Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Bioconjugate Chem. 2007, 18, 894−902 894 The Same Drug but a Different Mechanism of Action: Comparison of Free Doxorubicin with Two Different N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide Copolymer-Bound Doxorubicin Conjugates in EL-4 Cancer Cell Line Lubomı́r Kovář,*,† Jiřı́ Strohalm,‡ Petr Chytil,‡ Tomáš Mrkvan,† Marek Kovář,† Ondřej Hovorka,† Karel Ulbrich,‡ and Blanka Řı́hovᆠDepartment of Immunology and Gnotobiology, Institute of Microbiology ASCR, v.v.i., Vı́deňská 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic, and Department of Biomedical Polymers, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry ASCR, v.v.i., Heyrovský Square 2, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech Republic. Received August 8, 2006; Revised Manuscript Received February 8, 2007 Doxorubicin is one of the most potent anti-tumor drugs with a broad spectrum of use. To reduce its toxic effect and improve its pharmacokinetics, we conjugated it to an HPMA copolymer carrier that enhances its passive accumulation within solid tumors via the EPR effect and decreases its cytotoxicity to normal, noncancer cells. In this study, we compared the antiproliferative, pro-survival, and death signals triggered in EL-4 cancer cells exposed to free doxorubicin and doxorubicin conjugated to a HPMA copolymer carrier via either enzymatically (PK1) or hydrolytically (HYD) degradable bonds. We have previously shown that the intracellular distribution of free doxorubicin, HYD, and PK1 is markedly different. Here, we demonstrated that these three agents greatly differ also in the antiproliferative effect and cell death signals they trigger. JNK phosphorylation sharply increased in cells treated with HYD, while treatment with free doxorubicin moderately decreased and treatment with PK1 even strongly decreased it. On the other hand, treatment with free doxorubicin greatly increased p38 phosphorylation, while PK1 and HYD increased it slightly. PK1 also significantly increased ERK phosphorylation, while both the free doxorubicin and HYD conjugate slightly decreased it. Long-term inhibition of JNK significantly increased both proliferation and viability of EL-4 cells treated with free doxorubicin, showing that the JNK signaling pathway could be critical for mediating cell death in EL-4 cells exposed to free doxorubicin. Both activation of caspase 3 and decreased binding activity of the p50 subunit of NFκB were observed in cells treated with free doxorubicin and HYD, while no such effects were seen in cells incubated with PK1. Analysis of the expression of genes involved in apoptosis and regulation of the cell cycle demonstrated that free doxorubicin and HYD have very similar mechanisms of action, while PK1 has very different characteristics. INTRODUCTION Doxorubicin is one of the most effective anthracycline antibiotics with a broad anti-tumor spectrum. Unfortunately, numerous side effects such as severe cardiotoxicity, bone marrow suppression, and alopecia limit its use. Development of tumor-targeted formulations is one of the main lines of research for improving the safety and efficacy of anthracyclines. For this purpose, we have used a water-soluble, nontoxic copolymerbasedonN-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide(HPMA) as a carrier for anti-cancer drugs. Covalent conjugation of doxorubicin to HPMA copolymer eliminates its adverse cytotoxicity, as this conjugate is biologically inactive when circulating in the bloodstream (1). Enhanced and tumor-selective accumulation of HPMA conjugate within the solid tumor is achieved either passively due to the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect (2) or actively by addition of a targeting moiety (e.g., antibodies, lectins, carbohydrates) (3). Anthracyclines cause apoptosis of cancer cells by a complex network of events which include intercalation into the DNA, generation of reactive oxygen species, topoisomerase II inhibition, and DNA damage (4). HPMA conjugate that contains doxorubicin bound via a pH-sensitive bond (HYD) possesses similar biological properties as free doxorubicin (5), because * Corresponding author. Tel.: +420241062158. Fax: +420241721143. E-mail address: [email protected]. † Institute of Microbiology ASCR. ‡ Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry ASCR. doxorubicin is released inside the cell and then acts analogously to free doxorubicin. Controlled release of doxorubicin within cancer cells is achieved by hydrolysis of hydrazone conjugates having doxorubicin bound via pH-sensitive bonds (6). Those bonds are stable at physiological pH 7.4, but are effectively degraded at pH 5. Inside the cell, doxorubicin is released quickly in endosomes or lysosomes. Conjugates with doxorubicin bound to the HPMA carrier through a hydrazone bond are highly cytotoxic and cytostatic in vitro and in vivo (7). On the other hand, intracellular events triggered by HPMA copolymer-conjugated doxorubicin via an enzymatically degradable bond (PK1) remain unclear. These conjugates were originally designed to release the drug from the oligopeptide side chain by the activity of lysosomal proteases (8). Some authors initially demonstrated that HPMA copolymer conjugates with enzymatically degradable bonds can be stronger proapoptotic inducers than free doxorubicin (9). However, later it was shown that both apoptosis and necrosis are induced in cells exposed to proteolytically cleavable HPMA copolymer conjugates (10-12). Our recent data do not support the idea that the enzymatic degradation and doxorubicin release from PK1 are the most important mechanisms responsible for target cell death. They rather suggest that immediately after penetrating the plasma membrane the whole conjugate intercalates into the membrane system of the cell, causing its collapse and death (10, 11). PK1 with enzymatically degradable bond between the oligopeptide spacer GFLG and doxorubicin was tested in phase I 10.1021/bc060246e CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society Published on Web 04/03/2007 Doxorubicin and HPMA Conjugates in Cancer Cells and was recommended for phase II of clinical study (13). A conjugate similar to PK1 but containing human nonspecific antibody was used for the treatment of patients with advanced cancer (14). In this study, we used the EL-4 T-cell lymphoma to determine the differences in intracellular action of free doxorubicin, PK1, and HYD. We determined their impact on intracellular signaling pathways (mitogen-activated protein kinases, NFκB, and apoptosis) and expression of genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle, and showed differences in their intracellular distribution. