Download incremental forming processes

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
ESAFORM 2006
Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis for
Statistical Determination of
Forming Limit Diagrams
M. Strano
B.M. Colosimo
Università di Cassino
Dip. Ingegneria Industriale
http://webuser.unicas.it/tsl
Politecnico di Milano
Dip. Meccanica
http://tecnologie.mecc.polimi.it
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Motivation
• Scatter is usually quite large in FLD data
• Effective statistical tools are strongly
needed for a correct experimental
determination of formability
2/21
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Some remarks on the FLDs
An FLD taken from the literature
[C.L. Chow, M. Jie
/ I. J. Mech. Sc. 46
(2004)]
• Some points
will always fall
outside the
predicted FLD
uncertainty
3/21
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Some remarks on the FLDs
Another FLD taken from the literature
[D. Banabic et al. /
Modelling Simul. Mater.
Sci. Eng. 13 (2005)]
• Experimental data
are used to
compare different
model
4/21
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Uncertainty and multiple response
• Uncertainty
– On the position and shape of the “true” FLD
• Some use the concept of safety region or
forming limit band
• Statistical methods should be used to account
for uncertainty and a large number of experiments
(replicates) should be conducted for each FLD
• Multiple response
– Experimental results are not simply safe and failed
but are generally classified in to 3 different sets
either
5/21
• Safe
• In the neck field
• Necked
or
• Safe
• Necked
• Fractured
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Uncertainty and multiple response
• Uncertainty (40 papers in the literature)
Number of tests
yes;
17.9
%
ea
r
no;
82.1
%
un
cl
>3
0
0
20.5%
17.9%
17.9%
20
-3
0
10
-2
<1
0
23.1%
20.5%
Use of statistics
• Multiple response (in the literature)
– Practically no paper deals (on an experimental and
quantitative base) with the prediction of 2 different types of
failure
6/21
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Uncertainty and multiple response
• Proposed solution: probability map
– A statistical tool for the determination or the
quantitative evaluation of FLDs can be useful, able
to
• deal with 3 different data categories
• provide the probability of failure associated with
each point on the e1-e2 space
7/21
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
The probability map
Map obtained by binary logistic regression
 Points are
labeled only as
safe or failed
 p1 is the
probability of a
point being on
the safe side
 The Forming
Limit Band (FLB)
has been
obtained by
linear regression
analysis
8/21
[M. Strano B.M. Colosimo / Int. J. of Mach. Tools and Manuf., 46, 6 (2006) ]
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
The binary logistic regression
• A new response variable is introduced, a (Bernoulli)
random variable z which assumes
– the value 1 with probability p1 if the observed strains
characterize a safe point
– the value 0 with probability p0 if the observed strains induced a
failure
• Binary logistic regression computes the probability of
observing z=1 as function of minor and major strains
(ye1, xe2)
 p1
ln 
 p0
q
r

 p1 
i
j
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ

ln

a

c

y

d

x





i
j
1

p
i 1
j 1
1


logit link function
9/21
polynomial model
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
The binary logistic regression
 p1
ln 
 p0
q
r

