* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 1998-11-19-MIEM-WirelessWANs
Survey
Document related concepts
IEEE 802.1aq wikipedia , lookup
Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup
Spectrum reallocation wikipedia , lookup
Wake-on-LAN wikipedia , lookup
Zero-configuration networking wikipedia , lookup
Computer network wikipedia , lookup
Cellular network wikipedia , lookup
Airborne Networking wikipedia , lookup
Network tap wikipedia , lookup
IEEE 802.11 wikipedia , lookup
Wireless security wikipedia , lookup
Policies promoting wireless broadband in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Wireless WANs In-Depth Presented by: Paul Melson, CNE Mark Lachniet, MCNE Holt Public Schools “Wireless WANs” session agenda Case example - Holt Public Schools The solution - Install wireless WAN Applications for wireless networking Cost, speed, and configurations Radio Frequency Networks Spread Spectrum IEEE 802.11 Available Hardware Build Your Own? Case Example Holt Public Schools District-wide network installed through bond passage around 1993 Fiber optics wherever possible (local campuses) 11 Novell 4.0 fileservers Lan2Lan WAN cards & 56k DSU/CSU’s between remote locations and Education Center The Problem: 56k Leased Lines Too slow to be useful for anything other than EMail and simple applications Loading GroupWise Administrator 4.1 took 15 minutes! Routed solution - protocol specific and complicated (subnetting TCP/IP) EXPENSIVE = $12,000 per year budgeted for recurring fees on leased lines Frequently down due to problems with Telephone Company Holt’s Original WAN design The solution: Install wireless Remove leased line equipment Replace all 56k lines with 4mb/s wireless Move from routed to bridged networking Installed Linux proxy servers for Internet Original specification bid at $42,000 (but increased as & locations features added) Will pay for itself within 5 years The New Holt Schools WAN Physically Installing the Network Originally installed telescoping masts Had to upgrade to true tower segments because they weren’t high enough Supporting guywires required so placement on the building was difficult Required drilling through brick to run the 2 coaxial cables to an inside location Placed “Pinnacle Link” CPU in closet or storage room Physically Installing the Network Had to install and ground surge suppressors and lightning arrestors Had to run UTP cable or fiber optic from the closet to the rest of the network Overall, installing the physical components was hard work! My advice: contract the vendor to do it for you, and set up your agreement so you pay when it is all working (we didn’t have this problem ourselves, but you never know) Directing the Signal Relatively small data beam must be aimed Use GPS to determine general directions One person climbs the tower with a walkie-talkie while another watches the signal strength on the monitor Signal can go through some obstructions such as sparse leaves CANNOT go through buildings, tree trunks, or hills Our product has a “test mode” for reporting signal strength but we used a free UNIX program called TCPspray to measure actual throughput The bandwidth was sometimes low when the signal was reported as good - so test your system! Path Analysis Provided by a service with a geographical database Shows the altitude, etc. of the land between two points Path Analysis Also shows the best height to mount the antenna on the tower Logically Installing the Network Simply had to add an NE2000 Ethernet card to one fileserver at every campus location Plugged bridge and fileserver into the same Ethernet hub Had to “bind” a common network address to the wireless network We used the IPX network number “314159” - in other words “the Pi in the sky” Could also have done it as one big network with everyone on it - but why? From this point on, the network works just as if it were on Ethernet (except bridged) Signal Strength Having good signal is essential to having a good connection Height is a big factor - the higher the better The length of the coaxial cable from the antenna to the CPU is also a big factor the bigger the distance, the bigger the loss Use of amplifiers can greatly boost the signal of the links (this is what we use) An Ethernet Bridge Reduces traffic across WAN link Forwards or doesn’t forward information based upon the destination MAC address of the network packet Maintains a table of which MAC address is on which side (wireless or Ethernet) Will not forward traffic across the WAN link if it knows the recipient computer is on its own network Modern units do more sophisticated routing Wireless WANs a good fit for: Areas where no Telco solution is available Areas with major obstructions (freeways, railroad tracks, property owned by others, etc.) where fiber optics are not possible The tight budget - especially long term Institutions that need more speed Campus areas (many buildings in a small area) Over harsh terrain Data Security Configurations Many different configurations available No FCC