Download The Research on Evaluation System of Financial Strength

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Investment management wikipedia , lookup

Systemic risk wikipedia , lookup

Financial economics wikipedia , lookup

Financial literacy wikipedia , lookup

Global financial system wikipedia , lookup

Global saving glut wikipedia , lookup

Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission wikipedia , lookup

Systemically important financial institution wikipedia , lookup

Financial crisis wikipedia , lookup

Financialization wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Research on Evaluation System of Financial Strength
PAN Huiming, DU Yaxin
College of Economics and Management, Wuhan Textile University, P.R.China, 430073
[email protected]
Abstract: Based on the literatures, this paper established the financial performance evaluation system
with newly-added macroeconomic environment factors. This paper analyzed the global economy
situation and indicated the post financial crisis existed. By the entropy weight method, each indicator
was weighed. This newly financial evaluation system is more suitable for the companies in the
post-crisis era.
Keywords: post-crisis era, financial evaluation index system ,entropy -weight
,
1.
Introduction
Company's financial strength evaluation is to estimate the company's financial position and operating
results in ordering to reveal the financial situation and further trend, which based on the main index in
the financial reports. Financial strength evaluation is important for investors to assess the value of listed
companies, for the company's manager to make productive and financial decisions, for market regulators
to judge the company's financial situation and adopt regulatory measures. Therefore establish a scientific,
reasonable and comprehensive evaluation model of the company is actual important.
In the early twentieth century, Donaldson Brown from the American Donaldson company proposed the
famous Donaldson system to analyze the company's financial position. In 1928 American Alexander
wall used seven financial indexes by a linear relation to evaluate the company's financial condition.
Pnches Ming and Caruters adopted the factor analysis method which 48 financial indicators were
divided into investment return, capital and the stock, inventory, financial lever and the receivable
account. Muresan and Wolitzer introduced PALMS profit, asset utilization ratio, long-term liquidity,
market value, short-term liquidity to assess situation in 2004.
On the basis of the foreign studies, the study of company financial evaluation in Chinese started in the
1990. Liu Zhichun 2005 used the total index methods of the coefficient variation to carry on
comprehensive calculation to 50 typical every financial index of listed company. Wangman and Liqian
2007 adopted the factor analysis based on the company's survival and development capability to
evaluate the listed company's financial competitiveness.
There are some shortages about above. First, selecting indicator random resulting to the difference in the
same company indicators should conform to the economic environment and establish the index system
including the economic environment is necessary. Secondly, most of the appraisal methods not avoided
people’s subjectivity affecting the fairness of the evaluation. Thirdly, many research methods, such as
the factor of analysis are requiring for samples which have quantities and obey normal distribution.
(
2.
)
(
)
)
(
Post –crisis Era
With the global financial crisis gone, most of global economy reached the lowest point in the second
half of 2009 and started recovery. According to the latest statistics show that the world economy
declined 0.6% in 2009 comparing with the last year, GDP of USA declined 2.14 ;GDP of Japan
increased by 3.81% ,Europe declined 4.1%. China increased by 10.7% in the fourth quarter and total
GDP reached 8.7%. The latest report< The world economic outlook report> written by International
Monetary Fund (IMF) shows global economic growth will reached 4.2% in 2010 which higher 0.3%
than the forecast figure in January. The world economy recovery is better than expected and will reach
the growth of 4.3% in the next year. Thus the global economy is being out of the financial crisis, but the
%
793
recovery process will not smooth sailing, there are a lot of uncertainties which might destroy the
economic recovery in some time. There are these factors as follows:
1 The risk of inflation. In defending global financial crisis, the major nations introduced various
measures to stimulate the economic. China also took the economical plan to stimulate the real economy
which may have he pressure of inflation. It is expected that CPI index will rise, total of the CPI is -0.7
by 2009, but CPI has changed from negative to positive since last November and December. CPI
increased 1.9% in December that main reasons were food and real estates increased.
2 Global trade protectionism is popular. In ordering to defend financial crisis and promote economic
recovery, most countries adopt degrees of trade protectionism, trade protectionism is prevalent, which
has exacerbated the crisis to recovery. According to the figure shows there are 105 items of global trade
protection while the liberalization of trade policy is only 12, the former is nearly nine times than later
since the economic submit were held in Pittsburgh in September to December 2009.
Discriminatory trade policy and trade liberalization policies is close to 1:6 since last November to
