Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Gastroenterology Cases Nav Saloojee MD 2015 MCC Objectives : Gastroenterology • Have an approach to abdominal mass/pelvic mass • Have an approach to hepatomegaly • Beable to examine the liver • Have an approach to abdominal distension. Beable to separate bowel obstruction from ascites • Have an approach to anorectal pain • Have an approach to acute /chronic abdominal pain • Have an approach to liver enzymes • Have an approach to UGIB / LGIB MCC Objectives : Gastroenterology • Have an approach to constipation • Have an approach to acute and chronic diarrhea • Have an approach to dysphagia • Have an approach to fecal incontinence • Have an approach to jaundice • Have an approach to nausea / vomiting Realize that many of the causes are not GI in origin • Have an approach to weight loss Case 1 ODYNOPHAGIA • 35 y.o homosexual male presents with odynophagia. • HIV for about 5 years. CD4 100. VL 5000. • Hep C from IV drug use • No AIDS defining illnesses and has been noncompliant with antiretrovirals therapies. •Physical exam is unremarkable except for the presence of oral thrush. Esophageal plaques on EGD Filling defects on barium study Odynophagia •Infection •Candida •CMV •HIV ulcers •HSV •Pill esophagitis •Tetracycline/doxycycline •NSAIDS •Slow K •Iron •Others •Inflammatory • ( Severe GERD, Crohn’s, Behcet’s, Pemphigoid, •Chemo / radiation ) •Toxic ingestion •Lye Esophageal Disease In HIV • Esophageal candidiasis • most frequent AIDS defining illness • CD4 generally <200 • colonization by oral flora • occurs in combination with other pathology in ~25% ( CMV, HIV ulcer, HSV) • Common in other immunocompromised states •CRF, steroid use, hematologic malignancy, radiation, chemotherapy, etc. Treatment •Nystatin ( topical therapy ) for oral thrush •Fluconazole 100mg for 14 days for esophageal candidiasis •Amphotericin B if neutropenic Diagnosis? l squamocolumnar junction is located in the tubular esophagus, proximal to the anatomic gastroesophageal junction Biopsy shows specialized intestinal metaplasia. Mucosa resembles intestine in that it is villiform , numerous goblet cells are present and epithelium is columnar Barrett’s Esophagus • Barrett’s is premalignant • In a 5 year follow up of 50 patients with Barrett’s and High Grade Dysplasia, 32 % developed adenocarcinoma • PPI probably does not reverse changes but is recommended as lifelong treatment of the underlying reflux • The length of Barrett’s is important. • There is a recommendation for once in a lifetime endoscopy for a patient with longstanding reflux symptoms to exclude Barrett’s Dysphagia •Distinguish esophageal dysphagia from oropharyngeal dysphagia ( inability to initiate swallow, nasal regurgitation, coughing and choking) • Esophageal dysphagia : Key questions to distinguish mechanical ( reflux stricture, esophageal cancer) from motility ( achalasia and others ) • Solids only or both solids / liquids? • Intermittent or progressive? • Is there a history of reflux? • Is there weight loss? Reflux Stricture Dysphagia • Investigations : EGD, Ba Swallow, Manometry Barium swallow and EGD for a patient with intermittent, nonprogressive dysphagia to solids. No weight loss Diagnosis? Ba swallow and EGD for a patient with progressive dysphagia to both solids and liquids. Weight loss. Diagnosis? What would manometry show? EGD is important in suspected Achalasia. This patient had manometry consistent with achalasia ( Hypertensive LES that does not relax with swallow and aperistalsis of lower esophagus ). Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Transaminase Elevation What is the differential diagnosis for a patient with elevated transaminases ? What is the differential if transaminase levels >1000? What tests should one do in a patient with elevated transaminases? Transaminase Elevation ( ie hepatocellular injury) • • • • • • • • • • Drugs Acetominophen, etc Alcohol NAFLD Viral Hepatitis Ischemic Liver Injury Hemochromatosis Wilson’s disease Autoimmune hepatitis Alpha one antitrypsin deficiency Common Bile Duct Stone Marked Transaminase Elevation Few Causes of Transaminase Elevation >1000 • • • • • Drugs Viral Hepatitis