* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PowerPoint プレゼンテーション
Survey
Document related concepts
ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup
Theory of everything wikipedia , lookup
Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup
Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup
Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Supersymmetry wikipedia , lookup
Higgs mechanism wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Flatness problem wikipedia , lookup
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Non-minimal inflation and SUSY GUTs Nobuchika Okada University of Alabama International Workshop on Grand Unification Yukawa Institute of Theoretical Physics March 15-17, 2012 In collaboration with Masato Arai, Shinsuke Kawai, Mansoor Ur Rehman, Qaisar Shafi The Standard Big-Bang Cosmology The success of the Standard Big-Bang Cosmology Hubble expansion Hubble’s law: expansion of the Universe Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) 2.725K radiation, Planck distribution Big-Bang nucleosynthesis Success in synthesizing light nuclei in the early Universe General theory of relativity Homogeneous & isotropic universe Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric (k=0) Einstein equations: Perfect fluid: Expansion law: Continuity equation: w=1/3 : radiation w=0 : matter Brief thermal history of the Universe T Big-bang Hot & dense thermal state all particles are in thermal equilibrium Radiation dominated era w=1/3 Matter dominated era w=0 decoupling of some particles (example: Dark Matter) ~1 MeV (10^10 K) Big-bang nucleosynthesis ~1 eV Equal epoch (radiation density = matter density) ~ 0.1 eV Recombination origin of CMB ~0.0001 eV Present Problems of Big-Bang Cosmology Big-Bang Cosmology: w=1/3 : radiation w=0 : matter Decelerating expansion Flatness problem Fine-tuning of density parameter is necessary Horizon problem Observed CMB is isotropic nevertheless two regions have never contacted with each other Origin of density fluctuation need the seed of density fluctuation for the large scale structure formation of the Universe Basic Idea of Inflationary Universe Suppose the existence of a stage in the early universe with ``Inflation’’ Accelerating Expansion Simple example: de Sitter space Positive cosmological constant (vacuum energy) Expansion law: Continuity equation: Exponential expansion (Inflation) solves flatness problem spatial curvature flattened horizon problem small causal region expanded Simple model of inflation scalar field called ``inflaton’’ Quantum fluctuation of inflaton origin of primordial density fluctuation Simple inflation model The picture we seek…. Inflation before Big-Bang Big-bang cosmology Slow-roll inflation A scalar field (inflaton) slowly-rolling down to its potential minimum Slow-roll End of inflation Oscillations & decay 1. Inflation at slow-roll era 2. End of Inflation 3. Coherent oscillations 4. Decays to Standard Model particles 5. Reheating Big-Bang Cosmology Primordial density fluctuation Slow-roll End of inflation During inlaftion era, quantum fluctuation of inflaton is enlarged by inflation Oscillations & decay Inflaton fluctuation curvature fluctuation structure formation, CMB anisotropy Inflaton fluctuation inflaton potential, initial condition CMB anisotropy precision measurement by observation CMB Observations: Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) The observational cosmology is now a precision science! Inflationary Predictions VS. WMAP inflationary scenario Slow-roll parameters These are very small during inflation End of inflation Number of e-foldings N > 50-60 is necessary to solve horizon & flatness problem Inflationary Predictions VS. WMAP (cont’d) Conditions to fix parameters in inflation model Power spectrum WMAP 7yr e-foldings = 50 -60 By these conditions, the slow-roll parameters are fixed Predictions Spectral index: Tensor-to-scalar ratio: Example models We calculate the slow-roll parameters for each model and find predictions Model 1: Model 2: N=60 Model 2 Model 1 WMAP 7yr contours Inflation models with non-minimal gravitational coupling It is generally possible to add the non-minimal gravitational coupling to Einstein-Hilbert action Let us consider the model 2 with the non-minimal coupling In Jordan frame In Einstein frame In Einstein frame =const V for a large inflaton VEV Predictions of non-minimal phi^4 model N. O.,Rehman & Shafi Phys. Rev. D 82, 043502 (2010) N. O.,Rehman & Shafi Phys. Rev. D 82, 043502 (2010) Minimal model Higgs Inflation Replace phi H Bezrukov & Shaposhnikov, PLB 659 (2008) 703; JHEP 07 (2009) 089 Analysis beyond tree-level (RGE improved effective potential) De Simone, Hertzberg & Wilczek, PLB 678 (2009)1 Barvinsky et al., JCAP 0912 (2009) 003 Realization of the non-minimal inflation model in supersymmetric model The Standard Model of elementary particle physics The best theory we know so far in describing elementary particle physics @ E=O(100 GeV) Quarks & leptons Gauge interactions QCD, weak, E&M Higgs masses of particles However, Experimental results which cannot be explained by the SM ex) neutrino masses & mixings non-baryonic dark matter,… Theoretical problems ex) The gauge hierarchy problem (stability of EW scale) Origin of electroweak symmetry breaking Fermion mass hierarchy, etc. We need to extend the SM, New Physics beyond the SM E ~ 1 TeV or higher New Physics beyond the Standard Model takes place at high energies Remember: inflation occurs at very high energies We need to consider inflation scenario in the context of physics beyond the Standard Model Supersymmetric theory is one of the promising candidate of new physics beyond the Standard Model Inflation model in the context of SUSY (Supergravity) Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) SUSY version of SM quark, lepton (1/2) squark, slepton (0) gauge boson (1) gaugino (1/2) Higgs Higgsino (1/2) (0) SM particles Superpartners SUSY Grand Unification is strongly supported by measurement of Standard Model gauge couplings Gauge coupling unification @ The Minimal SUSY SU(5) GUT Particle contents Standard Gauge Interactions are unified into SU(5) GUT gauge interaction All quarks & leptons in the MSSM are unified into 5*+10 Higgs fields in the MSSM are included New Higgs field to break SU(5) to the SM Higgs inflation in the minimal SUSY SU(5) GUT Arai, Kawai & N.O., PRD 84 (2011) 123515 Supergravity Lagrangian in superconformal framework Compensating multiplet: Minimal SUSY SU(5) model (Higgs sector) We are interested in a special direction of the scalar potential SU(5) SM *Normalized by reduced Planck scale S is almost constant during inflation Phi^4 inflation model with non-minimal coupling! * This structure has been first pointed out by Ferrara, Kallosh, Linde, Marrani & Van Proeyen (PRD 82 (2010) 045003, PRD 83 (2011) 025008) in the context of Next-to-MSSM Predictions We also examined quantum corrections, but their effects are found to be negligible Extension to other GUT models is possible which includes SU(5) as a subgroup (Example) SO(10) model Another example Arai, Kawai & N.O. arXiv:1112.239 MSSM + right-handed neutrino (For simplicity, we consider the 1 generation case) Again, we have non-minimal phi^4 inflation From the seesaw relation by using The CMB data tells Homework Extend the model to a GUT model Summary We study the inflationary scenario in the context of the minimal SUSY SU(5) GUT We have found that the inflation model with non-minimal gravitational coupling is naturally implemented in the minimal SUSYT SU(5) GUT etc. with an appropriate Kahler potential The predicted cosmological parameters are consistent (almost best fit) with WMAP 7yr data In the near future, on-going Planck satellite experiment will provide us with more precise data which can discriminate different inflation models Planck satellite experiment is on-going and plans to release the data in 2013 ? Planck may tell us MR Thank you very much for your attention!