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Materials. Hydrazine monohydrate, methacryloyl chloride, 1-aminopropan-2-ol, 4-nitrophenol, 6-aminohexanoic acid, glycyl-L-phenylalanine, L-leucylglycine, 2,2′-azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN), 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate, dimethylformamide (DMF), N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), 1-hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBT), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), tert-butylcarbazate, and doxorubicin hydrochloride (Dox.HCl) were purchased from Fluka Chemie AG. 2,4,6-Trinitrobenzene1-sulfonic acid was purchased from SERVA Feinbiochemica Heidelberg. All other reagents and solvents were of analytical grade. Synthesis and Characterization of Monomers. N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) was synthesized as described in (15) using Na2CO3 as a base in the methacryloylation reaction (mp 70 °C; elemental analysis (calcd/found): 58.80/ 58.98% C; 9.16/9.18% H; 9.79/9.82% N). N-(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)-N′-(6-methacrylamidohexanoyl)hydrazine (Ma-AH-NHNHBoc) was prepared by a two-step synthesis consisting of methacryloylation of 6-aminohexanoic acid followed by reaction of the resulting N-methacryloyl-6-aminohexanoic acid with tertbutylcarbazate as described in (7). Yield: 6.06 g (46%). Mp 110-114 °C. Elemental analysis: calcd C 57.70%, H 8.33%, N 13.46%; found C 58.66%, H 8.84%, N 13.16%. N-Methacryloylglycyl-DL-phenylalanyl-L-leucylglycine and N-methacryloylglycyl-DL-phenylalanyl-L-leucylglycine 4-nitrophenyl ester (Ma-GFLG-ONp) were synthesized as described earlier (1). Mp 134-136 °C. Amino acid analysis: Gly/L-Phe/ D-Phe/L-Leu ) 2.05/0.54/0.47/1.00. Elemental analysis (calcd/ found): C 59.89/59.21%; H 6.07/6.25%; N 12.04/12.32%. HPLC showed two peaks of equal areas at 14.41 min (L-Phe peptide) and 14.71 min (D-Phe peptide). Purity of all monomers was examined by HPLC (LDC Analytical, U.S.A.) using a reversed-phase column Tessek SGX C18 (15 × 33 mm) with UV detection at 230 nm, eluent watermethanol with gradient 50-100 vol % methanol, flow rate 0.5 mL/min. Synthesis of Polymer Precursors. Copolymer poly(HPMAco-MA-AH-NHNH2). Copolymer poly(HPMA-co-MA-AHNHNH-Boc) was prepared by radical solution polymerization (AIBN, 1 wt %; monomer concentration, 14 wt % in methanol solution; molar ratio HPMA/MA-AH-NHNH-Boc 93/7; 60 °C; 23 h) in a sealed ampule under nitrogen. The copolymer was isolated by precipitation into a mixture of acetone/diethyl ether (2:1). The protecting Boc group was removed by dissolution of the polymer in concd trifluoroacetic acid (TFE), and a final polymer was isolated after dilution with methanol by precipitation into ethyl acetate and purified by gel filtration using a column filled with Sephadex LH-20 and methanol as a solvent. The poly(HPMA-co-MA-AH-NHNH2) was isolated by precipitation into ethyl acetate, separated by filtration, and dried in vacuum to constant weight. Poly(HPMA-co- Ma-GFLG-ONp) was prepared by radical precipitation polymerization as described in (15). Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007 895 HPMA homopolymer poly(HPMA) was prepared by radical solution polymerization using AIBN as initiator (0.8 wt %) and monomer concentration 16 wt % in methanol. Polymerization was carried out at 60 °C for 22 h in a sealed ampule under nitrogen; the polymer was isolated by precipitation into acetone and reprecipitated from methanol into acetone. Synthesis and Characterization of Polymer-Dox Conjugates. The conjugate bearing Dox attached via a pH-sensitive hydrazone bond poly(HPMA-co-MA-AH-NHN ) Dox) (HYD) and the conjugate bearing Dox attached via the enzymatically degradable oligopeptide sequence poly(HPMA-co- Ma-GFLGDox) (PK1) were prepared as described earlier, HYD in (6) and PK1 in (15). The polymer-drug conjugates were freed of low-molecularweight impurities (such as Dox, 4-nitrophenol) by gel filtration using a Sephadex LH-20 column with methanol elution and tested for the content of the free drug using a Pharmacia FPLC equipped with a Superose 6 column and by HPLC after extraction of free Dox from an aqueous polymer solution into chloroform. HPLC analysis of monomers was conducted on an HPLC analyzer (LDC Analytical, U.S.A.) using a reversed-phase column Tessek SGXC18 (125 × 4 mm) with UV detection at 230 nm, solvent methanol-water, gradient 50-100% methanol, and flow rate 0.5 mL/min. Content of Dox in the conjugates was measured spectrophotometrically in water using ) 11 500 L mol-1 cm-1 at λ ) 488 nm). Amino acid analysis was performed using an amino acid analyzer (LDC Analytical, U.S.A.) (precolumn OPA derivatization, reversed-phase column Tessek SGX C18, 250 × 4 mm, gradient sodium acetate buffer-methanol, fluorescence detector Fluoromonitor 4100). Determination of the molecular weight of all polymers was carried out with a FPLC Pharmacia system equipped with RI, UV, and multiangle light scattering DAWN DSP-F (Wyatt Co., U.S.A.) detectors using 0.3 M acetate buffer pH 6.5 and a Superose 6 column. The content of hydrazide groups in a precursor and HYD conjugate was determined by a modified TNBSA assay as described (16). The following polymers were prepared: HPMA copolymer bearing Dox attached via enzymatically degradable spacer (PK1), Mw ) 24.8 kDa, Mw/Mn ) 1.5, total Dox content 5.2 wt %, free Dox content <0.1%. HPMA copolymer bearing Dox attached via pH-sensitive hydrazone bond (HYD), Mw ) 25 kDa, Mw/Mn ) 1.8, total Dox content 5.2 wt %, free Dox content <0.3%. Detection of MAPK Phosporylation by Immunoblotting. 