Download Theories of Globalization

What’s wrong with
globalization?
Colin Sparks
Communication and Media
Research Institute
Introduction
• Discuss some problems with globalization
theories
• Construct the globalization paradigm from
the main theories
– 10 points underlying the different theories
• Discuss whether they account for the
evidence
– What do current theories miss out?
Communication and Media Research Institute
2
The realities of globalization
• There is little point in denying the realities
of globalization in the face of massive
evidence
• The term is used by politicians,
businessmen, journalists and everyone
else
• Also used by scholars, and we should be
precise about what we mean by a term
Communication and Media Research Institute
3
Many theories
• Many leading theorists have analyzed globalization in
contradictory ways
– E.g. some say it is generalised modernity, some say it is postmodernity, some say it is something else entirely
• Most theorists operate at a very abstract level and do not
produce much evidence
• Need to construct the globalization paradigm from the
work of leading theorists
• Need to see whether the evidence supports or
contradicts the theory
• Need to distinguish between “strong” theories of
globalization, that mean something new and “weak”
theories that are simply versions of the imperialism
paradigm in new language
Communication and Media Research Institute
4
1 - A new kind of theory
• Globalization is a radically different from
preceding theories
– It is “strikingly new” (Appadurai 1996)
• The sociological laws operating in the the period
of globalization are different from earlier periods
– Different from capitalism and imperialism
– Different from high modernity
– Different from industrial society
• The act together to make understanding the
dynamics of the new society different
Communication and Media Research Institute
5
2 - Methodological innovation
• Sharp contrast with Marxist theories (e.g.
imperialism)
– Marxism “reductivist”
– Globalization theory recognises irreducible complexity
“the complexity of the current global economy has to
do with certain disjunctures between economy,
politics and society” (Appadurai 1996)
• Globalization characterised by “various
autonomous logics” (Beck 2002), for example in
culture
Communication and Media Research Institute
6
3- Theory and practice
• Earlier theories we have examined
demonstrated a close link between theory and
practice
– Dominant paradigm and “policy science”
– Participatory paradigm and social movements
– Imperialism paradigm and NWICO
• Globalization has no such link
– There are no privileged actors in this paradigm
– Development no longer an issue
– Perhaps entrepreneurs are the real agents?
• No practical tests of the theory
Communication and Media Research Institute
7
4 - Media and communication
• New technologies permit media to operate with
a wider scope
• Greater importance of symbolic commodities in
global economy
• Symbolic commodities less bound by place than
are physical ones
– “It follows that the globalization of human society is
contingent on the extent to which cultural
arrangements are effective relative to economic and
political arrangements” (Waters 1995)
Communication and Media Research Institute
8
5 – Growth of supra-national
organisations
• “Westphalian” state being weakened from
“above”
• Increased importance of supra-national
organisations
– United Nations, WTO, European Union
• States no longer able to control media
circulating within their borders
• Development of global media organisations
• Developments towards a global culture
Communication and Media Research Institute
9
6 - The rise of the local
• States are being undermined from “below” by
local pressures
– Failure to achieve a unified national culture
• Movements for autonomy and independence
– Many notable European examples
• Two sense of the “local”
– The “small” place
– The “new” localities
Communication and Media Research Institute
10
7 - The absence of a centre
• There is no single controlling force in the global
world
• Globalization is not the result of the domination
of one culture over others
– “the United States is no longer the puppeteer of a
world system of images.” (Appadurai 1996)
• Existence of many centres of symbolic
production
Communication and Media Research Institute
11
8 - Multiple production centres
• Audiences almost invariably prefer “local”
productions
– US, however, still the second choice provider
• Many other centres than Hollywood, for
example TV Globo and Televisa
– Develop unique forms
– Win export successes
Communication and Media Research Institute
12
9 - Regional markets
• There is not one single uniform world
market for media products
• Regional markets have developed,
– South America
– East Asia
– Audiences increasing identify themselves with
cultural proximates
Communication and Media Research Institute
13
10 - Global media products
• To the extent that some media products do
circulate globally, they can originate anywhere
– Production is now mobile
– Personnel are now mobile
• Global media products are not purely US
products marketed on a global scale
– Disney
– CNN
• The emergence of “hybrid” cultural forms
Communication and Media Research Institute
14
Conclusion: a new paradigm
• No single author really fits all of these 10
elements
– Perhaps Appadurai comes closest
• The elements frame a paradigm within which
discussion of the media and globalization take
place
• They are open to development into testable
proposition
• What is the evidence?
Communication and Media Research Institute
15
1 - A new epoch in human
history?
• Not something we can answer in advance
• Only when we have seen whether the
component elements of theory are valid can we
judge how they combine
– If a significant number of them are invalid, then the
claim is invalid
• On the other hand, many of the features that are
claimed as new were observed long ago
Communication and Media Research Institute
16
2 - A new complexity
• The claim that there are “autonomous logics”
can be operationalised as:
– Is culture becoming more independent of economics?
