Download Acttalk - Kimberly Ho, Ph.D. CCC-SLP

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Aphasia and AAC
SLA G304
Shelley Weiss, MS CCC-SLP
Aphasia
• Aphasia: An acquired communication
disability, usually a result of stroke or
head injury, that affects symbolic
language processing across modalities
(after Schuell)
• Deficits in auditory comprehension,
reading, writing, speech
Aphasia
• Apraxia: Impairment in ability to
program, sequence and execute
purposeful gestures, despite intact
mobility
– Oral
– Limb
• Test of Limb and Oral Apraxia (HelmEstabrooks)
Aphasia
• Candidacy for AAC strategies in
aphasia
– a) those who find speech inadequate
or inefficient in certain instances
– b) those who do not regain sufficient
natural speech for communication of
basic needs (after Hux, Beukelman, and Garrett,
1994)
Aphasia
• Revised Candidacy Classification
system (Garrett and Beukelman)
– Basic Choice Communicator
– Controlled Situation Communicator
– Comprehensive Communicator
– Specific Needs Communicator
– Augmented Input Communicator
Basic Diagnostic Protocol
• Assessment custom tailored
• Completed over extended period of time
• Across environments and communication
partners
• Assessment and intervention occur
simultaneously
• Interdisciplinary team
Interdisciplinary Assessment Team
•
•
•
•
•
•
Physical therapist
Occupational therapist
Speech-language pathologist
Neuropsycologist
Physiatrist
Rehabilitation technician
Criteria-based Assessment
• Observe current level of function
• Observe changes over time
– More effective than norm referenced
– More sensitive to change over time
– Time efficient
Criteria-based Assessment
•
•
•
•
•
Skills assessment
Communication needs inventory
Opportunities and constraints
Feature matching
Trial period
Skills Assessment
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Diagnosis and prognosis
Motor function
Vision, hearing
Sensory, perceptual
Motor speech
Language
Communication, pragmatics
Cognition, behavior, psychosocial
Communication Needs Inventory
• Present and future needs
• Four functions of communication
(Light, 1988)
– Information transfer
– Social closeness
– Basic wants and needs
– Social etiquette
Opportunities and Constraints
Assessment
•
•
•
•
Adjustment to the disability
Stage of recovery
Changing skill levels
Multiple communication partners
Opportunities and Constraints
Assessment
• User environment (partner attitudes
towards AAC)
• Availability of technical support
• Medical protocol
• Financial resources
• Communicative desire, motivation
Feature Matching
• No single strategy or tool will have all
features to meet user’s needs
• Flexibility of system is greatest
consideration
Trial period
•
•
•
•
•
•
Need adequate time to teach system
Implement in natural contexts
Re-assess
Modify
Re-assess
Mass Medicaid funds device trial
periods
Demands of Communication for Person
with Aphasia for basic needs conversation
(Garrett, 1996)
• Self aware
• Generate an action plan
• Generate a conceptual representation
• Be attentive to environment
• Posses an expressive modality
• Sufficient working memory
• Adequate semantic mapping/translation skills
• Pragmatic skills to determine if message is received
accurately
• Metacommunicative ability to revise, repair
Aphasia: Demands imposed by
AAC strategies (Garrett, 1996)
• Alternate physical access
• Novel symbol translation
• Sufficient working memory to complete
preceding symbol translation skills
before forgetting the intent
• New operational skills for technology
Aphasia: General Intervention
Strategies
• Communication access and success is
intermittent in aphasia. Use what works
from moment to moment
• Rely on residual world knowledge
• Keep physical access demands simple
• Keep visual display simple
Aphasia: General Intervention
Strategies
• Carefully inventory communication
needs using Light’s (1988) model
• Develop strategies to participate with
peer group
– Play Bingo
– Tell jokes
– Reminisce
– Share opinions
Aphasia: General Intervention
Strategies
• Assess most effective means and
organization of representation
– Visual spatial (maps, rating scales)
– Categorical
• words, messages
• pictures
– Topical
Aphasia: General Intervention
Strategies
• Practice strategies in situational roleplays
• Family, important communication
partners play a critical role in therapy
Aphasia Intervention: Remnant
Book
• Basic choice,controlled situation,
comprehensive communicator
• Mementos, remnants, photographs
• Content is concrete, salient and unique
to user
• Capitalizes on residual world
knowledge
Aphasia Intervention: Remnant
Book
• Vehicle for sharing information, social
closeness
• No expectations for regulating behavior
• Promotes topic generation and
initiation for user and partner
• Stimulates appropriate voluntary motor
response: page turning, pointing
Aphasia Intervention Remnant
Book
• Emotionally salient content may
stimulate user input/output modalities
• Doesn’t look like augmentative
communication aid
• Primes user and family for future AAC
systems
Aphasia: Remnant Book Study
Results
– (Weiss, S., Ho, K., Garrett, K., Lloyd, L., 1999)
 Conversational support in the form of
topical, personalized communication
books, regardless of symbolic
representation facilitated the
communication
Aphasia: Remnant Book Study
Results
 Remnants superior to pictographic
symbols for:
 establishing joint attention
 maintaining conversational control
 communication partner ratings of
comfort and efficacy
Aphasia Intervention:
Communication book
• Inventory messages using Light’s model
• Visual: Simple symmetrical organization,
layout to compensate for field cuts,
neglect
• Obvious categories, tabs to mark pages
• Directions to communication partner
• Remnant section, maps, calendars, clocks,
letter boards, rating scales
Aphasia Intervention:
Communication book
• Decrease cognitive-linguistic demands
– Teach in structured choice making
– Revise partners’ expectations of PWA
self initiation
• Teach partner to structure environment
• Identify opportunities to make choice
Aphasia Intervention: Written
Choice (Garrett, 1993)
• Partner provides written choices in
context of conversation
• Possible responses anticipated and
written in list form
• PWA selects correct response by
pointing
• Creates successful interaction
• Good for sharing information, social
closeness
Aphasia: Tool Box
•
•
•
•
Alternative symbol boards, books
Retractable key chain
Remnant book
Maps, calendars, rating scales, clocks
Aphasia: Tool Box
• Dedicated VOCAs
– Simple: Macaw, MessageMate,
Cheaptalk
– Complex: Dynamyte, Dynavox
• Computer-based: Speaking
Dynamically, C-Speak Aphasia