Download Forum on PPP Policy Framework for Myanmar 17/03/2016

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup

Pensions crisis wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Forum on PPP Policy Framework for Myanmar
17/03/2016
Forum on Public Private Partnership (PPP) Policy Frameworks for Myanmar co‐organized with the Ministry of National Planning and Economic Development
17 March 2017
Setting the Scene:
Myanmar Infrastructure Challenges
Mr Mathieu Verougstraete
UNESCAP Transport Division
1. Infrastructure needs
2. Financing options
3. Public‐Private Partnerships
1
Forum on PPP Policy Framework for Myanmar
17/03/2016
The quality of infrastructure
Current perception is very low for Myanmar
How would you assess general infrastructure (e.g., transport, telephony, and energy) in your country?
7
[7 = extensive and efficient / among the best in the world]
6
5
Among top performers
Around the world average
Despite improvements, ranking remains low
World Average
4
3
[1 = extremely underdeveloped 2
/ among the worst in the world]
1
World Ranking (2014):
Myanmar
138
Vietnam Cambodia, Philippines Thailand
112
109
95
76
2006
Indonesia
72
Lao PDR
66
Malaysia Singapore
20
5
2014
Source: World Economic Forum (global‐competitiveness‐report‐2014‐2015)
Road Infrastructure under pressure
Booming demand for infrastructure services
 Number of vehicles is expected to grow exponentially in the future If Myanmar reaches Thailand’s level of motorization 600
Motor vehicles / 1000 people (2012)
488
500
 > 20 million vehicles more
400
 current fleet x 8.5
300
200
 Only 38.9% of the road network is paved
in Myanmar and road density is among the lowest in the region
100
57
0
Myanmar
Source: ADB – Myanmar Unlocking the Potential
Thailand
Source: ASEAN Statistic Leaflet 2013
 Regional integration requires more land connectivity with neighboring countries
 Huge investment required to improve quality and capacity
2
Forum on PPP Policy Framework for Myanmar
17/03/2016
Similar patterns in other transport sub‐sectors
Booming demand for infrastructure services
 Railways need to be upgraded (currently low operating speeds) and key links with other countries need to be built  Ports: Myanmar could become a regional hub thanks to its strategic location  port capacity will need to developed and handling facilities upgraded (volume of export almost tripled since 2000)
 Airport: number of passengers has almost tripled in Myanmar since 2000 Rapid urbanization creating investment needs
Booming demand for infrastructure services
 10 million more people are expected in Myanmar’s large cities by 2030, which is the equivalent of 2 new cities the size of Yangon or 10 new cities the size of Mandalay  Large cities would likely need to invest $146 billion from 2010 to 2030 to upgrade infrastructure for existing population and new arrivals Source: McKinsey Global Institute (2013)
Flickr / Axel Drainville
3
Forum on PPP Policy Framework for Myanmar
17/03/2016
Energy and Power potentials
Booming demand for infrastructure services
Electric power consumption (kWh per capita) ‐ 2012
3000
2465
2500
 Current capacity of electricity generation is insufficient to meet growing demand  Growth likely to continue  consumption is still low in international comparison
2000
1500
 Only 52% of the population has access to electricity
1000
500
 Electricity consumption doubled between 2007 and 2012 153
0
Myanmar
Thailand
 There are abundant sources of energy, including renewables (e.g. hydro)
Social sectors
Schools and hospitals
 Low Government investment levels in social infrastructure and services, compared to other ASEAN countries; gradual signs of social budgets increasing  Education is a key priority for national development; ratio of expenditure to GDP is low in comparison with other ASEAN countries
Source: PwC Presentation at ESCAP Workshop on PPP’s for Infrastructure Development in Myanmar (2014)
4
Forum on PPP Policy Framework for Myanmar
17/03/2016
Funding requirements
Difference btw the current & projected infrastructure stock
 Lack of modern Infrastructure is major challenges to economic development and impediment to the country competitiveness
Internet, 6%
 Investment gaps could total as much as $80 billion by 2030 or $4.7 billion per year (i.e. 7% of current GDP)
Mobile, 25%
Fixed Telephone, 1%
Rail, 5%
Power, 39%
Roads, 24%
Source: ADB – Myanmar Unlocking the Potential
1. Infrastructure needs
2. Role of Public‐Private Partnerships
5
Forum on PPP Policy Framework for Myanmar
17/03/2016
Financing Options
Public Finance
 Majority of the needs will be financed through the public budget, for example:
 Public Borrowing (Loans, Govt Bonds,…)
 Revenue collection (tax to GDP ratio low ~5%)
 Reprioritizing sector expenditures
 The public budget is unlikely to cover all the needs
 The government should try to tap private sector resources
 Public‐Private Partnership is the mechanism Private Finance
Public‐Private Partnerships
Key differences
Financial consideration
 No upfront disbursement from the public… but the private sector is not providing services for free.
 The private sector is not only building the infrastructure but also operating it
Output Specification
Duration
 The project is defined in terms of “what we want to achieve” and not “how to achieve it”
 Some project risks are transferred to the private sector (cost overruns in the construction/operation)
Risks
6
Forum on PPP Policy Framework for Myanmar
17/03/2016
Public‐Private Partnerships
Possible advantages
 More resources mobilized for infrastructure development
 Improved service delivery (quality, service coverage,…)
 Efficiency gains (resulting hopefully in cheaper costs for the end‐users)  Protection against some project risks
 Optimized use of assets (alternative source of revenues identified)
Public‐Private Partnerships
Not a panacea…
 PPP Projects are complex to prepare, structure and transact  Risks might be difficult to allocate and quantify
 Private sector financing costs are relatively high
 Contingent liabilities linked to public guarantees can heavily impact the fiscal stability  Clear understanding of the benefits and limitations of PPP
 Well‐defined strategy on how to use PPP
 Sufficient capacity to implement PPP Projects successfully
7
Forum on PPP Policy Framework for Myanmar
17/03/2016
Th@nk you
‐
website: www.unescap.org/our‐work/transport
Info.: escap‐[email protected]
8