Download Abstract

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Mathematical proof wikipedia , lookup

Line (geometry) wikipedia , lookup

Addition wikipedia , lookup

Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup

Vincent's theorem wikipedia , lookup

List of important publications in mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Central limit theorem wikipedia , lookup

Pythagorean theorem wikipedia , lookup

Recurrence relation wikipedia , lookup

Brouwer fixed-point theorem wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental theorem of calculus wikipedia , lookup

Four color theorem wikipedia , lookup

Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem wikipedia , lookup

Theorem wikipedia , lookup

System of polynomial equations wikipedia , lookup

Partial differential equation wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup

Proofs of Fermat's little theorem wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Russell Jay Hendel
Linear equalities in Fibonacci numbers,
Fibonacci Quart. 44 (2006), no. 3, 235–248.
Abstract
We study the equation Fb = Fx(1) + F−x(3) + F−x(4) + · · · + F−x(m)
with m ≥ 3, 0 < x(1) < b, and 0 < x(3) < x(4) < · · · < x(m). This
equation naturally arises in the generalization of several problems that
have appeared in The Fibonacci Quarterly in the problem sections.
This equation also has intrinsic interest in its own right. The main
theorem - the Accident theorem–states, that under very mild conditions, solutions to this equation cannot happen by accident; that is,
there are no singular solutions, but rather every solution belongs to a
parametrizable class of solutions. Furthermore if m ≥ 4, then b must
be even and there are exactly 9 parametrizable solutions. This is the
first major theorem in the literature on identities in Fibonacci numbers with an arbitrary number of summands whose subscripts have
mixed signs. There are only 2 hypothesii of the accident theorem: We
require that for all i, x(i) > 2 and that no proper subset of summands on the right hand side of the equation has a sum of zero. While
the proof of the accident theorem requires many sub-theorems and
lemmas, the basic proof method is to exploit Fibonacci Telescoping
lemmas. An example of Fibonacci Telescoping is illustrated by the following identity which leads to one of the 9 parametrizable solutions for
m ≥ 4 : Fb = Fb−o−3 + F−(b−o−2) + F−(b−o) + · · · + F−(b−1) with b even
and o an arbitrary positive odd integer.
1