Download Chapter 1 Culture of Lab Safety

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Factory and Workshop Act 1895 wikipedia , lookup

Iranian labor law wikipedia , lookup

Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Chapter 1
 Define
safety, risk, and risk assessment.
 List all entities that are responsible for
developing and carrying out regulations and
standards related to safety.
 Describe how the “Right to Know” law and
Chemical Hygiene Plan impact safety in the
lab.
 Describe the process by which companies and
individuals can go about creating a “total safety
culture” in the lab.
 Safety
• elimination of potential threats to human health
and well-being
 Can
a completely safe environment be
established in the laboratory?
• No

Most lab accidents occur while
performing routine tasks
 All labs have hazards.
• equipment, chemicals, and conditions that can
cause harm
 Most
accidents in a lab are minor in
nature
• trips, slips, and falls
• slamming fingers in doors or drawers
• minor cuts
 Since
it is impossible to eliminate all
hazards in a lab, safety is measured in
terms of risk.
• probability that a hazard will cause harm
• risk assessment attempts to estimate the
potential for human injury or damage to
property from an activity – “measurement of
safety”
 Industry
standards and practices for
health, safety and environmental issues
are more stringent than laboratories
 Safety
is a condition of employment
 Required
to understand and practice safe
behaviors
 Safety is everyone’s business.
• Federal Agencies
 Occupational Health & Safety Administration (OSHA)
 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
 Department of Transportation (DOT)
 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
• Institutions
• Laboratories
• Individuals
 Additional
sources for information
related to safety in the laboratory:
•
•
•
•
Prudent Practices in the Laboratory
Handling and Disposal of Chemicals
www.osha.gov
www.epa.gov
 Professional organizations
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
• National Safety Council
 Number
of federal, state, and local
regulations along with industry
standards.
• regulations
 operating principles required by law
 CFR’s
• standards
 operating principles or requirements related to many
areas, including safety
 Regulations
and standards that apply to lab
technicians can be categorized.
• Worker safety
 Ex. require lab chemicals be labeled
• Environmental protection
 Ex. disposal of chemicals is regulated to minimize impact on
environment
• Use and handling of animals
 Ex. type of cages that can be used to house animals
• Regulation of radioisotopes
 Ex. how radioisotopes should be handled and stored
 Federal
Hazard Communication Standard
(HCS) of 1983
• regulates hazardous materials in industrial
settings
• “Right to Know” law
 Employer must provide:




workplace hazard identification
written hazard communication plan
MSDS on file for all hazardous chemicals
training for workers on how to safely use all chemicals
 CHP
outlines the policies and procedures
for working safely with hazardous
materials.
 Requirement
by federal law – most labs
 1990
Occupational Exposure to Hazardous
Chemicals in Laboratories Standards (29 CFR
Part 1910)
• expands HCS to include academic, industrial, and
clinical laboratories
• requires a Chemical Hygiene Plan (CHP) be
developed to include specific information and
procedures to protect workers from hazardous
chemicals
• all work-related injuries and health problems must
be reported to OSHA
 Today
it is recommended that a
laboratory create a “total safety
culture”.
• everyone feels responsible
• people go beyond what is normally expected of
them to identify and correct unsafe conditions
• clear written descriptions of safe attitudes and
practices (ex. CHP)
• Safety should not be considered as a priority but
as an immovable value
A
number of businesses & industries have
implemented the use of a critical behavior
checklist (CBC).

See checklist pg. 7
 Usually
a “safety coach” or someone from the
safety committee will be charged with
• looks at behaviors that:
 have caused or could cause a large number of injuries or near
misses
 have caused or could cause a serious injury or fatality
 Care: truly
care about health and safety
of their co-workers
 Observe: take permission to observe
behavior of others systematically and
objectively
 Analyze: must understand risky
behaviors can occur because of work
demands, inconsistent messages from
management, etc
 Communicate: must
be active listener
and a persuasive speaker
• Separate behavioral feedback from personal
attitudes and feelings
 Help: coworkers
work more safely
 Even
with all of the regulations and
standards that exist, it still falls on the
individual to be responsible and use
good judgment.
 Define
 What
safety.
is CHP?
 Explain
 How
the work of a safety coach?
can you keep yourself safe in any
work place?



This project is funded by a grant awarded under the President’s Community Based Job Training Grant as
implemented by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration (CB-15-162-06-60). NCC
is an equal opportunity employer and does not discriminate on the following basis:
against any individual in the United States, on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age disability,
political affiliation or belief; and
against any beneficiary of programs financially assisted under Title I of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA), on the basis of the beneficiary’s citizenship/status as a lawfully admitted immigrant authorized to work in
the United States, or his or her participation in any WIA Title I-financially assisted program or activity.

This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded under the
President’s Community-Based Job Training Grants as implemented
by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training
Administration. The solution was created by the grantee and does
not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of
Labor. The Department of Labor makes no guarantees, warranties, or
assurances of any kind, express or implied, with respect to such
information, including any information on linked sites and including,
but not limited to, accuracy of the information or its completeness,
timeliness, usefulness, adequacy, continued availability, or
ownership. This solution is copyrighted by the institution that
created it. Internal use by an organization and/or personal use by an
individual for non-commercial purposes is permissible. All other
uses require the prior authorization of the copyright owner.