Ischemic Liver Injury Autoimmune hepatitis Common Bile Duct Stone ( Not much more than 1000 ) Transaminase Elevation : Tests • • • • • • • • • • Drugs Alcohol NAFLD Viral Hepatitis Ischemic Liver Injury Hemochromatosis Wilson’s disease Autoimmune hepatitis Alpha one antitrypsin deficiency Common Bile Duct Stone Clinical, levels Clinical, GGT, AST>ALT U/S. Exclude other Dx Serology Clinical Ferritin, % sat, gene test Ceruloplasmin ANA, Anti Smooth m A1AT level U/S Cholestasis Extrahepatic Cholestasis • CBD Stone • Pancreatic Cancer • Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis : MRCP • Extrinsic CBD Compression Intrahepatic Cholestasis • Meds • Primary Biliary Cirrhosis : Antimitochondrial antibody • Sepsis • TPN • Pregnancy PSC Approach Abnormal Liver Enzymes Abnormal Liver enzymes Increased ALP, GGT Cholestatic Pattern Increased AST, ALT Hepatocellular Pattern Ultrasound shows CBD dilatation Y Extrahepatic Cholestasis N Intrahepatic Cholestasis Approach to Abnormal Liver Enzymes Q. What are the stigmata of chronic liver disease? Approach to Abnormal Liver Enzymes • Palmar Erythema • Dupuytren’s Contarcture • Gynecomastia • Telangiectasia • Parotid enlargement • Caput Medusae • Testicular Atrophy • Ascites • Splenomegaly • Asterixis Case 2 45 year old woman History of alcohol abuse Presents to Emergency with intoxication, nausea and vomiting No other history available Physical examination VSS. Afebrile. Mucous membranes dry Abdomen soft. Non tender. No mass. No HSM. No stigmata of chronic liver disease Remainder of exam normal Case 2 Lab CBC, Lytes, Glucose, Urea, Creatinine normal. Anion Gap normal. AST 210 ( increased ) ALT 105 ( increased ) Bilirubin normal Albumin 34 ( normal ) CXR / 3V Abdo normal IV Fluid, Thiamine started Next Step? ALP 103 ( normal) GGT 620 ( increased) INR 1.1 ( normal ) Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity Acetaminophen level 150 ug/mL ( 1000uM/ L) ETOH level positive Remainder of tox screen negative Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity Acetaminophen P-450 Acetaminophen-Sulphate Acetaminophen-glucuronide Urine Toxic intermediate metabolite ( ? NAPQI ) Glutathione Conjugation Hepatocyte Protein conjugation Cell Death Metabolism of toxic doses of Acetaminophen depletes glutathione and saturates glucuronide and sulphate conjugation pathways Hepatotoxicity produces necrosis. Inflammation is minimal. Recovery is associated with complete resolution without fibrosis Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity • Safe in doses of 1 to 4 grams /day • Single doses greater than 10 g can result in liver injury • Severe Liver injury ( ALT > 1000) or fatality associated with doses of 15 –25 g. • Chronic ingestions of 4-6/ g day can lead to injury • Among heavy drinkers fatal doses of 6 g have been described • Most common cause of drug induced liver injury • An important cause of Fulminant Hepatic Failure – Rapid development of hepatocellular dysfunction (coagulopathy, encephalopathy ) Risk Factors for Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity • • • • Older Age Dose of acetominophen Blood level of acetaminophen Chronic Alcohol Ingestion • Fasting • Concomitant Medication • Late Presentation Lower threshold for injury as ETOH depletes glutathione ETOH induces p450 p450 induction ( Barbituates, INH, Dilantin) Best outcome if Rx within 12 hours Therapy Activated Charcoal may be useful in first 4 hours N- Acetylcysteine ( NAC ) : If in doubt, Give NAC • Acetaminophen level should be determined at presentation • Recognize that levels within 4 hours of ingestion are unreliable due to delayed gastric emptying • NAC given orally in U.S., given IV in Canada • NAC stimulates hepatic synthesis of GSH, may bind NAPQI, may be a sulphate precursor • Side Effects of NAC : GI upset and Allergic reactions • If a patient has known NAC hypersensitivity, Methionine can be used as an antidote Therapy N- Acetylcysteine ( NAC ) • Severe liver injury virtually abolished if NAC given within 12 hours for patients with a toxic Acetominophen level: NAC within 12 hours NAC 12-16 hours Hepatotoxicity Death <8% 34% 1% 2-3% Therapy N- Acetylcysteine ( NAC ) • After 16 