* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Presentación de PowerPoint
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
MYOPIA MYOPIA : PROGRAM Myopia: program I • Generalities – Definition – Etiology – Epidemiology • Classification: – According to magnitude – Clinical Myopia: program II • Myopia simple: – Characteristics – Clinical exam – Prescription criteria. Factors: • • • • Age Anisometropia Binocularity Control of myopic progression Myopia: program III • Degenerative myopia: – Characteristics – Clinical examen – Prescription criteria. Factors: • Type of optical compensation • Pseudomyopia: – Characteristics – Clinical exam – Prescription criteria Myopia: program IV • Nocturnal myopia: – Characteristics – Treatment MYOPIA: GENERALITIES Myopia: Generalities I • Refractive condition in which the image of an object at a distance does not form on the retina but focuses in front of the retina. • Structural causes of myopia could be: – Excessive axial longitude of the eye – Excessive power of the eye – Error in the relationship between axial longitude and power Myopia: Generalities II • The etiology of myopia depends on diverse factors. Such as: – – – – – – Hereditary Magnitude Sex Work NV Diet Etc. MYOPIA: CLASSIFICATION Myopia: classification I • According to the magnitude of the myopia: – – – – Low myopia: between -0,25 and -3,00 D Moderate myopia: between -3,25 and -6,00 D High myopia: between -6,25 and -10,00 D Very high myopia: above -10,00 D Myopia: Classification II • Clinically: – – – – Simple myopia Magna, degenerative, or pathological myopia Pseudomyopia Noctunal myopia Myopia: classification III SIMPLE MYOPIA • Most common type of myopia • Is recognized by: – Good VA in DV with correction – Absence of structural anomalies of the ocular sphere (no pathologies) – Retinoscopy subjective – Progresses limitedly • School age: 0.50 D/year • After 18-20 years of age it has few variations Myopia: Classification IV MAGNA OR DEGENERATIVE MYOPIA • Secondary to an excessive axial longitude of the eye • Associated to alterations or degeneration of certain ocular structures • With the passage of time the VA can be diminished • Alterations to the posterior pole (mainly): – – – – Myopic cone Loosening of the retina Macular alterations Etc Myopia: Classification V • Pseudomyopia – Result of an accomodative spasm – Subjective exam is more negative than the retiniscopy • Nocturnal myopia – VA reduction in conditions of low illumination MYOPIA: SIMPLE MYOPIA Simple myopia: Characteristics I Factors associated with the prevalence of simple myopia Age •2%-5% at 6 years of age •25%-35% in young adults Sex •Greater in women Race •Greater in white races, Japanese, Jews, and Chinese. •Lesser in darker races Reading and education •Increases when the reading and educational levels increase Occupation Greater in cases which consist of activity in NV Simple myopia: Characteristics II • Age – School age: • At 6 years of age: 5% myopes • At 18 years of age: 25-35% myopes – 20-60 years of age: stabalization – > 65 years of age: do not forget the relationship between nuclear cataracts and myopia Simple myopia: Characteristics III • Possible risk factors for the development of myopia: – – – – – – – Family history of myopia Emmetropia at pre-school age Astigmatism against the rule Altered accomodative function Endophoria in NV Prolonged work in NV and at very short distances Obstruction in the formation of images during the first few years Simple myopia: Symptoms and signs • Symptoms – Blurry vision in DV – Rarely symptoms in NV • Signs – Blinks to reduce the palpebral aperture – Good VA in NV – Mydriasis – Exodeviation – Bringing glasses closer Simple myopia : Clinical exam • Retinoscopy and subjective have similar value • With the adequate Rx the VA tends to reach 20/20 or even 20/15 • Absence of related anomalies in the funduscopy. • If the subject has never worn glasses he/she could show a reduced amplitude of accomodation for his/her age Simple myopia: Clinical treatment I • Age: – Children < 2 years of age: hypercorrect by 1-2 D – Children up to 5-years-old (pre-schoolers): hypercorrect by 0,5-1 D – From 6 to 40 years of age: avoid hypercorrections. Evaluate: • Visual needs • Binocularity – > 40-years-old: Precaution if he/she has never had a myopic Rx before Simple myopia: Clinical treatment II • Anisometropia: – Up to 8-10 years of age: try to prescribe for the anisometropia – > 10 -12 years of age: prudence in the prescription. Possible existence of monovision Simple myopia: Clinical treatment III • Binocularity: – Exodeviations: Total Rx for general use. • In young subjects with exotropia: evaluate a possible slight hypercorrection. – Endodeviations: avoid hypercorrections. • In NV try a slight hypocorrection MYOPIA: MYOPIA DEGENERATIVE Degenerative myopia: Generalities I • Elevated myopia associated to pathological degenerative changes mainly in the posterior segment of the eye • Abnormally large axial longitude • Ocular complications increase with age • Frequent cause of legal blindness Degenerative myopia: Generalities II • Etiology/risk factors: – – – – – Family history Prematurity and low weight Albinism Mental retardation Certain ocular pathologies • Age of beginning: – 0-5 years of age: 31% – 6-11 years of age: 61% – 12 or more years of age : 8% Degenerative myopia: Generalities III • Symptoms: – VA in DV, even with the best refraction: • From problems in the posterior segment • Minifying effect of the lenses (-) – Good VA in NV but at reduced distances – Discomfort with the glasses: • • • • Peripheral distortion Weight Chromatic aberration Minification of the environment Degenerative myopia: Clinical exam • Signs: – – – – – Occasionaly exophthalmos VA with the best refraction More negative retinoscopy than the subjective Vertex distance critical during the subjective Anterior segment: • Flatter and thinner cornea • Mydriasis • Deep anterior chamber – Posterior segment: • relationship cup/disc (in the ophthalmoscopy) • Myopic cone • Posterior staphyloma • Etc. Degenerative myopia: Clinical treatment • Avoid hypercorrections • If prescribing glasses: control the vertex distance • Importance of prismatic effects in secondary sight positions • Contact lenses: – Less distorted vision – More accomodative demand in NV MYOPIA: PSEUDOMYOPIA Pseudomyopia: Generalities I • Value of the subjective exam is more negative than the that of the retinoscopy • Possible spasm of the Ciliary muscle • Do not confuse pseudomyopia with myopic hypercorrection Pseudomyopia: Generalities II • Etiology: – – – – Spasm of the Ciliary muscle after tasks in NV Exodeviations Effects of medication Inadequate work conditions in NV • Symptoms: – VA in DV (constant or intermittent) – Asthenopia in NV Pseudomyopia: Clinical exam I • VA in DV • Retinoscopy: – Can fluctuate • Subjective: – More negative than in the retinoscopy – The VA does not justify the refractive changes • Accomodation: – With the Rx of the subjective it can seem like the amplitude of accomodation is reduced Pseudomyopia: Clinical exam II • Binocularity: – Can be associated with exodeviations (secondary condition pseudomyopia) – Can be associatated with endodeviations (primary condition pseudomyopia) Pseudomyopia: Clinical treatment • Treatment: – – – – Negative minimum If prescription: use mainly in DV Norms of visual hygiene Visual exercises to relax accomodation MYOPIA: NOCTURNAL MYOPIA Nocturnal myopia: Generalities • Diminishment of VA in conditions of poor illumination that improves with contact lenses • Etiology: – Spherical aberration – Dark focus of the accomodation • Detection depends on the subject’s symptomology Nocturnal myopia: Clinical treatment • Specific Rx for nocturnal activities – Tends to be sufficient with a prescription of -0,75 or -1,00 D MYOPIA: CASES Myopia: case 1-I • MT, 13-years-old. Student. • MC: Revision. Occasionally notes that he/she does not see well in DV • PH: Has never worn glasses. It is his/her first visual revision (previous check-ups by the pediatrician). No illnesses