1-5 × 107 EL-4 cells were incubated with tested samples at a concentration corresponding to 3, 10, or 50 × IC50 of doxorubicin equivalent. After incubation periods of 5, 15, 30, 60, or 120 min, the media from the cell culture were aspirated, and cells were washed twice with an ice-cold Tris-buffered saline (TBS) with 1 µM Na3VO4 (phosphatase inhibitor) and centrifuged (4000 g, 4 °C). Then, EL-4 cells were resuspended in Extract buffer composed of 1% Nonidet P-40 (Pierce), 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM DTT, 5% Protease mix (Sigma), 1 mM PMSF phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and TBS of pH 7.4, and passed ten times through a syringe needle (25-30G). After 60 min of incubation at 4 °C, cell lysates were centrifuged at 14 000 g (4 °C), and protein concentration in aspirated supernatants was determined by the Bradford method. 20 µg protein (final protein load per lane) aliquots were mixed 2:1 with 3× sample buffer composed of 62.5 mM Tris, 30% glycerol, 20.8 µM SDS, 50 mM DTT, and 0.03% w/v bromophenol blue and stored at -20 °C until needed. Then, standard electrophoresis using 10% polyacrylamide gel followed by standard blotting semidry procedure with 896 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007 nitrocellulose membrane was performed. 5 µL of a biotinylated protein ladder (Cell Signaling, MA) was used to estimate the molecular weight of protein bands. The membrane was washed in 25 mL of TBS and blocked for 60 min in 5% low-fat milk or 2% BSA in TBS at room temperature before overnight incubation with 1:1000 primary rabbit-anti-mouse phospho-p38, phospho-SAPK/JNK, or anti-mouse phospho-ERK antibodies (Cell Signaling, MA) at 4 °C in TBS with 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% BSA. Proper washing with TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS/T) preceded 60-120 min of incubation with anti-rabbit or anti-biotin, HRP-linked IgG (1:1000) (Cell Signaling, MA) in 5% low-fat milk or 2% BSA in TBS at room temperature. Finally, the membranes were washed in TBS/T, developed by chemiluminescence reaction and exposed to LAS-1000 CCD camera (Fujifilm). Then, the Aida Image Analyzer v 3.2.8. (Raytest, Germany) was used for data quantification. The molecular weights of the respective kinases were used as internal standards of assay specificity. The molecular weights of detected phospho-proteins were determined by using protein markers, compared with the data provided by the manufacturer and found to be identical with respective MAPKs. Untreated cells were used as another internal control. The level of respective phosphorylated MAPK in the untreated cell was regarded as a reference value to which all other values were referred. In Vitro Proliferation Assay. An EL-4 murine T-cell lymphoma cell line was grown in cultivation flasks at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with heatinactivated 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 4.5 g/L glucose, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. 2 × 105 cells/mL were cultured in Nunc 96-well flat-bottom plates with or without Dox.HCl, HYD, or PK1, and/or MAPK inhibitors. In order to exclude any effect of tested agents on noninhibited kinase pathways, EL-4 cells were pretreated with SP600125 (JNK inhibitor), SB203580 (p38 inhibitor), or with U0126 (ERK inhibitor) (Sigma) MAPK inhibitors for 30 min prior to addition of Dox, PK1, or HYD in 48 h proliferation assays. In short-term assays, which were performed in order to avoid indirect effects such as changes in gene expression that could happen during the 48 h inhibition, inhibitors were added 30 min prior to [3H]thymidine addition in 5 h MAPK inhibition assays. All samples were tested in pentaplets. The plates were then cultured in 5% CO2 for 48 h at 37 °C. 18.5 kBq of [3H]thymidine in 50 µL was added per well for the last 5 h of incubation. The cells were then harvested (Tomtec, Orange, CT) onto glass filter mats. After drying, the fiber filter was placed into a sample bag, a solid scintillator MeltiLex A (Wallac, Turcu, Finland) was applied, and the bags were sealed (Microsealer, Wallac). Counting was performed in a 1450 MicroBeta TriLux scintillation counter (Wallac). Flow Cytometry. Control, Dox, HYD, or PK1 treated cells were incubated for 24 or 48 h with or without MAPK inhibitors, as described in the In Vitro Proliferation Assay section. To exclude any unspecific effect of tested agents on noninhibited kinase pathways, kinase inhibitors were added 30 min prior to Dox, HYD, or PK1 treatment. All agents were used at a concentration of 1 × IC50. After incubation, cells were washed and collected at 4 °C in PBS. Then, 0.01 µg/mL of Hoechst 33258 (Molecular Probes, Oregon) in 10 µL was added. After 20 min of incubation at 4 °C in the dark, 50 µL of ice-cold PBS was added, and at least 50 000 cells were analyzed by FACS (LSRII, BD, San Jose, CA) with the use of FowJo software (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA). Detection of Caspase 3 Activity. 