hours, NAC less likely to affect liver necrosis • Nevertheless, late presenters should receive NAC as studies have shown decreased mortality when given in this group • Remember, the nomogram is only useful in an acute ingestion • Also, the nomogram was developed for nonalcoholic patients • NAC should be given in a chronic ingestion if hepatotoxicity is suspected • If an acetaminophen level can not be done quickly, NAC should be given • Follow Enzymes, INR, Mental Status, Acetominophen level • Consider prolonged NAC until acetominophen levels fall Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity Contact Transplant Centre • Rising INR • Encephalopathy – Remember that the early signs are subtle • Acidosis • Renal Failure Case 3 • 40 year old woman presents to Emergency • For 2 years, intermittent RUQ/ epigastric discomfort. • Episodes last 2 or 3 hours and then resolve. • No previous investigation • Now presents with RUQ pain that is not resolving • No significant past history. No meds. • Afebrile. Physical exam is normal aside from mild RUQ tenderness • AST and ALT 1.5 times normal. Alkaline Phosphatase and GGT three times normal. Bilirubin 1.5 times normal. Normal INR and Albumin •She is admitted Diagnosis? Case 3 •Choledocholithiasis. History of biliary colic. •Ultrasound confirms CBD dilation and intrahepatic duct dilation. Stones seen in gallbladder. •ERCP below shows filling defects due to stones which are removed. Case 3 • Post ERCP she feels well and liver enzymes normalize. • Cholecystectomy is suggested but she declines. • Three months later she presents with fever, jaundice, and RUQ pain • She looks unwell. Marked tenderness in RUQ • WBC 18. Liver enzymes show cholestatic picture and increased bilirubin •Diagnosis? Ascending Cholangitis • CBD obstruction with bile stasis and bacterial infection in biliary tree • Pus under pressure in the bile ducts leads to sepsis • 85% of cases due to CBD obstruction from stone • RUQ pain, fever and jaundice are Charcot’s triad. •This is a medical emergency • Treatment •Blood Cultures •Antibiotics ( ex Ampicillin / Cefotaxime / Flagyl ) •Decompression of CBD with ERCP or PTC ( percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography ) GI Bleeding Clinical presentation • Hematemesis : Vomiting of fresh red blood. Indicates brisk upper GI bleed • Coffee ground emesis : Vomiting of blackish material. Indicates upper GI bleed • Melena Passage of loose, black tarry stool. Commonly from UGIB. Can be from Right colonic bleed Other causes of black stool? GI Bleeding Clinical presentation • Hematochezia :Passage of bright red blood from rectum • Occult : Slow GI bleeding . Not apparent to patient ( Iron Deficiency / Fecal Occult Blood positive) • Obscure : Bleeding of any sort which is not easily pinpointed by usual diagnostic techniques Approach to the Bleeding Patient • Assess the severity of bleeding Hemodynamics Shock ( resting hypotension) Postural Change Normal % Intravascular Volume Loss 20-25 10-20 <10 Severity of Bleed Massive Moderate Minor • Resuscitation – IV Access – Monitor vitals – Transfuse when necessary – Correct Coagulopathy ie platelets, fresh frozen plasma, Vitamin K Take a History • • • • • • Age Known GI disease or previous bleed Known Liver Disease Previous surgery ASA /NSAID /Coumadin Gastrointestinal symptoms ( pain, dysphagia, vomiting, weight loss, change in bowel habit ) • Chest Pain , SOB • Physical may not help, but exclude signs of chronic liver disease Rectal examination! Tests • • • • • Hb Platelets MCV + / - Ferritin INR Urea • Localize bleed ( Endoscopy, Angiography) • Treat bleed ( pharmacologic, endoscopic, angiographic, surgery) Case 4 •58 year old man presents to the emergency department with hematemesis. No abdominal pain. • Long history of alcohol abuse. • No past medical history. On no medications • On exam, BP 90/ 50 and HR 130. Postural changes. • Palmar erythema, dupuytrens contracture, telangiectasia on chest, gynecomastia. No asterixis. • Abdomen soft. Non tender. Liver not palpable. Spleen tip palpable. Bulging flanks. Rectal reveals melena • Hb 110 (low ) MCV 99 ( high normal ) Platelets 125 (low) Urea 15 ( high ) Creatinine 89 ( normal ) •Normal AST/ ALT /ALP Bili 88 ( high) INR 1.5 ( high ) Albumin 24 ( low ) Case 4 What is the cause of bleeding? What is the differential diagnosis? What are the indicators for urgent endoscopy? Causes of Upper GI Bleeding PUD Varices Mallory Weiss Tumour Vascular Dieulafoy Other Jutabha et al. Med Clin North Am 1996 UCLA. Prospective series of 1000 patients. Early Endoscopy for Upper GI Bleeding • Overall, 80 % of UGIB self limited. • But 8-10% mortality • Early endoscopy Suspected variceal bleed ex. Cirrhotic patient Indicators of Profuse Bleeding Hemodynamic instability DESPITE resuscitation Hematemesis Red Blood per rectum in a suspected UGIB ? Multiple Comorbidities Natural History of Variceal Bleeding • Esophageal varices develop in 50 % of patients with cirrhosis • 30% of patients with varices will have a bleed within 2 years of diagnosis • After one variceal bleed, the risk of a second is high. 60 to 70 % will rebleed within 2 years. • Variceal bleeding accounts for 20 – 33 % of deaths in cirrhotics Causes of Portal Hypertension Be aware of Splenic Vein Thrombosis Case 4 What is the management of variceal bleeding? Management of Variceal Bleed • Volume Resuscitation • Correct coagulopathy. Vit K and FFP. +/- platelets • Pharmacotherapy : IV Octreotide 50 ug bolus and then 50ug /hour • Antibiotics • Endoscopic Therapy • Balloon Tamponade • TIPS • Watch for encephalopathy • Secondary Prophylaxis Pharmacotherapy. • IV Octreotide has a net impact of splanchnic vasoconstriction reducing variceal blood flow • RCTs show beneficial effect in control of the initial bleed ( ie octreotide + endoscopic therapy better than endoscopy alone) • IV octreotide shown to prevent early in hospital rebleed after control of initial hemorrhage. Continue for 48-72 hours Endoscopic Therapy Endoscopic Therapy • • • • Banding Can control acute bleed in about 90% Banding may be difficult due to poor visualization Current standard of care is combined endoscopic and pharmacotherapy (octreotide) Refractory Bleeding • Balloon Tamponade. • Complications : Aspiration Pneumonia, Esophageal ulceration or perforation • High rate of rebleed when balloon deflated Refractory Bleeding • TIPS ( Transhepatic Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt ) • A technically successful TIPS will decompress the portal circulation and control bleed in almost all patients • Main complication is encephalopathy Precipitants of Hepatic encephalopathy •GI Bleed •Uremia •Dehydration •Hypokalemia •Constipation •Excess dietary protein •Infection ( SBP ) •Sedatives •Metabolic alkalosis Treatment : Treat underlying cause Lactulose • Secondary Prophylaxis B Blockade or Repeated banding ( until varices obliterate ) reduce risk of rebleed Gastric Varices Gastric Varices Case 5 . Lower GI Bleed • 74 year old woman • Presents to the Emergency with 4 episodes of passing blood per rectum that day • No abdominal pain, or other GI symptoms • Past history : hypertension • On an ACE inhibitor. No other medications • BP 150/90. HR 90. No postural changes • Physical exam normal except red blood on rectal exam • Hb 120. MCV normal. Urea 10. Creatinine 100. Other labs normal. • Receives appropriate supportive care Lower GI Bleed •DDX • Diverticular Bleed • Angiodysplasia • Colon Cancer • Ischemic Colitis • Consider a brisk upper GI bleed • Other causes less common Lower GI Bleed Diverticular bleeding Bleeding spontaneously ceases in about 80% Roughly 25 % rebleed Of these, 50 % bleed again Angiodysplasia Mostly right sided Again, around 80 % subside spontaneously Lower GI Bleed Colon Cancer Rarely Severe LGIB Presentation ( R vs L) ? Endoscopic Management of Acute Lower GI Bleeding Approach to Lower GI Bleed Acute Lower GI Bleed Resuscitate EGD if UGIB suspected Bleeding Stops Bleeding Persists Colonoscopy after bowel preparation Angiogram to localize bleed Refer to surgery Colonic Polyps • Can be characterized by gross appearance Sessile vs pedunculated (on a stalk) • Removal of adenomatous polyps prevents Colorectal Cancer CRC : Screening • Early detection of Colon cancer improves prognosis • Fecal Occult Blood Testing /Fecal Immunochemistry (FIT) every 1-2 years FOBT is