Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF HYPOTHESES INTRODUCTION The deliberate and accidental introduction of alien species into new habitats where they establish and spread is a significant component of human-caused global change (Vitousek et al. 1997). Through predation on and competition with native species, introduced species accelerate extinction rates and reduce global biodiversity (Gurevitch and Padilla 2004). For instance, approximately 42% of the species on the U.S. Threatened and Endangered species lists are at risk primarily because of the activities of introduced species (Pimentel et al. 2004). In other regions of the world, introduced species seriously threaten up to 80% of native endangered species (Armstrong 1995). The endangerment and loss of native species is particularly acute on oceanic islands, which have unusually high rates of endemism (Kaneshiro 1988). In the Hawaiian Islands, where a considerable portion of intact native ecosystems are under State and Federal protection (Cuddihy and Stone 1990), invasive species are now the primary threat to the persistence of the native flora and fauna (Loope 1992). For native Hawaiian plants, competition from invasive plants and herbivory by invasive animals are two of the most important forces responsible for declining populations (Bruegmann et al. 2002). 1 Herbivory is central to the organization of biotic communities (Marquis 1992; Janzen 1970). By influencing plant species composition, it also has indirect effects on most other species in a community. While vertebrate herbivores are frequently the focus of studies regarding plant community dynamics (Kotanen 1995; Stone 1985), the impacts of invertebrates are important as well. Among invertebrate herbivores, terrestrial molluscs, such as slugs and snails, are some of the most important grazers of temperate grassland species (del-Val and Crawley 2004; Hitchmough 2003). Because these animals are known to target seedlings (Hanley et al. 1995), they can have profound consequences for native plant recruitment and therefore adult species composition (Hanley et al. 2002; Hanley et al. 1996). They may also play an important role in the success or failure of rare plant restoration efforts. Study organisms Slugs are a polyphyletic group of terrestrial gastropods descended from snails. The absence of a shell gives them their distinctive form, which arose by way of convergent evolution in multiple snail lineages (Runham and Hunter 1970). As a result of this evolutionary history, there exists a continuum of gastropod forms in terms of shell reduction, with snails at one end, slugs at the other, and various intermediate forms, sometimes referred to as “semi-slugs”, in between. Thus, the number of gastropod species considered to be slugs is not definitive. To avoid confusion, my use of the term is limited to those families considered to be slugs by South (1992) (Table 1.1). 2 The repeated evolution of the slug form in several gastropod lineages is a testament to its utility, particularly in calcium-poor, wet environments, such as those found on many volcanic islands. Both slugs and snails are hermaphroditic and many species can self-fertilize (Jordaens et al. 2000) as well as tolerate a wide range of temperatures (Rollo and Shibata 1990). These traits make slugs excellent colonizers and potential invaders when introduced into new areas. Slugs will feed on a variety of foods including carrion, animal feces, lichens, a variety of small animals and other slugs (South 1992). With the exception of a few geographically restricted groups, however, most slugs are considered to be generalist herbivores (Rathke 1985). Impacts of slug herbivory The exclusion of molluscs from plant communities has been shown to have a marked influence on the survivorship of emerging seedlings. Because seedlings are more sensitive than adults to the removal of small amounts of tissue, the risk of mortality due to slugs is highest when the plant is small. Risk is further enhanced by seedling architecture as slugs more readily attack plants less than 10 cm tall (Albrectsen et al. 2004; Rathke 1985) and find young plants more palatable than older ones (Fenner et al. 1999). Hulme (1994) followed the fate of roughly 13,000 seedlings in temperate grassland. Along with rodents, molluscs were among the most important seedling predators, exploiting on average 30% 3 of all individuals. Less is known regarding slugs’ importance as seedling predators in forest habitats. In one of the few studies of this kind, Christel et al. (2002) showed that seedling recruitment of a perennial forest herb in deciduous forest in Sweden was significantly greater following the application of molluscicide, and that these effects lasted up to four years following a single treatment. In open coniferous forest, Nystrand and Grandström (1997) demonstrated that high densities of the slug Arion subfuscus (Draparnaud) (Arionidae) were responsible for a three-fold increase in scots pine seedling mortality. Though death may not occur, the removal of large amounts of photosynthetic tissue and the damaging of reproductive organs can reduce the fitness of lowlying adult plants. In a limestone grassland in central England, for example, Breadmore and Kirk (1998) found that the two slugs Deroceras reticulatum (Mϋller) (Agriolimacidae) and Arion ater (Linneaus) (Arionidae) were the main petal herbivores of a wide range of herbaceous plant species, causing damage exceeding that of arthropods. Mollusc herbivory significantly reduced the number of capitulae produced by an invasive aster, Senecio inaequidens D.C., despite the presence of pyrrolizidine alkaloids (Scherber et al. 2003). Rai and Tripathi (1985) demonstrated that slug and insect herbivory was responsible for delayed flowering and reduced seed output in the weed Galinsoga quadriradiata Cav. (Asteraceae). 