 p1 
i
j
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ

ln

a

c

y

d

x





i
j
1

p
i 1
j 1
1


logit link function
polynomial model
aˆ, cˆi (i  1,..., q), dˆ j ( j  1,..., r )
are the maximum likelihood estimates of the true
coefficients and are obtained with an iterative
weighted least squares algorithm implemented in
most statistical software packages
10/21
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
The ordinal logistic regression
• A response random variable z(x,y) which assumes
– the value s with probability
characterize a safe point
ps if the observed strains
– the value m with probability pm if the observed strains induced
an almost failed (or necked) point
– the value f with probability
failure (or fracture)
pf if the observed strains induced a
• The sum of the three probabilities is equal to one
[ps (x,y)+ pm (x,y)+ pf (x,y)]=1
11/21
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
The ordinal logistic regression
• Ordinal logistic regression computes
p s ( x, y ) 
polynomial
model
12/21
exp  as    x, y  
1  exp  as    x, y  
;
  x, y   b1 x  b2 x 2 ...  c1 y  c2 y 2 ...  d1 xy  ...
• Not all polynomial terms up to a given degree
must necessarily be included
• Several alternatives should be tried until the best
model is found, while requiring the smallest
number of terms (following a parsimony principle)
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
The ordinal logistic regression
diagnostic
measures
Material: Al 6022-T4; data in Fig. 1a
Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Test that all slopes
are zero:
Method 2
DF p-value
Log-likelihood=-27
Pearson 67.48 121 1
G=79.7; DF=3;
Deviance 54.02 121 1
P-Value=0.0
Measures of Association
Pairs Number %
Summary Measures
Concordant 1206
94.7%
Somers' D 0.89
Discordant 67
5.3%
Goodman-Kruskal  0.89
Ties 1
0.1%
Kendall's -a 0.58
Somers’ D is similar to r2 in linear regression
13/21
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Application of the method [1]
ps 
exp  as    x, y  
1  exp  as    x, y  
; pm 
exp  am    x, y  
1  exp  am    x, y  

exp  as    x, y 
1  exp  as    x, y 
  b1x  b2 x2 ...  c1 y  c2 y 2 ...  d1xy  ...
model
14/21
Response
s
m
f
Coefficients
as
am
b1
b2
c2
Count
28
14
21
value
21.223
24.530
-73.78
706.5
-449.31
Material: Al 6022-T4;
data in [1]
Std. Error
4.656
5.283
19.47
285.3
98.74
p-value
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.013
0.000
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Application of the method [1]
probability map
x f
+m
s
15/21
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Application of the method [2]
probability map
x f
+m
s
16/21
5182-o
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Application of the method [2]
Determination of a single FLD curve
A prescribed
minimum safety
probability ps must
be selected by the
user
Material: Al 5182-o
y 0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
ps=0.7
ps=0.8
0.06
ps=0.9
0.05
17/21
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
x
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Application of the method [2]
Comparison with other FLDs
• Any other FLD
would most
certainly cross the
iso-ps lines
• It is not
iso-probabilistic
• Many interpret the
distance of a point
from the FLD as a
safety factor
• This is wrong
ps
0.12
y
0.9
0.8
0.1
0.7
0.08
0.6
0.5
0.06
0.4
0.04
0.3
x f
+m
0.02
0
18/21
Material: Al 6022-T4
0.2
s
-0.06 -0.04 -0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.1
x
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Application of the method [2]
Binary vs. ordinal regression
ps
Material: Al 5182-o
0.12
y
Material: Al 5182-o
0.9 0.12
0.8
0.1
y
0.1
0.7
0.08
0.6 0.08
0.5
0.06
0.06
0.4
0.04
0.3 0.04
Ordinal regression with 3
data sets: s, m, f
0.02
0
-0.06 -0.04 -0.02
19/21
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.2
0.02
x
0.1
0.1
0
Binary regression with 2
data sets: s, m U f
-0.06 -0.04 -0.02
• Probability maps are slightly different
• The most appropriate must be chosen
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
x
0.1
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Conclusions
• The mathematical formulation of the logistic
regression model has been presented, as a
method for experimental determination of
FLDs
• The method can
– provide a single, statistically determined, FLD curve
• if a tolerable failure probability is fixed
– provide a probability map of failure
– deal with binary or multiple response of
experiments
– Give a quantitative indication of goodness of fit of
any model
20/21
ESAFORM 2006 Ordinal logistic regression for FLD – Strano, Colosimo
Contents of this presentation
• Some remarks on the FLDs
– FLDs taken from the literature
– Uncertainty and multiple response
• The probability map
– The binary logistic regression
– The ordinal logistic regression
• Application of the proposed method
– Model
– Probability map
– Diagnostic measures
• Conclusions
21/21