licensing necessary Many use the Lucent “WaveLAN” card Point to Point vs. Omni-Directional 915MHz vs. 2.4GHz 2.4GHz - 5 separate channels Wide variance in speed, but most modern units are 2mb/s to 10mb/s Some (all?) spread spectrum 10mb/s solutions use all 5 2.4GHz channels, but is this good? Omnidirectional vs. Point to Point $ The Cost $ Wide variance of price and quality Good luck getting it funded by USF - the Telco companies lose money on wireless :( On the plus side, if you go all wireless, you might not have to fill out USF forms! Don’t forget about installation costs, costs of towers, labor, etc. Must buy 2 units to make a link, for a minimum of $6490 for a 2mb/s solution if you already have line of sight This is based only on our vendor - your mileage will vary From Pinnacle Communications of Dayton PinnacleLINK 2/E Wireless Ethernet Bridge, 2mb/s + Antenna $3,295 PinnacleLINK 2/E Multi-Port Repeater, 4mb/s + OMNI antennas $4,395 Microwave, both ends, including towers and assembly, 10mb/s $39,885 Administrative Analysis: The Good Points A good sell - recurring fees are bad Generally, the links are upgradable in the future by simply replacing the wireless network card Once properly configured, need little maintenance Easy to assimilate into any network design Fast - a 2mb/s wireless link is better than a T1 Resistant to adverse weather, fog, etc Good data security More control over your network All E-Mail is now Air-Mail! Administrative Analysis: The Bad Points Not easy to set up by yourself Initial investment requires up-front money Can’t always service the wireless equipment yourself (district insurance policies) May require a service call from a far away vendor this means waiting Possibility of interference from Cell towers, etc. Limited distance (generally 10 miles) Minor hassle from weather (ice storms, extreme winds) Requires line-of-sight to remote locations Radio Frequency Networks RF signals, including microwave, operate at frequencies from 30KHz to 300GHz. They break down into sub-bands from LF to EHF. Most commercial networking solutions use subchannels the UHF band, with a frequency range of 300Mhz to 3GHz, and a variable wavelength of 1meter to one tenth of a meter. Radio Frequency Networks RF networks are not limited to data applications. They can support audio/video content, voice communications, cellular and PCS signals. RF LANs and WANs are the current state-of-the-art in networking mobility. The ability to connect people, computers, and other resources without cables and without requiring FCC licenses will change the way the world works, and has the potential to revolutionize the way in which schools work together. Spread Spectrum Military Background Low Probability of Intercept (LPI) and low interference through pseudo-noise algorithms. Modulation Schemes (DSSS, FHSS, and THSS or “Chirp”) Spread Spectrum History Invented in Germany during WWII, both the Axis Powers and the Allies experimented with simple frequency-hopping algorithms. SS has been adopted as a staple means of field communication by the US military because of its LPI and anti-jamming characteristics. Despite the military’s reliance on this medium, it has only been within the past 5 years that commercial uses have become prevalent. Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) High-speed code sequence manages frequency modulation Produces signal centered at carrier frequency Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) Code function determines “hops” to manage frequency modulation Carrier is flat across spectrum Spread Spectrum Note Frequency modulation types are all exclusionary, meaning that a point-topoint link can not use FHSS on one end and DSSS on the other. Also, modulation is often hardware specific, making a heterogenous environment a wise option. IEEE 802.11 MAC layer protocol 802.3 - Ethernet 802.5 - Token Ring 802.11 - Wireless LAN/WAN New IEEE Standard Open Industry Standard Allows for third-party interoperability IEEE 802.11 Features Robust (because of ACK, RTS/CTS, and fragmentation features) Multi-channel roaming Automatic rate selection (2Mbps will fall back to 1Mbps instead of dropping packets to increase reliability) Security WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy based on RC4) Protocol level error correction Lucent's WaveLAN Card Uses IEEE Standard 802.11 2Mbps Raw Data Supports 2.4Ghz Direct Sequence (DSSS) Cards Available for: PC2 (PCMCIA) ISA (PC Clone) PCI (Mac Only) Spectrum24’s LA2400 Uses IEEE Standard 802.11 1Mbps Raw Data Supports 2.4GHz & 2.5GHz Frequency Hopping (FHSS) Cards Available for: PC2 (PCMCIA) Build Your Own? Hardware is cheap and available 802.11 standard bolsters interoperability between commercial and “homegrown” equipment Open Source solutions like Linux available for free to handle network management Build firewalls, routers, bridges and proxies, all for less than $1500/each QUESTIONS? Paul Melson, CNE [email protected] Mark Lachniet, MCNE [email protected] This presentation at http://lachniet.com