Download Nutrition in Surgery Facts, myths and controversies.

nutrition in surgery
facts, myths and controversies
Kelvin Chan
Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round 2013
Nutrition in surgery
• Malnutrition afflicts 30-55% hospitalised patients
• Surgical illness and malnutrition
– Intestinal dysfunction (intestinal obstruction, ileus)
– Cancer cachexia
• Malnutrition and adverse surgical outcomes
– Delayed wound healing
– Increased morbidity and mortality
– Increased length of stay & cost of care
August. JPEN 2002.
Shopbell. The Science and Practice of Nutrition Support. 2001.
INJURY
Metabolic response to injury
EBB PHASE
CATABOLIC
FLOW PHASE
24-48 hours
7 days +
 oxygen consumption
Neurohormonal control
Catecholamines
Glucagon, cortisol
 body temperature
 Energy expenditure
ANABOLIC
FLOW PHASE
Road to recovery
Cytokines
TNF-a, IL-1, IL-6
 oxygen consumption
Insulin resistance
Protein catabolism
Backburn. Surg Clin N Am 2011.
Backburn. Surg Clin N Am 2011.
Goals of nutritional support
• Preserve lean body mass
• Maintain immune function
• Avert metabolic complications
Martindale. Crit Care Med 2009.
Nutritional assessment
• History
– Medical illness
– Oral intake
– Marked weight loss
• Physical examination
– Oedema, ascites, cachexia, muscle wasting &c
– Anthropometric measurements
• Biochemical profile
– Albumin, prealbumin, transferrin
– Lymphocyte count
August. JPEN 2002.
Backburn. Surg Clin N Am 2011.
Nutritional requirement
Essential
amino acids
Trace
elements
Amino acids
4 kcal/g
ENERGY
Carbohydrates
4 kcal/g
Lipids
9 kcal/g
20-35 kcal
/ kg / day
Fluid &
Electrolytes
Vitamins
August. JPEN 2002.
Nutritional requirement
• Harris Benedict Equation
BEE = 66.5 + (13.7 x weight in kg) + (5 x height in cm) – (6.8 x age)
BEE = 655 + (9.6 x weight in kg) + (1.8 x height in cm) – (4.7 x age)
REE = BEE x activity factor x injury factor
Over 200 other formulae for estimation of caloric requirement.
Indirect calorimetry
• Gold standard
• Estimation of caloric requirement by measuring CO2 production and
oxygen consumption
• May be useful in critically ill patients with severe trauma, burns,
pancreatitis
• Routine use not recommended
Modes of nutritional support
Standard nutrition
Enteral nutrition
Parenteral nutrition
Enteral nutrition
• Modes
– Gastric tube
– Post-pyloric tube
– Gastrostomy
– Jejunostomy
• Contraindications
– Intestinal obstruction
– Paralytic ileus
– Intractable vomiting / diarrhoea
– High output fistulae
– Gastrointestinal ischaemia
– Diffuse peritonitis
– Fulminant sepsis
Fukatsu. Surg Clin N Am 2011.
Enteral nutrition
• Benefits of enteral nutrition
– Stimulate mucosal blood flow
– Stimulate T and B cells within Peyer patches
– Improve secretory IgA production
– Maintain integrity of mucosal barrier & villous height
– Reduce bacterial translocation
• Reduce mortality, length of stay, infectious complications in trauma &
burns patients
Martindale. Crit Care Med 2009.
August. JPEN 2002.
Fukatsu. Surg Clin N Am 2011.
Healthy subjects
After 14 days of TPN
Buchman, JPEN 1995
Enteral nutrition
• Enteral feeding should be started early within the first 24–48 hours
following admission
• The feedings should be advanced toward goal over the next 48–72 hours
• Problems
– Risk of aspiration
– Inadequate caloric delivery, especially feeding has to be withheld with
large gastric residual volumes
Martindale. Crit Care Med 2009.
August. JPEN 2002.
