* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download In which industries to invest? Aligning market and development incentives in Myanmar
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
In which industries to invest? Aligning market and development incentives in Myanmar MPDD Seminar Series Bangkok, 31 October 2012 Steven Ayres and Clovis Freire Macroeconomic Policy and Development Division (MPDD) Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) Main Messages Diversification towards more productive economic activities will best facilitate inclusive development in Myanmar Given market incentives, it will require strategic interventions, including targeted FDI Method to indentify economic activities to target 1 Content I. Introduction II. The opening up of the economy III. Inclusive development, structural transformation and the role of FDI IV. Theoretical framework V. Methodology & Data VI. Identifying opportunities for FDI VII. Conclusions I. Introduction Identifying investment opportunities in industries that will best facilitate inclusive growth and the achievement of development goals - the focus is not the broader issues of trade and investment in the new macroeconomic framework. (for a comprehensive review of this, see Anukoonwattaka & Mikic, 2012) Development and market incentives must be considered in planning strategies New industries should be the focus of such investments 2 II. The opening up of the economy Cause for optimism in Myanmar.... Years of isolation, both political and economic, have inhibited Myanmar’s development. Yet the current era of political and economic reforms offers new opportunities – FDI legislative reform could be instrumental in creating new economic activities Chance to exploit a number of strengths in this transition phase, despite a number of potential challenges Strengths Challenges - Demography - Geography - Natural Resources - Fiscal Deficits - High inflation - Macroeconomic management challenges III. Inclusive development, structural transformation & the role of FDI Opportunity to follow in neighbours’ growth and development footsteps Growth of an inclusive nature is key A transformation in the structure of the economy may help facilitate this. - Myanmar has made no progress in this respect, agriculture accounting for 35% of GDP in 1965, and 36% in 2010. ESCAP (2012) stresses the need for the movement towards more productive industries and services 3 Slow structural transformation is exacerbated by reduced private investment incentives. What role can FDI play? The benefits of FDI can be felt in many ways: - incomes and employment, capital formation and market access, market structure, technology and skills, fiscal revenues, political, social and cultural issues, etc. (UNCTAD, 1999) - Yet there are also certain caveats: - Crowding out of domestic investment Creation of macroeconomic instability Investment in protected industries It is both the quantity and quality of FDI that is of concern. But what constitutes quality FDI? Myanmar requires a carefully implemented strategy. - targeted FDI can serve as an integral part of such a strategy. - this can be done by maximising the advantages specific to Myanmar, and ensuring that investment facilitates structural change that will be conducive to development goals. 4 IV. Theoretical framework Based on evolutionary growth models (Silverberg and Vespagen, 2005) & Economic complexity (Hidalgo and Hausmann, 2009) Economy as a set of different economic activities Each producing a single product (x) with different: • productivity (q) • employment (e) • output (y) Productive capacities products x1 x2 x3 productivity q1 < q2 < q3 e1 + e2 + Each product requires a specific employment combination of “productive output capacities” to be produced y1 + y2 + xn < qn e3 + en = L y3 + yn = Y … e0 = unemployed Constant labour productivity of each economic activity: qj = (yj /ej) Function of the unique productive capacities used in the production Changing Average productivity of the economy as a whole: Productive capacities products x1 x2 x3 productivity q1 < q2 < q3 employment q = ∑(ej/L) qj changes with shifts in output employment and rate of growth by economic activity changes with creative destruction e1 + e2 + y1 + y2 + xn < qn e3 + en = L y3 + yn = Y … e0 = unemployed 5 Economy evolves by (a) shifting employment and changing rate of growth by economic activity Productive capacities products x1 x2 