Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis for Statistical Determination of Forming Limit Diagrams M. Strano B.M. Colosimo Università di Cassino Dip. Ingegneria Industriale http://webuser.unicas.it/tsl Politecnico di Milano Dip. Meccanica http://tecnologie.mecc.polimi.it ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Motivation • Scatter is usually quite large in FLD data • Effective statistical tools are strongly needed for a correct experimental determination of formability 2/21 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Some remarks on the FLDs An FLD taken from the literature [C.L. Chow, M. Jie / I. J. Mech. Sc. 46 (2004)] • Some points will always fall outside the predicted FLD uncertainty 3/21 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Some remarks on the FLDs Another FLD taken from the literature [D. Banabic et al. / Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 13 (2005)] • Experimental data are used to compare different model 4/21 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Uncertainty and multiple response • Uncertainty – On the position and shape of the “true” FLD • Some use the concept of safety region or forming limit band • Statistical methods should be used to account for uncertainty and a large number of experiments (replicates) should be conducted for each FLD • Multiple response – Experimental results are not simply safe and failed but are generally classified in to 3 different sets either 5/21 • Safe • In the neck field • Necked or • Safe • Necked • Fractured ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Uncertainty and multiple response • Uncertainty (40 papers in the literature) Number of tests yes; 17.9 % ea r no; 82.1 % un cl >3 0 0 20.5% 17.9% 17.9% 20 -3 0 10 -2 <1 0 23.1% 20.5% Use of statistics • Multiple response (in the literature) – Practically no paper deals (on an experimental and quantitative base) with the prediction of 2 different types of failure 6/21 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Uncertainty and multiple response • Proposed solution: probability map – A statistical tool for the determination or the quantitative evaluation of FLDs can be useful, able to • deal with 3 different data categories • provide the probability of failure associated with each point on the e1-e2 space 7/21 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo The probability map Map obtained by binary logistic regression Points are labeled only as safe or failed p1 is the probability of a point being on the safe side The Forming Limit Band (FLB) has been obtained by linear regression analysis 8/21 [M. Strano B.M. Colosimo / Int. J. of Mach. Tools and Manuf., 46, 6 (2006) ] ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo The binary logistic regression • A new response variable is introduced, a (Bernoulli) random variable z which assumes – the value 1 with probability p1 if the observed strains characterize a safe point – the value 0 with probability p0 if the observed strains induced a failure • Binary logistic regression computes the probability of observing z=1 as function of minor and major strains (ye1, xe2) p1 ln p0 q r p1 i j ˆ ˆ ˆ ln a c y d x i j 1 p i 1 j 1 1 logit link function 9/21 polynomial model ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo The binary logistic regression p1 ln p0 q r p1 i j ˆ ˆ ˆ ln a c y d x i j 1 p i 1 j 1 1 logit link function polynomial model aˆ, cˆi (i 1,..., q), dˆ j ( j 1,..., r ) are the maximum likelihood estimates of the true coefficients and are obtained with an iterative weighted least squares algorithm implemented in most statistical software packages 10/21 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo The ordinal logistic regression • A response random variable z(x,y) which assumes – the value s with probability characterize a safe point ps if the observed strains – the value m with probability pm if the observed strains induced an almost failed (or necked) point – the value f with probability failure (or fracture) pf if the observed strains induced a • The sum of the three probabilities is equal to one [ps (x,y)+ pm (x,y)+ pf (x,y)]=1 11/21 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo The ordinal logistic regression • Ordinal logistic regression computes p s ( x, y ) polynomial model 12/21 exp as x, y 1 exp as x, y ; x, y b1 x b2 x 2 ... c1 y c2 y 2 ... d1 xy ... • Not all polynomial terms up to a given degree must necessarily be included • Several alternatives should be tried until the best model is found, while requiring the smallest number of terms (following a parsimony principle) ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo The ordinal logistic regression diagnostic measures Material: Al 6022-T4; data in Fig. 1a Goodness-of-Fit Tests Test that all slopes are zero: Method 2 DF p-value Log-likelihood=-27 Pearson 67.48 121 1 G=79.7; DF=3; Deviance 54.02 121 1 P-Value=0.0 Measures of Association Pairs Number % Summary Measures Concordant 1206 94.7% Somers' D 0.89 Discordant 67 5.3% Goodman-Kruskal 0.89 Ties 1 0.1% Kendall's -a 0.58 Somers’ D is similar to r2 in linear regression 13/21 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Application of the method [1] ps exp as x, y 1 exp as x, y ; pm exp am x, y 1 exp am x, y exp as x, y 1 exp as x, y b1x b2 x2 ... c1 y c2 y 2 ... d1xy ... model 14/21 Response s m f Coefficients as am b1 b2 c2 Count 28 14 21 value 21.223 24.530 -73.78 706.5 -449.31 Material: Al 6022-T4; data in [1] Std. Error 4.656 5.283 19.47 285.3 98.74 p-value 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.013 0.000 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Application of the method [1] probability map x f +m s 15/21 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Application of the method [2] probability map x f +m s 16/21 5182-o ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Application of the method [2] Determination of a single FLD curve A prescribed minimum safety probability ps must be selected by the user Material: Al 5182-o y 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 ps=0.7 ps=0.8 0.06 ps=0.9 0.05 17/21 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 x 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Application of the method [2] Comparison with other FLDs • Any other FLD would most certainly cross the iso-ps lines • It is not iso-probabilistic • Many interpret the distance of a point from the FLD as a safety factor • This is wrong ps 0.12 y 0.9 0.8 0.1 0.7 0.08 0.6 0.5 0.06 0.4 0.04 0.3 x f +m 0.02 0 18/21 Material: Al 6022-T4 0.2 s -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.1 x ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Application of the method [2] Binary vs. ordinal regression ps Material: Al 5182-o 0.12 y Material: Al 5182-o 0.9 0.12 0.8 0.1 y 0.1 0.7 0.08 0.6 0.08 0.5 0.06 0.06 0.4 0.04 0.3 0.04 Ordinal regression with 3 data sets: s, m, f 0.02 0 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 19/21 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.2 0.02 x 0.1 0.1 0 Binary regression with 2 data sets: s, m U f -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 • Probability maps are slightly different • The most appropriate must be chosen 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 x 0.1 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Conclusions • The mathematical formulation of the logistic regression model has been presented, as a method for experimental determination of FLDs • The method can – provide a single, statistically determined, FLD curve • if a tolerable failure probability is fixed – provide a probability map of failure – deal with binary or multiple response of experiments – Give a quantitative indication of goodness of fit of any model 20/21 ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo Contents of this presentation • Some remarks on the FLDs – FLDs taken from the literature – Uncertainty and multiple response • The probability map – The binary logistic regression – The ordinal logistic regression • Application of the proposed method – Model – Probability map – Diagnostic measures • Conclusions 21/21