* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download slides - network systems lab @ sfu
Point-to-Point Protocol over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup
Computer network wikipedia , lookup
Network tap wikipedia , lookup
Zero-configuration networking wikipedia , lookup
Distributed firewall wikipedia , lookup
Internet protocol suite wikipedia , lookup
TCP congestion control wikipedia , lookup
Multiprotocol Label Switching wikipedia , lookup
Asynchronous Transfer Mode wikipedia , lookup
Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) wikipedia , lookup
Serial digital interface wikipedia , lookup
Wake-on-LAN wikipedia , lookup
Cracking of wireless networks wikipedia , lookup
Deep packet inspection wikipedia , lookup
Real-Time Messaging Protocol wikipedia , lookup
SIP extensions for the IP Multimedia Subsystem wikipedia , lookup
School of Computing Science Simon Fraser University CMPT 771/471: Internet Architecture and Protocols Multimedia Networking and Quality of Service Instructor: Dr. Mohamed Hefeeda 1 Multimedia, Quality of Service: What is it? Multimedia applications: network audio and video (“continuous media”) QoS network provides application with level of performance needed for application to function. 2 Chapter 7: Goals Principles Classify multimedia applications Identify the network services the apps need Making the best of best effort service Mechanisms for providing QoS Protocols and Architectures Specific protocols for best-effort Architectures for QoS 3 MM Networking Applications Classes of MM applications: 1) Streaming stored audio and video 2) Streaming live audio and video 3) Real-time interactive audio and video Jitter is the variability of packet delays within the same packet stream Fundamental characteristics: Typically delay sensitive end-to-end delay delay jitter But loss tolerant: infrequent losses cause minor glitches In contrast to data, which are loss intolerant but delay tolerant. 4 A few words about audio compression Analog signal sampled at constant rate telephone: 8,000 samples/sec CD music: 44,100 samples/sec Each sample quantized, i.e., rounded e.g., 28=256 possible quantized values Each quantized value represented by bits 8 bits for 256 values Example: 8,000 samples/sec, 256 quantized values --> 64,000 bps Receiver converts it back to analog signal: some quality reduction Example rates CD: 1.411 Mbps MP3: 96, 128, 160 kbps Internet telephony: 5.3 - 13 kbps 5 A few words about video compression Video is sequence of images displayed at constant rate e.g. 24 images/sec Digital image is array of pixels Each pixel represented by bits Redundancy spatial temporal Examples: MPEG 1 (CD-ROM) 1.5 Mbps MPEG2 (DVD) 3-6 Mbps MPEG4 (often used in Internet, < 1 Mbps) Research: Layered (scalable) video adapt layers to available bandwidth 6 Streaming Multimedia: UDP or TCP? UDP server sends at rate appropriate for client (oblivious to network congestion !) often send rate = encoding rate = constant rate then, fill rate = constant rate - packet loss short playout delay (2-5 seconds) to compensate for network delay jitter error recovery: time permitting TCP send at maximum possible rate under TCP fill rate fluctuates due to TCP congestion control larger playout delay: smooth TCP delivery rate HTTP/TCP passes more easily through firewalls 7 User Control of Streaming Media: RTSP HTTP Does not target multimedia content No commands for fast forward, etc. RTSP: RFC 2326 Client-server application layer protocol. For user to control display: rewind, fast forward, pause, resume, repositioning, etc… RTSP is out-of-band protocol (similar to FTP) What it doesn’t do: does not define how audio/video is encapsulated for streaming over network does not restrict how streamed media is transported; it can be transported over UDP or TCP does not specify how the media player buffers audio/video 8 RTSP Example : metafile communicated to web browser browser launches player player sets up an RTSP control connection, data connection to streaming server 9 Real-time interactive applications PC-2-PC phone instant messaging services are providing this PC-2-phone Dialpad Net2phone videoconference with Webcams 10 Interactive Multimedia: Internet Phone speaker’s audio: alternating talk spurts, silent periods. 64 kbps during talk spurt pkts generated only during talk spurts 20 msec chunks at 8 Kbytes/sec: 160 bytes data application-layer header added to each chunk Chunk+header encapsulated into UDP segment application sends UDP segment into socket every 20 msec during talk spurt Need to handle packet losses and delay jitter 11 Recovery from packet loss (1) forward error correction (FEC): simple scheme for every group of n chunks create a redundant chunk by exclusive OR-ing the n original chunks send out n+1 chunks, increasing the bandwidth by factor 1/n. can reconstruct the original n chunks if there is at most one lost chunk from the n+1 chunks Playout delay needs to be fixed to the time to receive all n+1 packets Tradeoff: increase n, less bandwidth waste increase n, longer playout delay increase n, higher probability that 2 or more chunks will be lost 12 Recovery from packet loss (2) 2nd FEC scheme • “piggyback lower quality stream” • send lower resolution audio stream as the redundant information • for