Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
4/20/2015 IM Board Review Timir Paul, MD, PhD, MPH, FACC Peripheral Arterial Disease Lower Extremity Case • 72 year female with CKD (GFR 27) diabetes, CAD, HTN, hyperlipidemia, diastolic HF, presents for evaluation of PAD • Denies any rest or exertional leg pain, fatigue • No ulcer, gangrene, discoloration or cold foot What do you do next? 1 4/20/2015 What do you do next? 1. Proceed with CTA or MRA 2. ABI 3. Exercise ABI 4. Get more history and thorough PE 5. Aggressive risk factor modification PAD ~ CAD CAD PAD • • • • • • • • • • Non cardiac pain Atypical chest pain Typical angina UA/NSTEMI STEMI No leg pain Atypical leg pain Claudication Critical limb ischemia Acute limb ischemia Clinical Presentations Asymptomatic: Without obvious symptomatic complaint (but usually with a functional impairment). This diagnosis should only be made if the patient is physically active. Exertional Pain “Atypical” leg pain: Lower extremity discomfort that is exertional but that does not consistently resolve with rest, consistently limit exercise at a reproducible distance, or meet all “Rose questionnaire” criteria. Classic claudication: Lower extremity symptoms confined to the muscles with a consistent (reproducible) onset with exercise and relief with rest. Yet it has poor sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients with PAD 2 4/20/2015 Clinical Presentations Rest Pain Critical limb lschemia: - Ischemic rest pain - Ulceration/ non-healing wound - Gangrene Acute limb ischemia: The five “P”s, defined by the clinical symptoms and signs that suggest potential limb jeopardy: Pain Pulselessness Pallor Paresthesias Paralysis (& polar, as a sixth “P”). PAD Diagnosis Diagnosis of PAD History and physical examination Diagnostic tools • Non-invasive Functional Studies (NIFS) – Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI), Toe-Brachial Index (TBI), and Segmental Pressures – Pulse Volume Recording (PVR) • Non-invasive imaging studies –Arterial Duplex ultrasound, MR Angiography, CT Angiography • Invasive imaging – Angiography (gold standard) 3 4/20/2015 Interpreting the Ankle‐Brachial Index ABI 1.00–1.4 Interpretation Normal 0.91–0.99 Borderline 0.41–0.90 Mild-to-moderate disease ≤0.40 Severe disease >1.40 Noncompressible ABI is 95% sensitive and 99% specific for PAD Rooke et al, circulation 2011 Hirsch AT, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:e1‐e192. Figure 6. Screening for Asymptomatic Patient With PAD Screening for Asymptomatic Patient With PAD Age ≥50 years with a history of smoking or diabetes or age ≥65 years ( class I C) Individuals with asymptomatic PAD should be identified in order to offer therapeutic interventions known to diminish their increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. ( Class I B) 4 4/20/2015 Patient With Intermittent Claudication ABI ( Class I B) Exercise ABI if the resting ABI is normal (Class I B) Treatment Treatment of PAD The modality to treat PAD depends on the following factors: Asymptomatic vs. symptomatic disease Location of disease Chronic vs. acute Critical vs non-critical Options • Medical Therapy • Exercise • Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) • Stents • Laser • Atherectomy • Thrombolytics • Vascular surgery 5 4/20/2015 Goals of Therapy for Patients With PAD Limb outcomes • Improve ability to walk – Increase in peak walking distance – Improvement in quality‐of‐ life (QoL) • Prevention of progression to CLI and amputation Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality outcomes • Decrease in morbidity from non‐fatal MI and stroke • Decrease in CV mortality from fatal MI and stroke Non‐pharmacologic Therapy for Intermittent Claudication Supervised Exercise Rehabilitation I IIa IIb III A program of supervised exercise training is recommended as an initial treatment modality for patients with intermittent claudication. I IIa IIb III Supervised exercise training should be performed for a minimum of 30 to 45 minutes, in sessions performed