* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Full text
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
ADVANCED PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS Edited by Florian Luca Please send all communications concerning ADVANCED PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS to FLORIAN LUCA, IMATE, UNAM, AP. POSTAL 61-3 (XANGARI), CP 58 089, MORELIA, MICHOACAN, MEXICO, or by e-mail at [email protected] as files of the type tex, dvi, ps, doc, html, pdf, etc. This department especially welcomes problems believed to be new or extending old results. Proposers should submit solutions or other information that will assist the editor. To facilitate their consideration, all solutions sent by regular mail should be submitted on separate signed sheets within two months after publication of the problems. PROBLEMS PROPOSED IN THIS ISSUE H-639 Proposed by H.-J. Seiffert, Berlin, Germany The sequences of the Fibonacci and Lucas polynomials are defined by F0 (x) = 0, F1 (x) = 1, and Fn+1 (x) = xFn (x) + Fn−1 (x) for n ≥ 1, L0 (x) = 2, L1 (x) = x, and Ln+1 (x) = xLn (x) + Ln−1 (x) for n ≥ 1, respectively. Prove that, for all non-zero complex numbers x and all positive integers n, (a) 2n−1 X k=0 4n − 1 − k 4n−1−2k k 2 x Fk (x) = x2n−1 L2n−1 (x)F2n (4/x), k (b) 2n−1 X k=0 4n − 1 − k 4n−1−2k k 2 x Lk (x) = x2n−1 (x2 + 4)F2n−1 (x)F2n (4/x), k (c) 2n X 4n + 1 − k k=0 k 24n+2−2k xk Fk (x) = x2n+1 F2n (x)L2n+1 (4/x), (d) 2n X 4n + 1 − k k=0 k 24n+2−2k xk Lk (x) = x2n+1 L2n (x)L2n+1 (4/x). 187 ADVANCED PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS H-640 Proposed by Jayantibhai M. Patel, Ahmedabad, India For any positive integer n ≥ 2, prove that the value of the following determinant −L2n F2n 2 Ln 2F2n 2 Ln F2n L2n −3(3Fn2 + 2(−1)n ) F2n F2n −L2n 2 2Fn 2F2n F2n L2n 2F2n 2Fn2 2F2n −6Fn+1 Fn−1 2F2n L2n F2n L2n 2F2n −L2n is (L2n + L2n )5 . H-641 Proposed by Emeric Deutsch, Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY A composition of n is an ordered sequence of positive integers having sum equal to n. The terms of the sequence are called the parts of n. It is known that the number of compositions of n is 2n−1 and the number of compositions of n with exactly k parts is equal to n−1 k−1 . Here, we consider a slightly modified concept assuming that there are two kinds of 1. Find: (i) The number an of compositions of n (for example, a2 = 5 because we have (2), (1, 1), (1, 10 ), (10 , 1), and (10 , 10 )); (ii) the number cn,k of compositions of n with exactly k parts (for example, c4,2 = 5 because we have (1, 3), (10 , 3), (3, 1), (3, 10 ), and (2, 2)). H-642 Walther Janous, Innsbruck, Austria Determine the limit lim L2 n+2 n→∞ Fn+2 − n X L2 k k=1 Fk . SOLUTIONS Bounding ratios of Fibonacci numbers H-625 Proposed by Russel Jay Hendel, Townson University, MD (Vol. 3, no. 2, May 2005) For an integer m > 0 let Km be the smallest positive integer such that Fn+m < Km Fn holds for all large n. For example, K1 = 2 because Fn < Fn+1 < 2Fn holds for all large n. Provide an explicit formula for Km . Solution by H.-J. Seiffert It is known (see equations (3.22) and (3.24) in [1]) that, for all integers m and n, Fn+m + (−1)m Fn−m = Lm Fn . 188 (1) ADVANCED PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS We shall prove that, for m > 0, ( Km = Lm + 1, Lm , if m is odd, if m is even. Suppose that m is odd. If n > m, then, by (1), Lm Fn = Fn+m − Fn−m < Fn+m < Fn+m + Fn − Fn−m = (Lm + 1)Fn . Let m be even. If n > m, then, by (1) again, (Lm − 1)Fn = Fn+m − (Fn − Fn−m ) < Fn+m < Fn+m + Fn−m = Lm Fn . This completes the proof of the above statement. [1] A. F. Horadam & Bro. J. M. Mahon. “Pell and Pell-Lucas Polynomials,” The Fibonacci Quarterly 23.1 (1985) : 7–20. Also solved by Paul S. Bruckman and the proposer. Pell numbers and Fibonacci polynomials H-626 Proposed by H.