or ingestions of medication. • FH: Father and older brother are myopes. Maternal grandmother has cataracts. Myopia: case 1-II • Normal VA in DV and NV: – RE: 20/30+; NV: 20/20 – LE: 20/25; NV: 20/20 • Binocularity in habitual conditions: – Cover test: • DV: ORTHO • NV: Low endophoria – Promixal convergence: 6/10cm Myopia: case 1-III • Retinoscopy: – RE: -0,50-0,50x90º – LE: -50x90º • Subjective DV and VA: – RE: -0,50-0,25x75º; VA: 20/20+ – LE: -0,50x100º; VA: 20/20+ • Habitual amplitude of accomodation: – RE: 8cm≈12,5D – LE: 8cm≈12,5D • Ocular health tests: within normal limits Myopia: case 1-IV • Complete diagnostic of the case • Treatment proposed and plan of revisions • Possible evolution of the condition Myopia: case 1-V • Complete diagnostic of the case – – – – Low inverse astigmatism in both eyes Low myopia in RE Endophoric tendency in NV The rest of the tests are within normal limits Myopia: case 1-VI • Treatment proposed. There are two possibilities: – Option A: • Do not prescribe glasses • Recommend sitting as close as possible to the board in class • Recommend rules of visual hygiene: postures and work distance • Explain the condition and desired conduct to the patient • Revision in 3-4 months Myopia: case 1-VII • Treatment proposed. There are two possibilities: – Option B: • Prescribe glasses: RE: -0,50-0,25x75º; LE: -0,50x100º • Exclusive use for DV. In class when necessary to in order to pay attention to the board. • Do not use the glasses while studying in NV • Recommend standards for visual hygiene: postures and work distance • Explain the condition and the desired conduct to the patient • Revision in 4-6 months Myopia: case 1-VIII • Possible evolution of the condition: – Progression of the myopia Myopia: case 2-I • SE, 23 years of age. Salesman. • MC: notes that he/she does not see will in DV, mainly while driving. • PH: Has worn general use glasses for 10 years. The most recent pair are three-yearsold. No illnesses or ingestion of medication. • FH: Irrevelant. Myopia: case 2-II • Rx and VA are habitual in DV and NV: – RE: -2,25; VADV: 20/25-; VANV: 20/20 – LE: -1,75-0,50x10º; VADV:20/30+; VANV: 20/20 • Binocularity in habitual conditions: – Cover test: • DV: Ortho • NV: Low exophoria – Proximal convergence: up to the nose Myopia: case 2-III • Retinoscopy: – RE: -2,75-0,25x180º – LE: -2,25-0,50x180º • Subjective DV and VA: – RE: -2,50-0,25x15º; VA: 20/20+ – LE: -2,25-0,50x15º; VA: 20/20+ • Habitual amplitude of accomodation: – RE: 9cm≈11D – LE: 9cm≈11D • Ocular health tests: within normal limits Myopia: case 2-IV • Complete diagnostic of the case • Treatment proposed and a plan of revisions • Possible evolution of the condition Myopia: case 2-V • Complete diagnostic of the case – – – – Simple myopia low in AO Low, direct astigmatism in both eyes Exphoric tendency in NV The rest of the tests within normal limits Myopia: case 2-VI • Treatment proposed: – Prescribe new glasses: • RE: -2,50-0,25x15º • LE: -2,25-0,50x15º – For general use – Explain the change made – New check-up in 2 years or before if new symptoms appear Myopia: case 2-VII • Possible evolution of the condition: – Significant refractive changes are not expected until the age of prebyopia MYOPIA: BIBLIOGRAPHY Myopia: bibliography • Amos JF. Diagnosis and management in vision care. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1987 • Milder B, Rubin ML. The fine art of prescribing glasses. (2nd edition), Triad Publishing company, 1991. • Grosvenor T. Flom MC. Refractive anomalies. Research and clinical applications. ButterworthHeinemann, 1991 • Brookman KE. Refractive management of ametropia. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996 • Werner DL, Press LJ. Clinical pearls in refractive care. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002 Myopia: Bibliography • http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/r/refractive_ eye_disorders/intro.htm • http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/art icle/001023.htm • http://www.tarso.com/Miopia.html