at least three times per week for a minimum of 12 weeks. Provide formal referral to a claudication exercise rehabilitation program 6 4/20/2015 Pharmacotherapy for Claudication FDA Approved Drugs • Pentoxifylline • Cilostazol (approved 1999) Contraindications to Cilostazol Class III-IV CHF Cilostazol is contraindicated in patients with symptoms of CHF . Pletal® (cilostazol) Package Insert. Rockville, Md: Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc; 1999. Medications for Patients With PAD Therapeutic Goal Drug To Reduce Ischemic Events To Improve Claudication Symptoms Aspirin/Clopidogrel Yes No Cilostazol No Yes 7 4/20/2015 Pharmacotherapy of Claudication I IIa IIb III Cilostazol (100 mg orally two times per day) is indicated as an effective therapy to improve symptoms and increase walking distance in patients with lower extremity PAD and intermittent claudication (in the absence of heart failure). Treatment to Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes Drug Therapy • Aspirin • Cilostazol • Cilostazol is contraindicated in HF patients 8 4/20/2015 Question • A 71 yr male reports of both thighs and calves pain. ABI 0.68 in left and 0.60 in right ankle. His sx improved slightly with exercise and intensive lifestyle modification. He also c/o dyspnea on exertion and mild b/l leg edema. He is taking ASA 325 mg daily • What is the next step 1. Start cilostazol 2. Duplex lower extremity US 3. 2 D echo 4. Start statin 5. Add plavix Take Home Message • ~ 1/3rd US population has PAD • Smoking is the strongest risk factor followed by diabetes • ~ 1/2 of the patients are asymptomatic • < 1/3rd patients presents with typical claudication • 1‐2% of patients suffer or progress to CLI • CLI: ischemic rest pain, ulceration or gangrene • ALI: 5 Ps ‐ pain, pulselessness, pallor, paresthesia, paralysis Take Home Message • Screening for asymptomatic patients: Age >= 50 yrs with smoking or diabetes and patients age >65 yrs • ABI is the first test to diagnose symptomatic and asymptomatic PAD • If resting ABI is normal but clinical suspicion is high exercise ABI is recommended • If ABI > 1.4, TBI is indicated • ABI =< 0.4 indicates severe disease 9 4/20/2015 Take Home Message • Duplex US is a class I indication for diagnosis, severity, anatomic location and post revascularization f/u • MRA is also safe and effective (class I) tool • Supervised graded exercise program is a class I indication and pre‐requisite for revascularization • Cilostazol increase walking distance to 100‐150% and is a class I recommendation • Cilostazol is contraindicated in HF patients Take Home Message • BB is effective and not contraindicated • ASA 75‐325 mg is the antiplatelet of choice to reduce MI, stroke and vascular death • Plavix is an alternative • Risk factor modification is a class I indication • Prophylactic revacularization is class III • Endovascular therapy is the Rx of choice for TASC type A iliac and femoro‐popliteal lesions • Surgery is the Rx of choice for TASC type D iliac and femoro‐ popliteal lesions • No sufficient evidence for recommendation of TASC B and C lesions Renal Artery Stenosis (RAS) 10 4/20/2015 Diagnosis of RAS Class I indications: 1. Resistant, accelerated and malignant hypertension 2. New azotemia or worsening renal function after administration of ACEI/ARB 3. Sudden unexplained pulmonary edema 4. Unexplained atrophic kidney or discrepancy in size between 2 kidneys > 1.5 cm 5. HTN before age 30 or severe HTN after age 55 years Diagnostic modalities Class I Duplex ultrasound CT angiogram MRA Renal angiogram is the gold standard Indications for Revascularization Hypertension: Preservation of renal function 11 4/20/2015 Indications for Revascularization Class I: Percutaneous revascularization is indicated for patients with significant RAS and recurrent unexplained heart failure or sudden unexplained pulmonary edema Class IIa Percutaneous revascularization is reasonable for patients with hemodynamically significant RAS and unstable angina Extra‐cranial Carotid and vertebral Artery