Download Punisher - People Server at UNCW

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Escape, Avoidance and
Punishment
Chapter 9
1
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Classes of Reinforcing and
Punishing Stimuli
Present
Positive
Increase
Reinforcer
Positive
Reinforcer
Decrease
Punisher
Positive
Punisher
Remove
Negative
Negative
Reinforcer
Negative
Punisher
2
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Reinforcement and Punishment
• All things being equal, most people will respond
better to both immediate reinforcement and
immediate punishment.
• Most punishments in American society are given
for behaviors that are immediately reinforcing,
while the threat of the punishments for these deeds
is delayed and uncertain.
3
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Reinforcement and Punishment
• Punishment tends to be ineffective except
for temporarily suppressing undesirable
behavior.
• Mild, logical and consistent punishment can
be informative and helpful.
4
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Four Categories of Operant Conditioning
5
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Avoidance
• Negative
reinforcement
– Escape
– Avoidance
6
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Two-Process Theory of Avoidance
• Classical Conditioning - fear
• Operant Conditioning - reduction of fear
• Evidence supporting two-factor theory
– Second order conditioning
• Problems with two-factor theory
– Avoidance without fear or fear reduction
• Extinction of Avoidance
– Where is the extinction?
7
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
One-Factor Theory
• Operant Conditioning Only
• Sidman Avoidance
– Free operant avoidance
– Shock-Shock or S-S interval
– Response-Shock or R-S interval
8
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
One-Factor Theory
• Hernstein and Hineline Experiment
– Shock frequency reduction
9
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Avoidance and Phobias
• Passive avoidance
• Classically conditioned fear response 
phobias
• Avoidance learning  phobic response
• Phobias
– Avoidance of CS
– Single trial learning
10
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Avoidance and ObsessiveCompulsive Disorders
• OCD- active avoidance
• Exposure and response prevention
11
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Biological Constraints in Avoidance
Learning
• Bolles
– Species-specific defense mechanisms SSDRs
– Freezing, fleeing and fighting
– Difficult for pigeons to learn key peck or rats a
bar press
12
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Learned Helplessness
• Seligman
– Repeated exposure to (aversive) events that are
unpredictable and uncontrollable can have
debilitating effects.
– Motivational, cognitive, emotional impairment
– depression
13
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Punishment
• Types of Punishment
– Positive punishment
– Negative punishment
• Time-out
• Response cost – removal of specific reinforcer
14
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Punishment
• Intrinsic punishment – punishment inherent
in aspect of behavior.
• Extrinsic punishment –
• Primary
• Secondary
– Generalized secondary punishers
15
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Punishment
• Is punishment the opposite of reinforcement
– The truncated Law of Effect
– Temporary suppression
• Suppression
– Decrease in behavior that does not depend on
the relationship between behavior and
environmental events
• Importance of Contingency
16
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Shock Maintained Responding
• Is it reinforcement or
punishment?
17
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Disadvantages of Punishment
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
General Suppression
Stimulus Control/ SD for punishment
Can generate or induce avoidance or escape
Elicit strong emotional effects
Elicit aggression
Requires continual monitoring
Modeling effects
Generate abusive behavior
18
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Effectiveness of Punishment
• Azrin and Holz 1966
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Manner of introduction
Immediacy of punishment
Schedule of punishment
Schedule of reinforcement
Motivational variables
Availability of other reinforcers
Punisher as discriminative stimulus
19
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Theories of Punishment
• Conditioned Suppression – punishment
does not weaken behavior .. Produces
emotional response interferes with behavior
• Avoidance theory – punishment actually
involves a type of avoidance conditioning
avoidance response any other behavior.
• Premack – low probability behavior can be
used to punish high probability behavior.
20
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Noncontingent Punishment?
• Learned helplessness
• Experimental Neurosis
21
Steven I. Dworkin, Ph.D.
Related documents