x3 productivity q1 < q2 < q3 employment e1 + e2 + output y1 + y2 + xn < qn e3 + en = L y3 + yn = Y … e0 = unemployed Economy evolves by (b) adding/removing productive capacities and/or links of the network of productive capacities Productive capacities products x1 x2 x3 productivity q1 < q2 < q3 employment e1 + e2 + output y1 + y2 + xn Xn+1 < qn < qn+1 e3 + en + = eLn+1 = L y3 + yn + = yYn+1 = Y … e0 = unemployed 6 Inclusive economic development Growth of total output (Yt+1 > Yt) Reduction of inequality by increasing employment in more productive sectors Growth with productive jobs Increase in total productivity of the economy (qt+1 > qt) Two ways to move employment into more productive activities 1) 2) Demand must be increased in existing economic activities that are more productive which, in turn, increases output and associated employment in that activity; Creation of new and more productive economic activities, which would increase the opportunity for more productive jobs. Productive capacities products x1 x2 x3 productivity q1 < q2 < q3 employment e1 + e2 + output y1 + y2 + xn < qn e3 + en = L y3 + yn = Y … e0 = unemployed Productive capacities products x1 x2 x3 productivity q1 < q2 < q3 employment e1 + e2 + output y1 + y2 + xn Xn+1 < qn < qn+1 e3 + en en+1 = L =+ L y3 + yn yn+1 = Y =+ Y … e0 = unemployed 7 But big reliance on investment in existing industries pose risks for inclusive development • High global demand for primary products is more likely to create incentives for increasing resources on lower-productivity activities (ESCAP, 2012); • If demand-side dynamics lead to the desirable outcome of higher output and employment in more productive activities, such outcome in the longer-term may have the perverse effect of perpetuating social injustices and the old power dynamics within the society (Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012) . Therefore, the creation of new more productive economic activities present a more successful approach to fostering inclusive development How diversification would come about? Emulation vs Innovation • Emulation: new to the country • Innovation: new to the world Path dependency Productive capacities products x1 x2 x3 xn Xn+1 productivity q1 < q2 < q3 < qn < qn+1 e1 + e2 + e3 + en =L =+ en+1 L y3 + yn =+ yn+1 Y =Y • New activities tend to exploit the productive employment output capacities that were previously developed for other activities y1 + y2 + … e0 = unemployed 8 How to facilitate the emergence of new productive capacities that would allow emulation of more productive activities? Economic institutions Specific rules of the game: set incentives and constraints for acquisition and combination of productive capacities Inclusive economic institutions (Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012) • Foster economic activity • Economic opportunities for a broad crosssection of society • Should address Information externalities (Rodrik, 2004) Address coordination externalities (Rodrik, 2004) Demand External Demand • Infrastructure • Human capital • Coordinate investment Laissez-faire vs strategic approach If economic institutions create an environment that foster economic activity, what is the probability (P) of more productive activities to emerge given the existing productive capacities and market incentives? Considering D(x) as the expected demand for x: P=D(B)/D(A+B) P > 50% => laissezfaire P < 50% => strategic approach Existing products in the world Potential new products Existing products in the country Higher productivity B A 9 From theory to practice Which economic activities are more likely to emerge given the existing productive capacities in the economy? • The Product Space (Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási, Hausmann, 2007) Which of those are associated with higher productivity? • Method of reflections (Hidalgo and Hausmann, 2009) What is the probability of those more productive activities emerge given the market incentives? • Export opportunity (ESCAP, 2012) Product Space Hidalgo, Klinger, Barabási, Hausmann (2007). The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations Network in which products are nodes connected to each other if they are usually part of the same product mix proximity between products A and B (ΦAB) ΦAB = ΦBA = min(P(A|B), P(B|A)) Source: Hidalgo, C.A., and others (2007) 10 Method of reflections Hidalgo and Hausmann (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Source: Hidalgo and Hausmann (2009) Method of reflections Hidalgo, César A., and Ricardo Hausmann (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. PNAS, vol.106, No. 26, pp. 1057010575. The method is defined as the recursive set of observables: ⎧1 M cp = ⎨ ⎩0 K c , 0 = ∑ M cp if RCA cp ≥ treshold otherwise. K c,N = p K p , 0 = ∑ M cp c K p,N = 1 K c,0 ∑M 1 K p,0 ∑M cp K p , N −1 p cp K c , N −1 c 11 Product complexity Measure of how ubiquitous the product is and the level of diversification of the countries that produce it 0 2 4 6 8 Maldives 6 4 2 0 8 6 4 ESCAP (2012): Rich countries export products with a wide range of complexity Japan 2 Percent 8 Bangladesh 0 Abdon and others (2010): Major exporters of more complex products are high-income countries and major exporters of less complex products are low-income countries -4 -2 0 2 Product complexity (global average=0, sd=1) Source: Author based on data from the United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database (COMTRADE). Product complexity by industry 8 2 0 0 2 4 Percent 6 4 Percent 6 8 10 12 10 12 10 8 Percent 6 4 2 0 Crude materials, inedible, except fuels 12 Beverages and tobacco Food and live animals Chemicals and related products 10 0 2 4 Percent 6 8 10 8 Percent 6 4 2 0 0 2 4 Percent 6 8 10 12 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 How common is the product-mix (Number of countries that export the product) Animal and vegetable oils, fats and waxes 12 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 How common is the product-mix (Number of countries that export the product) Mineral fuels, lubricants and related materials 12 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 How common is the product-mix (Number of countries that export the product) Miscellaneous manufactured articles -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 How common is the product-mix (Number of countries that export the product) 10 0 2 4 Percent 6 8 10 8 Percent 6 4 2 0 0 2 4 Percent 6 8 10 12 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 How common is the product-mix (Number of countries that export the product) Machinery and transport equipment 12 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 How common is the product-mix (Number of countries that export the product) Manufactured goods classified chiefly by materials 12 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 How common is the product-mix (Number of countries that export the product) -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 How common is the product-mix (Number of countries that export the product) -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 How common is the product-mix (Number of countries that export the product) Source: Freire, 2012. 12 Export Opportunities Based on ESCAP (2012) Captures expected demand for potential new products Overlap indicator designed to measure the degree to which potential new products of one country match the expanding markets of another ∑ Gisdt 0,t1 × M 2010 where t 0 ,t 1 = isd G i midt1 midt 0 − M t1 M t 0 if Φij>80% for some product j in the country’s existing product mix and midt1 midt 0 > M t1 M t 0 , and zero otherwise. V. Methodology & Data Identify the products that are more complex and that are nearby in the product space to the existing product-mix of the countries • Calculate product complexity using Method of reflections • Map the structure of the product space • Analyze price incentives (export) 13 Trade data disaggregated at 6-digit level of HS 2002 Products are also differentiated based on their unit value 43,293 products in 2010 Source: Author based on data from COMTRADE. code = 6-digit (HS) + 1digit (quantity unit code) + 1 digit (unit value range) VI. Identifying opportunities for FDI Myanmar Myanmar below $1 Million $1-$100 Million above $100 Million -3 -3 Complexity of potential new product -2 -1 Complexity of potential new product -2 -1 0 0 Export opportunities of potential new products -3 -2 -1 Complexity of existing product Number of existing products 1 724 0 Number of potential new products for emulation 2 604 -3 -2 -1 Complexity of existing product 0 Percentage of potential Percentage of export new products with opportunities with above above country's country's average average complexity complexity 64% 25% 14 New industries to target for FDI based on export opportunities (Share of potential opportunities in percentage) Myanmar 