Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Feasibility study on Scalable Self-Phase Locking of two beam combination using stimulated Brillouin scattering phase conjugate mirrors Hong-Jin Kong, Seong-Ku Lee, and Dong-Won Lee Dept. of Physics, KAIST, Daejon 305-701, Korea. LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Motivation • Laser IFE Program has the bottle neck mainly due to the laser driver with high rep. rate over 10 Hz. (NIF operates at 1 shot per several hours) LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Why bottleneck? Cooling Solid amp • For high power and high energy output, • big size of laser amplifier to reduce the optical damage and gain saturation is necessary. • But, it gives very high thermal load so that • it takes too much time to cool down . Cooling LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna How to solve the thermal load? • Use the pumping source with LD (Mercury, LLNL) • Use the high thermal conductivity laser materials such as ceramic crystals (K.Ueda) • Break down the amplifier with small size to reduce the size of the amplifier (H.Kong) Beam combination LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Beam combination Phase distortion Easy to cool down the sliced amps Each beam has different phases and distorted by the amp’s nonlinearities such as thermal lensing effect and thermal birefringence, different gain profiles and so on. Break up the amp into small size amp to reduce the thermal load Piston error How to combine the beams together in phase? (to fix the piston error) LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Phase conjugation mirror (PCM) Conventional mirror Phase conjugation mirror LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Types of PCM • 4 wave mixing PCM (complicated, phase controllable) • Stimulated Brillouin Scattering PCM (SBS PCM) (most simple, random phase piston error) LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Stimulated Brillouin Scattering PCM (SBS-PCM) • • • • Backward scattering – high reflectivity more than 90 % Phase conjugate wave – high fidelity Scattering by acoustic phonon induced by laser field Frequency down shift –negligible; ~1 GHz for liquids < 1 GHz for gases LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Cross-type PCM amplifier : Perfect Optical Isolator with PCMs Proposed by Kong (will be submitted, patent pending) Compensate the phase distortions experienced passing through the amplifier by PCM Perfect optical isolation Insensitive to misalignment: Fixed beam pointing LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Beam combination using SBS-PCM for highly repetitive high power and high energy laser Proposed by H.J.Kong Optical Review 4, 277-283(1997) Fusion Eng. & Design 44, 407-417(1999) • Interference between the beams at their boundaries in beam combination gives spatial spiking if their phases are not matched. • Phase difference between the beams should be less than /4 for constructive interference at the boundary of the combination not give spatial spiking. LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Phase locking between beams • Interference between the beams at their boundaries in beam combination gives spatial spiking if their phases are not matched. • Phase difference between the beams should be less than /4 for constructive interference at the boundary of the combination not give spatial spiking. LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Previous works for phase locking 1. Overlapping the SBS focal points locks the phases of the beams. 2. Phase locking by back seeding the Stokes shifted beam, which locks the phase of the PC wave. Lens SBS Cell Seeding Beam Polarizer Faraday Rotator SBS Cell SBS Cell Beam Splitter Mirror a) Overlap of two focal points b) Back-seeding of Stokes wave D.A.Rockwell and C.R.Giuliano, Opt. Lett. 11, 147 (1986) T.R.Loree, et. al., Opt. Lett. 12, 178 (1987) LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Proposed “Self-Phase locking” 1. Interference between the counter-propagating beams generates a very weak standing wave, which ignites the phonon and locks the phase of the moving grating (phonon). 