Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Biological Control of Tomato Foot and Root Rot Caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici by Pseudomonas Bacteria F. Kamilova, S. Validov and B. Lugtenberg Leiden University, Institute of Biology Wassenaarseweg 64, 2333 AL Leiden The Netherlands Keywords: biocontrol, antibiosis, induced systemic resistance, competition for nutrients and niches, Pseudomonas, tomato foot and root rot, Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicislycopersici Abstract Rhizobacteria are a natural and most suitable source for the isolation of potential microbiological control agents that can protect plants from soilborne pathogens and consequently improve crop quality and yield. The beneficial effect of such bacteria on plant health depends in many cases on their ability to aggressively colonize the rhizosphere and compete with the indigenous, including pathogenic, microflora for nutrients and niches on the plant root. Bacterial strains Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391 and P. fluorescens WCS365 employ antibiosis and induced systemic resistance, respectively, to control tomato foot and root rot (TFRR) caused by phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici (Forl). For the selection of biocontrol bacteria acting via the mechanism “competition for nutrients and niches” we have developed an enrichment method for enhanced tomato root tip colonizers, starting from a crude mixture of rhizobacteria coated on the seed, using a sterile quartz sand/plant nutrient solution gnotobiotic system. As a result of this enrichment procedure, and subsequent tests on competitive tomato root tip colonization, the strongly competitive biocontrol strains P. fluorescens PCL1751 and P. putida PCL1760 were isolated. Both strains effectively suppress TFRR under soil and hydroponic cultivation conditions. INTRODUCTION Successful management of plant diseases caused by phytopathogenic organisms includes many factors such as development of resistant plant cultivars, application of chemical pesticides, crop rotation, improvements of the qualities of the growth substrate as well as rational use of irrigation. Biological control is one of the important components of integrated pest control and sustainable agricultural practice. Biocontrol of plant pathogens is based on application of their natural enemies such as beneficial antagonistic microorganisms producing antimicrobial components, or microbes which can induce systemic resistance (ISR) by triggering defense mechanisms in the plant, or microbes which can out compete pathogens by faster and more efficient occupation of niches and consequently quicker consumption of nutrients provided by plants. In this article we describe a few plant growth promoting rhizosphere pseudomonads which use different mechanisms of control of TFRR caused by the phytopathogenic fungus Forl. P. chlororaphis PCL1391, a Phenazine-Producing Biocontrol Strain Acting through Antibiosis Screening of a large collection of tomato rhizosphere isolates resulted in selection of strain P. chlororaphis PCL1391, which has a strong in vitro antagonistic activity against Forl as well as against many other phytopathogenic fungi. This strain produces the antibiotic phenazine-1-carboximide (PCN), the volatile HCN, and enzymes such as protease and chitinase (Chin-A-Woeng et al., 1998). P. chlororaphis PCL1391 shows stable efficient biocontrol of TFRR in soil. It appeared that PCN is a crucial factor contributing to this activity. Mutants impaired in the biosynthesis of PCN are lacking biocontrol activity (Chin-A-Woeng et al., 1998). In addition to the production of PCN, Proc. IInd Intl. Symposium on Tomato Diseases Eds.: H. Saygili et al. Acta Hort. 808, ISHS 2009 317 also efficient colonization of tomato roots is crucial for the biocontrol ability of PCL1391. Motility-impaired mutants that are one thousand-fold impaired in competitive tomato root tip colonization cannot control TFRR, although the level of production of PCN is the same as that of the parental strain (Chin-A-Woeng et al., 2000). This finding indicates that root colonization by antagonistic strain P. chlororaphis PCL1391 acts as the delivery mechanism of antifungal compounds along the root to control phytopathogens. P. fluorescens WCS365 Induces Systemic Resistance against TFRR P. fluorescens WCS365 was isolated by Geels and Schippers (1983) and causes a reduction of the narrow