5 × 106 EL-4 cells were incubated with tested samples at a concentration corresponding to 3 × IC50 for different time intervals. After the incubation Kovář et al. periods, the cells were washed twice with PBS, and the pellets were resuspended in 50 µL of Lysis buffer (Caspase 3 Assay Kit, Sigma). Cells were lysed on ice for 20 min, and 50 µL of supernatant was collected after centrifugation (12 000 rpm, 5 min, 4 °C). The Bradford method was used to determine protein concentration in cell lysates. The activity in cell lysates was measured spectrophotometrically at 405 nm using the Caspase 3 Assay Kit (Sigma). Caspase 3 activity was finally expressed as the amount of p-nitroaniline (nmol) released from synthetic Caspase 3 substrate/µg of total protein in cell lysate. Binding Activity of NFKB. 5 × 106 EL-4 cells were incubated with tested samples at a concentration corresponding to 10 × IC50 for different time intervals. After the incubation period, the cells were washed twice with PBS, and the pellets were resuspended in Lysis buffer (Nuclear Extraction Kit, Chemicon). Cells were lysed on ice and passed five times through syringe with small (25-30) gauge needle. After centrifugation at 8 000 g for 20 min at 4 °C, the pellets were resuspended in nuclear extraction buffer, and nuclei were disrupted by lysis with the use of a 27G needle. After centrifugation (16 000 g, 5 min, 4 °C), protein concentration was determined with the use of the Bradford method, and aliquots were frozen at -80 °C until needed. Then, the binding assay was performed with the use of the NFκB p50/p65 Assay Kit (Chemicon). Briefly, in the streptavidin-coated 96-well plate, the biotinylated DNA binding sequence for NFκB was mixed with nuclear extract. After addition of specific antibodies, the amount of p50 or p65 subunits was detected spectrophotometrically at 450/650 nm. The NFκB binding activity was finally expressed as percent of controls. Intracellular Localization of Doxorubicin. 1 × 106 cells were incubated for 24 h with 5 µg/mL of free doxorubicin or an adequate equivalent contained in HYD conjugate. For PK1 conjugate, a concentration corresponding to 20 µg of doxorubicin per mL was used. The excitation of doxorubicin at 488 nm and emission at 560 nm was used to visualize the intracellular localization of doxorubicin under Leica TCS-SP2 Multiphoton Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (TCS-MP). Intensity profiles were performed by using AnalySIS Software (SIS software, Germany). RNase Protection Assay. Total RNA was extracted from EL-4 cells exposed to 3 × IC50 for different time intervals using the RNA blue reagent (Top-Bio, Czech Republic). Total RNA was quantified specrophotometrically and dried by vacuum centrifugation for 1 h. To determine the levels of cytokine mRNA transcripts, a RiboQuant Multi-probe RNase Protection Assay System (Pharmingen) was used following the manufacturer’s instruction. R[32P] UTP (Izotop, Budapest, Hungary) was used for the synthesis of antisense RNA probe sets. 32P-labeled protected fragments were resolved by electrophoresis on 5% long ranger gel (BMA, Rockland, Maine). Gels were dried and radioactivity visualized by phosphorimaging. The level of mRNA was evaluated for the genes involved in cell cycle regulation (cyclin A1, A2, B1, B2, C, D1, D2, D3, sin3, c-, n-, l-, b-myc, max, mad, mxi, mad3, mad4, mnt) and genes involved in apoptosis signaling (caspase 8, fasL, fas, fadd, fap, faf, trail, TNFRp55, tradd, rip, bcl-W, bfl-1, bcl-x, bak, bax, bcl-2, bad). For each individual sample including the control, mRNA levels for the genes listed above were expressed in % of mRNA level for the L32 housekeeping gene. Final results are presented as a ratio of mRNA levels for the particular gene in treated cells and nontreated controls. Statistical Analysis. The significance of any differences obtained between experimental groups was evaluated by the Student’s t-test. In all statistical analyses, significance was assessed at the P e 0.05 level. Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007 897 Doxorubicin and HPMA Conjugates in Cancer Cells Table 1. Cytostatic Effects of Free Doxorubicin, HPMA-Bound Doxorubicin, and MAPK Inhibitorsa sample IC50 concentration (µM) ( S.D. Dox.HCl HYD PK1 SP600125 SB203580 U0126 0.014 ( 0.001 0.066 ( 0.013 45.970 ( 3.844 6.36 ( 0.921 8.12 ( 0.725 38.00 ( 3.453 a IC 50 values determined in EL-4 cell line for free doxorubicin, HYD, PK1 conjugate, and JNK inhibitor SP600125, p38 inhibitor SB203580, and inhibitor of MEK/ERK U0126. Figure 1. Phosphorylation of MAPKs in EL-4 cells treated with different forms of doxorubicin. Phosphorylation of JNK (a), p38 (b), and ERK (c) MAP kinases in lysates of EL-4 cells after 5 min (empty bars), 30 min (dotted bars), or 120 min (full bars) treatment with different forms of doxorubicin (50 × IC50) relative to control cells (100%). Representative western blot bands are shown for each sample below the corresponding column. Dox.HCl, free doxorubicin; HYD, doxorubicin bound to HPMA copolymer via hydrolytically degradable bond; PK1, doxorubicin bound to HPMA copolymer via enzymatically cleavable bond. *The difference against control was significant at P < 0.05 (Student’s t-test). RESULTS MAPKs Phosphorylation. In preliminary studies, we used the concentrations of 3×, 10×, and 50× IC50 of Dox, HYD, and PK1 on MAPK phosphorylation (not shown). The highest phosphorylation rates were achieved with the highest concentration of 50 × IC50, and it was used in assays with phosphorylated JNK (Figure 1a), p38 (Figure 1b), and ERK (Figure 1c). Incubation of EL-4 cells with free doxorubicin stimulated phosphorylation of p38 kinase up to 450% of control, whereas it inhibited phosphorylation of JNK and ERK almost by 50% in comparison with control cells. The maximum stimulation of p38 phosphorylation was achieved during the longest incubation lasting 120 min, and inhibition of JNK and ERK was acheived during both the 30 and 120 min incubation periods. Hydrazone conjugate (HYD) stimulated the phosphorylation of the stressactivated protein kinase JNK up to 360% of controls in the 2 h incubation period. ERK phosphorylation was inhibited after both the 30 and 120 min incubation periods with HYD, whereas a slight inhibition of p38 phosphorylation turned into minute enhancement during the long-term incubation. Phosphorylation of ERK was enhanced up to 205% of controls after incubation with PK1 conjugate. PK1 achieved an almost total (95%) inhibition of JNK phosphorylation. During incubation of EL-4 cells with PK1 conjugate, previous almost absolute inhibition of p38 phosphorylation turned into the same level of phoshorylation as that of the control after longer incubation. EL-4 Cell Proliferation Assay and IC50 Values. IC50 values summarized in Table 1 represent the concentration of doxorubicin or MAPK