Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Adapted from: Atomic Structure A level at The Sixth Form College Colchester An example of How Science Works: Development of the Model of Atomic Structure Early Ideas of Matter Polystyrene foam? Early Ideas of Atoms • Two Ancient Greeks (5th Century BC): Look at matter on smaller and smaller scales: Ultimately you will see individual atoms objects that cannot be divided further (the definition of atom or atomos). • Galileo and Newton both believed in atoms • Lavoisier, Dalton and Avogadro found support for atoms in Chemistry Billiard Ball Atoms • The theory of atoms only became widely recognised when scientists could measure accurately the formulas of compounds. • Knowing that water was formed from gases: • 2 volumes of hydrogen and 1 volume of oxygen • suggested that H2O was the formula and lead Dalton to hypothesise that water was made from 2 atoms of hydrogen joined to one atom of oxygen. Atomic Structure • – 1808 state of atomic knowledge (Dalton) – Matter made of atoms like billiard balls – Atoms are electrically neutral – Atoms react in simple whole number ratios e.g. H2O CO2 MgSO4 Electrical Matter • Davy and Faraday realised that matter is electrical in nature as a result of experiments involving electrolysis • Now the billiard ball did not look so good • Where were the electrical charges? • More investigations were carried out to find out what was electrically charged Crookes 1875 • Crookes passed an electric current through an almost-evacuated tube. • He found that a beam travelled from the cathode towards the anode and made the glass fluoresce JJ Thompson - 1897 • He found that the beam of cathode rays was deflected towards the positive electrode when passed through an electric field. • The cathode rays must be: • Negatively charged. • He used the term “electron” (first used a few years earlier) for these negative particles Thompson’s experiment: Plum Pudding • Thompson (Nobel Prize 1906) came up with the plum pudding atomic model: Uniform sphere of +ve charge with electrons embedded inside Goldstein - 1886 • Discovered that positive rays were emitted behind the cathode in the cathode ray tube. Positive Rays • The mass of the particles in the positive rays depended on which element was in the Crookes tube • The smallest positive rays were present when hydrogen was the initial gas. • This smallest positive particle was eventually named the PROTON by Rutherford in 1914 Becquerel- Radioactivity 1896 • One type of radiation discovered by Becquerel was Alpha particles • These were found to be particles much smaller than atoms with a 2+ charge • Rutherford and his co-workers decided to use a stream of alpha particles like bullets to probe the inner structure of atoms Rutherford Scattering • Alpha particle scattering – Rutherford aimed alpha particles at a thin foil – He expected all to go straight through. – But noted that some were deflected • Manchester 1909 – Experiment performed just after Thomson (Rutherford’s old boss) published his “Plum Pudding” paper Rutherford Scattering Geiger and Marsden • Continued with Rutherford’s work • Scattered alpha particles with heavy metal foils, particularly gold Geiger and Marsden • Found that: • Most alpha particles went straight through with very little deflection • A few were deflected by large angles • About 1 in 8000 was reflected This image is taken from a Java Applet at: http://www.scri.fsu.edu/~jac/Java/rutherford.html Geiger Marsden Experiment Disproof of the Pudding • Rutherford calculated from the results – 1911: • To reflect alpha particles the +ve charge (and most of the mass) has to be in a very small diameter • About 1 x 10-15 m compared to 1 x 10-10 m for the diameter of the atom Disproof of the Pudding New Model: • To explain the large size of the atom and the very dense nucleus the next model had both protons and electrons in the central nucleus and orbiting electrons. Chadwick 1932 • It took Chadwick’s discovery of the neutron to produce the more modern version of the atom: • A nucleus containing protons and neutrons with electrons orbiting in shells. • Even this is not the full story ……… Solar System Model • Positively charged nucleus at centre • Negatively charged electrons in orbit • Problem – – Orbiting electrons are accelerating – – Will give off energy – – Will spiral in to centre • Model not stable Bohr Atom • 1913 Bohr presented his theory (Nobel Prize 1922) • Electrons in atoms can exist ONLY in certain discrete orbits, and they do not radiate energy • When an electron jumps from one orbit to another its energy is exactly equal to the energy difference between the orbits • Quantum theory was then the focus of research to explain the structure in more accurate detail Atomic Structure • Atoms are approx 1 x 10-10 m in diameter • Atoms consist of a positively charged nucleus surrounded by orbiting electrons • The nucleus is approx 1 x 10-15 m in diameter • Most of the atom is empty space Nuclear Structure • The nucleus is made up of two particles (collectively called NUCLEONS) • Protons and neutrons – Protons are +ve in charge – Neutrons are neutral Atomic Particles Relative Charge Electron -1 Relative Mass 1/1840 Proton 1 +1 Neutron No charge 1 Describing the Nucleus • We describe the nucleus by noting its Chemical Symbol along with – The number of protons Z – The number of nucleons A • Each chemical symbol always has the same number of protons – Hydrogen – 1 – Helium -- 4 – Carbon – 6 Describing the Nucleus 12 6 7 3 C Li indicates a carbon NUCLEUS with its usual 6 protons and a total of 12 nucleons (6 neutrons) indicates a lithium NUCLEUS with its usual 3 protons and a total of 7 nucleons (4 neutrons) Isotopes 12 6 C 14 6 C • These two represent isotopes of carbon – Chemically they would behave identically (if they are combined with 6 electrons to make atoms) – To a physicist they are different • Different masses • Different behaviour – They can be separated by physics, not by chemistry