor, i.e. if you have 5 socket
outlets the diversity factor should be 0.2.
Thus, when using Febdok most components must be chosen manually and the electric loads in
each switchboard should be observed so that the drawn plant corresponds to reality; even if a
calculation software is used to dimension electrical installations, professional common sense
should always be used. On the other hand it won’t be a problem once the program is learned
properly and these minor faults are known. None of the programs that were looked into in this
thesis worked entirely automatically, meaning that only the load would have to be set and the
program would choose the rest of the devices automatically.
My conclusion is that Febdok is a great program for dimensioning electrical installations.
Documentation is very complete and distinct. On the other hand the single-line diagram is not
complete enough for my employer’s needs, but Febdok is a good complement to e.g. Autocad
for project documentation. According to an article in Sähköinfo 2/2008, a property for moving
information directly from a CAD-program to Febdok is under development. (Tiainen, 2008b,
online) If this property becomes available in the future, Febdok will be even more attractive
for those who plan electrical installations.
Febdok benefits:
•
The extensive device database
•
Ease of use and fast to learn
•
Distinct documentation
•
Calculation of DC circuits possible
•
Verification of selectivity is simple
42
Febdok drawbacks:
8
•
Feels a bit old and the single-line diagram does not look very good
•
No MV calculations (but this wasn’t required either)
•
You have to choose most components manually
Result
The goal with my thesis work was to find a calculation software that is simple, rapid and
versatile without compromising on accuracy. To choose one software is very difficult since
they all have different qualities. The goal was to decide on only one calculation software, so
that it can be used as a standard calculation procedure. In the evaluation I didn’t only look at
the requirements set in the beginning of this project, since I also found other useful
functionalities during my work.
Considering user friendliness Febdok has an advantage over ABB Doc. It is a bit easier to use,
but most of all faster to learn. ABB Doc has more functionalities and settings which makes it
more versatile, but it doesn’t have the functionality to calculate DC circuits, like Febdok has.
ABB Doc is the only one of the two that can calculate MV plants. This is the biggest
difference between these two softwares, as regards functionalities. They seem aimed at
different areas considering this fact. DC calculations were listed as one of the important
functionalities, and MV calculations were not. When taking the importance of DC circuits in
outdoor switchgear into account, Febdok is more suitable for the employer.
ABB Doc was considered a bit faster to use than Febdok. The devices are chosen more
automatically than in Febdok, where basically every single device has to be chosen manually.
This might be a result of the huge device database of Febdok, and of the fact that there are
several different manufacturers to choose between. The conclusion of this is that seen from the
device diversity point of view Febdok is more versatile. This is the biggest advantage over
ABB Doc, which is limited to only ABB devices.
43
The verification of selectivity is done in similar ways in both programs but it is more
distinct in Febdok, whereas the curves module used for the verification of selectivity in ABB
Doc is more versatile. The content of the documentation is very similar in the two softwares.
The single-line diagram looks more professional in ABB Doc.
When the properties of both programs were summed up I reached the conclusion that the
calculation software I am going to recommend to my employer is Febdok. The reason why I
chose this software is that it is very user friendly and still versatile. It is very easy to learn and
I believe that the project engineers will find it useful in the dimensioning of electrical
installations. The great device database is also one of the main arguments that I have based my
decision on. Additionally Febdok is the only calculation software I have looked into that meets
all the basic requirements, which after all does have great importance for the final result of my
thesis work. The current version of Febdok is 5.0.42, and possible software and device updates
are included in the user license.
9
Conclusion and discussion
9.1
Conclusion
When I was first given the assignment I had a good idea about how the assignment should be
carried out. I began by searching the internet for different alternatives, in order to get a view
over the product range on the market. When I had made up my mind about what softwares I
wanted to study further, I sent questions and requests to the suppliers in order to acquire
further information. At this point I still hadn’t made up my mind about how to present the
softwares in my thesis.
One thing that was very clear to me from the beginning was how to present the theory behind
calculation procedures. The basics were found without problem in electrical installation
handbooks and the SFS 600 handbook. Calculation procedures of short-circuit currents took
me many hours. I studied extensive IEC-regulations in order to sort out the calculations that
are relevant for my assignment. The calculation of impedances was the most time consuming
44
operation. However, once this was sorted out it was easy to see the big picture and then the
calculation procedure became very clear to me.