rotation effect of potato. This strain does not inhibit growth of phytopathogenic fungi in vitro, but has a profound suppressive effect on TFRR (Lugtenberg et al., 2001; Kamilova et al., 2005). P. fluorescens WCS365 was used as a model strain to study bacterial competitive colonization traits because of its excellent colonization of the root systems of various plants (Lugtenberg et al., 2001). In contrast to P. chlororaphis PCL1391, colonization mutants of P. fluorescens WCS365 are not or hardly impaired in biological control of TFRR (Lugtenberg et al., 2001). Apparently a high efficiency of colonization of the complete root system is not important for the biocontrol ability of this bacterium. This finding excluded the notion that WCS365 acts through the mechanism “competition for nutrients and niches”. We subsequently tested whether WCS365 induces systemic resistance (ISR) in the plant. Indeed when WCS365 is used for inoculation of tomato plants with a split-root system, in which the beneficial and pathogenic strains are spatially separated, this strain controls TFRR as good as in regular biocontrol experiments with an intact root system (Kamilova et al., 2005). P. fluorescens PCL 1751 and P. putida PCL1760 Control TFRR via Competition with the Pathogen for Nutrients and Niches 1. Selection of Biocontrol Strains by Enrichment of Enhanced Tomato Root Tip Colonizers. In a gnotobiotic system (Simons et al., 1996) sterile tomato seedlings are grown in quartz sand or in stonewool moistured with plant nutrient solution. After bacterization of seeds with a mixture of thousands of rhizobacteria, and subsequent growth of the plant, good root colonizers move along the root towards the root tip. The distribution of individual strains along the root is a result of at least two characteristics: their abilities to swim and to utilize root exudate nutrients. Those strains which grow fast on root exudate and can move fast along the root will colonize the whole root system and will be the first to reach the root tip. They will be excellent candidates to compete with pathogens for nutrients and niches along the root. Based on this assumption we applied an enrichment strategy for the isolation of the best tomato root colonizers from a crude mixture of rhizobacteria. The majority of the resulting isolates did not show antagonistic activity against Forl in vitro. After identification of the best colonizing isolates, only strains belonging to safety group 1 (Anonymous, 1998) were compared with P. fluorescens strain WCS365 or P. fluorescens PCL 1285, a Km-resistant derivative of P. fluorescens WCS365, as a reference strain, in a competitive tomato root tip colonization assay. Those isolates that appeared as good as or better than the reference root colonizing strain were tested in biocontrol experiments. As a result, the excellent tomato root colonizing strains with strong biocontrol ability P. fluorescens PCL 1751 (Kamilova et al., 2005) and P. putida PCL1760 (Validov et al., 2007) were selected. To our knowledge this is the only published method for direct selection of biocontrol strains. 2. Selected Biocontrol Strains Suppress Forl by Competition for Nutrients and Niches. Growth tests of the enhanced colonizers in tomato root exudate revealed that these strains out compete randomly chosen rhizobacteria and suppress the development of Forl propagules. These results indicate that the selected bacteria are highly competitive for the nutrients provided by the plant root. These data are in agreement with results of experiments with P. putida PCL1760 mutants impaired in the uptake of dicarboxylic acids, major exudate compounds. These mutants are significantly worse in the control of TFRR than the parental strain. Motility mutants of P. fluorescens PCL1751 are also 318 inefficient in biocontrol. Based on these results we claim that the selected strains control TFRR using the mechanism “competition for nutrients and niches”. CONCLUSIONS Many bacterial strains are described as biocontrol agents (see reviews Tomashow and Weller, 1995; Bloemberg and Lugtenberg, 2001; Defago and Haas, 2005). Most of this strains act via antibiosis. Antagonistic strains can be isolated by means of a rather simple and quick screening procedure in vitro. But practice shows that very often antagonistic strains fail in field and greenhouse experiments or show unstable results (Handelsman and Stabb, 1996). One of the reasons is that production of antimicrobial