• Discussion of international communication
issues has moved from Unesco to WTO
• No sign if weakening of organisations like the
MPAA
• Broadcasting in many places more dependent
on economics today than in the past
– BBC, Doordarshan, CCTV
Communication and Media Research Institute
17
3 - Theory and practice
• Different practical and political conclusions have
been drawn from the paradigm
–
–
–
–
Acceptance of globalization
Attempts to restate the Social-Democratic perspective
Outright rejection of globalization
Attempts to reshape globalization to benefit the
world’s poor
• None of these flow logically from the paradigm
– They are all more or less “personal” opinions about
society
Communication and Media Research Institute
18
4 - The scale of symbolic content
• What is the relative size of media corporations and how
far are their products relatively global?
• Media corporations are large but not significantly larger
than the “Fordist” industries
• Even in a very open economy and post-industrial
economy like the UK:
– It exported finished manufactured goods (e.g. cars, aircraft
petrochemicals and so on) to the value of £101,252m in 2004
– It exported services (e.g. royalties, financial services, licenses
and so on) to the value of £99,100m
– Of these services, the royalties and licences earnings of the film
and television industry amounted to £6,564m
• Symbolic products are not more global than material
products
– Cars and television programmes
Communication and Media Research Institute
19
5 - Withering away of the state?
• Are states (any states) still viable entities?
• Max Weber on the monopoly of violence
• Military spending dipped at the end of the cold war, but is now rising
again
– USA accounts for 40 per centUSA, Japan, UK, France and China
together account for more than 60 per cent
• The internal coercive power of the state is not withering away
– In 2002, the US government jailed more than 2 million of its citizens
– More than 4 times as many as in 1980
– Border controls have become much tougher since 9/11
• In the media, the state remains to control of television operations
– ITC and Ofcom have banned porn channels and Med TV
– Al Jazeera is a state financed and owned operation
– China controls access for satellite channels
Communication and Media Research Institute
20
6 - Is the local a problem
• Are local media a new development?
• There have long be geographically local media
– Newspaper operations in most countries were and
remain local
– Chain ownership is usually national rather than global
• Broadcasting tends toward the national at the
expense of the local if left to itself
• The “new localities” and their media based on
ethnicity are not recent phenomena
Communication and Media Research Institute
21
7 - A world without a centre
• Surely this is quite incredible given the
preponderance of the USA?
• Military strength and relative economic
weakness
• “Global” media companies are in fact
overwhelmingly US companies from an
economic point of view
• The USA has challengers, but is still by far the
most important
Communication and Media Research Institute
22
8 - Multiple production centres
• There are multiple production centres
• In the cinema they are much less significant than
Hollywood
– In 2002, accounted for more than 70% of film
investment
– In major markets, Hollywood films account for the
majority of box office takings
• Other media have different dynamics
– In TV production, some national centres remain
important
– In music, many national centres exist
Communication and Media Research Institute
23
9 – Regional media markets
• What is the relative proportion of traded
media products from different sources?
• Some evidence of regional specificity
– Korean wave in East Asia
• On the other hand, Europe dominated by
US imports
• Regional markets still subordinate to
global market
Communication and Media Research Institute
24
10 - Global media products?
• How far can we claim that global products
can originate “anywhere”?
• The case of Winnie-the-Pooh
• In order to become global, media products
must first be adapted to suit the needs of
consumers in the large and wealthy
markets
Communication and Media Research Institute
25
In summary
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1 - The claim that there are new autonomous logics in culture is false
2 - The claim that the globalization paradigm does not lead to practice is
correct
3 - The claim that media are central to globalization is false, or at best very
weakly supported
4 - The claim that the state is becoming weaker is false
5 - The claims that the local is undermining the national is false
6 - The claim that there are multiple production centres is true, but the
powerful centres are in the developed world and primarily the USA
7 - There are regional markets in TV production, but intra-regional trade is
relatively weak compared with imports from the USA
8 - Global media products do exist, but the exist only insofar as they are
adapted to the tastes of consumers in the rich countries
10 - Taken together, there is very little evidence that globalization
constitutes a new epoch in human history
Communication and Media Research Institute
26
Why does this matter?
• Too many of the claims currently made by theories of
globalization are empirically false for us to accept them
– A false theory leads to a false understanding of the world
• Globalization theorists have concentrated on diasporic
audiences
–
–
–
–
These experience are important
They are very visible in the metropolitan centres
In terms of human significance, they are relatively marginal
Perhaps 5 million people have come to the UK in the last 20
years, maybe 50 million internationally
– More than 1,000,000,000 have moved inside states from the
country to the city
Communication and Media Research Institute
27