example, nominal stream PCM at 64 kbps and redundant stream GSM at 13 kbps. • Whenever there is non-consecutive loss, the receiver can conceal the loss. • Can also append (n-1)st and (n-2)nd low-bit rate chunk 13 Recovery from packet loss (3) Interleaving chunks are broken up into smaller units for example, four 5 msec units per chunk Packet contains small units from different chunks if packet is lost, still have most of every chunk has no redundancy overhead but adds to playout delay 14 Handling Delay Jitter Receiver uses a playout buffer Fixed buffer Adaptive buffer: depends on network conditions packets loss packets generated packets received playout schedule p' - r playout schedule p-r time r p’ p 15 Adaptive Playout Buffer (1) Goal: minimize playout delay, keeping late loss rate low Approach: adaptive playout delay adjustment: Estimate network delay, adjust playout delay at beginning of each talk spurt. Chunks still played out every 20 msec during talk spurt. t i timestamp of the ith packet ri the time packet i is received by receiver p i the time packet i is played at receiver ri t i network delay for ith packet d i estimate of average network delay after receiving ith packet Dynamic estimate of average delay at receiver: di (1 u)di 1 u(ri ti ) where u is a fixed constant (e.g., u = 0.01). 16 Adaptive Playout Buffer (2) Also useful to estimate the average deviation of the delay, vi : vi (1 u)vi 1 u | ri ti di | The estimates di and vi are calculated for every received packet, although they are only used at the beginning of a talk spurt. For first packet in talk spurt, playout time is: pi ti di Kvi where K is a positive constant. Remaining packets in talk spurt are played out periodically 17 Real-Time Protocol (RTP): FRC 1889 RTP specifies packet structure for audio and video data payload type identification packet sequence numbering time stamping RTP runs in the end systems RTP packets are encapsulated in UDP segments RTP does not provide any mechanism to ensure QoS RTP encapsulation is only seen at the end systems 18 RTP Header Payload Type (7 bits): Indicates type of encoding currently being used: e.g., •Payload type 0: PCM mu-law, 64 kbps •Payload type 33, MPEG2 video Sequence Number (16 bits): Increments by one for each RTP packet sent, and may be used to detect packet Timestamp field (32 bytes long). Reflects the sampling instant of the first byte in the RTP data packet. SSRC field (32 bits long). Identifies the source of the RTP stream. Each stream in a RTP session should have a distinct SSRC. 19 Real-Time Control Protocol (RTCP) Works in conjunction with RTP Each participant in RTP session periodically transmits RTCP control packets to all other participants Each RTCP packet contains sender and/or receiver reports statistics, e.g., number of packets sent, number of packets lost, interarrival jitter, etc. used to control app performance Sender may modify its transmissions based on feedback 20 RTCP Packets Receiver report packets: fraction of packets lost, last sequence number, average interarrival jitter. Sender report packets: SSRC of the RTP stream, the current time, the number of packets sent, and the number of bytes sent. Source description packets: e-mail address of sender, sender's name, SSRC of associated RTP stream. Provide mapping between the SSRC and the user/host name. 21 RTCP: Synchronization of Streams RTCP can synchronize different media streams within a RTP session. Consider videoconferencing app for which each sender generates one RTP stream for video and one for audio. Timestamps in RTP packets tied to the video and audio sampling clocks not tied to the wallclock time Each RTCP sender-report packet contains (for the most recently generated packet in the associated RTP stream): timestamp of the RTP packet wall-clock time for when packet was created. Receivers can use this association to synchronize the playout of audio and video. 22 Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Comes from IETF SIP long-term vision All telephone calls and video conference calls take place over the Internet People are identified by names or e-mail addresses, rather than by phone numbers You can reach the callee, no matter where the callee roams, no matter what IP device the callee is currently using. 23 SIP Services Setting up a call Provides mechanisms for caller to let callee know she wants to establish a call Provides mechanisms so that caller and callee can agree on media type and encoding. Provides mechanisms to end call. Determine current IP address of callee Maps mnemonic identifier to current IP address Call management Add new media streams during call Change encoding during call Invite others Transfer and hold calls 24 Setting up a call to a known IP address Bob Alice 167.180.112.24 INVITE bob @193.64.2 10.89 c=IN IP4 16 7.180.112.2 4 m=audio 38 060 RTP/A VP 0 193.64.210.89 port 5060 port 5060 Bob's terminal rings 200 OK .210.89 c=IN IP4 193.64 RTP/AVP 3 3 75 m=audio 48 ACK port 5060 • Alice’s SIP invite message indicates her port number & IP address. Indicates encoding that Alice prefers to receive (PCM ulaw) • Bob’s 200 OK message indicates his port number, IP address & preferred encoding (GSM) m Law audio port 38060 GSM time port 48753 time • SIP messages can be sent over TCP or UDP; here sent over RTP/UDP. •Default SIP port number is 5060. 