Download The Scientific Revolution - Online

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Rare Earth hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup

History of astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Astrobiology wikipedia , lookup

De revolutionibus orbium coelestium wikipedia , lookup

Astronomical unit wikipedia , lookup

Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup

Modified Newtonian dynamics wikipedia , lookup

IAU definition of planet wikipedia , lookup

Planets beyond Neptune wikipedia , lookup

Orrery wikipedia , lookup

Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup

Celestial spheres wikipedia , lookup

Lunar theory wikipedia , lookup

Extraterrestrial life wikipedia , lookup

Satellite system (astronomy) wikipedia , lookup

Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Geocentric model wikipedia , lookup

Copernican heliocentrism wikipedia , lookup

Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Scientific Revolution
From Aristotle to Einstein
1
View of the Universe 500 Years Ago
2
3
Based on ancient speculations: “The School of the Athens” by Raphael (1510)
Plato (c.428-347 BC), the idealist, points to sky and his World of Ideas (perfection)
4
Aristotle (384-322 BC), the realist, points to the ground (imperfection)
Aristotle’s View of the Universe: 55 crystalline spheres, celestial objects attached
to spheres, spheres rotated at different velocities, the Earth was at the center.5
Three Guiding Principles
Celestial
objects are
made from
perfect
material and
cannot
change their
properties
(e.g., their
brightness).
Earth is at
the center
of the
Universe
All motion
in the
heavens is
uniform
circular
motion
6
Aristotle’s Prime Mover
Point of Reference
Problem: Ancient Model Could Not Explain
Retrograde Motion & Varying Brightness
7
Solution: Epicycles and Deferents
8
Movement of the Planets: As the center of the epicycle moves around the
deferent, the planet moves around the epicycle. The apparent path
against the background stars is indicated by the blue line
9
10
11
Further Refinements: to account for the detailed motion of the planets, in
12
some cases, epicycles were themselves placed on epicycles.
13
Ptolemy
The Ptolemaic Universe : Ideas about uniform circular motion and epicycles
14
were catalogued by Ptolemy in 150 A.D. in his book the Almagest.
REASSURANCE
Divine power
would triumph over
corruption and
decay of earthly
things and lift the
soul to an afterlife
in heaven
COMFORT
Individual could
locate God. Soul’s
destination would
be above or below.
STABILITY
Earth was
at center.
Mankind
important in
God’s plan
15
Medieval Representation of Ptolemaic Universe
Philosopher-theologian Thomas Aquinas (1222-1274) rediscovered
Aristotle and blended his ideas with medieval theology.
16
Aristotle’s
Prime Mover
became the
God of
Christian
theology.
The outermost
sphere became
the Christian
heaven.
Earth at center
represented the
Christian God’s
concern for
mankind.
17
Religious Dogma: Ideas originating with pagan Greek philosophers were
incorporated into the Catholic church and became dogma. To challenge this
18
view of the universe was to challenge, not only science, but theology.
Finally, Polish astronomer Nicolas Copernicus (1473-1543) proposed a suncentered solar system. Did he get into trouble? No, On the Revolutions of the 19
Heavenly Bodies was published on his deathbed .
Copernicus’ Universe
20
21
Contemporary Representation of Copernicus’ Solar System
The Heliocentric System offers a simple explanation
for varying brightness and retrograde motion
22
Since the orbits of the planets are not circles but ellipses, Copernicus
could not explain all the details of planetary motion without epicycles 23
24
A Danish nobleman, Tycho Brahe (1546-1601), made important contributions:
an astronomical observatory, precise instruments, extensive data on Mars25
(Kepler used to prove that the orbit of Mars was not a circle but an ellipse).
Uraniborg Astronomical Observatory
26
Brahe’s Observations: Proposed a model intermediate between the
27
Ptolemaic and Copernican models with Earth at center (widely accepted)
28
Brahe’s Solar System
Johannes Kepler (1571-1630), a German who went to Prague to become
Brahe's assistant, realized that the orbits of the planets were not circles but
29
ellipses and developed three laws to describe the phenomenon he observed.
Kepler’s First Law: The orbits of the planets are ellipses, with the
Sun at one focus of the ellipse.
30
Kepler’s Second Law: The line joining the planet to the Sun sweeps
out equal areas in equal times as the planet travels around the ellipse
31
Kepler’s Third Law: The ratio of the squares of the revolutionary periods
for two planets is equal to the ratio of the cubes of their semi major axes32
HTML Version of Kepler’s Law
33
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) proved the Copernican theory with his telescope,
challenged Aristotle's universe and its theological-philosophical worldview,34and
laid the foundations for dynamics (how objects move on the earth) and gravity.
Sunspots
Galileo observed sunspots that
moved, indicating that the Sun
was rotating on an axis and
that it was not made from a
perfect, unchanging substance.
He observed four points of light
that changed their positions
around the planet Jupiter and
concluded that they were
moons circling the planet as it
moved around its orbit.
.
35
Galileo used his telescope to show that Venus went through a complete set of
36
phases, just like the Moon. This observation confirmed the Copernican system
and proved that the Ptolemaic system was incorrect.
Galileo's challenge of the Church's authority got him into deep trouble with37
the
Inquisition. Late in his life, he was forced to recant his Copernican views publicly.
Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) Newton demonstrated that the motion of
objects on the Earth could be described by three new Laws of Motion 38
and the Universal Law of Gravitation.
Newton’s First Law of Motion: An object in motion tends to stay in
motion and an object at rest tends to stay at rest, unless the
object is acted upon by an outside force
39
Free Fall
Air Resistance
Newton’s Second Law of Motion: The acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting upon it and inversely proportional to its mass.
40
Newton’s Third Law of Motion: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
41
When he observed an apple fall from a tree, Newton thought: The apple is
accelerated as it moves from the tree toward the ground. There must be a
force that acts on the apple to cause this acceleration. Let's call the force
gravity. If the force of gravity reaches to the top of the highest tree, might it
not reach even further to the orbit of the Moon. Then, the orbit of the Moon
42
about the Earth could be a consequence of the gravitational force.
64. Newton’s Excellent Idea
 Now came Newton's truly brilliant insight:
if the force of gravity reaches to the top of
the highest tree, might it not reach even
further to the orbit of the Moon. Then, the
orbit of the Moon about the Earth could
be a consequence of the gravitational
force.
43
44
Newton's theory of gravitation was soon accepted without question, and it
remained unquestioned until the beginning of this century when Albert
45
Einstein (1879-1955) shook the foundations of physics with the introduction
of his Special Theory of Relativity (1905) General Theory of Relativity (1915).
Einstein Explains the Equivalence
of Energy and Matter
 It followed from the special theory of relativity
that mass and energy are both but different
manifestations of the same thing -- a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind.
Furthermore, the equation E is equal to m c-squared, in
which energy is put equal to mass, multiplied by the
square of the velocity of light, showed that very small
amounts of mass may be converted into a very large
amount of energy and vice versa. The mass and energy
were in fact equivalent, according to the formula
mentioned before. This was demonstrated by Cockcroft
and Walton in 1932, experimentally.
46