Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cracking of wireless networks wikipedia , lookup
Piggybacking (Internet access) wikipedia , lookup
Distributed firewall wikipedia , lookup
Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) wikipedia , lookup
Computer security wikipedia , lookup
Network tap wikipedia , lookup
Airborne Networking wikipedia , lookup
Service-oriented architecture implementation framework wikipedia , lookup
Cyberinfrastructure and Internet2 Eric Boyd Deputy Technology Officer Internet2 What is Cyberinfrastructure (CI)? • A strategic orientation supported by NSF • Calls for large-scale public investment to encourage the evolution of widely distributed computing via the telecommunications network • Goal is to deploy the combined capacity of multiple sites to support the advance of current research, initially in science and engineering The Distributed CI Computer Instrumentation Control Help Desk Researcher Security Viewing Data Generation Program Security Collab Tools Control Training Education And Outreach Publishing Policy and Funding Management Security and Access Access Control Human Support Funding Agencies Authentication Resource Providers Campuses 3D Imaging Display Tools Authorization Security Security Analysis Simulation Computation Program Input Archive Retrieval Data Sets Storage Search Data Directories Schema Metadata Ontologies Data . Input Network Security Display and Visualization The Network is the Backplane for the Distributed CI Computer Instrumentation Control Help Desk Researcher Security Viewing Data Generation Program Security Collab Tools Control Training Education And Outreach Publishing Policy and Funding Management Security and Access Access Control Human Support Funding Agencies Authentication Resource Providers Campuses 3D Imaging Display Tools Authorization Security Security Analysis Simulation Computation Program Input Archive Retrieval Data Sets Storage Search Data Directories Schema Metadata Ontologies Data . Input Network Security Display and Visualization Challenge and Opportunity • Challenge: • The R&E community thinks of CI primarily in terms of building distributed computing clusters • Opportunity: • The network is a key component of CI • Internet2 is leading the development of solutions for the network component of CI LHC epitomizes the CI Challenge Current Situation • Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN will go operational in 2008 • Over 68 U.S. Universities and National Laboratories are poised to receive data • More than 1500 scientists are waiting for this data • Are campus, regional, and national networks ready for the task? 7 Local Infrastructure US Tier 4 (1500 US scientists) Scientists Analyze Data US Tier 3 (68 orgs) Internet2/Connectors Internet2/Connectors Scientists Request Data Atlas (6-7) CMS (7) US Tier 2 (15 orgs) Provides Data to Tier 3 GEANT-ESNet-Internet2 Tier 1 (12 orgs) FNAL BNL Shared Data Storage and Reduction LHCOPN Tier 0 8 CERN Raw Data Peak Flow Network Requirements Local Infrastructure Tier 1 or 2 to Tier 3: Estimate: Requires 1.6 Gbps per transfer (2 TB's in 3 hours) Internet2/Connectors Internet2/Connectors Tier 1 to Tier 2: Requires 10-20 Gbps GEANT-ESNet-Internet2 Tier 0 to Tier1: Requires 10-40 Gbps LHCOPN CERN 9 Science Network Requirements Aggregation Summary (slide courtesy of ESNet) Science Drivers End2End Reliability Connectivity 2006 End2End Band width 2010 End2End Band width 1 TB/day 5 TB/day 300 Mbps 1.5 Gbps • DOE sites • US Universities 625 Mbps 250 Gbps Science Areas / Facilities Advanced Light Source - Bioinformatics - • DOE sites • US Universities • Industry 12.5 Gbps in two years Traffic Characteristics Network Services • Bulk data • Remote control • Guaranteed bandwidth • PKI / Grid • Bulk data • Remote control • Point-to-multipoint • Guaranteed bandwidth • High-speed multicast Chemistry / Combustion - • DOE sites • US Universities • Industry - 10s of Gigabits per second • Bulk data • Guaranteed bandwidth • PKI / Grid Climate Science - • DOE sites • US Universities • International - 5 PB per year • Bulk data • Remote control • Guaranteed bandwidth • PKI / Grid • Bulk data • Remote control • Guaranteed bandwidth • Traffic isolation • PKI / Grid High Energy Physics (LHC) 99.95+% (Less than 4 hrs/year) • US Tier1 (DOE) • US Tier2 (Universities) • International (Europe, Canada) 5 Gbps 10 Gbps 60 to 80 Gbps (30-40 Gbps per US Tier1) Science Network Requirements Aggregation Summary (slide courtesy of ESNet) Science Drivers End2End Reliability Connectivity 2006 End2End Band width 2010 End2End Band width • DOE sites • US Universities • Industry 200+ Mbps 1 Gbps • Bulk data • Remote control • Guaranteed bandwidth • Guaranteed QoS • Deadline scheduling • DOE sites • US Universities • Industry • International • DOE sites • US Universities • Industry • International • DOE sites • US Universities • International 10 Gbps 20 to 40 Gbps • Bulk data • Remote control • Guaranteed bandwidth • Guaranteed QoS • Deadline Scheduling • PKI / Grid Backbone Band width parity Backbone band width parity • Bulk data 12 Gbps 70 Gbps • Bulk data • DOE sites 640 Mbps 2 Gbps • Bulk data Science Areas / Facilities Magnetic Fusion Energy 99.999% (Impossible without full redundancy) NERSC - NLCF - Nuclear Physics (RHIC) - Spallation Neutron Source High (24x7 operation) Traffic Characteristics Network Services • Guaranteed bandwidth • PKI / Grid CI Components • Supercomputing / Cycles / Computational • Supercomputing / Storage (Non-volatile) • Interconnecting Networks (Campuses, Regionals, Backbones) • Cyberinfrastructure Software • Analysis / Visualization CI Components Applications Bulk Transport 2-Way Interactive Video Real-Time Communications …. …. …. Performance Infrastructure / Tools Middleware Phoebus Measurement Nodes Network …. Control Plane Control Plane Nodes Network Cyberinfrastructure Applications call on Network Cyberinfrastructure Internet2 Network CI Software • Dynamic Circuit Control Infrastructure • DRAGON (with ISI, MAX) • Oscars (with ESnet) • Middleware (Federated trust Infrastructure) • • • • Shibboleth Signet Grouper Comanage • Performance Monitoring Infrastructure • perfSONAR (with ESnet, GEANT2 JRA1, RNP, many others) • BWCTL, NDT, OWAMP, Thrulay • Distributed System Infrastructure • Topology Service (with University of Delaware) • Distributed Lookup Service (with University of Delaware, PSNC) Internet2 Network CI Standardization • Dynamic Circuit Control Protocol (IDC) • DICE-Control, GLIF • Measurement Schema / Protocol • OGF NMWG • IETF IPPM • perfSONAR Consortium • Middleware Arena • Liberty Alliance • OASIS • Possible emerging corporate consortium • Topology Schema / Protocol • OGF NML-WG • perfSONAR Consortium • DICE-Control Internet2’s CI Vision • Internet2’s CI vision: • Be a networking cyber-service provider • Be a trust cyber-service provider • Be a CI technology developer. Internet2’s CI Position • Internet2’s position: • Backbone network provider • Federated trust infrastructure provider • Forum for collaboration by members of the R&E community • Gives Internet2 a unique vision and strategy for Cyberinfrastructure. Internet2’s CI Constituencies • • • • • • • • Collaborators University Members Regional Networks Regional CI Organizations High Performance Computing Centers Federal Partners International Partners CI Integrators Early Thoughts: Internet2’s CI Strategy (1) • Requirements • Informed by our membership • Agenda set by our governance mechanisms • Offer, and in some cases develop, services and technology that are key components of a coherent CI software suite. • CI-enhanced Networks: IP Network, Dynamic Circuit Network • Services: InCommon, USHER • New Technologies: DCN software, perfSONAR, Shibboleth • Systems Integration: Assemble open source communication tools into a common veneer. • Emphasize a systems approach towards CI. Early Thoughts: Internet2’s CI Strategy (2) • Take a “toolkit” approach • Make sure it still looks like a wall jack to end user • Push for best practices for campuses • What to do • How to do it • Community learns as a whole / avoid reinventing the wheel • Contribute to the support structure for use of CI • Open source CI software • Centers of Excellence • Training Early Thoughts: Internet2’s CI Strategy (3) • Play the role of community CI coordinator, convening community conversations. • Partner with other community coordinators (e.g. Teragrid, EDUCAUSE). • Play a convening function in order to facilitate the development, use, and dissemination of CI • Take a lead in international outreach efforts • Facilitate conversations among various federal agencies (e.g. DOE, NSF, NIH), each of which is developing its own CI