inhibitors required for 50% inhibition of EL-4 cell proliferation after 48 h. Free doxorubicin exhibited the highest cytostatic effect at 0.014 µM, IC50 value of hydrazone conjugate was 0.066 µM (doxorubicin equivalent), while PK1 conjugate showed the lowest cytostatic effect of 45.97 µM. IC50 of SP600125, SB203580, and U0126 were 6.36 µM, 8.12 µM, and 38 µM, respectively. After 48 h of incubation with 1 × IC50 value of SP600125 (JNK pathway inhibitor), EL-4 cells proliferated about 50% less when coincubated with or without hydrazone or PK1. On the other hand, when coincubated with free doxorubicin, EL-4 cells proliferated twice more in comparison with control cells incubated only with free doxorubicin without SP600125. EL-4 cells incubated for 48 h with free doxorubicin or HYD conjugate followed by 5 h of JNK inhibition with SP600125 proliferated about 50% less than cells without SP600125 inhibitor with free doxorubicin or HYD conjugate. This short-term, 5 h JNK pathway inhibition did not have any effect on proliferation of control or PK1-treated cells (Figure 2a). Neither 5 (not shown) nor 48 h inhibition of both the p38 pathway by SB203580 (Figure 2b) and ERK pathway by U0126 (Figure 2c) caused any significant differences in the proliferation of controls or cells treated with doxorubicin, HYD, or PK1. In those incubation assays, proliferation of all cells was inhibited approximately by 50% relative to corresponding untreated control cells. FACS Analysis of Cell Viability. Inhibition of the JNK pathway by SP600125 (Figure 3a) for 48 h had no significant effect on cellular viability in controls, HYD-, or PK1-treated cells. Coincubation of EL-4 cells with doxorubicin and SP600125 reduced cellular viability up to 86% relative to the cells with uninhibited JNK pathway, whereas cells exposed only to Dox.HCl reduced their viability by approximately up to 60%. On the other hand, inhibition of the JNK pathway had no significant effect on viability of cells exposed to HYD or PK1 conjugates. A 24 h inhibition of the JNK pathway did not significantly affect the number of dead cells in controls or any tested samples. 898 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007 Kovář et al. Figure 2. Proliferative activity of EL-4 cells incubated with different forms of doxorubicin and with/without MAPK inhibitors. Proliferation of EL-4 cells after a 48 h treatment with different forms of doxorubicin (1 × IC50) relative to control cells (100%). Dox.HCl, free doxorubicin; HYD, doxorubicin bound to HPMA copolymer via hydrolytically degradable bond; PK1, doxorubicin bound to HPMA copolymer via proteolytically cleavable bond. Cells were coincubated either for 5 h (empty bars) or for 48 h (full bars) with MAPKs inhibitors (1 × IC50) or without MAPK inhibitors (dotted bars). Inhibition of JNK (a), p38 (b), or inhibition of ERK (c). *The difference against the group without inhibitor but exposed to the same form of doxorubicin was significant at P < 0.05 (Student’s t-test). Figure 3. Viability of EL-4 cells incubated with different forms of doxorubicin and with/without MAPK inhibitors. Viability of EL-4 cells after a 48 h treatment with different forms of doxorubicin (1 × IC50) relative to control cells (100%). Dox.HCl, free doxorubicin; HYD, doxorubicin bound to HPMA copolymer via hydrolytically degradable bond; PK1, doxorubicin bound to HPMA copolymer via enzymatically cleavable bond. Cells were coincubated either for 24 h (empty bars) or for 48 h (full bars) with MAPKs inhibitors (1 × IC50) (a) inhibiting JNK, (b) p38, or (c) inhibiting ERK. Dotted bars show cells without inhibited MAPK pathway incubated with different forms of doxorubicin. *The difference against the group without inhibitor, but exposed to the same form of doxorubicin was significant at P < 0.05 (Student’s t-test). Inhibition of the p38 kinase pathway (Figure 3b) for 24 or 48 h did not significantly affect the viability of control cells nor of those treated with Dox.HCl, HYD, and PK1 conjugate when compared to cells exposed to free doxorubicin or HPMA conjugates without inhibitor. U0126 inibitor had been shown to have toxic effects even on control EL-4 cells incubated in cultivation media only. Coincubation with free doxorubicin or HPMA conjugate enhanced U0126 toxicity. Cells exposed to Dox.HCl, HYD, or PK1 conjugate showed reduced viability by 94%, 95%, and 89%, respectively, in 48 h incubation. 24 h incubation showed 85%, 88%, and 68% viability reduction in Dox.HCl, HYD, and PK1 treated cells, respectively (Figure 3c). Caspase 3 Activity. Caspase 3 was rapidly activated in EL-4 cells after treatment with free doxorubicin or hydrazone conjugate, and its activity increased more than 7- and 5-fold relative to controls, respectively. PK1 conjugate did not enhance the activity of this effector caspase even over an incubation period as long as 30 h (Figure 4a). NFKB Binding Activity. The NFκB p50 binding activity was significantly reduced in cell lysates after treatment with free doxorubicin and hydrazone conjugate at all tested time intervals. The lowest binding was detected in the longest 16 h treatment and was as low as 43% with Dox.HCl and 42% with hydrazone conjugate, as compared with controls. On the other hand, in PK1-treated cells, the p50 binding was significantly reduced only after 4 and 8 h incubation (Figure 4b). The binding activity of the p65 subunit was not significantly changed either with Dox.HCl and with hydrazone, or in PK1-treated cells (data not shown). Intracellular Localization. The confocal laser scanning microscopy visualizing the intracellular localization of free or HPMA-conjugated doxorubicin in native cells showed differences in the intracellular fate of these agents. The fluorescence of free doxorubicin was localized mainly inside the nucleus and endosomes, whereas the fluorescence of doxorubicin in the PK1 conjugate was clearly localized in cell membranes (cytoplasmic, nuclear, endosomal, Golgi apparatus, etc.). The doxorubicin contained in the hydrazone conjugate was shown to be localized in endosomes and lysosomes, and released doxorubicin was detected inside the nucleus (Figure 4c). Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007 899 Doxorubicin and HPMA Conjugates in Cancer Cells Expression of Genes Involved in the Regulation of Cell Cycle and Apoptosis. Expression of selected mRNA for genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle and apoptosis was determined in EL-4 cells treated with 3 × IC50 values of tested conjugates. The results for the most important genes with significantly altered expression are shown in Figure 5. Expression of an important proapoptotic gene bad was elevated up to 112% and 127% after incubation with free doxorubicin and the hydrazone conjugate, respectively, whereas the PK1 conjugate significantly reduced the level of mRNA for this gene to 48%, as compared with controls. Expression of another gene involved in apoptosis signaling - fas, were elevated after incubation with all tested forms of doxorubicin. The enhancement caused with the PK1 conjugate is significantly lower and more timedependent in comparison with free doxorubicin or hydrazone conjugate. We did not observe any changes in the expression of bcl-2 family members tested, nor in the expression of bax and bak. PK1-treated cells exhibited significantly increased levels of c-myc and max that are important for cell cycle progression. This nearly 150% and 120% increase of c-myc and max, respectively, turned into inhibition later on. Free doxorubicin and HYD conjugate quickly and strongly reduced the amount of those two genes. The expression of all tested cyclines was quickly reduced after incubation with Dox.HCl and HYD conjugated, but this inhibition was slighter and slower after incubation of EL-4 cells with PK1 conjugates. Cyclines A2 and D2 are shown as typical indicators of action of tested forms of doxorubicin on expression of cycline genes. DISCUSSION Figure 4. Caspase 3 activity, binding activity of p50 subunit of NFκB and intracellular distribution in EL-4 cells after treatment with different forms of doxorubicin. (a) The activity of caspase 3 in cells incubated with different forms of doxorubicin (3 × IC50). Caspase 3 activity is expressed as the amount of p-nitroaniline (nmol) released from synthetic caspase 3 substrate/µg of total protein in cell lysate and are related to control (control cells ) 100%). (b) Binding activity of p50 subunit of NFκB in cells treated with 10 × IC50 of different forms of doxorubicin for 4 (empty bars), 8 (dotted bars), 16 (hatched bars), or 24 (full bars) hours relative to control cells (100%). *The difference against control was significant at P < 0.05 (Student’s t-test). (c) Intracellular localization of free doxorubicin, hydrazone conjugate, both with 5 µg of doxorubicin per mL and with PK1 conjugate with 20 µg of doxorubicin per mL in EL-4 cells after 24 h of treatment. Cross-section lines represent the intensity profiles demonstrating the fluorescence of doxorubicin. Free doxorubicin (-b-, Dox.HCl), doxorubicin bound to HPMA copolymer via hydrolytically degradable bond (-9-, HYD), doxorubicin bound to HPMA copolymer via proteolytically cleavable bond (-2-, PK1). The MAPK transfers signals from the cell membrane to the nucleus by phosphorylation of transcription factors like Elk-1. JNK, p38, and ERK are serine/threonine kinases that are activated by dual phosphorylation of the threonine/tyrosine motif by upstream kinases (17). Using specific antibodies, we found that Dox.HCl, HYD, and PK1 conjugates activate different MAPKs. Free doxorubicin and HYD activated the p38 and JNK, respectively. These kinases are typically activated in response to cell stress, DNA damage, and precede apoptotic cell death (18). Moreover, both the free drug and HYD conjugate enhanced the expression of proapoptotic gene bad and increased the activity of caspase 3, an effector apoptotic caspase whose activation is an irreversible step in apoptotic cell death. Both the Dox.HCl and HYD conjugate also increased the expression of Fas and thus made the cells more sensitive to FasL-mediated apoptotic cell death. These two agents also inhibited the activation of the p50 subunit of NFκB transcription factor that provides antiapoptotic signals. On the other hand, the PK1 conjugate activated the ERK that is usually associated with cell growth and differentiation (17). In contrast to free doxorubicin and HYD conjugate, the PK1 conjugate reduced the expression of bad, did not enhance the activity of caspase 3 (up to 30 h of incubation), and was not inhibitory for p50 activation in longer time intervals. Surprisingly, neither free drug nor HPMA conjugates changed the expression of antiapoptotic genes as well as the expression of cyclin-dependent kinases (data not shown). The mode of action of the HYD conjugate resembles that of free doxorubicin, as doxorubicin is released from the HYD conjugate by hydrolysis, a relatively fast process, and it acts as free doxorubicin by triggering apoptosis. This explains the similar mode of action of these agents in our study that has been demonstrated previously with another cell line (5). In contrast, the mechanism of action of the PK1 conjugate is less clear. Recently, we have shown new data which do not support the enzymatic degradation of PK1 conjugate in vivo and thus 900 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007 Kovář et al. Figure 5. Expression of selected genes on mRNA level in EL-4 cells treated with different forms of doxorubicin. The level of mRNA for selected genes determined by RNAse protection assay in the EL-4 cells after treatment with different forms of doxorubicin (3 × IC50). For each individual sample including control, mRNA levels were expressed in % of mRNA level for L32 housekeeping gene. Final results are presented as a ratio of mRNA levels for the particular gene in treated cells and non-treated controls. Free doxorubicin (-b-), doxorubicin bound to HPMA copolymer via hydrolytically degradable bond (-9-), doxorubicin bound to HPMA copolymer via proteolytically cleavable bond (-2-). *The