inexpensive and non invasive FOBT testing will reduce CRC mortality FOBT is not a good test to detect polyps Many false positives occur. Only 2 % of positive tests due to cancer CRC : Screening FOBT/FIT Flexible Sigmoidoscopy DCBE Colonoscopy CT Colonography? CRC : Screening Screen patients at average risk at age 50 and then every ten years ( with colonoscopy ) Screen patients with first degree relative ten years before index case and then every 5 years ( with colonoscopy) If adenomatous polyp found, screen every 5years ( with colonoscopy ) IBD patients with pancolitis. Colonoscopy 8-10 years after diagnosis and then q 2 years. IBD patients with distal colitis. Colonoscopy 15 years after diagnosis and then q 2 years. Case 6 • 20 year old university student 3 year history severe, episodic periumbilical pain Some relief of pain with bowel movement 3 to 6 loose bowel movements/ day. No blood No weight loss Past history unremarkable Meds Iron supplement Family history unremarkable No extraintestinal manifestations of IBD • Differential diagnosis? Case 6 Labs Hb 106 (low) MCV 73 (low) Plt 697 (high) ESR 25 (high) CRP 45 ( high) Ferritin 6 (low) Albumin 20 (low) Lytes , Urea, Cr, Liver enzymes, TSH Normal Anti ttg negative. IgA normal Case 6 Colonoscopy Colon normal Ileum. Linear ulcers. Cobblestoned appearance. Erythema. normal Crohn’s ileitis Case 6 Biopsies of ileum chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate distortion of architecture granulomata Case 6 Inflammatory crohn’s Response to steroid Unfortunately steroid dependent Failed azathioprine ( imuran ) Doing well on infliximab ( remiacade) What is the difference between Ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s? Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease Crohn’s Ulcerative Colitis Th2 Th1 Superficial inflammation Transmural Inflammation May be granulomata Bleeding more common Weight loss and pain more common Continuous Discontinuous Colon only Anywhere in GI tract Predilection for terminal ileum Inflammatory Inflammatory Fibrostenosing Fistulizing Better with smoking Worse with smoking Surgery curative Recurs after surgery The evolution of therapy: toward optimal treatment of IBD Objectives of therapy Less surgery Surgery Biologics :Infliximab / Adalimumab Immunosuppressives (AZA/6-MP, MTX) Steroids Proper patient identification: • Which patients should be treated with IFX? • Widespread use • Earlier recognition of failure • Brief exposure • Earlier identification of resistance/dependence Case 7 • 57-year-old man • Recently diagnosed as having ulcerative colitis • Presents with persistent bloody diarrhea • Abdominal pain • He had a fever of 38.8 degrees. HR 120. BP 110 / 70 • Decreased bowel sounds, and a tense, mildly distended abdomen. • WBC 15 Case 7 Diagnosis? Treatment ? Toxic Megacolon • Differentiate from ileus where there is no colonic inflammation • Inflammation leads to colonic paralysis • Can result from IBD / Ischemia / Infectious colitis • X-ray evidence of colonic distension. > 6 cm in transverse colon • Fever, tachycardia, high WBC • High mortality with perforation • Remember, perforation can occur in ulcerative colitis ( or other forms of colitis ) without toxic megacolon Toxic Megacolon : Treatment • • • • NPO, F&E, NG IV Solumedrol 20 mg q8h for 24 hours Immediate surgical consult Colectomy if fails to resolve in 24-48 hours or if peritoneal signs Case 8 • 69 year old man hospitalized for pneumonia • After treatment with antibiotics, develops small volume, non bloody, profuse diarrhea • Medications noncontributory • Physical exam noncontributory • Bloodwork noncontributory Clostridium Difficile • Spore forming microorganism distributed widely in the environment • Major risk is associated antibiotic use which disrupts normal colonic flora • Hospitalized patients particularly at risk in part due to age and immunodeficiency • Easily transferable and thus a threat to hospitalized patients • C. Diff produces toxin A and B which mediate colonic damage • Testing stool for toxin forms the basis of diagnosis • Can perform endoscopy for rapid diagnosis : presence of pseudomembranes : yellowish adherent plaques Any Questions?