Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
4x4 Optimization Alkesh Patel & Hemant Patel Background IP address – identify computer on the network Mobile domain - mobile host IP address is not restricted to region Problem : Identifying computer on mobile domain Solution: Change IP address when the host moves to other subnet Use same IP address and add special routing entries to track the current location of the user – good for small group Challenge Following challenges should be solved before considering solution Compatibility: Should work with current wired internet infrastructure Scalability: Should be able to support large number of user to meet future demands Transparency: User should not feel difference between wireless and wired network Optimization Optimization scheme should ensure Guaranteed delivery Low latency Low overhead 4x4 Approach Four options for packets direction IN approaches CN to MN OUT approaches MN to CN s – outer source in the encapsulated packet d – outer destination in the encapsulated packet S – inner source of the packet D – inner destination of the packet The IN strategies in 4x4 approach IN Strategy s d S D Acceptable Combinations Notes Incoming Indirect Encapsulated (IN-IE) IP address of HA COA of the MN IP address of the CN Home IP address of the MN 1. Highest overhead 2. Guaranteed delivery Uses tunneling CN need not be mobility aware OUT-IE OUT-DE OUT-DH Incoming Direct Encapsulated (IN-DE) IP address of CN COA of the MN IP address of the CN Home IP address of the MN 1. CN is mobility aware 2. No tunneling OUT-DE OUT-DH Not applicable Not applicable Home IP address of the MN 1. No encapsulation 2. Usable when there are no security constraints at intervening routers 3. MN and CN on same subnet OUT-DH only Not applicable Not applicable COA of MN 1. MN cannot receive packets addressd to its orginal IP address 2. Useful for short-term communication OUT-DT only Incoming Uses Home Address (IN-DH) Incoming Direct Uses Temporary address (IN-DT) IP address of the CN IP address of the CN The OUT strategies in 4x4 approach OUT Strategy s d S D Notes Acceptable Combinations Outgoing Indirect Encapsulated (OUT-IE) COA of the MN IP address of HA Home IP address of the MN IP address of the CN 1. Highest overhead 2. Guaranteed delivery 3. No ingress filtering 4. CN need not be mobility aware IN-IE only Outging Direct Encapsulated (OUT-DE) COA of the MN IP address of CN Home IP address of the MN IP address of the CN 1. CB is mobility aware 2. No tunneling IN-IE IN-DE Outgoing Direct Home Address (OUT-DH) Not Applicable Not Applicable Home IP address of the MN IP address of the CN 1. No encapsulation 2. Usable when there are no security constrains at the intervening routers 3. MN and CN on the same subject IN-IE IN-DE IN-DH Outgoing Direct uses Termporary Address (OUT-DT) Not Applicable Not Applicable COA of MN IP address of the CN 1. MN cannot receiver packets addressed to its original IP address 2. Useful for shortterm communication IN-DT only Comparison & Evaluation 16 different strategies for transmission Four approaches for each of the two directions Different advantages & disadvantages Choice based on session basis or packet-to-packet basis