The presentation of calculation softwares was finally written parallel to the testing. I chose to
present the softwares by systematically going through how calculation results are approached.
I found this a good way of giving the reader an idea of how the calculation softwares are used.
During this stage I also formed my opinion about the benefits and drawbacks. I had to try to
keep the presentations short and focus on the essentials, otherwise the thesis could easily have
become too long.
The result of the thesis work is my opinion about which calculation software can be utilized
best in project planning for my employer. The goal has been reached: based on my results my
employer will be able to choose a good software for their needs.
9.2
Discussion
An examination like this can be done in many ways. I chose to deepen myself into the
softwares that seemed most interesting. Another way would have been to look into a greater
number, but that would have been done more superficially. My opinion is that the result is
more credible with more thorough studies.
If I should do a similar examination again, I would spend much more time planning the
approach. I think I would have saved a lot of time by making up a schedule at the beginning
and trying to stick to it. Another thing that I would do is spend more time on the theory, before
even beginning to examine calculation softwares.
However, the result was achieved and I believe I have got a good view of how calculation
softwares should be utilized in the best possible way. I could still test the softwares in more
extensive plants and compare results and the time consumed, to get an even better foundation
to base the results on. I would also consider including several softwares in the final evaluation.
45
List of sources
DOC_EN.pdf. ABB Doc: Help. User manual (release 1.0.0.007)
Electrical installation & energy efficiency, Electrical engineering community. (2010) Best
electrical calculation software review. (Online). (Read: 25.01.2011)
http://engineering.electrical-equipment.org/electrical-software/best-electrical-calculationsoftware-review.html
Finlands standardiseringsförbund. (2008-02). SFS-Handbok 600:sv.
Lågspänningselinstallationer och säkerheten vid elarbeten.
Handbook_EN.pdf. ABB Doc: Help. Electrical installation handbook: Volume 2: Electrical
devices. (5th edition March 2007). Bergamo: ABB SACE
International electrotechnical commission. (2001). IEC 60909. Short-circuit currents in threephase AC systems. Part 0: Calculation of currents.
Nelfo, Foreningen for EL og IT Bedriftene. Febdok Hovedside. (Online). (Read: 30.11.2010).
http://nelfo.no/viewPage.aspx?mid=93
Suomen sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry. (1995). Sähköasennukset 1. Espoo: Suomen
sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry.
Tiainen, E. (2008a). Sähköasennukset 1. Espoo: Sähköinfo Oy
Tiainen, E. (2008b). Febdok helpottaa sähköverkon mitoitusta. Sähköinfo. (2/2008). (Online).
(Read: 04.02.2011).
http://www.sahkoinfo.fi/Download.aspx?id=2150&type=1
Vaasa Engineering Oy. Company presentation. (Online). (Read: 29.01.2011).
http://www.veo.fi/In_English/Company_presentation
APPENDIX 1
1(2)
Reference methods of installation
Reference method of installation A
- Isolated conductors in an installation-pipe mounted in insulated wall.
- Multi-core cable mounted in insulated wall.
- Isolated conductors in an installation-pipe mounted in installation strip.
(Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995, p.314)
Figure.1. Method of installation A. (Handbook_EN.pdf, 2007, p.27-30)
Reference method of installation C
- Multi-core cable fixed to the wall.
- Single-core cables fixed to the wall.
- Multi-core cable in stone constructions.
- Single- or multi-core cables mounted in an open or ventilated channel.
- Multi-core cables in channels or installation pipes in an open space or in contact with a
brick wall (the values should be multiplied by 0,8).
(Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995, p.315)
Figure.2. Method of installation C. (Handbook_EN.pdf, 2007, p.27-30)
APPENDIX 1
2(2)
Reference method of installation D
- Multi-core cables in channels placed in the ground.
- Single-core cables in channels placed in the ground.
- Single- or multi-core cables mounted directly in the ground.
(The current carrying capacity table (table 1) is based on a ground heat resistivity value of
1,0 k m/W and an installation depth of 0,7 m.
(Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995, p.315)
Figure.3. Method of installation D. (Handbook_EN.pdf, 2007, p.27-30)
Reference method of installation E
- Multi-core cables in overhead installation.
(Free distance from wall at least 0,3 times the diameter of the cable).
(Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995, p.315)
Reference method of installation F
- Single-core cable in overhead installation
(Free distance from wall at least one cable diameter).
(Suomen Sähköurakoitsijaliitto ry, 1995, p.315)
Figure.4. Method of installation E or F. (Handbook_EN.pdf, 2007, p.27-30)
APPENDIX 2
1(3)
Current carrying capacities and correction factors
(Table 1. Conductor current carrying capacity table)
Conductor nominal
cross section (mm²)
Cu
1,5
2,5
4
6
10
16
25
35
50
70
95
120
150
185
240
300
Al
16
25
35
50
70
95
120
150
185
240
300
Different installation ways according to SFS
6000
A
C
D
E
14
19
24
31
41
55
72
88
105
133
159
182
208
236
278
316
18,5
25
34
43
60
80
102
126
153
195
236
274
317
361
427
492
26
35
46
57
77
100
130
160
190
240
285
325
370
420
480
550
19
26
36
45
63
85
107
134
162
208
252
292
338
386
456
527
43
56
69
83
104
125
143
164
187
219
257
62
77
95
117
148
180
209
240
274
323
372
78
100
125
150
185
220
255
280
330
375
430
65
83
102
124
159
194
224
260
297
350
404
APPENDIX 2
2(3)
(Table 2. Correction factors of overhead cables, if the temperature differs from 25 ºC)
Correction factor
PVC insulation
PEX & EPR insulation
1,15
1,11
1,10
1,07
1,05
1,04
1,00
1,00
0,94
0,96
0,88
0,92
0,82
0,88
0,75
0,84
0,67
0,79
0,58
0,73
0,47
0,68
0,62
0,56
0,48
0,39
Environment
temperature (ºC)
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
(Table 3. Correction factor depending on surrounding ground temperature)
Ground
temperature (ºC)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Correction factor
PVC insulation
PEX & EPR insulation
1,13
1,10
1,09
1,06
1,05
1,03
1,00
1,00
0,95
0,96
0,90
0,93
0,85
0,89
(Table 4. Correction factors concerning ground heat resistivity)
Heat resistivity, K m/W
Correction factor
0,7 1,0 1,2 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0
1,10 1,00 0,92 0,85 0,75 0,69 0,63
(Table 5. Ground heat resistivity values)
Ground type
Dry sand (0% humidity)
Dry gravel or mud
Semi-dry gravel, svamp mud and sand (10%
humidity)
Semi-dry mud and humid gravel
Humid mud and sand (25% humidity)
Heat resistivity, K m/W
3,0
1,5
1,2
1,0
0,7
APPENDIX 2
3(3)
(Table 6. Correction factors concerning other nearby cables or current circuits)
Placement (cables are
touching)
Bundle in air, on a
surface, immersed or
inside a case
1
2
Number of current circuits or multi-conductor cables
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
12
16
20
1,00 0,80 0,70 0,65 0,60 0,57 0,54 0,52 0,50 0,45 0,41 0,38
In one layer on the wall,
on the floor or on a non- 1,00 0,85 0,79 0,75 0,73 0,72 0,72 0,71 0,71
perforated cable shelf
In one layer attached
directly under a wooden 0,95 0,85 0,72 0,68 0,66 0,64 0,63 0,62 0,61
ceiling
In one layer on a
perforated horisontal or
vertical cable shelf
1,00 0,88 0,82 0,77 0,75 0,73 0,73 0,72 0,72
In one layer on a
ladder, on a support or
on fasteners
1,00 0,87 0,82 0,80 0,80 0,79 0,79 0,78 0,78
APPENDIX 3
Generator technical specification
Figur.1.Generator technical specification
(http://www05.abb.com/global/scot/scot234.nsf/veritydisplay/591668c948a8fca2482576f5002cf66e/$file/amg%2
00180bb04%20technical%20spec.pdf)