-J. Seiffert, Berlin, Germany (Vol. 43, no. 2, May 2005) The Fibonacci polynomials are defined by F0 (x) = 0, F1 (x) = 1, and Fn+2 (x) = xFn+1 (x) + Fn (x) for n ≥ 0. Let n be a positive integer. a. Prove that, for all complex numbers x, Fn+1 (x) + iFn (x) = 4 −n n X 2n + 1 k=0 2k + 1 (x − 2i)k (x + 2i)n−k , where i = √ −1. b. Deduce the identities −b n 2c Pn = 2 n−1 X k=0 46|n−2k+1 b (−1) (n−2k) c 4 n X (n+1) (n−2k−1) 2n − 1 −b 2 c b c 2n + 1 4 and Pn = 2 (−1) , 2k + 1 2k + 1 k=0 46|n−2k where Pn = Fn (2) is the nth Pell number. Solution by the proposer 189 ADVANCED PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS It is well-known that F2n+1 (x) = √ x + √x2 + 4 2n+1 1 2 x2 + 4 − x − √x2 + 4 2n+1 2 . Applying the Binomial Theorem gives F2n+1 (x) = 4 −n n X 2n + 1 2k + 1 k=0 (x2 + 4)k x2n−2k . √ √ Replacing x by ix − 2 (here, ix − 2 can be any of the at most two possible square roots of ix − 2) and multiplying by (−i)n yields n X √ 2n + 1 −n (−i) F2n+1 ( ix − 2) = 4 (x − 2i)k (x + 2i)n−k . 2k + 1 n k=0 Using the known relation F2j (y)/y = i1−j Fj (i(y 2 + 2)) with y = Fj (−x) = (−1)j−1 Fj (x), we find √ ix − 2 and noting that √ √ √ (−i)n (−i)n F2n+1 ( ix − 2) = √ F2n+2 ( ix − 2) − F2n ( ix − 2) = Fn+1 (x) + iFn (x). ix − 2 This proves the identity of part a. √ √ Since 1 − i = 2e−iπ/4 and 1 + i = 2eiπ/4 , the identity of a with x = 2 implies that −n/2 Pn+1 + iPn = 2 n X 2n + 1 (n − 2k)πi . exp 4 2k + 1 k=0 Using Euler’s relation eiy = cos y + i sin y, after equating the real and imaginary parts, we find −n/2 Pn+1 = 2 n X 2n + 1 2k + 1 k=0 An−2k , (1) and −n/2 Pn = 2 n X 2n + 1 k=0 2k + 1 190 Bn−2k , (2) ADVANCED PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS where Aj = cos(jπ/4) and Bj = sin(jπ/4), for j ∈ Z. Simple calculations show that ( (−1)b(j+1)/4c 2bj/2c−j/2 , 0, if j 6≡ 2 (mod 4), if j ≡ 2 (mod 4), ( (−1)b(j−1)/4c 2bj/2c−j/2 , 0, if j 6≡ 0 (mod 4), if j ≡ 0 (mod 4). Aj = Bj = Now the identities of part b follows from (1) with n replaced by n − 1 and (2). Also solved by Paul S. Bruckman. Revisiting the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality H-627 Proposed by Slavko Simic, Belgrade, Yugoslavia (Vol. 43, no. 3, August 2005) Find all sequences c = {ci }ni=1 , ci = ci (n) such that the inequality |x∗ − n X v u n n X uX √ 2 2 t ci xi − ci xi , ci xi | ≤ n − 1 i=1 i=1 i=1 holds for all sequences x = {xi }ni=1 of arbitrary real numbers and arbitrary x∗ ∈ x. Solution by the proposer We show that the conditions of the problem are satisfied if and only if ci = 1/n for i = 1, . . . , n. Putting xi = 1 P for all i = 1,P. . . , n, we see that a necessary condition for the given n n inequality to hold is ( i=1 ci )(1 − i=1 ci ) ≥ 0; i.e., 0≤ n X ci ≤ 1. (1) i=1 Also, putting subsequently xi = 0, i 6= s, x∗s = xs = 1, for all s = 1, . . . , n, in the desired inequality, we obtain p √ |1 − cs | ≤ n − 1 cs (1 − cs ), s = 1, . . . , n; 191 ADVANCED PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS i.e, cs ≥ 1/n for all s = 1, . . . , n. But these last inequalities together with (1) imply that cs = 1/n for all s = 1, . . . , n. This last condition is also sufficient since n n Pn x2 Pn x 2 n − 1 X X 2 2 i=1 i i=1 i (n − 1) = n − x − x i i n n n2 i=1 i=1 n−1 = n2 X 1≤i<j≤n n n X 2 1 1 X ∗ 2 (xi − xj ) ≥ 2 (n − 1) (xi − x ) ≥ 2 (xi − x∗ ) n n i=1 i=1 2 = Pn i=1 xi n − x∗ 2 , which completes the proof. Sums of three cubes H-628 Proposed by Juan Pla, Paris, France (Vol. 43, no. 3, August 2005) Let us consider the set S of all the sequences {Un }n≥0 satisfying a second order linear recurrence Un+2 − aUn+1 + bUn = 0, with both a and b rational integers, and having only integral values. Prove that for infinitely many of these sequences their general term Un is a sum of three cubes of integers for any value of the subscript n. Solution by the proposer The starting point is the following easy to prove identity (x + y + z)3 − (x3 + y 3 + z 3 ) = 3(x + y)(y + z)(z + x). (1) Setting in (1): x = Un+2 , y = −aUn+1 , z = bUn , we obtain easily 3 Un+2 + (−aUn+1 )3 + (bUn )3 = −3abUn+2 Un+1 Un . (2) But since we have the classical relation 2 Un+2 Un − Un+1 = bn (U2 U0 − U12 ), after substitution of Un Un+2 in the right hand side of (2) and simplifications we obtain 3 3 Un+2 − (−3ab + a3 )Un+1 + (bUn )3 = −3abn+1 (U2 U0 − U12 )Un+1 . (3) To have a sum of three cubes on the left hand side, we need only that −3ab+b3 be a cube, which is the case if we set a to be an arbitrary integer and then look for b such that −3b + a2 = a2 c3 , or, equivalently, b = a2 (1 − c3 )/3, with an arbitrary integer c. In order for b to be an integer, it suffices to impose that either a is a multiple of 3 or c ≡ 1 (mod 3). It is now easy to prove that the sequence whose general term appears in the right hand side of relation (3) does belong to the set S. 192