Parenteral nutrition
• Indicated for those requiring nutritional support but
– Contraindication to enteral nutrition
– Inadequate caloric intake despite enteral nutritional support
• Should be initiated if
– Inadequate oral intake for 7-14 days / expected over 7-14 days
– Malnourished patients 5-7 days pre-operatively and continued to postoperative period
• Parenteral nutrition of less than 5–7 days have no outcome effect and may
result in increased risk to the patient
Martindale. Crit Care Med 2009.
August. JPEN 2002.
Parenteral nutrition
• Risks of parenteral nutrition
– Sepsis & catheter related complications
– Fluid & electrolyte imbalance
– Hyperglycaemia
– Hepatic steatosis, cholestasis
– Liver failure
1. Carbohydrate (glucose)
2. Lipid emulsion
3. Amino acids
4. Electrolytes
CENTRAL PREPARATION
Osmolarity 1500 mosmol/L
Nitrogen 12 grams
Non protein calorie 1300 kcal
PERIPHERAL PREPARATION
Osmolarity 750 mosmol/L
Nitrogen 5.4 grams
Non protein calorie 900 kcal
[SmofKabiven 1470mL & Kabiven Peripheral 1440mL. Fresenius Kabi AG, Germany]
Immune-modulating nutrition
Immune-modulating nutrition
• Nutrition has major effects on the immune system
• Mechanisms not completely understood
• Favourable outcomes in selected surgical patients
– Head and neck cancers
– Upper gastrointestinal cancer
– Severe trauma
– Severe burns (>30% TBSA)
– Surgical ICU patients
• Key nutrients: arginine, glutamine, omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants
Martindale. Crit Care Med 2009.
Immune-modulating nutrition
• Omega-3 fatty acids
– Omega-3 : Fish oils
– Omega-6 : vegetable oils
– Essential polyunsaturated fatty acids
– Omega-3 fatty acids displace omega-6 from the cell membranes of
immune cells, reduces systemic inflammation through the production
of biologically less active prostaglandins & leukotrienes
– Reduce ARDS and the likelihood of sepsis
Jayarajan. Surg Clin N Am 2011.
Martindale. Crit Care Med 2009.
Immune-modulating nutrition
• Glutamine
– Conditionally essential amino acid
– Functions
• Fuel source for enterocytes & immune cells
• Cellular respiration
• T-cell proliferation
• B-cell differentiation
• Production of IL-2
– Parenteral glutamine reduces infectious complications, length of stay
– No impact on mortality
– No effect from enteral supplement
Jayarajan. Surg Clin N Am 2011.
Vanek. Nutr Clin Pract 2011.
Immune-modulating nutrition
• Arginine
– Conditionally essential
– Functions
• Secretion of insulin & growth hormones
• Protein synthesis
• (Nitric oxide) vasodilation, regulate immune cells
• (Polyamines) regulate pro-inflammatory cytokines & T-cell
– Increased mortality in severely septic patients (44% vs 14%, p = 0.039)
– ? Increased NO in septic / haemodynamically unstable patients
Jayarajan. Surg Clin N Am 2011.
Morris. Am J Clin Nutr 2006.
Martindale. Crit Care Med 2009.
 infection  length of stay  ventilator days No change in mortality
Martindale. Crit Care Med 2009.
Immune-modulating nutrition
• Limitations
– Mechanisms not completely understood
– Few studies have addressed the individual nutrients, their specific
effect, or their proper dosing
– Laboratory findings difficult to study in clinical setting
– Interpretation of results limited by heterogeneity of clinical studies
– Large scale clinical trials needed
Martindale. Crit Care Med 2009.
Jayarajan. Surg Clin N Am 2011.
Conclusions
• Nutritional support forms an integral part of comprehensive surgical care
• Nutritional assessment should be performed for high risk patients
• Appropriate nutritional support potentially improves surgical outcomes
• Enteral feeding should be started early whenever the GI tract is functional
and the clinical condition permits
• Emerging evidence has shown that immune-modulating nutrition may
improve surgical outcomes. Benefits have not been consistently
demonstrated in all surgical patients. Further research is required to clarify
the type of immune-modulating nutrient, the dosage and target patients
that would benefit.
Thank you