Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Evaluation of Chest Pain in the Emergency Department Rachel Steinhart, MD, MPH CCRMC Emergency Dept. 5-1-2008 Chest Pain in the ED There an estimated 4.6 million annual ED visits for “non-traumatic chest pain” by adults ≥25 in the US 27.7 visits per 1,000 persons annually Acute Cardiac Insufficiency is estimated to account for 11% of these non-traumatic chest pain visits* Burt CW. Am J Emerg Med. 1999 Oct;17(6):552-9. Chest Pain in the ED At SFGH, 2.5% of all visits in patients >35 were for “non-traumatic chest pain” Of these, 37.6% were hospitalized, 45% of whom received significant diagnoses • 10.7% MI • • • • 22.5% UA or Stable CAD 11.2% Serious Pulmonary Etiology 0.4% Aortic Dissection 0.3% Pulmonary Embolism Overall, approximately 16% of visits with serious etiology (Calculated) Kohn MA, et al. J Emerg Med. 2005;29(4):383-90. Chest Pain in the ED Litigation Missed myocardial infarction represents approximately 10% of malpractice suits filed Missed myocardial infarction represents approximately 30% of the dollars paid out in malpractice claims Emerg Med News. 2006: 28(2); 20-7 Proportion of final diagnoses in patients presenting with CP Family Practice. 2001;18(6):586-8 Chest Pain: HPI P: pattern (temporal sequence) A: associated features • SOB, N/V, diaphoresis • Fever, cough, chills • Neurologic symptoms I: initiation and improvement N: nature (quality) Chest Pain: Location Aortic dissection Boorhave’s Myocardial ischemia Pulmonary embolism Pericarditis Myocardial ischemia Intra-peritoneal fluid Pericarditis Pleurisy Myocardial ischemia Cervical spine Thoracic outlet Myocardial ischemia CHF Pancreatitis Cholecystitis Peptic disease Pulmonary embolism Pneumonia Splenic infarction Intraperitoneal fluid Clear cut alternative diagnosis Patients given a clear-cut alternative noncardiac diagnosis At significantly lower risk of revascularization, MI or death in the subsequent 30 days HOWEVER Still with 4% event rate at 30 days Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Mar; 14(3):210-5 Character of Chest Pain Lik elih ood ratios for myoca rdial infar ct ion (MI ) ba se d on component s of the ches t pain history LLR (95% CI) Description of pain Descriptions increasing the likeliho Radiation to right arm or shoulder Radiation to both arms or shoulders Exertional Radiation to left arm Associated with diaphoresis Associated with nausea or vomiting Worse than previous angina or similar to previous MI Described as pressure od of MI Descriptions decreasing the likelih ood of MI Pleuritic Positional Sharp Reproducible with palpation Inframammary location Nonexertional 4.7 4.1 2.4 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.8 (1.9-12) (2.5-6.5) (1.5-3.8) (1.7-3.1) (1.9-2.2) (1.7-2.3) (1.6-2.0) 1.3 (1.2-1.5) 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.8 (0.1-0.3) (0.2-0.5) (0.2-0.5) (0.2-0.4) (0.7-0.9) (0.6-0.9) JAMA 2005; 294:2623. Nitroglycerine in ER Chest Pain Annals of Internal Medicine 2003 Improvement in chest pain with nitroglycerine proved: 35% Sensitive 30% Specific Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:979-986 Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine 2006 Improvement in chest pain with nitroglycerine proved: 72% Sensitive 37% Specific Can J Emerg Med 2006;8(3):164-9 Chest Pain: PMH CAD - self or family Hypertension Diabetes Recent surgery, travel Substance abuse - alcohol, cigarettes, meth/coke DVT/PE/Aortic dissection - self or family Lupus Marfan’s/connective tissue dz - self or family Medications - HAART, estrogen Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59;321-325 N Engl J Med 2007 Apr 26;356(17):1723-35 Chest Pain: Physical Exam Vital signs - Hypoxia? Tachycardia? Hypertension? General appearance - Marfanoid? Carotids and JVP, check neck for crepitus Lungs Cardiac exam Thoracic cage - Trauma? Pectus excavatum? Abdominal exam - Hepatomegaly? Periphery - symmetric pulses? edema? Skin - dermatomal rash? Physical Signs Chest Pain: Laboratory EKG - serial Chest x-ray Blood studies • CBC • Cardiac enzymes • Liver function • Lipase • D-Dimer • BNP Imaging: Ultrasound, CT, Nuclear Study EKG Findings in Adult Patients with Chest Pain: Association with Ischemic Events Interpretation MI UA Other Total Normal 1% 4% 95% 114 Nonspecific ST-T-wave changes 3% 23% 75% 150 Abnormal but non-diagnostic of ischemia 4% 21% 75% 72 Ischemia, strain, or infarct pattern OLD 7% 48% 45% 60 Ischemia or strain not known to be old 25% 43% 32% 114 Probable MI 73% 13% 14% 86 TOTAL Number Patients 104 143 349 596 From Aufiderheide TP, Brady WJ: Electrocardiography in the patient with myocardial ischemia or infarction. In Gilber WB, Aufderheide TP (eds): Emergency cardiac care, St Louis, 1994, Mosby: adapted from Lee TH, Cook EF, Weisberg M, et al: Arch Intern Med 145:65, 1985 Adverse Cardiac Events (12 mo out) Patients discharged with chest pain of unclear origin: Abnormal ECG OR 9.5 (2.0 - 45.8) Preexisting DM OR 7.1 (1.8 - 27.2) Preexisting CAD OR 28.4 (3.5 - 229.0) Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;43(1):59-67 Potential Underlying Causes of ACS Tachyarrhythmias Severe anemia/acute hemorrhage Medication withdrawal Stimulant substance abuse Hyperthyroidism Sepsis Hypotension Post-op Chest Pain and SOB 70 yo man 10 days following CABG Developed acute dyspnea and rightsided chest pain on awakening Exam revealed tachypnea, tachycardia, and hypoxemia Normal RUL pna R pl eff Studies in suspected PE Initial CXR in PE virtually always NORMAL Hampton hump – LATE & RARE Westermark sign - RARE EKG Evidence: Atelectasis, small pleural effusion & Elevated hemidiaphragm may develop 24-72 hours – focal infiltrates Tachycardia - sinus, afib or aflutter RV Strain S1, Q3, T3 Poor R wave prog + TWI V1-4 D-Dimer - Only useful to rule out PE in LOW RISK Acute Upper Back Pain 49 yo man with long standing hypertension Sudden mid back and interscapular pain Associated with nausea and sweats Unrelieved by change of position Some radiation toward the left chest Wide mediastinum - Dissection Aortic Dissection: clinical presentation Sudden severe Migrating pain Tearing pain pain 90% 31% 39% (spec. 95%) Hypertension Diastolic murmur Pulse deficits or BP differential Focal neurologic deficits Syncope ECG criteria for AMI 49% 28% 31% 17% 13% 7% Klompas et al, JAMA 2002; 287:2262-2272. Nallamothy et al, Am J Med 2002; 113:468-471. Aortic Dissection: etiology Prevalence of major risk factors: Hypertension 50-90% Bicuspid AoV 9-13% Marfan syndrome 3-5% Radiographic Signs of Thoracic Aortic Dissection Studies suggest up to 90% of patients will have “abnormal” CXR* Widened mediastinum (>8cm on AP film) [50-65%] Left pleural effusion (hemothorax) Ring Sign (displaced intimal calcification >5mm) Blurred aortic knob Tracheal deviation to the Right Esophageal deviation to the Right (seen via NGT) Left apical cap Depressed Left mainstem bronchus Loss of paratracheal stripe *Hogg K. Sensitivity of a normal chest radiograph in ruling out aortic dissection. Best Evidence Topics. 9 March 2004. Aortic Dissection QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Wrestler with Chest Pain 18 yo high school wrestler develops right-sided chest pain while pinning his opponent. Pneumothorax Alcoholic with Chest Pain and Cough 45 yo alcoholic man with fever, chills and productive cough over two days RUL Pneumonia Hyperemesis with Chest Pain 26yo G1P0 at 10wks presents with 4 days refractory emesis and 12 hours progressive, severe substernal chest pain Pneumomediastinum - Boerhaave’s Smoker with Chest Pain 68 yo former smoker with persistant, nonexertional, left substernal and left shoulder pain Summary Chest pain in the ED differs from chest pain in primary care Not all serious chest pain is ACS Diagnosis of chest pain in the ED is rarely straight forward Chest pain in the ED is a high-stakes evaluation Parting Words Neither NTG nor GI cocktail response, nor reproducibility on palpation are diagnostic Post-prandial pain may be ischemic Use caution when diagnosing “non-cardiac” chest pain in patients with CAD risk Atypical may be typical of something else Careful history and physical are imperative Observation can be key