Download 1. dia

My-X team,
an Idea Breeding Farm
http://miau.gau.hu/miau/196/My-X%20Team_A5%20fuzet_EN_jav.pdf
(ISBN: 978-963-12-0943-3)
László Pitlik
My-X research group
Finnish - Hungarian Workshop
Gödöllő, Hungary, October 12, 2015
Introduction
Motivation:
to minimize negative effects
caused by the magic of words
in the Gutenberg-Galaxy
(Heretic?!) Motto (for virtual robot designer):
Science is, what can be transformed into source code,
each other human performance can be seen
as a sort of artistic activity…
Sciences and Arts can not be ranked!
Fable
Once upon a time, in the far orient lived a Sultan and his 5 Scholars. In his time there
might be no greater Sultan than him...
The Sultan created a function. This function had 5 variables (X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) - for each
Scholar there was one input channel into the function. The problem (having to solve by
the Scholars) can be supported through visual effects:
Let us bring a bowl filled with 100 identical diamonds! Each Scholar should take a
handful of diamonds. The last one takes the rest! Each Scholar has to count and to say,
how many gems he has.
If the Sultan knows the 5 numbers (the distribution ratio, sum(X1:X5)=100), then he will
calculate with his function an appropriate response-value. This process can be repeated
e.g. 20-times. In the next iteration the Scholars should bring a distribution of the
diamonds, which will lead through the functions to a new maximal response-value.
If the Scholars can not bring the necessary solution, then they are not proved to be a
good expert. It is here not important who may have the best approximation. Hereby the
Sultan will evaluate the Scholars in a collective way. Should they bring a good solution,
they can take all the diamonds, else they will die the next day.
Would you like to play this game? Or would the risk be too high for you?
Please, do not forget: each decision maker (namely we all) plays some similar play
continuously...
Demonstration to the fable
Term-creation based on artificial intelligence
or the operationalism of sustainability
is a mathematical issue
I. declaration:
Term-creation based on similarity analyses is possible
II. declaration:
Behind of static equilibrium, there can be massive
force fields
Term-creation based on artificial intelligence (I)
Human intuitions produce abstractions, like
sustainability…
Sustainability can not be measured in a direct way…
The modelling of sustainability can be seen e.g. as a
term-creation task…
The quality of term-creation can only be evaluated by
Turing tests…
Solutions based on similarity analyses are already
proved…
Turing-test
The Turing test is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior
equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Alan Turing proposed
that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a
human and a machine that is designed to generate human-like responses. The
evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation is a
machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The
conversation would be limited to a text-only channel such as a computer
keyboard and screen so that the result would not be dependent on the
machine's ability to render words as speech.[2] If the evaluator cannot reliably
tell the machine from the human (Turing originally suggested that the machine
would convince a human 70% of the time after five minutes of conversation),
the machine is said to have passed the test. The test does not check the ability
to give correct answers to questions, only how closely answers resemble those
a human would give. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test)
Our machine-expertises had only successful tests till now…
New interpretations of sustainability (I)
Static approach: each object can be evaluated as the
same value…
Dynamic approach: Bubble-effects should be
minimized…
Bubbles are differences between
estimated/modelled/norm-like and measured values in
an OAM, if models have a tautological background…
Tautology can be approximated by multi-layered
consistence controlling of models…
Consistence can be ensured through symmetry of
staircase functions and Occam’s razor…
New interpretations of sustainability (I)
Evaluation models based on the principle of Occam’s
razor make possible to rank models…
The well-known SWOT analysis can be automated
based on similarity analyses in order to explore bubble
effects…
Term-creation (abstraction, like the term of
sustainability) can be modelled based on measured
phenomena through optimized aggregation of quasi
universal similarities…
Force fields behind sustainable surfaces (II)
If
objects follow consequently the principle of minimizing of
bubble-effects starting from a seemingly/static
sustainable constellation,
then
some objects will be forced to be king(s) and a slave(s),
(where a king-object is the best according to the aggregated
evaluation, and a slave object has the most limited value.
Massive differences between objects can be also seen as a
sustainable constellation…)
Conclusion
Virtual robot experts
can be designed
to handle with abstractions
like human experts…
Recent project ideas
STRESSAP (H2020 – Phase II)
ISMON (H2020 – Phase II)
Robot-Psycologist (diverse applications)
Virtual Robot Farmers (diverse applications)
…
Thank you for your attention!
PPT:
http://miau.gau.hu/miau/206/myx_151012.ppt
[email protected]
http://miau.gau.hu
INNOCSEKK 156/2006