2 4 4 4 5 38 6 8 9 11 9 Inorganic chemicals, precious metal compound, isotopes Paper & paperboard, articles of pulp, paper and board Miscellaneous chemical products Organic chemicals Articles of iron or steel Iron and steel Electrical, electronic equipment Plastics and articles thereof Optical, photo, technical, medical, etc apparatus Machinery & mech appliance etc Sum of others with smaller shares Example of export opportunities of potential new products by HS sector (HS) Description, price range (020714) Cuts & edible offal of species Gallus domesticus, frozen, $1-3 (040130) Milk & cream, not concentrated/sweetened, fat content by wt. >6%, $1-3 (040310) Yogurt, $1-4 (040610) Fresh (unripened/uncured) cheese, incl. whey cheese, & curd, $0-3 (040610) Fresh (unripened/uncured) cheese, incl. whey cheese, & curd, $3-7 (040630) Processed cheese, not grated/powdered, $3-7 (060390) Cut flowers & flower buds of a kind suit. for bouquets/ornamental purps., d ..., $4-13 (070490) Cabbages, kohlrabi, kale & sim. edible brassicas (excl. cauliflowers, heade ..., $0-1 (070610) Carrots & turnips, fresh/chilled, $0-1 (080232) Walnuts, shelled, $5-10 (080510) Oranges, fresh/dried, $0-1 (080620) Grapes, dried, $1-3 (080920) Cherries, fresh, $1-7 (080940) Plums & sloes, fresh, $0-2 (081190) Fruit & nuts, n.e.s., uncooked/cooked by steaming/boiling in water, frozen, ..., $1-3 (100620) Husked (brown) rice, $0-2 (110812) Maize (corn) starch, $0-1 (110813) Potato starch, $0-1 (150790) Soya bean oil, other than crude, & fractions thereof , whether or not ref. ..., $1-2 (150990) Olive oil (excl. crude & virgin) & fractions thereof , whether or not ref. ..., $2-6 (151219) Sunflower seed/safflower oil, other than crude, & fractions thereof , wheth ..., $1-2 (151790) Edible mixts./preps. of animal/veg. fats/oils/fractions of diff. fats/oils ..., $0-1 (151790) Edible mixts./preps. of animal/veg. fats/oils/fractions of diff. fats/oils ..., $1-4 (151800) Animal/veg. fats & oils & fractions thereof , boiled/oxidised/dehydrated/su ..., $0-0 (160232) Prepared/presvd. preps. of fowls of the genus Gallus domesticus (excl. homo ..., $0-2 (160232) Prepared/presvd. preps. of fowls of the genus Gallus domesticus (excl. homo ..., $2-6 … Export opportunity (US$ Million) 238.7 11.8 22.6 36.4 51.6 27.3 9.6 6.8 11.5 10.7 59.4 24.4 18.9 7.6 16.2 36.5 9.3 7.4 40.8 5.4 63.1 23.7 62.9 48.4 27.5 89.3 top1 top2 HK 57.2 CN 45.5 SE 1.5 RU 1.3 NL 3.1 SK 2.8 GB 11.7 IT 5.2 JP 9.1 FR 8.2 BE 3.6 GB 3.1 DE 4.5 FR 2.3 RU 1.6 NL .8 RU 5.1 TH .7 TR 1.8 KR 1.8 RU 9.6 JP 6.8 GB 3.4 NL 3.4 HK 5.3 CA 2.4 NL 2.2 RU 1.4 US 5.5 NL 1.9 GB 7.3 NL 4.9 GB 1.8 NL 1.4 NL 2.1 DE .9 BE 4.2 DE 3.2 RU 1.6 DE .8 BE 10 GB 6.8 CL 6.8 PL 1.5 FR 9.5 UA 8.9 PH 8.2 AF 5.6 DE 12 HK 6.8 GB 20.4 NL 17.1 top3 RU 23.1 PL 1 IT 1.8 BE 4.5 IT 5.4 SA 2.8 BE .5 CA .5 PL .4 DE 1 HK 6.5 DE 2.9 RU 2 CN 1.1 BE 1.3 KR 3.9 MY .7 KR .6 CA 3 IN .5 FR 6.2 CZ 1.1 US 7.8 MX 4 MX 2.1 JP 12.7 top4 top5 JP 21.9 UA 17.9 CN .9 KR .7 AT 1.4 US 1.1 PL 2 CZ 1.4 RU 2.9 NL 2.6 UA 1.4 LB 1.3 IE .4 PL .2 LT .5 FR .4 MY .4 BE .4 ES .9 IL .8 UA 5.3 NL 4.8 CA 2.3 AU 1.9 CN 1.9 US 1.8 BR .8 HK .3 AT .9 FR .8 IT 2.8 FR 2.3 MX .6 ET .5 BE .5 TH .3 CO 2.3 MX 2.2 VE .5 MA .2 ZW 5.3 NL 3.1 KE 1 DE 1 CA 4 NL 3.2 ES 3.6 AT 3.5 CO 1.6 CL .5 FR 3.9 DK 3.2 Full list of export opportunities of over $1Million has 848 products 15 VII. Conclusions Creation of and investment on new economic activities would present a more successful approach to fostering inclusive development in Myanmar • It will create new job opportunities and will push upwards the productivity of the whole economy But the process of economic diversification is pathdependent and not all new industries will deliver the desirable social benefits Diversification would require the strategic identification of potential new industries that would create productive jobs and would provide attractive investment possibilities Also important, these potential new industries should be the ones that are likely to emerge from the existing productive capacities in the economy. VII. Conclusions List of potential products could serve as a public good • Reduces the cost of discovery of potential successful new economic activities • Guide the government in identifying factors that could facilitate or prevent the process of discovery of these new economic activities by the business sector 16 Thank you Steven Ayres ([email protected]) Clovis Freire ([email protected]) 17