2. This phonon locks the phase of the SBS wave. SBS Cell #1 SBS Cell#1 Concave Mirror Lens Concave Mirror SBS Cell #2 (a) Self-seeding SBS Cell #2 (b) Backward focusing SBS LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Basic concept of a new phase locking LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Experimental setup for self-phase locking of two beams W1 M1 L3 SBS Cell CM1 SBS Cell CM2 Faraday Rotator PBS HWP2 Isolator L1 L2 L4 45 degree M2 Reflection Coated Prism W2 P1 HWP1 CCD Camera Nd:YAG Laser M1&M2, mirror; W1&W2, wedge; L1&L2, cylindrical lens: L3&L4, focusing lens, CM1&CM2, concave mirror; HWP1&HWP2, half wave-plate; P1, polarizer; PBS, polarization beam splitter LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Properties of the pumping laser Nd3+:YAG laser (1064 nm) Repetition rate: 10 Hz Single longitudinal mode Line-width: ~120MHz Pulse width: 6-8 ns Beam diameter : 8 mm Beam profile LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Properties of SBS medium (FC-75) 1.0 0.8 Refletivity Main component C8F18 Absorption coefficient <10-5(cm-1) Optical breakdown threshold 100∼130GW/cm2 Brillouin frequency shift 1.34 GHz Hyper sound velocity V 563 m/sec SBS gain coefficient g 4.5∼5 cm/GW Brillouin bandwidth 350 ~ 400 (MHz) Hyper sound decay time 0.8 ns 0.6 0.4 FC-75 single mode, f=15cm single mode, f=25cm 0.2 0.0 1 10 100 Energy(mJ) Reflectivity vs. pump energy LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Average fluctuation 0.6 Normal case: No locking 180 135 Lens(f=250mm) SBS Cell #2 90 Phase (degree) SBS Cell #1(l=500mm) 45 0 -45 -90 -135 -180 0 50 100 150 Number of shot (A.U.) Intensity profile of interference Intensity profile of interference for 160 shots LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Average fluctuation 0.27 180 Backward focusing SBS 135 SBS Cell #1(l=500mm) Phase (degree) 90 45 0 -45 -90 -135 SBS Cell #2 Concave Mirror (R=500mm, 100%R) -180 0 50 100 150 200 Number of shot (A.U) 228/238 : success (96%) Intensity profile of interference for 238 shots LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Average fluctuation 0.33 180 SBS Cell#1 (l=500mm) 135 90 Phase (degree) Concentric seeding beam case #1 45 0 -45 -90 -135 -180 0 50 100 150 200 Number of shot (A. U.) Lens(f=250mm) Concave Mirror (R=300mm, uncoated) SBS Cell #2 178/203 : success (88%) Intensity profile of interference for 203 shots LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Average fluctuation 0.31 180 Confocal seeding beam 135 case #2 SBS Cell#1(l=300mm) Phase (degree) 90 45 0 -45 -90 -135 -180 Lens(f=250mm) Concave Mirror (R=100mm, uncoated) 0 50 100 150 200 Number of shot (A.U.) SBS Cell #2 181/199 : success (91%) Intensity profile of interference for 199 shots LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Average fluctuation 0.38 180 Confocal seeding beam 135 case #3 SBS Cell#1(l=300mm) Phase (degree) 90 45 0 -45 -90 -135 -180 0 Lens(f=250mm) Concave Mirror (R=90mm, AR coated) 50 100 150 200 Number of shot (A.U) SBS Cell #2 178/216 : success (82%) Intensity profile of interference for 216 shots LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Average fluctuation 0.09 180 Two mirrors 135 Two mirrors Phase(degree) 90 45 0 -45 Mirror1 -90 Mirror2 -135 -180 0 50 100 150 200 250 Number of Shot (A. U) 256 shots LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Average fluctuations for each case 180 Average Fluctuation (degree) 135 90 Normal case Backward focusing case Self Seeding beam case #1 Self Seeding beam case #2(uncoated) Self Seeding beam case #3(AR coated) 45 0 -45 -90 -135 -180 0 1 2 3 4 5 A.U. LSRL 06 Nov, 2003, IAEA CRP Meeting in Vienna Summary • We have proposed a new scalable phase locking method, “the self-phase locking”. • For the case of the backward focusing, the average fluctuation of phases between two beams is 0.27 (96% success). • Further works are necessary to reduce the phase locking fluctuation < 0.25 with 100% success. • This new method can easily scaled up to a number of beams to get a high power and high energy laser output for IFE or other applications. • With or without LD pumped ceramic laser materials developed by K. Ueda, this new technique is expected to advance the Laser Fusion Program, IFE, and also expand the high power laser application area including laser machining. LSRL