Download Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix Recommendation Paper

Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix
Recommendation Paper – Proposal for Battery Facility Technical and
Operating Requirements
October 22, 2013
The AESO is asking market participants and interested parties to participate in the AESO’s consultation regarding the
development of sections 502.13 and 502.14 of the ISO rules, which will create technical and operating requirements for
battery facilities. The AESO is seeking comments from stakeholders on the associated recommendation paper.
Date of Request for Comment:
Period of Consultation:
2013-12-11
2013-10-22
Comments From:
Suncor Energy Inc.
Date
[yyyy/mm/dd]:
2013-12-11
through
2013-12-11
Contact:
Ben Hui
Phone:
403-296-8440
E-mail:
[email protected]
Recommendation Paper – Executive Summary and Purpose
Do stakeholders have any comments on the Executive Summary and Purpose sections?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
AESO Replies
Recommendation Paper – Background
Do stakeholders have any comments on the Background section?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
AESO Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Introduction
AESO Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix: 2013-10-22
1
Do stakeholders agree with the introduction to the Technical Requirements section?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
AESO Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Source and Sink Resource
Do stakeholders agree with the proposal to refer to battery facilities as a “source and sink resource”?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Connection Rule and Operating Rules
Do stakeholders agree with the proposal to develop two separate ISO rules, one relating to battery facility technical requirements for
connection and another for battery facility operating requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Other Rules
Do stakeholders have any comments on the need to review and possibly make incidental amendments to some existing sections of the
ISO rules?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Applicability and Variances
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed applicability and variances?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Maximum Authorized Real Power
Do stakeholders agree with the proposal to make the legal owner responsible for declaring the maximum authorized real power of a
battery facility?
AESO Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix: 2013-10-22
2
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
For an aggregated generating facility, it
would seem to be reasonable to have the
MARP (of the battery) to represent the
source capability.
Replies
As the “MARP” is the measure in which the
AESO would be making performance
assessments – another value may need to
be used to represent the sink capability if
sinking is not equivalent to a load in terms
of requirements.
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Operating Voltage Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed operating voltage requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Voltage Ride-Through Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed voltage ride-through requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Voltage Regulation
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed voltage regulation requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Reactive Power Capability
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed reactive power capability requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
AESO Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix: 2013-10-22
3
Replies
Can the AESO please provide some
description of the reactive power
requirement shown as dotted lines in
Figure 3 of the document.
In the session, this was explained as the
inherent capability of the system which
must be offered if it is available. Please
provide more details on the use of this
range as to whether this range of reactive
power would always be used in an
automatic voltage control scenario or if the
AESO intends to provide a reactive power
output setpoint for the battery facility.
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Transmission System Step-Up Transformer
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed transmission system step-up transformer requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Off Nominal Frequency Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed off nominal frequency requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Frequency Responsive Control System Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed frequency responsive control system requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Real Power and Ramp Rate Control Requirements
AESO Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix: 2013-10-22
4
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed real power and ramp rate control requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
As the AESO has indicated in the session,
the ramp rate may be dependent on system
characteristics in the local region of the
battery installation.
Would it be possible for the AESO to
provide a range of ramp rates that is
generally accepted for connecting to the
AIES.
For cases which would warrant a separate
study to determine the ramp rate, can the
AESO provide some general guidelines as
to what the technical criteria would be in
determining the ramp rates?
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Power Quality
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed power quality requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – WECC Stability Control Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed WECC stability control requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Facilities Synchrophasor Measurement
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed facilities synchrophasor measurement requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
AESO Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix: 2013-10-22
5
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Facilities Testing Post Connection
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed facilities testing post-connection requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Technical Requirements – Other Requirements
Do stakeholders have any comments on the proposed other requirements?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Replies
Recommendation Paper – Other Comments
Do stakeholders have any other comments on the Recommendation Paper?
Stakeholder
Stakeholder Comment
Suncor is a strong supporter of the
AESO’s mandate to operate a Fair,
Efficient and Openly Competitive
(FEOC) and the deployment of market
based mechanisms whenever possible.
Considering the services that are being
required for the battery system in its
sinking mode, Suncor would encourage
the AESO consider market mechanisms
for these services. It is not appropriate
to have energy storage facilities provide
services that are not required by other
generators and loads.
AESO Stakeholder Comment and AESO Replies Matrix: 2013-10-22
6
Replies