4 Slugs can have profound effects on single species if they are among their favored food items. Bruelheide and Scheidel (1999) reported that non-native slugs removed nearly three-fourths of all leaf tissue from the rare perennial Arnica montana Linneaus (Asteraceae), and, further, restricted this species to high elevations where herbivory was less intense. In New Zealand alien slugs caused extensive defoliation of a native slow-growing fern, thereby facilitating the invasion of alien plant species (Sessions and Kelley 2002). Several studies have described the short-term effects of slug grazing in European pasture, noting a general shift away from the use of highly palatable herbaceous species towards more herbivore resistant grasses (Wilby and Brown 2001; Hanley et al. 1996). Cates and Orians (1975) found the palatability of 100 species to slugs was strongly correlated with successional status. Annuals were preferred to perennials and early successional species were preferred to later successional species, a finding supported by Briner and Frank (1998) using 78 additional plant species. As a result of this work, it has been suggested that molluscs, and especially slugs, can influence both the rate and direction of succession. Slugs in Hawai‘i According to the plant-defense hypothesis, plants evolve anti-herbivore defenses in response to grazing (Feeny 1992). Thus, plants that evolved in the presence of herbivores are likely to be better defended than plants that evolved in their 5 absence. The degree to which plants develop, or fail to develop, herbivore defenses is largely a function of the combined effects of resource availability and herbivore pressure (Coley et al. 1985). In an environment with few herbivores, evolution would tend to favor fast growing, highly fecund individuals over welldefended ones. As a result, when non-native herbivores are introduced into a plant community, species composition can change rapidly and rare species can be pushed towards extinction (Coomes et. al 2003; Schreiner 1997). This is a critical issue in Hawai‘i (Stone 1985), where several important guilds of herbivores were historically lacking and endemism in the flora and fauna is high because of the islands’ extreme isolation. Hawai‘i lacks native slugs, but has a rich native snail fauna (Cowie 1995; Gagné and Christenson 1985). Native snails have not been reported to eat living plant tissue; tree snails of the genus Achatinella Swainson (Achatinellidae), for example, are believed to feed exclusively on epiphytic algae and fungi (Severns 1981; Hadfield and Mountain 1980). The diets of most groups of native snails, however, have yet to be studied (R. Cowie pers. comm.), and it is therefore unknown to what extent native plants are adapted to mollusc herbivory. At least 12 slugs and one semi-slug, Parmarion martensi Simroth (Ariophantidae), are now established in Hawai‘i (Table 1.2). This number is conservative, as thorough surveys for slugs in Hawai‘i have not been undertaken. While no formal studies have been conducted to investigate the impacts that alien slugs are having on native flora, they are nevertheless widely regarded among local botanists to be 6 key limiting factors to native seedling survival and responsible for the failure of several restoration efforts. The number of endangered Hawaiian plant species reported by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to be imminently or potentially threatened by alien slugs is alarming (Table 1.3). Two field trials in Lyon Arboretum on O‘ahu (A. Yoshinaga, unpublished) demonstrated that slugs could reduce the survival of Cyanea angustifolia (Cham.) Hillebr. (Campanulaceae) seedlings by as much as 80%. In one of the few published reports of slug feeding in Hawai‘i, Gagné (1983) documented the slug Milax gagates (Draparnaud) (Milacidae) feeding on the native greensword Argyroxiphium grayanum (Hillebrand) Degener (Asteraceae). Managers with the Nature Conservancy and the Army Natural Resource Center constructed elaborate mollusk barriers after plantings of Solanum sandwicense Hook. & Arnott (Solanaceae), Schiedea kaalae Caum & Hosaka, Schiedea obovata (Sherff) (Caryophyllaceae), Cyrtandra dentata St. John & Storey and Cyanea superba (Cham.) A. Gray (Campanulaceae) apparently failed because of slugs (Sailer 2002; Arcand et al. 2002). HYPOTHESES My study investigates the potential impacts of introduced slugs on native and introduced plants in Hawai’i. The aim of this research is to identify differences (if any) in plant acceptability to slugs in the laboratory as well as assess the effect of slug feeding on plant survival and seedling regeneration under natural conditions. 7 Hypotheses specifically addressed are: H1) The acceptability of plant material to slugs differs among different plant species H2) The acceptability of plant material to slugs differs among different slug species H3) Slug herbivory is responsible for increased damage to leaf tissue H4) Slug herbivory is responsible for reduced plant growth H5) Slug herbivory is responsible for increased seedling mortality H6) Plant species will differ in the above effects (increased leaf damage, reduced growth, reduced survival) of slug herbivory H7) The number and/or species composition of seedlings naturally regenerating from the seed bank is altered by slug herbivory. To investigate these hypotheses, two experiments were carried out, one in the laboratory and one in the field. The first addressed H1 and H2 (Chapter 2) and was conducted under controlled conditions using five slug species and five plant species. Plant acceptability was ranked from 0-1 using an index developed by Dirzo (1980) and differences attributable to slug species, plant species and/or an interaction between the two, were quantified. A second experiment (Chapter 3) carried out in the Wai‘anae Mountains, followed the fate of transplanted seedlings (H3-H6), and tracked changes in the number and identity of germinants from the seed bank (H7), when exposed to or protected from slug herbivory. 8