December in the relevant policy taken by many countries. “Indeed, protectionism in trade has not yet
been reached level of the economic depression 1930 , but water is not in the boil point necessary"
Switzerland Sankt Gallen University professor Simon said “they are in the way to increases trade
protection, this trend is not hold up.” The International Trade Center warns that protectionist measures
number is approximately expected 70 in the first half year. China is the most affected by the trade
protectionist.
3 Economic restructuring, sustainable development and low carbon economy are important features in
the post-crisis era. After Financial crisis, there are various transformations of industrial structure. The
new energy industry and environmental industry is expected to lead to the global industry upgrade. In
response to the financial crisis, many countries have increasing invest in the new energy and other areas
of technical development. Green industries development may lead to a new global industrial structure
and promote world economic growth.
4 Global economy recovery is unbalanced. In the recovery process different regions of the economic
situation show a sharp contrast. New market economy growth strong, America recovery progress
remains good, but on the other hand, Europe economic growth stagnated. On the debt restructuring and
tightening monetary policies, the government of the measures to stimulate the economy has gradually
failure. Therefore, to the economic outlook is still cautious, the economic growth of Europe will slow
down slightly to 0.8% in the second half year.
.
.
( )
.
.
3. Construction Evaluation Index System of the Financial Strength
3.1 Principles of financial evaluation index system
Financial indicator is the carrier of evaluation and the competitiveness of enterprises. For assessing the
financial strength, it is necessary to formulate a set of appraisal target scientific system. The complex
system were divided into several parts in according a higher level an order, appraisal each parts strength
in ordering to assess the entity. Construct the financial index system should follow the following
principles
. The comprehensive principle. The evaluation should be comprehensive and complete to assess the
company's financial strength and conditions. System should consider not only financial capacity of
dominant potential but also macroscopic external environment.
Scientific principle. The evaluation system should scientifically reflect true financial power and
facilitate the competence of their financial strength comparing with other companies.
Purposeful principle. The target evaluation system aims to measure of financial capability and find
out company's financial weaknesses, avoiding financial risk.
Universal and developmental principle. The indicator system designed has wide application and
development in the different corporations, which makes the auto-adjustments with environmental
changes.
①
:
②
③
④
794
3.2 Construction evaluation index system of the financial strength
Establish financial evaluation index system of 5 parts including basic financial viability, profitability,
operating capability, innovation growth and resistance to the risk
Enterprises financial viability continue survival ability . Enterprise viability is to maintain survival
and normal operation in the daily life. Many companies pull through the global financial crisis based on
the strong financial viability even the poor profitability. It has great significance.
current rate= current assets ÷current liabilities ×100%
cash -liabilities rate=cash flow ÷current liabilities×100%
assets- debt rate=total liabilities÷ total assets×100%
cash total liabilities rate=cash ÷ total liabilities×100%
Profitability indicators. Profits is the first goal for the enterprises, in the post-crisis, consider not
only profit amount but also the profitable quantity, including inflation ,the cash flows and the costs of
major economic indicators. Thus select the adjusted net assets profit rates, net cash flow profit rate ,
①
(
)
①
-
main operating margins rate, which uses the method of EVA(economic value added)
Adjust net assert profit rate=EVA ÷average total assets ×100%. EVA=economic profit
cost of
capital . Use of the EVA avoiding the limitations of accounting profit, the capital cost of the adjustment
including inflation, the staff training expenses and profit
Main operating margins=main operation profit ÷ business income×100% This indicator reflect the profit
level
net cash flaw profit rate=cash flow ÷ net profit×100%
Management ability. It is results and capabilities made by efficient management, including its
operating capabilities and management efficiency.
velocity of account receivable=total income ÷account receivable×100%
inventory turnover=sales cost ÷ total inventory×100%
total assets turnover rate=total income÷ total assets×100%
management cost rate=cost of management ÷operation income×100%
Sustainable development ability. It is primarily includes the ability of enterprises growth and
innovation ability. Growing capacity means the extending of enterprises scales from inner or other ways
to obtain funds and enlarge production. Selecting the income growth rate, assets increase rate, net profit
growth rate. Innovation select technology input rates, the ability of newly product profitability.
sales growth rate of 3years= main operation income÷ main operation income before 3 years-1 1/3×100
②
③
%
(
(
(
)
%
)
total assets growth rate of 3years= total assets÷ total assets before 3 years-1 1/3×100
