Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 FM FPU Subunits A. Poglitsch PACS FPU Subunits 1 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Performance of FPU and Subunits (I) • Structure – Temperature (stability) requirements – Mechanical/optical tolerances, alignment • Mirrors – Optical performance • Chopper – Pointing accuracy – Dynamic behaviour (duty cycle) • Grating – Optical performance of grating – Mechanical performance of grating drive • Precision of position readout/actuator; jitter • Dynamic properties (scanning/dithering/frequency switching) PACS FPU Subunits 2 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Performance of FPU and Subunits (II) • Filters – In-band transmission – Out-of-band suppression • Calibration Sources – Absolute emissivity – Homogeneity PACS FPU Subunits 3 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 FPU Structure • Most (but not all) of the FPU structure has been used in CQM • Thermal requirements fulfilled by CQM as far as tested – expect no changes with FM – More detailed tests necessary w.r.t. sensitivity to L0/L1 interface temperature tolerances/variations – Ge:Ga detector thermal interface changed for thermal curing • LHe Optical Alignment Stability Test under way – CQM ILT revealed no anomalies PACS FPU Subunits 4 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Optics: Mirrors • All mirrors tested individually at ambient temperature • Visible light end-to-end test – Documentation with delivery of FPU • No unexplained anomalies observed in QM – But PSF measurements were hampered by telescope simulator defocus PACS FPU Subunits 5 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Chopper • Mirror optical performance – Flatness – Roughness – Reflectivity < 150 nm < 50 nm > 98% tested; failed but accepted tested; passed by verified coating process • Actuator performance (static/dynamic) – – – – Range observation ± 4.1°; accuracy ± 1 arcmin Duty cycle observation @ 10 Hz >80% Range calibration ± 9°; accuracy ± 2 arcmin Duty cycle calibration >70% tested; tested; tested; tested; ok ok ok ok ± 0.5 arcsec on sky PACS FPU Subunits 6 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Grating (I) • Groove period - spec 117.65 (± 0.7) µm – Only measured for CQM: g=117.66 ± 0.11 µm (2 sigma) • Facet angles - spec 34.5° (± 1°) and 62.4° (± 1°) – Average: 34.1846°; standard deviation: 0.3455° – Average: 62.3264°; standard deviation: 0.4233° • Groove regularity - spec 0.3 µm r.m.s. – Not verified search for grating ghosts in ILT essential! – Positioning precision of machine used for ruling is 0.1 µm w.r.t. reference (reference: Heidenhain glass ruler). Measured ruler error (interferometric) over 100 mm travel: 0.15 µm (p-p); no measurement over full length available • Groove depth - spec 56 µm ± 2 µm – Not measured, but 0th order diffraction efficiency indicates no major deviation of grating profile from spec PACS FPU Subunits 7 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Grating (II) • Groove parallelism - spec ± 10” – Each groove to each other: not verified, but hard to miss with machine used for ruling – Grooves to rotation axis: no absolute measurement done, but grating drive wobble measured – uses up error entire budget! Thorough test of position shifts and spectral shear/tilt as function of grating angle during ILT required! • Overall surface flatness - spec 3 (goal 1.5) µm r.m.s. – Verification by WFE measurement with 10 µm interferometer in three grating orders partly achieved (only partial coverage of grating area by beam at a time); machining error <0.5 µm (but internal stress in grating body could lead to deformation) Confirmation by measurement of PSF / spectral profile during ILT PACS FPU Subunits 8 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Grating Drive • Position precision within the useful angular throw: 8 arcsec (goal: 4 arcsec) – Calibration certificate: ± 3 arcsec; ± 4 arcsec (nom.; red.) • Grating position “jitter” shall be < 0.1 arcsec/√Hz – verified by test • Wavelength switching: amplitude of < 3 arcmin with frequencies of < 3 Hz and a duty cycle of 80% – verified by test • Stabilization time for a grating step of 18 arcsec: < 23 ms – verified by test PACS FPU Subunits 9 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Filters: “Red” Photometer PACS FPU Subunits 10 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Filters: “Green” Photometer PACS FPU Subunits 11 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Filters: “Blue” Photometer PACS FPU Subunits 12 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Filters: “Red” Spectrometer PACS FPU Subunits 13 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Filters: “Green” Spectrometer PACS FPU Subunits 14 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Filters: “Blue” Spectrometer PACS FPU Subunits 15 PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Calibration Sources • No measurements of FM CSs possible before FM ILT • Cause of inhomogeneity in CS1 illumination identified in QM FPU; avoided in FM FPU • Emissivity adjusted • Stability expected in spec (similarity with QM) CS2 PACS FPU Subunits QM QM CS1 16