metabolites is regulated in a very complex way. Due to this complexity, small changes in pH, temperature, salinity and other environmental factors can cause a negative effect on the biosynthesis of antimicrobials and consequently on biocontrol ability of these strains (Duffy and Defago, 1999; van Rij et al., 2004). Moreover, production of antibiotics by a potential biocontrol agent is an extra burden for its registration as a product. For strains which do not produce antibiotics and act through the mechanisms ISR or competition for nutrients and niches, registration would not be a problem. However, screening of strains for ISR is a very laborious task and direct selection is not possible. From this point of view biocontrol bacteria using the mechanism “competition for nutrients and niches” have a big advantage: their direct selection is easy and can be adjusted to the required plant species, growth substrate and environmental conditions. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This presentation was supported by the Technology Foundation Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen, Applied Science Division of the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, and the Technology Programme of the Ministry of Economic Affairs (LBI.5884). Literature Cited Anonymous. 1998. Sichere Biotechnologie. Eingruppierung biologischer Agenzien: Bacterien, BG Chemie, Merkblatt B 006 8/98 ZH 1/346, Jedermann-Verlag Dr. Otto Pfeffer oHG, Heidelberg, Germany. Bloemberg, G.V. and Lugtenberg, B.J.J. 2001 Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 343-350. Chin-A-Woeng, T.F.C., Bloemberg, G.V., van der Bij, A.J., van der Drift, K.M.G.M., Schripsema, J., de Bruijn, F.J., Thomas-Oates, J.E. and Lugtenberg, B.J.J. 1998. Biocontrol by phenazine-1-carboxamide-producing Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391 of tomato root rot caused by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicis-lycopersici. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 11: 1069-1077. Chin-A-Woeng, T.F.C., Bloemberg, G.V., Mulders, I.H., Dekkers, L.C. and Lugtenberg, B.J.J. 2000. Root colonization by phenazine-1-carboxamide-producing bacterium Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391 is essential for biocontrol of tomato foot and root rot. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13:1340-1345. Duffy, B.A. and Defago, G. 1999. Environmental factors modulating antibiotic and siderophore biosynthesis by Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 2429-2438. Geels, F.P. and Schippers, B. 1983. Reduction of yield depressions in high frequency potato cropping soil after seed tuber treatments with antagonistic fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Phytopath. Z. 108:207-214. Haas, D. and Defago, G. 2005. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev. Microbiol. 3:307-19. Handelsman, J. and Stabb, E.V. 1966. Biocontrol of soilborne plant pathogens. Plant Cell 8:1855-1866. Kamilova, F., Validov, S., Azarova, T., Mulders, I. and Lugtenberg, B. 2005. Enrichment for enhanced competitive root tip colonizers selects for a new class of biocontrol 319 bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 7:1809-1817. Lugtenberg, B.J.J., Dekkers, L.C. and Bloemberg, G.V. 2001. Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol 39:461-490. Simons, M., van der Bij, A.J., Brand, I., de Weger, L.A., Wijffelman, C.A. and Lugtenberg B.J.J. 1996 Gnotobiotic system for studying rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas bacteria. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 9:600607. Tomashow, L.S. and Weller, D.M. 1995. Current concepts in the use of introduced bacteria for biological disease control: mechanisms and antifungal metabolites. In: G. Stacey and N.T. Keen (eds.), Plant-Microbe Interactions. Chapman & Hall, New York, p.187-235. Validov, S., Kamilova F., Qi, S., Stephan, D., Wang, J.J., Makarova, N. and Lugtenberg, B. 2007. Selection of bacteria able to control Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicislycopersici in stonewool substrate. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102:461-471 Van Rij, E.T., Wesselink, M., Chin-A-Woeng, T.F.C., Bloemberg, G.V. and Lugtenberg, B.J.J. 2004. Influence of environmental conditions on the production of phenazine-1carboxamide by Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain PCL1391. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 17:557-566. 320