25 Name translation and user location Caller wants to call callee, but only has callee’s name or e-mail address. Need to get IP address of callee’s current host: user moves around DHCP protocol user has different IP devices (PC, PDA, car device) Result can be based on: time of day (work, home) caller (don’t want boss to call you at home) status of callee (calls sent to voicemail when callee is already talking to someone) Service provided by SIP servers: SIP registrar server SIP proxy server 26 SIP Registrar When Bob starts SIP client, client sends SIP REGISTER message to Bob’s registrar server (similar function needed by Instant Messaging) Register Message: REGISTER sip:domain.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 193.64.210.89 From: sip:[email protected] To: sip:[email protected] Expires: 3600 27 SIP Proxy Alice sends invite message to her proxy server contains address sip:[email protected] Proxy responsible for routing SIP messages to callee possibly through multiple proxies. Callee sends response back through the same set of proxies. Proxy returns SIP response message to Alice contains Bob’s IP address Note: proxy is analogous to local DNS server 28 Example Caller [email protected] places a call to [email protected] (1) Jim sends INVITE message to umass SIP proxy. (2) Proxy forwards request to upenn registrar server. (3) upenn server returns redirect response, indicating that it should try [email protected] SIP registrar upenn.edu SIP registrar eurecom.fr 2 SIP proxy umass.edu 1 3 4 5 7 8 6 9 SIP client 217.123.56.89 SIP client 197.87.54.21 (4) umass proxy sends INVITE to eurecom registrar. (5) eurecom registrar forwards INVITE to 197.87.54.21, which is running keith’s SIP client. (6-8) SIP response sent back (9) media sent directly between clients. Note: also a SIP ack message, which is not shown. 29 Comparison with H.323 H.323 is another signaling protocol for real-time, interactive H.323 is a complete, vertically integrated suite of protocols for multimedia conferencing: signaling, registration, admission control, transport and codecs. SIP is a single component. Works with RTP, but does not mandate it. Can be combined with other protocols and services. H.323 comes from the ITU (telephony). SIP comes from IETF: Borrows much of its concepts from HTTP. SIP has a Web flavor, whereas H.323 has a telephony flavor. SIP uses the KISS principle: Keep it simple stupid. 30 Improving QoS in IP Networks Thus far: “making the best of best effort” Future: next generation Internet with QoS guarantees What do we need to do to get QoS guarantees? simple model for sharing and congestion studies: 31 Principles for QoS Guarantees Example: 1Mbps IP phone, FTP share 1.5 Mbps link. bursts of FTP can congest router, cause audio loss want to give priority to audio over FTP Principle 1 packet marking needed for router to distinguish between different classes; and new router policy to treat packets accordingly 32 Principles for QoS Guarantees (more) what if applications misbehave (audio sends higher than declared rate) policing: force source adherence to bandwidth allocations marking and policing at network edge: similar to ATM UNI (User Network Interface) Principle 2 provide protection (isolation) for one class from others 33 Principles for QoS Guarantees (more) Allocating fixed (non-sharable) bandwidth to flow: inefficient use of bandwidth if flows doesn’t use its allocation Principle 3 While providing isolation, it is desirable to use resources as efficiently as possible 34 Principles for QoS Guarantees (more) Basic fact of life: can not support traffic demands beyond link capacity Principle 4 Call Admission: flow declares its needs, network may block call (e.g., busy signal) if it cannot meet needs 35 Summary of QoS Principles Let’s next look at mechanisms for achieving this …. 36 Scheduling And Policing Mechanisms scheduling: choose next packet to send on link FIFO (first in first out) scheduling: send in order of arrival to queue discard policy: if packet arrives to full queue: what to discard? • Tail drop: drop arriving packet • priority: drop/remove on priority basis • random: drop/remove randomly 37 Scheduling Policies: more Priority scheduling: transmit highest-priority queued packet multiple classes, with different priorities class may depend on marking or other header info, e.g. IP source/dest, port numbers, etc 38 Scheduling Policies: still more Weighted Fair Queuing: generalized Round Robin each class gets weighted amount of service in each cycle 39 Policing Mechanisms Goal: limit traffic to not exceed declared parameters Three common-used criteria: (Long term) Average Rate: how many pkts can be sent per unit time (in the long run) crucial question: what is the interval length: 100 packets per sec and 6000 packets per min (ppm) have same average! Peak Rate: e.g., Avg rate: 6000 ppm Peak rate: 1500 ppm (Max.) Burst Size: max. number of pkts sent consecutively (with no intervening idle period) 40 Policing Mechanisms Leaky Bucket: limit input to specified Burst Size and Average Rate. bucket can hold b tokens tokens generated at rate r token/sec unless bucket full over interval of length t: number of packets admitted less than or equal to (r t + b). 