difference against the free doxorubicin and hydrazone-treated groups was significant at P < 0.05. †The difference against the free doxorubicin and hydrazone (except for the 4 h incubation period with hydrazone) treated groups was significant at P < 0.05. ‡The difference against the free doxorubicin and hydrazone (except for the 4 h incubation period with both free doxorubicin and hydrazone) treated groups was significant at P < 0.05 (Student’s t-test). show that the release of free doxorubicin is not a dominant mechanism (15). Instead, we suggest that the whole PK1 conjugate interacts with cell membranes, causing their damage (changed permeability, blockade of intracellular trafficking, etc.) and subsequently resulting in cell death (10, 11). These data are supported by our recent finding that both the Dox.HCl and HYD conjugate trigger stress-activated signaling pathways JNK and p38 and strongly induce apoptosis. On the other hand, the PK1 conjugate activates ERK and suppresses the activation of JNK. Thus, PK1 shows an opposite pattern in activation of different MAPKs in comparison to Dox.HCl and HYD. The data showing the effect of free or HPMA-conjugated doxorubicin on expression of genes involved in cell cycle (c-myc, max, and cyclines) demonstrate that Dox.HCl and HYD conjugate inhibit cell proliferation quickly, whereas the PK1 conjugate does not inhibit the cell cycle efficiently within the first 24 h. Further, we used inhibitors specific for JNK, p38, and ERK to evaluate their impact on proliferation and cell death. These inhibitors alone showed some inhibition of proliferation which is shown in Table 1. Doxorubicin-treated cells with inhibited JNK proliferated more than twice as much as the cells without JNK inhibitor. Moreover, the viability of the cells with inhibited JNK was higher than that of cells treated only with free doxorubicin, which clearly shows that JNK plays a key role in mediating the cytostatic and cytotoxic effect of Dox.HCl. On the other hand, the death of control cells and HPMA conjugate treated cells was not significantly changed after treatment with the JNK inhibitor. It seems that, in doxorubicin treated cells, the JNK pathway triggers a lethal, probably proapoptotic signal, and blocking of this signal protects cells against doxorubicininduced cell death (19). In contrast, this important role of the JNK pathway was not seen in cells treated with PK1 and even with HYD conjugate. This is surprising, because the HYD conjugate has been reported to possess properties very similar to the free drug (5). As shown previously with different cell lines (10, 11), the intracellular distribution of the PK1 conjugate greatly differs from that of free doxorubicin and the hydrazone Doxorubicin and HPMA Conjugates in Cancer Cells conjugate. These data discussed previously support our present results and show one of the possible mechanisms of action. Furthermore, we used a confocal laser scanning microscopy to visualize the intracellular localization of doxorubicin in living cells exposed to different forms of doxorubicin. We demonstrated significant differences in the intracellular fate of these agents. The cells treated with free doxorubicin showed localization of the drug mainly inside the nucleus and acidic organelles (10). The fluorescence pattern within cells incubated with hydrazone conjugate was similar to that of the free drug, and the strong signal within the nucleus verified the effective release of doxorubicin from its carrier. By contrast, the fluorescence signal in cells treated with the PK1 conjugate was clearly localized almost solely within cell membranes (cytoplasmic, nuclear, endosomal, Golgi apparatus, etc.), and we were not able to detect any nuclear fluorescence. The latter finding indicates that PK1 conjugate was not intracellularly degraded and doxorubicin was not released in sufficient amount to be detected within cell nucleus. This seems to be in contradiction to the data published by Duncan’s team (20), as well as two other groups who demonstrated nuclear localization of doxorubicin presumably released from the PK1 conjugate (21, 22). To put these conflicting data into accord, we propose that the differences might be due to the use of different cancer cell lines for the studies, as different cells have different trafficking pathways and the level of enzymes capable of cleaving doxorubicin from its carrier. Another explanation might be that doxorubicin detected within the nucleus was due to a contamination of the PK1 conjugate by free doxorubicin rather than to its intracellular release from the conjugate. This assumption is based on the fact that Duncan’s group (20) reported that the PK1 conjugate used in their study contained 0.39% of free doxorubicin, while the content of free doxorubicin in our PK1 conjugate is up to the limit of 0.1% of total doxorubicin. In fact, the content of free doxorubicin in the PK1 conjugate synthesized by us is probably much lower, but the 0.1% content of free doxorubicin corresponds to doxorubicin concentration which is near the detection limit of the analytical assay. Unfortunately, the two remaining papers (21, 22) demonstrating the doxorubicin release from the PK1 conjugate do not even indicate free doxorubicin content in their PK1 conjugates and therefore neither disprove nor corroborate our hypothesis. To sum up, we demonstrated that the conjugation of doxorubicin to HPMA copolymer carrier modulates the mechanism of its intracellular action. As mentioned before (5), the intracellular action of hydrazone conjugate resembles that of free doxorubicin, but in this study we have found different roles for MAP kinases. The PK1 conjugate has different and in some parameters opposite mechanisms of action from both free doxorubicin and the hydrazone conjugate. Since PK1 triggers different intracellular pathways involved in regulation of cell death and/or proliferation than free doxorubicin, one can hypothesize that there can also be a different spectrum of tumors sensitive to PK1. As an example, Dox.HCl is not used for the treatment of colorectal cancer at all, but PK1 showed some therapeutic effect in patients with this type of cancer (13). If such a hypothesis is shown to be true, the finding that the cancerostatic activity of a particular cytostatic drug toward different types of tumor can be modified by binding to a polymeric carrier is both scientifically interesting and important for the development of new polymer-bound drugs for treatment of tumors resistant to this drug in the free form. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This research was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (grants 305/05/2268 and 310/03/H147), the Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007 901 grant of MEYS CR 1M0505, and by the Institutional Research Concept AV0Z50200510. LITERATURE CITED (1) Rihova, B., Bilej, M., Vetvicka, V., Ulbrich, K., Strohalm, J., Kopecek, J., and Duncan, R. (1989) Biocompatibility of N-(2hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide copolymers containing adriamycin. Immunogenicity, and effect on haematopoietic stem cells in bone marrow in vivo and mouse splenocytes and human peripheral blood lymphocytes in vitro. Biomaterials 10, 335-42. (2) Maeda, H. (2001) The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. AdV. Enzyme Regul. 41, 189-207. (3) Rihova, B. (1995) Antibody-targeted polymer-bound drugs. Folia Microbiol. (Prague, Czech Repub.) 40, 367-84. (4) Minotti, G., Menna, P., Salvatorelli, E., Cairo, G., and Gianni, L. (2004) Anthracyclines: molecular advances and pharmacologic developments in antitumor activity and cardiotoxicity. Pharmacol. ReV. 56, 185-229. (5) Kovar, M., Kovar, L., Subr, V., Etrych, T., Ulbrich, K., Mrkvan, T., Loucka, J., and Rihova, B. (2004) HPMA copolymers containing doxorubicin bound by a proteolytically or hydrolytically cleavable bond: comparison of biological properties in vitro. J. Controlled Release 99, 301-14. (6) Etrych, T., Chytil, P., Jelinkova, M., Rihova, B., and Ulbrich, K. (2002) Synthesis of HPMA copolymers containing doxorubicin bound via a hydrazone linkage. Effect of spacer on drug release and in vitro cytotoxicity. Macromol. Biosci. 2, 43-52. (7) Mrkvan, T., Sirova, M., Etrych, T., Chytil, P., Strohalm, J., Plocova, D., Ulbrich, K., and Rihova, B. (2005) Chemotherapy based on HPMA copolymer conjugates with pH-controlled release of doxorubicin triggers anti-tumor immunity. J. Controlled Release 110, 119-129. (8) Kopecek, J., Rejmanova, P., Strohalm, J., Ulbrich, K., Rihova, B., Chytrý, V., Duncan, R., and Lloyd, J. B. (1991) Synthetic polymeric drugs. U.S. Patent 5,037,883. (9) Minko, T., Kopeckova, P., and Kopecek, J. (2001) Preliminary evaluation of caspases-dependent apoptosis signaling pathways of free and HPMA copolymer-bound doxorubicin in human ovarian carcinoma cells. J. Controlled Release 71, 227-37. (10) Hovorka, O., St’astny, M., Etrych, T., Subr, V., Strohalm, J., Ulbrich, K., and Rihova, B. (2002) Differences in the intracellular fate of free and polymer-bound doxorubicin. J. Controlled Release 80, 101-17. (11) Hovorka, O., Etrych, T., Šubr, V., Strohalm, J., Ulbrych, K., and Řı́hová, B. (2005) HPMA based macromolecular therapeutics: internalization, intracellular pathway and cell death depend on the character of covalent bond between the drug and the peptidic spacer and also on spacer composition. J. Drug Targeting 14, 391-403. (12) Demoy, M., Minko, T., Kopeckova, P., and Kopecek, J. (2000) Time- and concentration-dependent apoptosis and necrosis induced by free and HPMA copolymer-bound doxorubicin in human ovarian carcinoma cells. J. Controlled Release 69, 185-196. (13) Vasey, P. A., Kaye, S. B., Morrison, R., Twelves, C., Wilson, P., Duncan, R., Thomson, A. H., Murray, L. S., Hilditch, T. E., Murray, T., Burtles, S., Fraier, D., Frigerio, E., and Cassidy, J. (1999) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of PK1 [N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymer doxorubicin]: first member of a new class of chemotherapeutic agents-drug-polymer conjugates. Clin. Cancer Res. 5, 83-94. (14) Rihova, B. (2003) Antibody-targeted HPMA copolymer-bound anthracycline antibiotics. Drugs Future 28, 1189-1210. (15) Ulbrich, K., Subr, V., Strohalm, J., Plocova, D., Jelinkova, M., and Rihova, B. (2000) Polymeric drugs based on conjugates of synthetic and natural macromolecules. I. Synthesis and physicochemical characterisation. J. Controlled Release 64, 63-79. (16) Etrych, T., Jelinkova, M., Rihova, B., and Ulbrich, K. (2001) New HPMA copolymers containing doxorubicin bound via pH-sensitive linkage: synthesis and preliminary in vitro and in vivo biological properties. J. Controlled Release 73, 89-102. (17) Kyosseva, S. (2004) Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. Int. ReV. Neurobiol. 59, 201-20. (18) Wada, T., and Penninger, J. (2004) Mitogen-activated protein kinases in apoptosis regulation. Oncogene 23, 2838-49. 902 Bioconjugate Chem., Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007 (19) Brantley-Finley, C., Lyle, C., Du, L., Goodwin, M., Hall, T., Szwedo, D., Kaushal, G., and Chambers, T. (2003) The JNK, ERK and p53 pathways play distinct roles in apoptosis mediated by the antitumor agents vinblastine, doxorubicin, and etoposide. Biochem. Pharmacol. 66, 459-69. (20) Seib, F. P., Jones, A. T., and Duncan, R. (2006) Establishment of subcellular fractionation techniques to monitor the intracellular fate of polymer therapeutics I. Differential centrifugation fractionation B16F10 cells and use to study the intracellular fate of HPMA copolymer - doxorubicin. J. Drug Targeting 14, 375-90. Kovář et al. (21) Nan, A., Ghandehari, H., Hebert, C., Siavash, H., Nikitakis, N., Reynolds, M., and Sauk, J. J. (2005) Water-soluble polymers for targeted drug delivery to human squamous carcinoma of head and neck. J. Drug Targeting 13, 189-97. (22) Omelyanenko, V., Kopeckova, P., Gentry, C., and Kopecek, J. (1998) Targetable HPMA copolymer-adriamycin conjugates. Recognition, internalization, and subcellular fate. J. Controlled Release 53, 25-37. BC060246E