Stenosis AHA/ASA guidelines for secondary prevention of stroke 12 4/20/2015 AHA/ASA guidelines for secondary prevention of stroke Carotid Revascularization Carotid Revascularization Class I, Evidence B 13 4/20/2015 Endarterectomy vs Stenting ASA/ACCF/AHA/ 2011 Guidelines on management of extracranial carotid and vertebral Artery disease. Circulation 2011 Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) Diseases of Aorta 14 4/20/2015 Screening high risk population AAA Ruptures AAA surveillance • If AAA 4‐5.4 US every 6 months • For smaller AAA every 2‐3 yrs 15 4/20/2015 QUESTIONS • Which of the following are indications for infrarenal AAA repair? • 1. Diameter > 5.5 cm • 2. Expansion rate greater than 1 cm/yr • 3. Inflammatory or infectious etiology • 4. Recurrent atheroembolism • 5. All of the above Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Indications for Thoracic AA Surgery Ascending aortic diameter >= 5.5 cm Exceptions: ‐ Expansion rate greater than 0.5 cm/yr ‐ Infectious etiology ‐ Traumatic origin ‐ Symptomatic ‐ Bicuspid aortic valve, Marfan or Turner, Ehlers‐Danlos, familial thoracic aortic aneurysm (>4.0‐5.5 cm) ‐ Patients undergoing aortic valve repair or replacement and who have an ascending aorta or aortic root > 4.5 cm 16 4/20/2015 Ascending Aortic Aneurysm Surveillance Aneurysm 3.5‐ 4.4 cm Annual CT or MR Aneurysm 4.5‐ 5.4 cm Semi‐annual CT or MR Dissecting Ascending Aortic Aneurysm Type A Dissection • • • • • • Chest pain radiating to back Acute AR murmur and HF Widened mediastinum Blood pressure differential between arms Cardiac tamponade Evidence of thromboembolism or dissection of branch arteries (stroke, MI ) • In what other conditions you see wide mediastinum? • This is an emergency • Treatment is surgery Types of Dissection Stanford classification • Ascending aortic dissection – Type A • All others dissections – type B 17 4/20/2015 Diagnostics • CT scan with contrast or MRA • TEE for critically ill patients who cannot move from a monitored setting Type B Aortic Dissections • Uncomplicated Type B dissections usually treated medically • Beta blockers and nitroprusside for acute dissections • Long term BB for all patients • If pain persists then surgery • If major aortic vessels( renal arteries ) are involved Questions • 63 yr male admitted for symptomatic repair of 5.6 cm of AAA. He has h/o DM, dyslipidemia and family h/o Mi in brother at age 58. BP is borderline controlled with ACE and HCTZ. what is the next appropriate step? • • • • • 1. Proceed with surgery 2. Nuclear stress test 3. Exercise stress test 4. Titrate up BP meds 5. transfer patient to ICU and start nitroprusside 18 4/20/2015 Other diseases of aorta • Aortic atheroma • Aortic transection • Penetrating aortic ulcer – Crescent like thickening of aortic wall – Absence of dissection flap • Marfan syndrome – Aortic root dilatation – MVP • Takayasu’s arteritis Takayasu’s arteritis • Areas of focal stenosis in multiple major arteries • Young adult women from Japan and other parts of Asia • The mainstay therapy is corticosteroids • Large vessels bypass and angioplasty/stenting is often required Questions • A 68 yr male with HTN, DLP, current smoker and family h/o of AAA. He had an US done 2 yrs ago that did not reveal AAA. • When is the next US should be performed for f/u • 1. 1 yr • 2. 3 yrs • 3. 5 yrs • 4. no further US • 5. any time between 70‐75 yrs 19 4/20/2015 Questions • 58 yr male with h/o CAD presents with severe chest apin radiating to back. BP 185/100, HR 100/min. A decrescendo murmur was heard in the precordium. • What you should do next: • 1. Stat surgery consult • 2. EKG and troponin • 3. IV nitroprusside • 4. BB and IV nitroprusside • 5. CT with contrast question • 58 yr male with h/o CAD presents with tearing chest apin radiating to back. BP 100/60 in right arm and 140/70 in left arm, HR 100/min. CXR showed widened mediastinum • What you should do next: • 1. EKG and troponin • 2. Surgery consultation • 3. BB and IV nitroprusside • 4. emergent CT with contrast • 5. 3 and 4 20