41 Policing Mechanisms (more) Leaky bucket + WFQ provide guaranteed upper bound on delay, i.e., QoS guarantee! How? WFQ: guaranteed share of bandwidth Leaky bucket: limit max number of packets in queue (burst) Ri R wi / w j d max i bi / Ri 42 IETF Integrated Services (IntServ) architecture for providing QoS guarantees in IP networks for individual application sessions resource reservation: routers maintain state info of allocated resources, QoS req’s admit/deny new call setup requests: Question: can newly arriving flow be admitted with performance guarantees while not violated QoS guarantees made to already admitted flows? 43 IntServ: QoS guarantee scenario Resource reservation call setup, signaling (RSVP) traffic, QoS declaration per-element admission control request/ reply QoS-sensitive scheduling (e.g., WFQ) 44 Call Admission Arriving session must: declare its QoS requirement R-spec: defines the QoS being requested characterize traffic it will send into network T-spec: defines traffic characteristics signaling protocol: needed to carry R-spec and Tspec to routers (where reservation is required) RSVP 45 IntServ QoS: Service models [rfc2211, rfc 2212] Guaranteed service: worst case traffic arrival: leaky-bucket-policed source simple (mathematically provable) bound on delay [Parekh 1993, Cruz 1988] arriving traffic token rate, r bucket size, b WFQ per-flow rate, R D = b/R max 46 IETF Differentiated Services (DiffServ) Concerns with IntServ: Scalability: signaling, maintaining per-flow router state difficult with large number of flows Example: OC-48 (2.5 Gbps) link serving 64 Kbps audio streams 39,000 flows! Each requires state maintenance. Flexible Service Models: Intserv has only two classes. Also want “qualitative” service classes relative service distinction: Platinum, Gold, Silver DiffServ approach: simple functions in network core, relatively complex functions at edge routers (or hosts) Don’t define service classes, provide functional components to build service classes 47 DiffServ Architecture Edge router: r per-flow traffic management Classifies (marks) pkts different classes within a class: in-profile b marking scheduling .. . and out-profile Core router: per class traffic management buffering and scheduling based on marking at edge preference given to in-profile packets 48 Edge-router Packet Marking profile: pre-negotiated rate A, bucket size B packet marking at edge based on per-flow profile Rate A B User packets Possible usage of marking: class-based marking: packets of different classes marked differently intra-class marking: conforming portion of flow marked differently than non-conforming one 49 Edge-router: Classification and Conditioning Packet is marked in the Type of Service (TOS) in IPv4, and Traffic Class in IPv6 6 bits used for Differentiated Service Code Point (DSCP) and determine Per-Hop Behavior (PHB) that the packet will receive 2 bits are currently unused 50 Edge-router: Classification and Conditioning may be desirable to limit traffic injection rate of some class: user declares traffic profile (e.g., rate, burst size) traffic metered, shaped if non-conforming 51 Core-router: Forwarding (PHB) PHB result in a different observable (measurable) forwarding performance behavior PHB does not specify what mechanisms to use to ensure required PHB performance behavior Examples: Class A gets x% of outgoing link bandwidth over time intervals of a specified length Class A packets leave first before packets from class B 52 Core-router: Forwarding (PHB) PHBs being developed: Expedited Forwarding (EF): pkt departure rate of a class equals or exceeds specified rate logical link with a minimum guaranteed rate May require edge routers to limit EF traffic rate Could be implemented using strict priority scheduling or WFQ with higher weight for EF traffic Assured Forwarding: multiple traffic classes, treated differently amount of bandwidth allocated, or drop priorities Can be implemented using WFQ+leaky bucket or RED (Random Early Detection) with different threshold values. • See Sections. 6.4.2 and 6.5.3 in [PD07] 53 Intserv and Diffserv: Discussion For over 20 years, many attempts failed to introduce QoS into packet-switched networks. Why? Both Intserv and Diffserv need collaboration between all ISPs, otherwise you can not provide guarantee hard QoS needs accounting, extra processing (shaping, marking, policing,…) complex and costly equipment/management charge customers more Most of the time there would be no perceived difference between Best-effort and Intserv/Diffserv services, at moderate load So why would customers pay more?? 54 How should the Internet evolve to better support multimedia? Integrated services philosophy: Fundamental changes in Internet so that apps can reserve end-to-end bandwidth Requires new, complex software in hosts & routers Laissez-faire (minimum intervention) no major changes more bandwidth when needed content distribution, application-layer multicast application layer Differentiated services philosophy: Fewer changes to Internet infrastructure, yet provide 1st and 2nd class service. What’s your opinion? 55 Multimedia Networking: Summary multimedia applications and requirements making the best of today’s best effort service scheduling and policing mechanisms next generation Internet: Intserv, RSVP, Diffserv 56