net profit growth rate of 3years= net profit÷ net profit before 3 years-1 1/3×100
Technology input rate=cost of research ÷total income.
Newly product profit ability= profit of new production ÷profit.
The resistance to the risk. It mainly included financial risks and operational risks. Operational risks
refer to the operation change resulting to the enterprises risk while financial risk by debt financing for
the company's shares by shareholders.
)
%
⑤
Index system evaluation of financial strength
Index
Evaluation index
Analysis index
Detailed appraisal
index
current rate
Enterprises financial viability
Profitability indicators
、
Pay ability cash ability
profit ability
795
cash debt rate
assert- debt rate
cash total debt rate
adjust net assert
profit rate
main
operating
margins
net cash flaw
profit rate
velocity
of
account receivable
Management ability
Operational ability
Grow ability
Sustainable development ability
Innovation
inventory turnover
total
assets
turnover rate
circulating asset
turnover rate
sales growth rate
total
asset
growth rate
net profit growth
rate
technological
input rate
new product profit
ability
financial risk
The resistance to the risk
4.
Risk level
operational risk
comprehensive
ability
Entropy weight
Entropy coming from thermodynamic is later introduced to information theory. It is measurement of
unsorted in the system, for a given indicator, the greater of sample data difference, which has the more
information; the greater play the role in the evaluation, giving the big weight to the indicator. Using
Entropy Weight to give the weight of each indicator to reflect the data’s dispersion degree and dynamic
change which can avoid the artificial factors
There are basic steps as follows:
1. Establish a sequence of analysis. Treating financial strength as a research system, i is the number of
enterprises, and j is the number of indicator,( j= 1, 2, 3... ) xij is the actual target indicators of i enterprise
j indicator.
2. The processing of data in dimensionless. Different data type has different dimensions, leading to
difficult to compare, therefore, it is necessary to dimensionless and standardized. The standardized
indicators is in 0,1 .
Positive type data most include benefit indicator which means the bigger number the better financial
situation.
xij − min( xij )
4.1
pij =
max ( xij ) − min( xij )
Negative indicator most include cost type indictor which means the smaller the number, the better
financial situation.
,
【 】
pij =
max( xij ) − xij
max ( xij ) − min( xij )
4.2
xij is the actual indicators of i enterprise j indicator.
min( xij ) is the minimum of j indicator, max( xij ) is the maximum of j indicator
3. Entropy weight
796
p
f ij =
ij
n
∑
p
ij
j = 1
4.3
ei =
−1 n
∑ p ij ln( p ij )
ln j = a
4.4
n
fij is Feature proportion , pij is the standard indicator
∑p
ij
is the sum of the j indicator number.
j =1
ei is the Entropy of indicator
wi =
1 − ei
4.5
m
m − ∑ ei
i =1
Wi is the Entropy weight of j indicator
5.
Conclusion
In recent years, with the development of science, the financial strength of the appraisal method shows
diversity. How to evaluate the financial strength of the enterprises scientific is becoming increasingly
popular topic. This paper analyzed the economic situation firstly indicating that most countries have
shaken off the shadow of the financial crisis and started recovery, but will not be smooth sailing still
facing many challenges.
This paper established evaluation index system of the financial strength, which including inflation and
sustainable development of enterprises facing the risk and other factors with combination of cash flow.
The comprehensive evaluation system was divided into five parts including the enterprises financial
viability, profit-making capacity, managerial capacity, growth ability, the risk level. By the method of
entropy weight to give the weight of each indicator to reflect the data’s dispersion degree and dynamic
change which can avoid the artificial factors. This newly evaluation financial system has great
significant application in the asset the financial situation when considering the economic factor and cash
flow situation.
,
References
[1]. Gu Xuesong The Financial Evaluation Model of Listed Companies Based on Entropy-Weight
TOPSIS and Empirical Studying on Petrochemical Industry [J] Value Engineering No 8 2009 (in
Chinese)
[2]. Wang Yiping On the Method of Quantitative Assessment of the Financial Strength in Listed
Companies—Study of Framework Based on Principal Component Analysis[J] REFORMATION
STRATE number 1 2010(in Chinese)
[3]. Salminen P, Hokkanen J, Lahdelma B Comparing methods in the context of environmental
problems[J] European Journal of Operational Research, 1998 104(3): 485-496
[4]. Bell Michelle L Hobbs Benjamin F Ellis The decision making methods in the integrated
assessment of multi-criteria climate change implications for IA practitioners[J] Socio-Economic
Planning Sciences, 2003, 37(4): 289-316
[5]. Goieoeehea A, Stakhiv E, Fu LI Experimental evaluation of multiple criteria decision models for
application to water resources Planning Water[J] Resources Bulletin, 1992, 28(1): 89—102
[6]. Alexander Wall Ratio analysis of financial statements [M] New York Harper Press, 1928
..
.
.
.
.
. .
.
&
.
.
797
.
.
:
.
;
[7]. Jia Yan Empirical Study on Financial Competitiveness of Listed State-owned Companies Value
Engineering
[8]. Cheng Zhenfeng The research on the core competitiveness of financial system [J] Management
And Information 2008 December (in Chinese)
798