Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Aphasia and AAC SLA G304 Shelley Weiss, MS CCC-SLP Aphasia • Aphasia: An acquired communication disability, usually a result of stroke or head injury, that affects symbolic language processing across modalities (after Schuell) • Deficits in auditory comprehension, reading, writing, speech Aphasia • Apraxia: Impairment in ability to program, sequence and execute purposeful gestures, despite intact mobility – Oral – Limb • Test of Limb and Oral Apraxia (HelmEstabrooks) Aphasia • Candidacy for AAC strategies in aphasia – a) those who find speech inadequate or inefficient in certain instances – b) those who do not regain sufficient natural speech for communication of basic needs (after Hux, Beukelman, and Garrett, 1994) Aphasia • Revised Candidacy Classification system (Garrett and Beukelman) – Basic Choice Communicator – Controlled Situation Communicator – Comprehensive Communicator – Specific Needs Communicator – Augmented Input Communicator Basic Diagnostic Protocol • Assessment custom tailored • Completed over extended period of time • Across environments and communication partners • Assessment and intervention occur simultaneously • Interdisciplinary team Interdisciplinary Assessment Team • • • • • • Physical therapist Occupational therapist Speech-language pathologist Neuropsycologist Physiatrist Rehabilitation technician Criteria-based Assessment • Observe current level of function • Observe changes over time – More effective than norm referenced – More sensitive to change over time – Time efficient Criteria-based Assessment • • • • • Skills assessment Communication needs inventory Opportunities and constraints Feature matching Trial period Skills Assessment • • • • • • • • Diagnosis and prognosis Motor function Vision, hearing Sensory, perceptual Motor speech Language Communication, pragmatics Cognition, behavior, psychosocial Communication Needs Inventory • Present and future needs • Four functions of communication (Light, 1988) – Information transfer – Social closeness – Basic wants and needs – Social etiquette Opportunities and Constraints Assessment • • • • Adjustment to the disability Stage of recovery Changing skill levels Multiple communication partners Opportunities and Constraints Assessment • User environment (partner attitudes towards AAC) • Availability of technical support • Medical protocol • Financial resources • Communicative desire, motivation Feature Matching • No single strategy or tool will have all features to meet user’s needs • Flexibility of system is greatest consideration Trial period • • • • • • Need adequate time to teach system Implement in natural contexts Re-assess Modify Re-assess Mass Medicaid funds device trial periods Demands of Communication for Person with Aphasia for basic needs conversation (Garrett, 1996) • Self aware • Generate an action plan • Generate a conceptual representation • Be attentive to environment • Posses an expressive modality • Sufficient working memory • Adequate semantic mapping/translation skills • Pragmatic skills to determine if message is received accurately • Metacommunicative ability to revise, repair Aphasia: Demands imposed by AAC strategies (Garrett, 1996) • Alternate physical access • Novel symbol translation • Sufficient working memory to complete preceding symbol translation skills before forgetting the intent • New operational skills for technology Aphasia: General Intervention Strategies • Communication access and success is intermittent in aphasia. Use what works from moment to moment • Rely on residual world knowledge • Keep physical access demands simple • Keep visual display simple Aphasia: General Intervention Strategies • Carefully inventory communication needs using Light’s (1988) model • Develop strategies to participate with peer group – Play Bingo – Tell jokes – Reminisce – Share opinions Aphasia: General Intervention Strategies • Assess most effective means and organization of representation – Visual spatial (maps, rating scales) – Categorical • words, messages • pictures – Topical Aphasia: General Intervention Strategies • Practice strategies in situational roleplays • Family, important communication partners play a critical role in therapy Aphasia Intervention: Remnant Book • Basic choice,controlled situation, comprehensive communicator • Mementos, remnants, photographs • Content is concrete, salient and unique to user • Capitalizes on residual world knowledge Aphasia Intervention: Remnant Book • Vehicle for sharing information, social closeness • No expectations for regulating behavior • Promotes topic generation and initiation for user and partner • Stimulates appropriate voluntary motor response: page turning, pointing Aphasia Intervention Remnant Book • Emotionally salient content may stimulate user input/output modalities • Doesn’t look like augmentative communication aid • Primes user and family for future AAC systems Aphasia: Remnant Book Study Results – (Weiss, S., Ho, K., Garrett, K., Lloyd, L., 1999) Conversational support in the form of topical, personalized communication books, regardless of symbolic representation facilitated the communication Aphasia: Remnant Book Study Results Remnants superior to pictographic symbols for: establishing joint attention maintaining conversational control communication partner ratings of comfort and efficacy Aphasia Intervention: Communication book • Inventory messages using Light’s model • Visual: Simple symmetrical organization, layout to compensate for field cuts, neglect • Obvious categories, tabs to mark pages • Directions to communication partner • Remnant section, maps, calendars, clocks, letter boards, rating scales Aphasia Intervention: Communication book • Decrease cognitive-linguistic demands – Teach in structured choice making – Revise partners’ expectations of PWA self initiation • Teach partner to structure environment • Identify opportunities to make choice Aphasia Intervention: Written Choice (Garrett, 1993) • Partner provides written choices in context of conversation • Possible responses anticipated and written in list form • PWA selects correct response by pointing • Creates successful interaction • Good for sharing information, social closeness Aphasia: Tool Box • • • • Alternative symbol boards, books Retractable key chain Remnant book Maps, calendars, rating scales, clocks Aphasia: Tool Box • Dedicated VOCAs – Simple: Macaw, MessageMate, Cheaptalk – Complex: Dynamyte, Dynavox • Computer-based: Speaking Dynamically, C-Speak Aphasia