Download District 29 Malibu Water System Master Plan Moving Forward Recommendations June 24, 2013 1

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Internal rate of return wikipedia , lookup

Conditional budgeting wikipedia , lookup

History of the Federal Reserve System wikipedia , lookup

Pensions crisis wikipedia , lookup

Financialization wikipedia , lookup

Global saving glut wikipedia , lookup

Corporate finance wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
1
District 29 Malibu Water System Master Plan
Moving Forward Recommendations
June 24, 2013
2
Master Plan Objectives
• Investigate the existing system
• Understand future system needs
• Determine where upgrades are needed
• Present funding options
• Suggest options for moving forward
Our commitment was to deliver a Master
Plan using a stakeholder process
The Master Plan Answered
the “What” Question
Identified hydraulic deficiencies, replacements
due to age and future needs totaling…..
$266 Million
Then we evaluated several funding options…
3
We looked at a portfolio approach to
funding…
User Rates (existing customer base only)
Property Assessments (entire District 29 land area)
Connection Fees (future growth/private conversion)
113
4
5
…and Different Allocation Methods
• Regional  existing user rates
• Sub-regional deficiencies
(Topanga/Malibu)  Property
assessment
• Area/Canyon-Specific 
combination of user rate
increase, property assessment,
and connection fees
Regional
SubRegional
AreaSpecific
Recommendation: “Start Smaller” –
Develop Priority 1 Project List
• Target: 1st Phase Cost ≈ $50M
– 50% from existing revenues
– 50% from new capital source(s)
1
2
3
4
5
• Target: highest priority projects
– Water quality protection
– System reliability
– Address fire flow needs
• Target: positive steps forward
– Make measureable progress
7
Recommended projects (Phase I ~ $57M)
8
Recommended Environmental Approach
• Multiple approval agencies, permits, etc.
• Many projects with similar impacts
• Avoid piecemealing- comprehensive approach
Therefore:
Program level document for entire Master Plan
(with as much project specific detail for first Phase as possible)
9
Environmental Process Timeline
Public Review of
Draft PEIR &
Public Meeting
(Mos. 15-16)
Consult with
Permitting Agencies
Initial Study,
(Month 8)
Notice of
Preparation
of PEIR,
Public
Contracting
Meeting
Process (6
(Mos. 6-9)
Months)
Initial
Agency
Coordina
tion
(Mos. 67)
Draft
PEIR
(Mos. 514)
Conduct
special
studies
i.e. bio,
cultural,
etc.
(Mos. 814)
~ 20 – 24 Months
Finalize
PEIR
(Mos. 2024)
Permit
Application
Packages
(Mos. 17-19)
ACO Fund Financial Goals
FY2015-16 to FY2019-20
• Fund Capital Improvements ($56.6M)
• Maintain reserves levels (25% of Revenues)
• Maintain Debt Service Coverage (1.25x)
• Minimize Rate Increases (District approved 5% average
annual increases from FY2012-13 through FY2016-17)
• Find Optimal combination of debt and rate increases to
fund capital improvements
10
11
ACO Fund Financial Plan Results
FY2013-14 to FY2019-20
$15.0
$10.0
$5.0
Millions
$0.0
-$5.0
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
-$10.0
-$15.0
-$20.0
-$25.0
Revenues
EOY Cash Balance
Capital Expenses
Reserves Requirements
**Capital Expenses for FY2014 and FY2015 include projects programmed in WWDs Existing 5-year Plan
12
ACO Fund Financial Plan Results
FY2013-14 to FY2022-23
$30.0
$25.0
$30M Bonds*
Millions
$20.0
No debt or rate
increases can
support $3.1M in CIP
$15.0
$10.0
$5.0
$0.0
2014
2015
2016
Revenues
EOY Cash Balance
*30 Year Bonds
4% Interest
1.5% Issuance Cost
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Capital Expenses
Reserves Requirements
**Capital Expenses for FY2014 and FY2015 include projects programmed in WWDs
Existing 5-year Plan
13
Funding Strategy FY2013-14 to FY2017-18
Cash Reserves,
$2.36
Capital
Improvement
Charges, $2.26
Capital
Surcharges,
$15.92
Bond
Proceeds,
$29.32
Property Taxes,
$12.36
Current Annual Revenues
and Reserves to Fund
53% of Phase I Projects
14
ACO Fund Financial Plan Results
FY2013-14 to FY2022-23 ($10M CIP) Calibrated
$30.0
2.5% rate increase or property assessments
$25.0
$30M Bonds
$23M Bonds
Millions
$20.0
$15.0
$10.0
$5.0
$0.0
2014
2015
2016
Revenues
EOY Cash Balance
*30 Year Bonds
4% Interest
1.5% Issuance Cost
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Capital Expenses
Reserves Requirements
**Capital Expenses for FY2014 and FY2015 include projects programmed in
WWDs Existing 5-year Plan
15
In Summary…
1. Phase 1 accomplishes our critical goals:
– Provides new emergency interconnections
– Implements water quality upgrades
– Addresses all pipelines and ~50% of the tanks for fire flow
needs
2. No new rate increases or taxes needed for now
– Future phases will require new funding sources
3. Timeline - 18-24 months to complete planning,
financial, design and environmental
– Planned CIP projects continue in the meantime
16
Where do we go from here?
Secure funding and
various permits:
Present to Malibu
City Council
(CEQA, 404, Coastal
Commission, etc.)
Develop
Implementation Plan:
Implement
-infrastructure plan
-financial plan
-EIR/EIS
+/- 7 years
17
Questions ?